Censorship of TRC Fraud Complaint Filed Against SANEF Editors

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:29 AM
To: ICC OTP Information Desk
Cc: NATO: SHAPE, US Navy JAG
Subject: ICC Prosecutor's Office: Art 15 Rome Statute Complaint (RSA SAP Case 823-08-2010)
Attach: 11-11-19 SAPS Insp-Engel Complaint (Signed AckRec) :: 11-05-09 Genocide Complaint ITO Art-15 Rome Statute to ICC (FS+NoC+Complaint)

TO: INT’L CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
Per Email

CC: NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE: CHIEFS OF DEFENCE
Per Email (via SHAPE)

CC: US NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S OFFICE (JAG)
Per Email


Additional Evidence to: Notice of Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute, filed on 09 May 2011

Please find attached additional information submitted to SAP complaint (Case 823-08-2010), in regards to the aforementioned complaint filed with the ICC Prosecutors Office, against relevant Accessories to Censorship of South Africa’s TRC FRAUD.

Complaint reads as follows:

Professor William K Black led the investigations of the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980-90′s, and put 1000 executive crooks in jail. Professor Black explains that fraud typically underlies virtually all major financial failures: financial collapses are caused by fraud (criminal activity) rather than mismanagement or accident. (15:56)

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African citizens.

Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions).
As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

TRC Fraud Genocide Charges filed to ICC against: Mandela, Tutu, de Klerk, Nobel Committee, 88 SA media, New York Times, Telegraph & Algemene Dagblad

The Complainants hereby request the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.

Charges Filed Against:

Archbishop Desmond Tutu Reverend Alex Boraine Former President Nelson Mandela Nelson Mandela Foundation Former President F.W. de Klerk F.W. de Klerk Foundation Norwegian Nobel Committee Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo Dep. Ch. Justice Dikgang Moseneke	Justice Edwin Cameron Justice Johan Froneman Justice Chris Jafta Justice Sisi Khampepe Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng Justice Bess Nkabinde Justice Johann van der Westhuizen Justice Zak Yacoob
SA National Editors Forum (SANEF) Mondli Makhanya (SANEF Chair) SA Press Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe SA Press Appeals Panel: Judge Ralph Zulman SA Dep. Press Ombudsman: Johan Retief SA Press Association (SAPA) Mark van der Velden (SAPA Editor) Business Day Peter Bruce (Bus. Day Editor) Business Report Jabulani Sikhakane (Bus. Report Editor) Cape Argus Chris Witfield (Cape Argus Editor) Cape Times Alide Dasnois (Cape Times Editor) City Press Ferial Haffajee (City Press Editor) The Citizen Martin Williams (Citizen Editor) Daily Dispatch Andrew Trench (Daily Dispatch Editor) Daily Maverick Brkic Branko (Daily Maverick Editor) Daily News Alan Dunn (Daily News Editor) East Coast Radio (ECR) Diane MacPherson (ECR Editor) Eyetwitness News Katy Katapodis (Eyewitness News Editor) Independent Online (IOL) Adrian Ephram (IOL Editor) Mail and Guardian Nic Dawes (M&G Editor) The Mercury Angela Quintal (Mercury Editor) News 24 Jannie Momberg (News 24 Editor) Pretoria News Zingisa Mkhuma (Pretoria News Editor) SA Star Moegsien Williams (SA Star Editor) Sunday Independent Makhudu Sefara (Sun. Ind. Editor)	Sunday Tribune Philani Mgwaba(Sun Tribune Editor) Sunday Times/Times Live Ray Hartley (Sun Times Editor) 3rd Degree Debora Patta (3rd Degree Exec. Prod.) Beeld Tim du Plessis (Beeld Editor) Daily Sun Themba Khumalo (Daily Sun Editor) Die Burger Henry Jeffery (Burger Editor) Bun Booysen (Burger Editor) E-News Patrick Conroy (Head of News) Financial Mail Barney Mthombothi (Fin. Mail Editor) Finweek Colleen Naude (Finweek Editor) The George Herald Mandi Botha (George Herald Editor) Independent on Saturday Trevor Bruce (Ind. on Sat. Editor) 702 Radio Pheladi Gwangwa (702 Radio Prod.) Rapport Lisa Albrecht (Rapport Editor) The Saturday Star Brendan Seery (Sat. Star Editor) Sowetan Bongani Keswa (Sowetan Editor) The Herald Jeremy McCabe (Herald Editor) Volksblad Ainsley Moos (Volksblad Editor) Rod Amner (Rhodes Journo Lecturer) Robert Brand (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Guy Berger (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Harry Dugmore (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Harold Gess (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Jane Duncan (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Anton Harber (Wits Journo Prof.) Franz Kruger (Wits Journo Prof.) William Bird, Media Monitoring Africa Projourn Steering Committee
New York Times Celia Dugger (NYT) Arthur Brisbane (NYT) The Daily Telegraph	Ainslinn Laing (DT) Tony Gallagher (DT) Algemene Dagblad Casper Naber (AD)

