Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.
Showing posts with label * Letters: RH Voltaire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label * Letters: RH Voltaire. Show all posts

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Response to BNP: Newcastle Upon Tyne: Mr. Keith McFarlane: “Just found out your a red. and you were married to a n*gg*r. bye you filthy race traitor.”





Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:22 AM
To: BNP Scotland; BNP North East; BNP Head Office
Subject: Please Forward to BNP: Newcastle Upon Tyne: Mr. Keith McFarlane

Please forward to Mr. Keith McFarlane; believed to be BNP Member: Newcastle Upon Tyne. Many thanks. Commendations to BNP for having such an honest honourable member as Mr. McFarlane who share their constructive criticism to a persons face, not behind your back. A salute to Mr. McFarlane for his honourable act of criticism.

Mr. Keith McFarlane
Newcastle Upon Tyne
British National Party

Dear Mr. McFarlane,

I write in response to your Facebook message: “Just found out your a red. and you were married to a n*gg*r. bye you filthy race traitor...”

Many thanks for what I interpret as your brutally honest angry statement. If your intention was to insult me; you are going to have to try a little harder! ;-)

It is almost impossible to insult me. I imagine the reason why it is so difficult to insult me, is because I know that whenever I give someone an honest blunt criticism piece of my mind, I share it sincerely as constructive criticism. I may be angry with them, but my intentions are not dishonourable. I want to share my anger with them, and get over it, and understand the source of our misunderstanding.

I assume, I know my intentions for sharing my anger are not malicious; hence I always give others the benefit of the doubt that their sharing of their anger is also with honourable constructive criticism intention. In Radical Honesty, to share constructive criticism is the highest form of respect and love. I know other cultures don’t share this perspective to constructive criticism, but I prefer to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. So, I appreciate your courage to confront me to my face with your honest blunt opinion about me – whether founded in fact or not – so that we can resolve our misunderstanding, and I can learn from your constructive criticism (if proven to be worthy).

Please herewith find my response to your statement as follows: (1) Married to an Honourable Nigger; (2) Correction: Member of Radical Honesty Culture; not a ‘Red/Communist’; (3) Correction: Only Social Contract I swore allegiance to (and can be a traitor to) is the Radical Honesty Social Contract.

Continued in attached PDF

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

Friday, March 4, 2011

Open Letter to Foxy Liberal Hypocrit: Trevor Manuel






Mr. Manuel: You Sanctimonious Self-Righteous Two-Faced Hypocrit

So, can you now understand why it is my conclusion that you are furious that Mr. Manyi blurted the ANC’s official demographic policy of hegemony out for all to hear, by confirming it to every ignorant idiot, who lacked Hendrik Verwoerd’s knowledge about the role of demographics and geography, equalling a culture or races destiny.

You want Mr. Manyi to Shut the Fuck Up and stop Waking People up to the reality of the ANC’s Africa for Africans policies and political itnentions. You lack Mr. Manyi’s – cohones – to tell the truth about the ANC’s real Africa for African intentions. You are a gutless two-faced hypocrite and coward, Foxy Liberal Traitor to your people, a token Rainbow Coloured to bullshit and deceive your people about the ANC’s alleged ‘non-racialism’.

So, I don’t know if Mr. Manyi is indeed ‘racist’, and hence worthy of moral condemnation. It depends on how you define racist. I have not yet drawn any conclusions as to whether Mr. Manyi is or is not a ‘racist’, in accordance to Dr. Gedaliah Braun’s definition of Racism and Racists. Unlike Foxy Liberals, I make impartial enquiries into whether the actions of the alleged ‘racist’ individual, measure up to beyond reasonable doubt evidence of guilt in accordance to the definition of ‘racist’.

So, how do you Trevor Manuel define ‘racist’ or don’t you; is it just an easy political football label to throw around?


Thursday, March 3, 2011

[V] “You DUMB FUCK, stupid, uneducated, undereducated.. YOU ARE A RACIST” - Adv. JP van der Veen





Confirmation of Receipt of Notice of Advocate Van der Veen's Meeting with Legal Resources Center (at the request of the Zuma family or ANC officials?) and other concerned people; to request LCR to file Hate Speech Charges against Why We Are White Refugees blogger: Lara Johnstone, Member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion

For publishing (1) the Opinions of Dr. Gedaliah Braun's interviews with black South Africans who say they were better off under Apartheid (White Rule); and (2) Radical Honesty SA's 3 definitions for the term 'Kaffir'; as per the Application for Direct Access to the SA Constitutional Court in CCT 06-11 (Radical Honesty & 1 Other vs. SANEF and 87 others), namely: [i] ‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition; [ii] ‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for ‘Kaffir’; and [iii] ‘Kaffir Legislation’ = Inalienable Right to Breed’ Poverty, Misery and War legislation; pretending it advocates for ‘peace’ and ‘human rights’.



