FBI Complaint: Fraud & Patriarchal Discrimination of Templeton Foundation, Tutu, et al

FBI Complaint: Fraud & Patriarchal Discrimination of Templeton Foundation, Tutu, et al

Charges of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination against (a) Templeton Foundation President & Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr & VP’s, (b) 2013 Nominator: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Winner: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Prize Judges, Templeton Trustees and Templeton Board of Advisors.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 27 April 2013

Complaint to FBI: Pennsylvania & UK National Fraud Intelligence Bureau: Subject: FBI- Pennsylvania & UK Nat Fraud Intel Bureau: Fraud & Discrimination Complaint; CC: Prince Phillip c/o UKIP N. Farage (PDF)

FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND DISCRIMINATON COMPLAINT:

Charges of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination against (a) Templeton Foundation President & Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr & VP’s, (b) 2013 Nominator: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Winner: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Prize Judges, Templeton Trustees and Templeton Board of Advisors.

Fraud: ‘Templeton Prize’ is a fraudulent misrepresentation. Templeton Prize Chairman, Judges, Trustees & Advisors refuse to amend ‘Templeton Prize’ to ‘Templeton Prize for Taker – Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric – Spirituality’; to accurately reflect the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric forms of spirituality Templeton endorses & rewards.

Discrimination: Templeton Prize practices Gender and Ideological Discrimination against Ecocentric non-Patriarchal, Primitivist religions. All of the recipients for the Templeton Prize, for the past 40 years have been to individuals who are members of, or who endorse, Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric religions/spirituality. (Shall be withdrawn if Templeton Prize amend their name to accurately reflect the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric forms of spirituality Templeton endorses & rewards.)

Fraud, Corruption & Discrimination: The nomination of the 2013 Templeton Prize was corrupt and fraudulent. Archbishop Desmond Tutu was nominated for the prize by his own biographer, who censored information from the Judges about Tutu’s involvement in, and endorsement of, South Africa’s TRC Fraud, and discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist cultures. Tutu’s biographer refused to withdraw the nomination. Templeton Prize Judges also refused to withdraw the award, endorsing Tutu’s TRC Fraud and discrimination against Ecocentric, non-Patriarchal, Primitivist Leaver cultures.

Please find attached PDF’s:

· Templeton Foundation: Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination Complaint: Charges of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination against (a) Templeton Foundation President & Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr & VP’s, (b) 2013 Nominator: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Winner: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Prize Judges, Templeton Trustees and Templeton Board of Advisors. (PDF)
· Affidavit of Lara Johnstone in support of Complaint to FBI: Pennsylvania: Special Agent in Charge: Edward Hanko and National Fraud Intelligence Bureau, City of London Police. (PDF)
· Templeton Prize 2013: Fraud, Corruption & Discrimination: Annexure A, B, & C (PDF)
· Templeton Foundation: Fraud & Discrimination: Annexure D. (PDF)

Templeton Prize: Earth Day Spiritual Test: Patriarchal vs Primitivist

Spiritual Test for Templeton Foundation: Confront ‘Templeton Prize for Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Spirituality’ endorsement of (a) fraud, corruption and discrimination of 2013 Templeton Prize; (b) discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist spirituality.



Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 22 April 2013

Spiritual Test for Templeton Foundation: Confront ‘Templeton Prize for Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Spirituality’ endorsement of (a) fraud, corruption and discrimination of 2013 Templeton Prize; (b) discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist spirituality.

Spiritual Test for Templeton Foundation: If the Templeton Prize considers honesty a spiritual concept, should it not rename the Templeton Prize to the ‘Templeton Prize for Taker – Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric – Spirituality’, considering that (a) All of the recipients for the Templeton Prize, for the past 40 years have been to individuals who are members of, or whose scientific / spirituality endorses, Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Religions; (b) Templeton Prize’s endorsement of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Tutu’s TRC Fraud and discrimination against Ecocentric, non-Patriarchal, Primitivist Leaver cultures; clearly shows Templeton’s endorsement of Gender and Ideological Discrimination against Ecocentric non-Patriarchal, Primitivist spirituality?

Notification and Confirmation of Templeton Foundation Trustees and Board of Advisors Endorsement of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination by (a) Templeton Foundation President and Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr, (b) Nominator of Archbishop Desmond Tutu for Templeton Prize: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Recipient: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Foundation Prize Judges: H.R.H. Princess Areej Ghazi, Stephen Barr, Prof. Russell Cowburn FRS, Gurcharan Das, Matthieu Ricard, Vladimir Shmaliy, Esther Sternberg, Faraneh Vargha-Khadem, Miroslav Volf.