SA's TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Concourt Corruption; to be a Guinness World Record?

21 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

A South African citizen has filed a submission to Guinness World Records, nominating a Constitutional Court ruling dismissal of her case, against 88 media respondents, as a World Guinness Record “of Judicial Incompetence – i.e. refusal to apply their minds to the evidence before them, to make such an impartial enquiry into such evidence; in accordance with the Rule of Law.”

The Application was submitted to Guinness World Records on 21 February, 2011; Webclaim ID # 343110. The suggested Guinness Record Title: Constitutional Court Application Dismissal

Lara Johnstone, the author of the submission, states that it was not her intention to set the record for a Constitutional Court Application dismissal. She doubts that it is any legal practitioner's intention, to spend days and weeks, if not months researching the law and evidentiary facts, to draft and application to the Supreme Court in their country, in this case the SA Constitutional Court; to have it summarily dismissed without anything remotely resembling an impartial enquiry into its merits; or alternatively because the legal issues addressed in the application were of such an explosive nature, the Justices are petrified of confronting them.

Consequently, she is "applying to Guiness World Records, to record a Guiness Record, which occurred without [her] intentional effort to do so; and to record it, for the sake of posterity."

In the late afternoon of 28 January 2011, I filed a written application to the SA Constitutional Court, for direct access; for a writ of (1) Habeus Mentem; and (2) Certiorari/Review. The respondents were 88 media publications and their editors. The court reference number issued by the Registrar was: CCT 06-11. The Justices were returning from their Christmas vacations on 01 February, and the Registrar suggested I have all my documentation ready for them, before their return.

Generally, an application for direct access, or for approval to proceed as an Amicus or such issues, -- understandably -- takes the Justices a few weeks, sometimes over a month to enquire into. They need to read the application, its affidavit, and consider all the legal arguments, and their stare decisis precedent, etc. Applying one’s mind to reading legal applications and documents is a time consuming process.

In this application, due to the number of respondents, the Founding Affidavit was longer than the usual 50 pages. Additionally the legal issues addressed are rather controversial, and would be considered a serious challenge to legal minded individuals who love making the application of the law relevant to the people in a code of conduct that can be easily understood. As stated in one of the evidentiary documents; the Radical Honesty SA Amicus in Support of a Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995; which if seriously considered by the Concourt Justices would encourage a legal ecological revolution of consciousness, as radical as that of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses against Indulgences:

“A healthy ecological environment, with due regard for carrying capacity laws of sustainability is a sine qua non for all other constitutional rights; similarly a psychological integrity environment of philosophical courageous truth searching honesty and sincere forgiveness is a sine qua non for healthy, transparent relationships that result in the co-creation of a code of conduct that enables non-violent honest sincere resolutions to disagreements.