03 March 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees



In Rainbow Hypocrisy SA
To be, or not to be; a Racist
is no different than
In Anti-Apartheid Struggle SA
To be, or not to be; a Witch

A legal definition of 'racist'
is as irrelevant, as
a legal definition of 'witch'

For legal definitions require factual evidence
to prove guilt or innocence
for 'racism' or 'witchcraft'

And innocence is problematic
for the practitioners of
ANC Occult Struggle Witchhunt Politics



In a recent Google search, I came across a blog called the Troublemaker Times, written by “a lawyer, a dreamer, a writer, an atheist” JP aka The Troublemaker Times “(educated, part time faggot, jew wanna be, kaffir lover, friend to niggers and white as the driven snow).”

The most popular post on his blog is, a criticism of (in my interpretation) insincere liberals, in A Tribute to Winnie Mandela or Welcome Back to our Politics, we missed you Mamma Afrika, wherein he concludes his appreciation of Winnie with “welcome back Mamma Africa, we missed you. Thank you, for liberating us, with just a box of matches!” (Note: I differentiate between sincere and insincere liberals and conservatives. I have no problem with sincere liberals or conservatives, i.e. those who sincerely hold their beliefs, based upon the information available to them, who are willing to hear contradictory information, and if the contradictory evidence is of sufficient weight to change their minds/beliefs. I have little time for insincere (fake) fundamentalist dogmatic liberals or conservatives.)

Adv. JP seems to think that in this wonderful new 'democracy' brought to us by Mama Afrika's Anti-Apartheid Movement (sic), also known as the KGB's foremost Stalinist Front; the Supreme Court of Appeal is committed to Descartian Rule of Law principles of Evidence. For an Advocate, he is blisfully in denial about an entire Justice System, where political cases are given KANGAROO COURT RUBBER STAMPS, where Descartian Rule of Law EVIDENCE IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

[IV] “You DUMB FUCK, stupid, uneducated, undereducated.. YOU ARE A RACIST” - Adv. JP van der Veen





‘Kill Whitey, ZASUCKS, and ILuvSA white supremacist social rejects with nazi-esque opinions, dressed as politics..’ - Adv. JP van der Veen

Adv. van der Veen gives notice of his intentions to file charges of Hate Speech against Why We Are White Refugees, in the Equality Court



03 March 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees



In Rainbow Hypocrisy SA
To be, or not to be; a Racist
is no different than
In Anti-Apartheid Struggle SA
To be, or not to be; a Witch

A legal definition of 'racist'
is as irrelevant, as
a legal definition of 'witch'

For legal definitions require factual evidence
to prove guilt or innocence
for 'racism' or 'witchcraft'

And innocence is problematic
for the practitioners of
ANC Occult Struggle Witchhunt Politics



In a recent Google search, I came across a blog called the Troublemaker Times, written by “a lawyer, a dreamer, a writer, an atheist” JP aka The Troublemaker Times “(educated, part time faggot, jew wanna be, kaffir lover, friend to niggers and white as the driven snow).”

The most popular post on his blog is, a criticism of (in my interpretation) insincere liberals, in A Tribute to Winnie Mandela or Welcome Back to our Politics, we missed you Mamma Afrika, wherein he concludes his appreciation of Winnie with “welcome back Mamma Africa, we missed you. Thank you, for liberating us, with just a box of matches!” (Note: I differentiate between sincere and insincere liberals and conservatives. I have no problem with sincere liberals or conservatives, i.e. those who sincerely hold their beliefs, based upon the information available to them, who are willing to hear contradictory information, and if the contradictory evidence is of sufficient weight to change their minds/beliefs. I have little time for insincere (fake) fundamentalist dogmatic liberals or conservatives.)

Adv. JP seems to think that in this wonderful new 'democracy' brought to us by Mama Afrika's Anti-Apartheid Movement (sic), also known as the KGB's foremost Stalinist Front; the Supreme Court of Appeal is committed to Descartian Rule of Law principles of Evidence. For an Advocate, he is blisfully in denial about an entire Justice System, where political cases are given KANGAROO COURT RUBBER STAMPS, where Descartian Rule of Law EVIDENCE IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

[III] “You DUMB FUCK, stupid, uneducated, undereducated.. YOU ARE A RACIST” - Adv. JP van der Veen





‘I challenge you to send this e mail to 50 universities' philosophy departments. Ask them if I am wrong. Go ahead. I dare you.’ - Adv. JP van der Veen

Q to Adv. van der Veen: If you are 'wrong'; should you lose all your educational philosophy degrees; your right to practice law; and make a public apology to Dr. Braun?

If you are 'right'; should these philosophy departments make an official submission to the United Nations, to appoint you as the World's Philosophy 'Racism' Czar?