The nomination of the 2013 Templeton Prize was corrupt and fraudulent: Archbishop Desmond Tutu was nominated for the prize by his own biographer, who censored information from the Judges about Tutu’s involvement in, and endorsement of, South Africa’s TRC Fraud, and discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist cultures. Tutu’s biographer refused to withdraw the nomination. Templeton Prize Judges also refused to withdraw the award, endorsing Tutu’s TRC Fraud and discrimination against Ecocentric, non-Patriarchal, Primitivist Leaver cultures.

AUM Prof Steven Gish: Request withdrawal of Tutu nomination for Templeton Prize

AUM Prof Steven Gish: Request withdrawal of Tutu nomination for Templeton Prize

Radical Honoursty Culture and TYGAE Request for Withdrawal of your Nomination of Desmond Tutu as Recipient of Templeton Prize, due to your (a) biographer conflict of interest, and (b) failure to provide the evidence of Archbishop Tutu’s involvement in the cover-up and censorship of South Africa’s TRC Fraud.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | SQSwans | 11 April 2013

[1.20] Colonialism is a product and symptom of Patriarchy’s addiction to breeding and consumption wars. Colonialism, whether it is the colonialism of Europeans conquering African tribes, or the colonialism of African tribes who conquered other African tribes, or the colonialism of both Europeans and Africans who conquered the gender balanced Bushmen tribes.

[1.21] All Colonialism, whether it resulted from the conquering wars of Columbus, or Shaka Zulu, or Mohammed, were a product and symptom of Patriarchy.

[1.22] A patriarchal society, or a society which does not address the causes of masculine insecurity, cannot and will not ever be sustainable. Any ideology, whether political or religious, founded upon masculine insecurity (patriarchy) will result in (a) breeding and consumption war concepts of power and domination (to provide insecure males with social/psychological penis extension status symbols, their fragile ego's lack).

[1.23] Consumption wars require exponential expropriation of land, natural resources and knowledge. Breeding wars require a war against sustainable consciousness (ecological and political balance) and a human factory farming war economy racket culling. Colonialism is a symptom of Patriarch’s addiction to breeding and consumption wars; i.e. consuming above carrying capacity, and then using the surplus population as cannon fodder to conquer another culture’s resources.

[1.24] The argument that Apartheid and European colonialism was morally reprehensible, and had massive destructive psychological and physical consequences for the Bushmen and African tribes conquered; is a very valid argument; if those making such an argument, hold all other African, Chinese, etc cultures to the same standard, by condemning those culture’s patriarchal conquering and colonization of other tribes resources.

[1.25] An honourable impartial argument against European Colonialism, including apartheid, must also admit that all Patriarchal colonialism is morally reprehensible, irrespective of who the patriarchal colonialists were who were doing the breeding war, consumption war conquering!

[1.26] When an individual argues that only European and Boer colonialism is morally reprehensible, while ignoring the patriarchal reprehensible colonialism of African Tribes conquering and colonizing other tribes, including African tribes, then the implication of that argument is that African Patriarchy and Colonialism and African Patriarch’s are morally inferior and incapable of criticism of their Patriarchal Colonizing behaviour.

[1.27] Put differently, when European or Africans argue that only European and Boer Colonialists should be considered morally reprehensible, they effectively agree with European and Boer Colonialists that Europeans/Boers are superior to Africans, and that Africans are inferior and incapable of being held to the same Patriarchal colonialists standards as white men.

[1.28] If you object to Colonialism and Apartheid (the symptom of Patriarchal culture’s) and want a world where one group of people are not constantly being colonized by another group of people, anywhere and everywhere on the planet; then you must be consistent and object to all patriarchy (the root cause of colonialism).

Primitivist Q's for Desmond Tutu & Templeton Prize Judges: RE: Tutu's & SA's Censorship of TRC Fraud

Primitivist Q's for Desmond Tutu & Templeton Prize Judges: RE: Tutu's & SA's Censorship of TRC Fraud

Questions to Archbishop Tutu; or if unanswered by Tutu and Prize Upheld by Templeton Prize Judges; (ii) Congratulations on Receipt of the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 04 April 2013 | SQSwans

RE: Questions to Archbishop Tutu; or if unanswered by Tutu and Prize Upheld by Templeton Prize Judges; (ii) Congratulations on Receipt of the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering.

