Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Friday, October 9, 2015

Eco Innocent -vs- Ego Scarcity Combatant Procreation & Consumption Footprints



Eco Innocent v Ego Man Scarcity Combatant’s and their Crime of Aggression Acts of War Footprints

Eco Innocents: Anders Breivik, Dylann Storm Roof, Aaron Alexis, Chris Harper-Mercer, Beate Zchape, Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh
Ego Scarcity Combatants: Jacob Zuma, Cliven Bundy, Brad Blanton, Dennis Banks, Martin Luther King, Julian Assange, Mark Zuckerberg, William Windsor.


08 October 2015 | Andrea Muhrrteyn

An individuals Ego/Eco Footprint is determined from their:
Consumption Footprint x Procreation Factor.

Consumption Footprint: An Individuals Consumption Footprint is a measure of their consumption of renewable natural resources. The total area of productive land or sea required to produce all the crops, meat, seafood, wood and fibre the individual consumes, to sustain its energy consumption and to give space for its infrastructure. The individuals consumption habits (size of house, consumption habits, etc need to be collected) are submitted to a Footprint Quiz calculator.

Procreation Factor: The procreation factor is '20' for every child. For every child the citizen has procreated, their consumption footprint must be multiplied by a factor of 20; i.e. (1 child, multiply by '20'; 2 children, multiply by 40; and so on)

These Footprint analysis and conclusions have been submitted to scientific Footprint experts for their feedback and confirmation to International Criminal Court; in the matter of EoP PoW -v- Nobel Peace Laurettes, et al.




Ego Scarcity Combatants:


Jacob Zuma

Consumption Footprint: 65.66 gha

President Jacob Zuma's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like President Zuma, we would need 4.18 earths.

Procreation Footprint Factor: 500

President Zuma has 25 children (some say 32, but I used 25). His procreation footprint factor is 25 x 20* = 500. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]

Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint: 33,280 gha

Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (500) = Net Footprint of 33280 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Zuma, we would need 2,090 earths.


********

Martin Luther King

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

I have given Martin Luther King the consumption footprint as Assange's Ecuador Embassy footprint, for easy comparative reasons; although King's consumption footprint would have been higher. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Martin Luther King / Assange; we would need 2.04 earths.

Procreation Footprint Factor: 80

Martin Luther King had 4 children. His procreation footprint factor is 04 x 20* = 80. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]

Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint: 2578 gha

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (80) = Net Footprint of 2,578 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Martin Luther King, we would need 163 earths.


********

Cliven Bundy

Consumption Footprint: 91.10 gha

Cliven Bundy's tentative Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 91.10 global hectares (gha). America's average consumption footprint is 99.8 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Brad Blanton, we would need 5.8 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 280

Cliven Bundy has 14 children. His procreation footprint factor is 14 x 20* = 280. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 25,508 gha (1624 earths)

Consumption (91.1) x Procreation (280) = Ego Footprint of 25,508 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Cliven Bundy, we would need 1624 earths.


*****

Brad Blanton

Consumption Footprint: 85.18 gha

Brad Blanton's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 85.18 global hectares (gha). America's average consumption footprint is 99.8 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Brad Blanton, we would need 5.42 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 120

Brad Blanton has 6 children. His procreation footprint factor is 6 x 20* = 120. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 10,221.6 gha (650 earths)

Consumption (85.18) x Procreation (120) = Ego Footprint of 10,221.6 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Brad Blanton, we would need 650 earths.


*****

Julian Assange

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

Julian Assange's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 32.10 global hectares (gha). UK's average consumption footprint is 48.19 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Julian Assange, we would need 2.04 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 80

Julian Assange has at least four children. His procreation footprint factor is 4 x 20* = 80. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 2568 gha (163.2 earths)

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (80) = Ego Footprint of 2568 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Julian Assange, we would need 163.2 earths.