02 March 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees



In Rainbow Hypocrisy SA
To be, or not to be; a Racist
is no different than
In Anti-Apartheid Struggle SA
To be, or not to be; a Witch

A legal definition of 'racist'
is as irrelevant, as
a legal definition of 'witch'

For legal definitions require factual evidence
to prove guilt or innocence
for 'racism' or 'witchcraft'

And innocence is problematic
for the practitioners of
ANC Occult Struggle Witchhunt Politics



In a recent Google search, I came across a blog called the Troublemaker Times, written by “a lawyer, a dreamer, a writer, an atheist” JP aka The Troublemaker Times “(educated, part time faggot, jew wanna be, kaffir lover, friend to niggers and white as the driven snow).”

The most popular post on his blog is, a criticism of (in my interpretation) insincere liberals, in A Tribute to Winnie Mandela or Welcome Back to our Politics, we missed you Mamma Afrika, wherein he concludes his appreciation of Winnie with “welcome back Mamma Africa, we missed you. Thank you, for liberating us, with just a box of matches!” (Note: I differentiate between sincere and insincere liberals and conservatives. I have no problem with sincere liberals or conservatives, i.e. those who sincerely hold their beliefs, based upon the information available to them, who are willing to hear contradictory information, and if the contradictory evidence is of sufficient weight to change their minds/beliefs. I have little time for insincere (fake) fundamentalist dogmatic liberals or conservatives.)

Adv. JP seems to think that in this wonderful new 'democracy' brought to us by Mama Afrika's Anti-Apartheid Movement (sic), also known as the KGB's foremost Stalinist Front; the Supreme Court of Appeal is committed to Descartian Rule of Law principles of Evidence. For an Advocate, he is blisfully in denial about an entire Justice System, where political cases are given KANGAROO COURT RUBBER STAMPS, where Descartian Rule of Law EVIDENCE IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

[II] “You DUMB FUCK, stupid, uneducated, undereducated.. YOU ARE A RACIST” - Adv. JP van der Veen





‘Look Moron, I have seen your website, it is one hateful diatribe. You are not a refugee, white or otherwise. You are hatful, evil, violent, and stupid. But mostly in my short connection with you, you are so stupid that you have no idea that you are stupid.’ - Adv. JP van der Veen

“Its fucking unbelievable. I will grant you this, I had no idea how stupid you people were until I met you. I thought I love SA was racist, but you bring new definition to the word. Your stupidity is psychotic.” - Adv. van der Veen



27 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees



In Rainbow Hypocrisy SA
To be, or not to be; a Racist
is no different than
In Anti-Apartheid Struggle SA
To be, or not to be; a Witch

A legal definition of 'racist'
is as irrelevant, as
a legal definition of 'witch'

For legal definitions require factual evidence
to prove guilt or innocence
for 'racism' or 'witchcraft'

And innocence is problematic
for the practitioners of
ANC Occult Struggle Witchhunt Politics



In a recent Google search, I came across a blog called the Troublemaker Times, written by “a lawyer, a dreamer, a writer, an atheist” JP aka The Troublemaker Times “(educated, part time faggot, jew wanna be, kaffir lover, friend to niggers and white as the driven snow).”

The most popular post on his blog is, a criticism of (in my interpretation) insincere liberals, in A Tribute to Winnie Mandela or Welcome Back to our Politics, we missed you Mamma Afrika, wherein he concludes his appreciation of Winnie with “welcome back Mamma Africa, we missed you. Thank you, for liberating us, with just a box of matches!” (Note: I differentiate between sincere and insincere liberals and conservatives. I have no problem with sincere liberals or conservatives, i.e. those who sincerely hold their beliefs, based upon the information available to them, who are willing to hear contradictory information, and if the contradictory evidence is of sufficient weight to change their minds/beliefs. I have little time for insincere (fake) fundamentalist dogmatic liberals or conservatives.)

Adv. JP seems to think that in this wonderful new 'democracy' brought to us by Mama Afrika's Anti-Apartheid Movement (sic), also known as the KGB's foremost Stalinist Front; the Supreme Court of Appeal is committed to Descartian Rule of Law principles of Evidence. For an Advocate, he is blisfully in denial about an entire Justice System, where political cases are given KANGAROO COURT RUBBER STAMPS, where Descartian Rule of Law EVIDENCE IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

Friday, February 25, 2011

[I] “You DUMB FUCK, stupid, uneducated, undereducated.. YOU ARE A RACIST” - Adv. JP van der Veen





‘You DUMB FUCK, let me explain to your stupid, uneducated, undereducated, and arrogant self. If you believe that RACE is a defining characteristic in term of human value, YOU ARE A RACIST. Can you be more stupid?’ - Adv. JP van der Veen