[www.guerrylla-law.co.nr] David vs Tutu Goliath's TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Corruption

[Concourt #23-10: Citizen v. McBride] :: [Concourt #06-11: Radical Honesty SA v SANEF & 87 Others]
[Bloemfontein Mag. Crt: State v. Reitz 4] :: [UK Westminster Mag. Crt: RSA v. Shrien Dewani]
[Scientific Journalism Ratings]

Concourt #23-10: The Citizen v. Robert McBride

Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae in Support of Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995

Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus:

• 26 Mar 2010: Radical Honesty Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court)
  
• 18 July 2010: Radical Honesty Amicus Heads of Argument
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: The legal, psychological, & socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’
  
• Expert Witness Dr. T. Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment connection
  
• Radical Honesty Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument: [Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of TRC Act] :: [Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon] :: [Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract Principles] :: [Population Policy Common Sense Principles] :: [TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History] :: [Radical Honesty: Culture and Religion, or Refugee Status?]

‘Exposing (i) TRC Fraud, (ii) Media's Ecolaw Corruption & (ii) African White Refugee Persecution; not in interests of justice' - SA Concourt

Judges don't want to hear about race censorship claim

Would-be litigant runs various websites featuring posts on the genocide of whites

15 February 2011
Sowetan / SAPA / Jenni O'Grady

The Constitutional Court has dismissed an application for an order finding that over 80 editors and journalism professors are censoring Western Cape woman Lara Johnstone, according to papers received on Tuesday.

“The Constitutional Court has considered the application for direct access and concluded that the application should be dismissed as it is not in the interests of justice to hear the matter,” read an order dated February 1.

Johnstone, who intended representing herself because she believes no-one in the country has the ability to grasp her arguments, had filed lengthy papers spanning various issues.

These included that argument in her previous applications to be a friend of courts hearing matters she was interested in, were not reported on. One was the “Reitz Four” case and another the “Robert McBride” case.

Johnstone runs various websites featuring posts on the genocide of whites and farmers, white refugees from Africa and media “prostitutes”.

She believes the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was a fraud because the underlying causes of the world’s problems — overpopulation and ecological sustainability — have not been addressed and that because of this, true forgiveness cannot take place.

The complaint against the SA Press Association, which was among those she had tried to have a ruling on, was that the news agency did not report on all aspects of her arrest on a crimen injuria charge.

She had allegedly sent SMSs to Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille, in the course of a lengthy attempt at seeking comment from politicians on her theories, and De Lille decided to lay the charge.

According to the court report filed by Sapa, based on the court proceedings, Johnstone refused to leave the holding cell and refused to participate in a forensic psychological assessment.

Are the media allergic to constructive critical examination of their conduct?

Tweets: ‘Woman wants editors in Concourt over Censorship’

News24: @News24 South Africa: News24 is Southern Africa and Africa's premier online news resource reaching over 2.3 million local users each month. http://www.news24.com.

In What some media don’t want you to think about, Christi van der Westhuizen writes:

I recently resigned as monthly columnist at Media24’s daily newspapers after one of my columns was censured. The offence that led to the censorship? As a proponent of the position that the media’s allergic reaction to self-criticism is to its own detriment, I had dared to do exactly that: employ critical examination of the media.

The following tweets are responses to:

• News 24: Woman wants editors in ConCourt over censorship (‘Conspiracy of Silence as David v. Goliath in Concourt: CCT #06-11 Blacklisted by SA Media’ Email to SA Legal Fraternity drives SAPA to Action), and
  
• The South African: SA citizen challenges Dewani extradition (‘SA citizens - SA legal system is corrupt - Amicus challenge to Dewani extradition’ - The South African)
.

