CLA Secretariat & CLC 2013: Req for Info: Re: SA's Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny
Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng
Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 16 April 2013
Correspondence to Commonwealth Lawyers Assoc.: President: Boma Ozobia and Vice President: Mark Stephens. CC: Keynote Speakers & Invited Speakers: Subject: CLA: Req for Info: Re: African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?
Please find attached PDF: Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng
Issues covered: (a) Apartheid’s Legal Tyranny of ‘vague and ambiguous’ definitions; (b) Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: Who is to be Master?; (c) African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny
Do the Commonwealth Lawyers Association endorse the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?
Does CLA believe SA citizens are entitled to clear and succinct definitions for the legal terms of ‘reconciliation’ and ‘transformation’; from our African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist masters? Or, don’t the CLA hold African Patriarch masters to the same standards as Boer Patriarch Masters? When can we expect you to release a statement, clarifying your position?
Sent to: Commonwealth Law Society Secretariat
CC: Navi Pillay, c/o UN High Comm HR || Justice Kate O’Regan: c/o: Corruption Watch || Lord Judge: Lord Chief Justice c/o: Secretary of State: Chris Grayling & Ministry of Justice || Judge James L. Kateka: Int’l Tribunal for the Law of the Sea || Don Deya: The Centre for Citizens Participation on the African Union || Babajide Ogundipe: Sofunde Osakwe Ogundipe & Belgore || Judge Sophia Wambura: The Tanzanian Women Judges Association & Education International || Simon Davenport QC, James Dingemans QC, Thomas Roe, 3 Harescourt ||Albert Kamunde Esq: Albert Kamunde & Co Advocates || Dr Nechi Ezeako: Odade Consulting || Nene Amegatcher: Ghana Bar Association || Peter Leon: Webber Wentzel || Miannaya Essien SAN: Principles Law || Lady Katya Lester: c/o Lord Lester of Herne Hill || Piet Faber: World Services Group || Mark Guthrie: Tooks Chambers ||David J McQuoid-Mason: Street Law SA || Baroness Ruth Deech: Bar Standards Board || Charles Flint QC: Blackstone Chambers ||Vinayak Sri Ram LLB LLM: Tan Rajah & Cheah ||Max du Plessis: Doughty Street ||Nicole Fritz: S Africa Litigation Centre || Hannah Kinch: Young Barristers Comm Bar Council ||Justice John Alexander Logan: Queensland Bar Assoc || Dr Peter Slinn: SOAS || Fiona McLeod S.C.: Victoria Bar || Maura McGowan QC: 2 Bedford Row ||Catherine Warburton: Imbewu Sustainability Legal Specialists || Sir Declan Morgan: NIJAC: N. Ireland Judicial App Comm.
Dear Commonwealth Law Society Secretariat,
Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng
Apartheid’s Legal Tyranny of ‘vague and ambiguous’ definitions:
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Mandela and the ANC accused Apartheid for being a legal tyranny, for providing definitions for specific legal terms, which were ‘vague and ambiguous’.
Apartheid was a ‘vague and ambiguous’ legal tyranny; the new South Africa is a ‘no definitions whatsoever, not even vague and ambiguous definition’ legal tyranny.
For the past ten years I have requested Archbishop Tutu, Nelson Mandela, FW de Klerk, the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement to provide a clear legal definition for the term ‘reconciliation’. I have been ignored and refused. Justice Mogoeng’s has ordered the Concourt registrar to refuse to process my application to the Constitutional Court, regarding South Africa’s TRC Fraud failure to provide clear cultural definitions for their meaning of ‘reconciliation’.
Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: Who is to be Master?:
“I don't know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don't—till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!’”
“But ‘glory’ doesn't mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that's all. .. Impenetrability! That's what I say!”