“I am not a liberal, I am not a racist. I am deeply disturbed by the rise of anti-intellectual garbage on the net. So, Madam. whilst I think your beliefs simply beyond belief, I do not support hate speech regulation, and I would be happy to die for your right to have your beliefs.” - Adv. van der Veen


25 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees



In Rainbow Hypocrisy SA
To be, or not to be; a Racist
is no different than
In Anti-Apartheid Struggle SA
To be, or not to be; a Witch

A legal definition of 'racist'
is as irrelevant, as
a legal definition of 'witch'

For legal definitions require factual evidence
to prove guilt or innocence
for 'racism' or 'witchcraft'

And innocence is problematic
for the practitioners of
ANC Occult Struggle Witchhunt Politics



In a recent Google search, I came across a blog called the Troublemaker Times, written by “a lawyer, a dreamer, a writer, an atheist” JP aka The Troublemaker Times “(educated, part time faggot, jew wanna be, kaffir lover, friend to niggers and white as the driven snow).”

The most popular post on his blog is, a criticism of (in my interpretation) insincere liberals, in A Tribute to Winnie Mandela or Welcome Back to our Politics, we missed you Mamma Afrika, wherein he concludes his appreciation of Winnie with “welcome back Mamma Africa, we missed you. Thank you, for liberating us, with just a box of matches!” (Note: I differentiate between sincere and insincere liberals and conservatives. I have no problem with sincere liberals or conservatives, i.e. those who sincerely hold their beliefs, based upon the information available to them, who are willing to hear contradictory information, and if the contradictory evidence is of sufficient weight to change their minds/beliefs. I have little time for insincere (fake) fundamentalist dogmatic liberals or conservatives.)

Adv. JP seems to think that in this wonderful new 'democracy' brought to us by Mama Afrika's Anti-Apartheid Movement (sic), also known as the KGB's foremost Stalinist Front; the Supreme Court of Appeal is committed to Descartian Rule of Law principles of Evidence. For an Advocate, he is blisfully in denial about an entire Justice System, where political cases are given KANGAROO COURT RUBBER STAMPS, where Descartian Rule of Law EVIDENCE IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Q to Cape Law Soc: Which argument/s in Radical Honesty SA Amicus in RSA v. Dewani is/are ‘without substance or legal basis’?






02 February 2011


Ms. Nalini Gangen
Cape Law Society
ABSA Centre, 2 Riebeeck Street
Cape Town 8001
Tel: (021) 443 6700 | Fax: (021) 443 6751/2
Email: cls@capelawsoc.law.za

Dear Ms. Gangen,

RE: Law Societies statement that Radical Honesty SA Amicus Application in RSA v. Dewani is ‘without substance or legal basis’

I write regarding your statements in SA citizen challenges Dewani extradition, The South African, 01-02-2011, wherein Rob Boffard states the following:
Nalini Gangen, director of the Cape Law Society, says, however, that Ms Johnstone’s views are “without substance or legal basis”.

“There is no reason to doubt that Mr Dewani would receive a fair hearing. South Africa has one of the best constitutions in the world and the Constitution provides for the instruments of democracy to be protected. The Constitution provides for the separation of powers and in particular the independence of the judiciary.

“South African legal processes are clearly defined and any accused would have the freedom of choice of legal representation.

“We have confidence in our judiciary,” she added.

I’d appreciate it if you could please clarify the following issues for me:

Friday, January 28, 2011

Open Letter to Tutu: Why do you endorse blacklisting of TRC Fraud critics & evidence?








28 January 2011

Honourable Desmond Tutu,

Why does Archbishop Tutu endorse the blacklisting and censorship of Radical Honesty SA?

As you know Archbishop Tutu, you know who I am, and you know that I am censored and blacklisted by the SA media, because I belong to a culture founded on telling the truth, and practicing sincere – not fake - forgiveness. You know that I was so committed to sincere forgiveness between black and white South Africans, that I was willing to donate my entire inheritance to contribute to that reality, as per my 1999 submission to the TRC.

As you know: You tell the world: South Africa supports truth and reconciliation; and then you censor and blacklist the only South African whose culture is founded on truth-telling and sincere forgiveness! And then you wonder why ‘Proudly South African’ whites and blacks who practice fake reconciliation and sycophancy and hate brutal honesty, suffer from inferiority complexes!

As you know, you endorse me being blacklisted and censored; because you don’t want to hold an honest conversation with someone who belongs to a culture who practices telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, every hour of every day. You do not want to hold a conversation with someone from a culture who has no murderers and no rapists. You do not want to ask them: HOW DO YOU DO IT? WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM YOU? PLEASE SHARE WITH US YOUR SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE? NO, YOU CENSOR AND BLACKLIST THEM! BECAUSE YOU DON’T WANT TO TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR TRC FRAUD!