‘Conspiracy of Silence as David v. Goliath in Concourt: CCT #06-11 Blacklisted by SA Media’ Email to SA Legal Fraternity drives SAPA to Action

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

On 01 February 2011, the following email -- CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE AS DAVID vs. GOLIATH IN CONCOURT: CCT # 06-11 BLACKLISTED BY SA MEDIA; BLACKLIST ENDORSED BY TUTU -- was emailed to a few hundred of SA's Advocates, all the different Law Societies and Bar Councils; all the non-profit Legal Aid Agencies, from Afriforum to F.W's Center for Constitutional Rights.

On 02 February, the SAPA news article further below -- WOMAN WANTS EDITORS IN CONCOURT OVER CENSORSHIP -- was released, and published on News 24 and Mail and Guardian.

Can Goliath ANC's Political Correctness Cuckoo's Nest be Liberated?

In How Will World War IV be Fought, Mike Smith writes:

The question to ask is whether we are intellectually, culturally, sociologically and psychologically prepared for such a war. The battlefield has shifted from jungles and desserts to the media and cyberspace, the prize to fight for is the minds of people. Arming yourself with rifles is one thing, but are we arming ourselves psychologically? The winners of World War IV will be the ones who possesses the most social and cultural intelligence.

So how do we win such a war?

I have a few ideas, but the most important is the training of our “soldiers” for this kind of war. Our educational institutions are where the soldiers are trained and armed and where we have to shape and form their minds, arm them with the best and sharpest tools.

Perception shaping is another. Let us face is that Whites in South Africa has more enemies than friends in the world. We need to change that perception, of what the world thinks of us. This should be a national effort from each and every White person in SA, driven by our Academics who understand these things. Not only should they change the perception the world has of us, but also that of our enemy.

In How David Beats Goliath: When underdogs break the rules, Malcolm Gladwell writes, among others:

CCT # 06-11: Concourt to review SANEF censorship of TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Media Corruption

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Constitutional Court, Johannesburg (21-Jan-2011): On 19 January 2011 the Concourt Registrar Mr. Delano Louw issued the Concourt Reference Number CCT 06-11, in the matter of Radical Honesty SA and others vs. SANEF and others. The Concourt had been submitted with Proof of Service documentation proving that Radical Honesty SA had provided all the respondents with their Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit documentation.

The Applicants in the matter are Lara Johnstone and Radical Honesty SA, who filed an Application with the Constitutional Court for direct access, as a Pauperis Propria Persona / Litigant in Person; for a [I] writ of Habeus Mentem and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review.

The Application was filed against 88 respondents: (a) three administrators of the SA Press Council; (v) SANEF and its chairman: Mr. Makhanya, (c) 36 SANEF and related media publications and their respective editors, managerial officials; (d) eight Media Professors from Univ. of Rhodes and Wits Journalism faculty departments; (e) Media Monitoring Africa: Mr. William Bird; and finally (f) Projourn Steering Committee.

Radical Honesty SA v. SANEF Press Council, et al: Radical Honesty takes 88 SA Media Elite to Concourt for Censorship of Media Corruption

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

On 03 January 2011, Lara Johnstone and Radical Honesty SA filed an Application with the Constitutional Court for direct access, as a Pauperis Propria Persona / Litigant in Person; for a [I] writ of Habeus Mentem and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review.

The Application was filed against 88 respondents: (a) three administrators of the SA Press Council; (v) SANEF and its chairman: Mr. Makhanya, (c) 36 SANEF and related media publications and their respective editors, managerial officials; (d) eight Media Professors from Univ. of Rhodes and Wits Journalism faculty departments; (e) Media Monitoring Africa: Mr. William Bird; and finally (f) Projourn Steering Committee.

Ms. Martie Stander, registrar of the Constitutional Court tentatively accepted the documentation, requesting that the Proof of Service documentation be filed with the Court, prior to any Reference Number could be issued.

On 14 January 2011, Ms. Stander and the Director of the Concourt were provided with the Proof of Service documentation proving that Radical Honesty SA had provided all the respondents with their Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit documentation.