Ecology of Peace Theses urges ANC-HPCSA to dismiss charges against Wouter Basson
The proceedings against Mr. Wouter Basson should be suspended until (a) the South African Constitutional Court has ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence of TRC fraud submitted to it, in Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs Afriforum, et al
Andrea Muhrrteyn | 17 July 2013 | TYGAE

Electronic Filing to The Registrar, Health Professions Council of South Africa; HPCSA Prosecutor: Salie Joubert SC; Dr. Basson Council: Jaap Cilliers SC, Brooklyn Advocate Chambers; Dr. Wouter Basson - Cardiologist. CC: Transparency: Concourt Case: Alien v. Afriforum et al Parties
[1] The proceedings against Mr. Wouter Basson should be suspended until (a) the South African Constitutional Court has ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence of TRC fraud submitted to it, in Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs Afriforum, et al; and/or (b) foreign international courts have ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence that civilized patriarchy’s legal matrix jurisprudence is based upon fraudulent social contracts between civilized patriarchy nations and their citizens.
South Africa’s Civilized Patriarchy TRC Fraud:
[2] On 27 November 2012 a Pro Se application was filed for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal ‘Kill Boere Hate Speech’ Mediation Agreement between: ANC, Mr. Malema, Afriforum and TAU-SA. The Ecology of Peace application argues that: (A) The Agreement ignores SA’s TRC Fraud Failure to Clearly Define ‘Reconciliation’ and address Ecological Overshoot induced Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict Issues; and (B) Any ‘Peace’ Agreement that Ignores Ecological Overshoot and Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict is not a Credible Peace Agreement. South African Bar Associations and Law Societies have, for the past ten years, been unable to find a South African lawyer who is willing to represent me in accordance to my Ecology of Peace – “Thou shalt not legislate laws that allow citizens to procreate or consume above carrying capacity limits” – gender and inter-species equality jurisprudence principles. The media have so far refused to publish an appeal to South African attorneys to find an attorney to represent a South African citizen whose gender balanced cultural jurisprudence is based on Ecology of Peace principles. The Constitutional Court registrar refused to process the application, even though the Commission for Gender Equality and the South African Human Rights Commission have respectively ruled the Concourt registrars actions were an act of error and maladministration and referred the matter to the Public Protector and Media Ombudsman.



