As you know, Dr. Brad Blanton, founder of Center for Radical Honesty and bestselling author of the Radical Honesty series of books, former candidate for United States Congress from Virginia in 2004 and 2006, has filed expert witness affidavits in the South African High Court (WC Case #19963-09) and Constitutional Court (Case #23-10), wherein he clarifies his reasons for how and why Tutu and Mandela’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was fake, not sincere, a fraud committed on black and white South Africans.

What answers did you give to the legal documents filed in the SA Constitutional Court (CCT #23-10) for how and why your Truth and Reconciliation Commission committed TRC fraud, Sir?

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Radical Honesty SA Q to SA Holocaust Foundation: What has been Tutu's response to TRC Fraud Allegations filed in Concourt #23-10?




Updated: 16 January 2011: 14:41 hrs
Additional Recipients Added to Letter




Radical Honesty SA scientific journalism submission to SA Holocaust Foundation: Censorship of Tutu’s Just War TRC Fraud: African National Congress (ANC) & Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth & Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud (Excerpts):

[..] The evidence for the TRC FRAUD arguments are dealt with in great detail in the Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Briefing Paper. One of them: Did Black South Africans Want Black Rule?; is a parallel of the current reality in Israel: Do Palestinians want Arab Rule?

When the Anti-Apartheid ANC elite finally confronted this reality [that Black Africans did NOT want Black Rule], they decided that the Black African majority would need to be coerced and terrorized to support the ANC’s alleged ‘liberation struggle’, and consequently Nelson Mandela implemented the M-PLAN. Did the ANC’s decision bother the Archbishop’s conscience during the ‘liberation struggle’ against Apartheid; or perhaps enough to disclose these truths during the TRC hearings. No. It was not enough that he committed fraud on his own people, and happily accepted his 30 pieces of Noble Peace Prize silver, for betraying them with Orwellian Ministry of Truth deception and lies. Now he wishes to overthrow the state of Israel; with a big middle finger to the majority of Palestinians in Israel, who do not want to live under Arab rule.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

[Updated] Radical Honesty SA Questions to V&A Waterfront: 'Public Relations Censorship & Deception' of Crime in SA, by SA Media




by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees
Updated @ 16:13 hrs with V&A Response




Radical Honesty SA Questions to V&A Waterfront: 'Public Relations Censorship & Deception' of Crime in SA, by SA Media [Large]
Radical Honesty SA Questions to V&A Waterfront Spokesperson Ms. Emma King (who works for Corporate Image), about 'Public Relations Censorship & Deception' of Crime in SA, by the South African Media

Radical Honesty SA contacted the V&A Waterfront to speak to their Spokesperson Ms. Emma King, after reading the news article: WATERFRONT CONFISCATES HATE FLYERS: Pamphlets targeting V & A tourists tell of 'white genocide' on former Sunday Times journalist, Adriana Stuijt's blog: Censorbugbear: Boer-Genocide Protests: Paris, Cape Town, Randburg.

The V&A receptionist informed Radical Honesty SA, of Ms. King's cell phone number. When asked for a landline number, the receptionist said she did not have the landline number, but Ms. King works for the company known as Corporate Image, and can be contacted there.
Corporate Image is a public affairs company with a particular focus on corporate communications, media liaison, crisis communication and issues management. Reputation management and corporate brand strategy are the two areas where the company enjoys special expertise.

The company has been extensively involved over the years with the corporate, financial and industrial sectors. Corporate Image has completed successful bids including five gambling licence applications and has also conducted successful JSE listings, crisis communications, investment issues, major corporate image re-vamps, and employee programmes ranging from transformation to share schemes.

Radical Honesty SA telephoned Ms. King at her Corporate Image offices, and asked her whether she would be willing to answer some questions about the article in the Cape Argus. She said she had ten minutes available and would do so.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Thought-Crime: A ‘Robotoid Successful’ World-Cup-of-Bribery in Rainbow-Hypocrisy-La-La Land




Letter to Minister Mthwethwa; RE: Xenophobia and 'Successful' World Cup

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees




11 July 2010

Mr. Nathi Mthethwa
Minister of Police
Private Bag X 463, Pretoria, 0001
Tel: (012) 393 2810 / 2811
Fax: (012) 393 2812
Email: monaheng@saps.org.za

CC:
  • General Beki Cele, National Commissioner of Police (NgobeniMi@saps.org.za)
  • Zuger Polizei, c/o Judith Aklin (info.polizei@zg.ch)
  • SA Political Party Leaders: DA, IFP, FF+, ID, et al
  • WC 2010 Local Organizing Committee
  • SA and Intn’l Media Editors, et al


Minister Mthwethwa,

A ‘Robotoid Successful’ World-Cup-of-Bribery in Rainbow-Hypocrisy-La-La Land: Is it a ‘Xenophobia Rumours and World Cup Failure’ Thought-Crime, to ‘THINK’?