-- Humpty Dumpty discussing semantics with Alice in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass (1872)
In Britain this passage was used by Lord Atkin in his dissenting judgement to protest about the distortion of a statute by the majority of the House of Lords, in the landmark case of Liversidge v. Anderson (1942) . It has also become a popular citation in United States legal opinions, appearing in 250 judicial decisions in the Westlaw database as of April 19, 2008, including two Supreme Court cases (TVA v. Hill and Zschernig v. Miller).
African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny:
Please find attached for your records and information:
Annex A: 12 April 2013 Letter to Judicial Service Commission:
The Judicial Service Commission’s ‘transformation’ debate and Izak Smuts resignation is a red herring, obscuring the JSC’s ‘transformation’ agenda to (i) censor the Fraud and Failures of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence; while (ii) simply transforming South Africa’s Jurisprudence from a European Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric flavour to an African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric flavour.
Issues: Sincere Consumer Orientated Perspective to Juristic Transformation:
[1] SA’s current system of Jurisprudence is Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric. Patriarchy: A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.
[2] A Credible Judicial System for Citizens and Nature is one such as the Mosuo’s, who have no rape, no murder, no suicide, no prisons, no unemployed, no homeless. If illiterate peasant women are capable of regulating the relations between nature, humans and animals, so simply that they result in a society with no rape, no murder, no suicide, no unemployed, no homeless; why are Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric lawyers with Ph.D’s and seven years of university education incapable of the same results? Because South Africa’s legislators and jurists all endorse the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric jurisprudence recipe of breeding and consumption wars, for resource scarcity and conflict creation, and their profits!?
[3] Fraud of AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence: Primary Beneficiaries: Anthropocentric males and corporations; Primary Losers: Non-Anthropocentric humans and nature.
[4] Transforming a system of Jurisprudence from Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric to Æquilibriaex: equal & balanced Eco/Anthropocentric law.
[5] Other Examples of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence Transformations to Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence: (i) Example of the Application of Aequilibriaex Principles, from a submission to the Military Judge of the US Army First Judicial Court, Ft. Meade in the matter of United States v. Bradley Manning; (ii) New Zealand, Ecuador, Bolivia and US Counties grant Nature Rights; (iii) Pennsylvania judge rules that corporations are not people.
Annex B: 14 April 2013 Letter to William Saunderson-Meyer:
SA Legal Society Corruption: SA’s Legal Corruption (denial of Legal Representation and access to courts to RH culture) is endorsed by SA Political Parties, Media Editors, International Bar Association, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, SA Judicial Service Commission, Tutu, Mandela & De Klerk.
Issues:
[1] Concourt: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v. Afriforum, et al: Afriforum v. Malema et al: Equality Court (07-2010 EQ JHB) to & Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA 815/11):
• Concourt Justice’s TRC Fraud Corruption
• Denied Cultural Legal Representation: SA Bar Ass’s & Law Societies
• Concourt Justice’s TRC Fraud Corruption Endorsed by SA Media, CRL Rights Commission, IBA, Human Rights Watch & Amnesty International, Judicial Service Commission, Afriforum, TAU-SA, ANC, Tutu, Mandela and De Klerk, Tutu and Templeton Prize Judges
[2] General Systemic Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Legal Corruption:
In Chief Justice denies ‘reverse racism’, Leila Samodien reports on the statements made by Justice Mogoeng at the 18th Commonwealth Law Conference:
Justice Mogoeng said the question of whether there was a need to transform the country’s judiciary “doesn’t require a debate”.
“Transformation does not even require to be defined. We know what the problem was,” he said. “We’ve got to address it, and address it responsibly. And I can’t imagine the JSC going about its business in an irresponsible and reckless manner.”
Do the Commonwealth Lawyers Association endorse the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?
Does CLA believe SA citizens are entitled to clear and succinct definitions for the legal terms of ‘reconciliation’ and ‘transformation’; from our African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist masters? Or, don’t you hold African Patriarch masters to the same standards as Boer Patriarch Masters? When can we expect you to release a statement, clarifying your position?
» » » » [TYGAE (PDF)]
No comments:
Post a Comment