*****

Mark Zuckerberg

Consumption Footprint: 408.22 gha

Mark Zuckerberg's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 408.22 global hectares (gha). America's average consumption footprint is 99.8 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Mark Zuckerberg, we would need 25.99 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 0

Mark Zuckerberg has no children. His procreation footprint factor is 0 x 20* = 0. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 408.22 gha (26 earths)

Consumption (408.22) x Procreation (0) = Ego Footprint of 408.22 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Mark Zuckerberg, we would need 26 earths.


******

Dennis Banks

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

Dennis Banks accurate consumption footprint is unknown. The equivalent of Julian Assange's consumption footprint was used. Julian Assange's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 359.34 global hectares (gha). If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Dennis Banks and Julian Assange, we would need 2.04 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 540

According to Idle No More [Life and Death of Anna Mae Aquash 01:02:03] Dennis Banks has at least twenty seven children. His procreation footprint factor is 27 x 20* = 540. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 17,334 gha (1,099 earths)

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (540) = Ego Footprint of 17,334 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Dennis Banks, we would need 1,099 earths.


******

William Windsor

Consumption Footprint: 359.34 gha

William Windsor's consumption footprint is unknown. I imagine it would not be less than that of Hans Astrup. Astrup's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 359.34 global hectares (gha).
If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Hans Astrup and William Windsor, we would need 22.87 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 40

William and Kate Windsor currently have one child; Kate is expecting their second child. His procreation footprint factor, subsequent to the birth of his second child is 2 x 20* = 40. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 359.34 gha (23 earths)

Consumption (359.34) x Procreation (40) = Ego Footprint of 14 373.6 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Hans Astrup, we would need 912 earths.


Julian Assange

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

Julian Assange's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 32.10 global hectares (gha). UK's average consumption footprint is 48.19 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Julian Assange, we would need 2.04 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 80

Julian Assange has at least four children. His procreation footprint factor is 4 x 20* = 80. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 2568 gha (163.2 earths)

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (80) = Ego Footprint of 2568 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Julian Assange, we would need 163.2 earths.



*************************

Eco - Innocents:

Anders Breivik / Dylann Storm Roof / Aaron Alexis / Chris Harper-Mercer / Beate Zschape / Ted Kaczynski / Timothy McVeigh

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

Eco-Innocents average consumption footprint is stated as either 32.10 equal to that of Julian Assange; such as Anders Breivik, Dylann Storm Roof; or 12: equal to that of the author; for McVeigh, Zschape, Mercer and Alexis; whereas Kaczynski would be much less than 12.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 0

None of the Eco-Innocents have any children; consequently their procreation footprint is zero children. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 32 gha ( earths)

Consumption (32.10 / 12) x Procreation (0) = Eco Footprint of 32 / 12 gha.

If accurate, on a planet with 7 billion; if everyone's Total Consumption & Procreation footprint was 32 gha; we would need 2.04 earths; and if their Total Consumption & Procreation footprint was 12 gha we would need 0.81 earths. On a planet of 7 billion a 32 gha would therefore qualify as a -- compared to the other aforementioned Scarcity Combatant footprints -- minuscule scarcity combatant footprint.

If there were 3.5 billion people on the planet, if everyone's Total Consumption & Procreation footprint was 32 gha, we would need 1.02 earths; and if their Total Consumption & Procreation footprint was 12 gha; we would need 0.41 earths. On a planet of 3.5 billion, a 32 gha footprint is on the red line between eco-innocent and scarcity combatant.

If there were 1.25 billion people on the planet; if everyone's Total Consumption & Procreation footprint was 32 gha; we would need 0.51 earths; and if their Total Consumption & Procreation footprint was 12 gha; we would need 0.205 earths. On a planet of 1.25 billion, a 32 gha footprint is an Eco-Innocent footprint.

[These Footprint analysis and conclusions have been submitted to scientific Footprint experts for their feedback and confirmation to International Criminal Court; in the matter of EoP PoW -v- Nobel Peace Laurettes, et al.]


» » » » [Astrup :: Zuckerberg :: Assange :: Blanton :: Bundy :: Zuma]

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: [jmc.pa.tf(at)gmail(dot)com]