In Xenophobia reports a plot to discredit SA – minister (Sunday Times, 11 July 2010), Mr. Minister appears to imply that it is a thought-crime for citizens to think for themselves, and to base their conclusions upon evidence. Instead it sounds almost as if citizens should just blindly ‘Heil ANC’ believe what we are instructed to believe. Is that your intention, Sir?

You state that you consider the World Cup a “success”. As you are no doubt aware, ‘success’ is an abstract concept, which means many different things to different people. I am unaware what definition of the abstract word ‘success’ you are referring to. For example:

Monday, February 15, 2010

Appeal of M&G Ombudsman Ruling: Clarifying Cultural Definitions of Respect





On 11 February 2010 I filed a complaint with the Mail and Guardian Ombudsman: M&G Violations of Press Code: Re: "Mandela: Icon of Freedom & Forgiveness", Feb 08, 2010, which alleged the Mail and Guardian article contained Material Ommissions of Contrarion Perspectives for Fairness, Balance & Accuracy, under the following subheadings:
  1. Reality of Life for (a) Poor Blacks and (b) service delivery for all South Africans; under ‘National Party’s White Supremacy’ vs. ‘ANC’s Black Elite Corrupt Domination’
  2. Mandela and the ANC: Advocate’s for ‘non-racial democracy’ or Black Liberation Theology violence, with the goal of ‘Black Power’?
  3. Black Liberation Theology Doctrine: Extermination of White Culture & Whiteness
  4. Nelson Mandela was the Commander in Chief who chose to conduct the ANC & MK’s alleged ‘black liberation’ along the path of violence and terrorism; as opposed to the Just War path of Gandhian Nonviolent Civil Disobedience.
  5. Guilty of Sabotage; Judge President of Tvl. Division of the SA Supreme Court.
  6. Admitted to Ordering Terrorist Acts of Murder: Church Street Bombing.
  7. Black Liberation Theology: Necklacing as a Terror Tactic of Intimidation to coerce unwilling citizens to participate in the alleged ‘black liberation struggle’.
  8. Merging of African Ideal of Manhood & Black Liberation Theology: Slavery & Cannon Fodder Production
  9. Complaint to the Norwegian Nobel Committee: Withdraw SA’s Nobel Peace Prize Medals, from Nelson Mandela, FW de Klerk & Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
  10. Respondent in Legal Prosecution and Persecution of White Refugee Complaint to High Court: Western Cape # 19663-09
  11. Respondent in Complaint to SA Human Rights Commission, for (a) Crimes against Humanity, (b) Crimes against the Peace & the (c) Crime of Apartheid.
  12. Summary and ‘Icon of Freedom and Forgiveness’ Questions:
Below is my Appeal of Ombudsman Franz Kruger response wherein he justifies the Mail and Guardian's bias, because:
“For all South Africa’s many problems, the reality is that the overwhelming majority of South Africans have a deep and abiding respect for Mandela, as shown in the reaction to the 20th anniversary of his release yesterday.”

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Ask Ernie Els: “No Normal Sport, in an Abnormal Society”




Ask Ernie Letter (further below) sent to: [Mr. Ernie Els: Ask Ernie (Ack Rec/Read: C. Burke)] [Mr. Hannes van Niekerk, Ernie Els Foundation (Ack Rec/Read: P. Cotton)]

CC: [Darryl Cullinan, Shaun Pollock, Graeme Pollock, Hugh Page, Clive Rice, Jacques Kallis, Morne du Plessis, Mike Proctor, Jonty Rhodes, Marks Maponyane, Gary Baily, Bruce Fordyce, Fanie de Villiers, Ian McIntosh, Steve Elworthy, Lara Kaplan; c/o Sandton Sports Club (Ack Rec/Read: G. Wallace) (Ack Rec/Read: D. Britz) (Ack Rec/Read: D. Viljoen)]

CC: [New York Times] [Wall Street Journal: Heather McDonald] [Fancourt: Mr. & Mrs. Plattner (Ack Rec)] [FIFA: Sepp Blatter (Ack Rec)] [Transparency in Sport: Andrew Jennings] [2010 Local Organizing Committee: Danny Jordaan (Ack Rec/Read)] [ANC Youth League: Julius Malema, c/o Mr. Gwede Mantashe] [Sowetan: Andile Mngxitama (Ack Rec/Read)] [Fahrenheit 2010: Craig Tanner (Ack Rec)] [HSRC: Udesh Pillay] [Salon: Jenifer Schute (Ack Rec/Del.)] [AIPCS: Ben Chavis] [Abathembu: Attorney Majola] [ISS: Henry Boshoff (Ack Rec/Read: Webmaster)] [Cape Party: Jack Miller] [VVK: Paul Kruger] [SAIRR: Anthea Jeffery] [Treatment Action Campaign (TAC): Nathan Geffen] [Social Justice Action: Mr. Gavin Silber (Ack Rec/Del.)] [SAHRC Complaint # WC-2009-0455BS: Head: Danaline Franzman & Complaints Registrar: Sebongile Mutlwane (Ack Rec/Read: P Carelse)] [Norwegian Council for Africa: Sigrun Johnstad] [Nelson Mandela, F.W de Klerk, Desmond Tutu; c/o and via: DA Leader, Ms. Helen Zille (Ack Rec/Read: DA Leader)]

Media et al: [Rian Malan] [Jani Allan] [Anglican Church of SA: Archbishop Makgoro (Ack Rec)] [Fedhasa] [702 Radio Editor] [Beeld Editor] [Biophile Editor] [Business Community Journal Editor] [Die Burger Editor] [Business Day Editor] [Citizen Editor] [Litnet Editor] [Mbendi Editor] [Mirror Editor] [Sake 24 Editor] [SAPA Capetown Editor] [SAPA Johannesburg Editor] [Sowetan Editor] [Sunday World Editor] [Sunday Times Editor] [Tech Review Editor] [Mail & Guardian: ThoughtLeader Editor] [Thoughtleader David Smith] [Weekend Post Editor] [Witness Editor] [Weekend Post Editor] [Limpopo Mirror Editor] [Zoutpansberger Editor] [SABC2 Morning Live]

Saturday, January 23, 2010

“White SA's I know, DO WANT a Honest Debate about Race”





23 January 2010

Mr. Andile Mngxitama
c/o and via The Editor, Sowetan
Email: letters@sowetan.co.za

Sir,

RE: Whites I know do NOT want the World Cup; and DO WANT a Honest Debate about Race; (i.e. Truth & Justice; in the absence thereof: Secession)

Firstly, may I inform you that I do not know one white person, who wanted the ANC government to bid for the 2010 World Cup. Every single white person I know, would have much preferred the ANC to save the money that is being spent on the World Cup, and to invest that money in education, and police services, and service delivery for all South Africans. Unfortunately, the ANC do not listen to these white South Africans, nor does the ANC care in the slightest what we would prefer the ANC do with our taxes. The ANC and those who voted for the ANC, wanted to bid for the World Cup, but not one white person I know wanted the ANC to bid for the World Cup. NOT ONE! Furthermore, in this letter I would like to provide you with the following feedback, and alternative factual evidentiary information and theoretical perspectives.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Notice to IOL.co.za Technology Editor; c/o & via: Independent News & Media PLC Board of Directors: RE: Violations of Press Code Allegations





Given reporters' penchant for proclaiming to "tell both sides," to render all the news that's fit to print, to answer who? what? where? when? and why?, this leads naturally to the question: Why do reporters avoid the population issue so steadfastly? » » » » How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, University of Southwestern Louisiana

Boycott 2010 World Cup, allege that IOL Technology violated the following Press Code of Conduct Principles:
  • Report the news truthfully, accurately and fairly;
  • Presents news in context and in a balanced manner, without any intentional or negligent departure from the facts, whether by Distortion, exaggeration or misrepresentation; Material omissions; or Summarisation;
  • To seek the views of the subject of serious critical reportage in advance of publication;
  • To make amends for publishing information or comment that is found to be inaccurate by printing, promptly and with appropriate prominence, a retraction, correction or explanation;
  • A publication is justified in strongly advocating its own views on controversial topics provided that it treats its readers fairly by: * Making fact and opinion clearly distinguishable; * Not misrepresenting or suppressing relevant facts; * Not distorting the facts in text or headlines.
  • Comment by the press shall be presented in such manner that it appears clearly that it is comment, and shall be made on facts truly stated or fairly indicated and referred to.
  • Comment by the press shall be an honest expression of opinion, without malice or dishonest motives, and shall take fair account of all available facts which are material to the matter commented upon.
  • Headlines shall give a reasonable reflection of the contents of the report in question.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Pro-SA “Boycott 2010 World Cup” Campaign on Facebook





“In the last 15 years, over 45 000 Afrikaners have been murdered and over 90 000 Afrikaner women have been raped. How can a you have a World Cup Soccer event in a country where one of its minority groups are being exterminated?” asks Bittereinder Boer, at his Boycott 2010 World Cup South Africa Facebook Cause

Boycott 2010 World Cup Campaign Letter (PDF) Response to IOL: Technology article, Anti-SA Smear Campaign on Facebook (PDF), by Daily News Senior Journalist, Ms. Noelene Barbeau

Sent TO: [Ms. Noelene Barbeau, Daily News Senior Journalist]

Sent CC: [2010 Local Organizing Committee (Ack Rec)] [Belgium Ambassador: Hon. Amb. Mutton] [French Ambassador: Hon. Amb. Lapouge (Ack. Rec.)] [International Marketing Council] [Reputation Institute - South Africa: Dominik Heil, Ph.D.]

Sent CC: Individuals quoted at www.boycott-2010-world-cup.co.nr: [Brad Blanton, Ph.D; Radical Honesty] [Dr. Frank Ellis, Former Prof. Russian & Slavonic Studies, Leeds Univ.] [Firearm News] [Mr. Nick Buckles, CEO: G4S Security (Ack. Rec.)] [Michael C. Ruppert, Founder & Editor of From the Wilderness; Star of Collapse (Documentary)] [Ms. Anthea Jeffery, South African Institute of Race Relations] [Justice Malala, Sunday Times Journalist] [Blackwash, Journalist for Uhuru News] [Peter Fabricius, IOL] et al...

[27/12/09: Notice to IOL: Violations of Press Code Allegations]
[*Update 21/01/2010: Facebook Deletes Boycott 2010 World Cup & Pop. Policy Common Sense*]

Monday, December 7, 2009

Open Letter to FIFA 2010 World Cup Teams: God vs. FIFA: Do you have the Honourable Courage to be a ‘Flying Scotsman’?






Issues Covered:
  • FIFA’s Three Blind Monkeys to African Occult Phallic Manhood (Slavery and Cannon Fodder Breeding) Cultural and Religious Practices: From Ritual Animal Terror Sacrificial Slaughter & Muti Murders Practices, to Exterminating ‘White Settlers’ from Africa...
  • FIFA & 2010 World Cup’s Challenges to God as Indigent and Powerless:
  • God’s Pocket Change: Natural Resources
  • FIFA’S Occult Moral Order: “There is a clear link between muti and business”
  • FIFA Ignores African Occult Ritual Slaughter of Animals and Humans for Financial Profit
  • Gods Moral Order Covenants: Loving Procreation & Human Stewardship of Natural Resources
  • South Africa’s Contemptuous Breach of 16 December Covenants
  • An Inconvenient Truth: The Imminent Collapse of Western Industrial Civilization: TRC-RSA Occult Cult of Hypocrisy: 18 July 2006 :: PeakOilRSA :: Briefing Paper
  • FIFA’S Corporate Terrorist Occult-Parasite Business Practices:
  • FIFA’S Soccer World Cup Animal Sacrifice and Torture Muti Business Profits
  • South Africa Moral Legal Order: Respects African Occult Terror Torture of Animal Sacrifice
  • Are African Occult Muti Sacrifice Ritual Belief Systems Belief Sources of African Criminality?
  • African Occult Terror Torture: Occult Foundations of Muti Murder and African Spirituality

Screenshots of Open Letter to FIFA 2010 World Cup Teams Emails Sent to:


Open Letter to FIFA World Cup Teams: God’s Honourable Moral Order vs. FIFA's African Occult Muti Profit Order



All 2010 World Cup Team Captains and Players,

Open Letter to FIFA World Cup Teams: God’s Honourable Moral Order vs. FIFA's African Occult Muti Profit Order

Question [1]: If 3,000 African Occult worshipping Black South African farmers had been robbed, tortured, raped, sodomized and executed by white South Africans, since 1994’; would FIFA have awarded the 2010 World Cup to South Africa? (FEllis/PDF);

Question [2]: Do you have the Honourable Courage to be a ‘Flying Scotsman’?

Will Africa for Africans Final Solution 2 Exterminate Whites from Africa Grossly Aggravate return of Slavery.Inc & Tribal Mob Justice, aka Xenophobia?







Will Africa for the Africans Final Solution to Exterminate Whites from Africa Grossly Aggravate the return of Slavery.Inc and Tribal Mob Justice, aka Xenophobia?

Africa for Africans: Exterminating White People from Africa (PDF):
In an interview with CNN in September 2009, Robert Mugabe once again stated his support for the Final Solution and Extermination of White Farmers from Zimbabwe, as the ‘best thing to have happened to an African nation.’

When asked how things could have gone so wrong, from liberation of Zimbabwe by ‘reconciliation with the whites’, Mugabe responded that everybody knew, ZANU-PF’s Land Reform Intentions, in regards to White Settlers.

Children as African Occult Cannon Fodder Child Soldiers

Saturday, November 7, 2009

[Update 16-11-09] Notice of (i) Correction of Error/s & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl.Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)




Update 09 Nov '09: Corrections are as follows:

Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (below Update Notices)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009

  • Letter to SA Students Congress, Mandela Rhodes Foundation, ANC Youth League; RE: Reitz 4 & Black Culture...
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 11:18 PM
    » » Honey Attorneys: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 4:16 PM

  • Letter to Irish Embassy, Jefferson Family & Independent Newspapers; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 10:00 PM
    » » Owen Swaine Solicitors: Read: Sun 11/8/2009 6:31 PM

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: [jmc.pa.tf(at)gmail(dot)com]