Questions to Archbishop Desmond Tutu:

1. Please clarify in writing whether you believe the Templeton Judges are aware of the following Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement?

2. If the Templeton Judges are not aware of the following Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement, why are they ignorant of them?

3. If you (a) continue your policy of endorsing the censorship of the Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement, by refusing to transparently inform the Templeton Judges why you endorse the Anti-Apartheid movement and Constitutional Courts censorship of Radical Honoursty culture allegations of TRC Fraud; and (b) the Templeton Judges endorse your lack of honour and actions of censorship of your involvement in TRC Fraud; we could fairly conclude that (c) You have been awarded the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering?

Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement: Corrupt Censorship by SA Constitutional Court of Radical Honoursty culture’s Application for Review of South Africa’s TRC Fraud:

Mandela, Tutu, the ANC & Anti-Apartheid movement have censored and silenced the only South African who – for the past 12 years – has exposed South Africa’s Anthropocentric and Ideologically biased TRC Fraud, and advocated on behalf of a brutally honest sincere and ecologically and scientifically credible Truth and Reconciliation Commission, focussed on exposing the underlying psychological, cultural, racial, Compulsive Development and Scarcity induced factors contributing to Apartheid’s Political violence.

SA Concourt seeks Radical Honesty lawyer

SA Concourt seeks Radical Honesty lawyer

Application to the Constitutional Court, for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum, TAU-SA, Julius Malema and the ANC, is seeking a 'Radical Honesty' lawyer.

09 December 2012 | Link2Media | Andrea Muhrrteyn

An Application to the Constitutional Court, for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum, TAU-SA, Julius Malema and the ANC, is seeking a 'Radical Honesty' lawyer.

The Pro Se application was filed with the Constitutional Court Registrar on 27 November, by an EcoFeminist paralegal and South Africa's only member of the Radical Honesty culture. The respondents are: Afriforum, Transvaal Agricultural Union, Julius Malema, African National Congress, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Former Presidents Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk, CRL Rights Commission, Norwegian Nobel Committee: Chair, Central Intelligence Agency: Director, and David Petraeus.

The application requests the Court to issue orders: (1) allowing the applicant to invoke cultural law on behalf of her Radical Honesty culture; (2) to review the ambiguity and lack of clarity of the Afriforum-Malema SCA Negotiated Agreement, (3) alleges that the ‘TRC Fraud’ evidence submitted to the Equality and Supreme Court of Appeal by the Applicant was censored and ignored by the primary parties and that the agreement is not a credible peace agreement; (4) that a credible proactive peace plan requires confronting Peak Non-renewable Resources (NNR) and Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict; (5) Alternatively; to order all South African’s to prepare for SA’s Race and Class War in the impending Peak NNR Crisis of Conflict.

TIAA-CREF: Tutu’s ‘Israel Apartheid’ Outrage; while censoring Tutu's TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ was Falsification of SA History

I read Archbishops Desmond Tutu’s letter in the Charlotte Observer: TIAA-CREF should hear us, divest from Israeli apartheid, about his alleged moral outrage against ‘Israel Apartheid’ demanding disinvestment from Israeli companies.

This letter is to provide you further information regarding information that is currently censored from the world’s right to know; which significantly affect the credibility of Archbishop Tutu and the South African ‘TRC’ religious, academic, media, political etc. elite.

Radical Honesty SA recently filed a ‘Censorship of TRC Fraud’ complaint with the International Criminal Court against South Africa’s political, legal and media elite; one of whom includes Archbishop Desmond Tutu (PDF):

[..] Attached are excerpts from Petition to the EU and two legal Amicus Applications to South African courts (CCT 23-10: PDF; & 07-2010 EQ-SG: PDF) which examine the Truth and Reconciliation Commission from the perspective of International Just War Theory.

Both of these applications, have been totally censored by the SA media; with the endorsement of Archbishop Tutu, who is not outraged about the SA media censoring evidence of allegations of his TRC Fraud.

Conclusions reached are that if we discard political correct ideology and impartially and unemotionally examine the motivations for implementing Apartheid it meets all the requirements for a Just War of Self Defense: It was a just cause to ensure Afrikaner Demographic Survival, it was a last resort, it was declared by proper authority, it possessed right intention, it had a reasonable chance of success, and the end was proportional to the means used.

The ANC’s Anti-Apartheid Movement on the other hand meets none of the requirements to be considered a Just War: The ANC had no Just Cause: The ANC Could Have Non-violently Ended their Breeding War; which would have terminated the requirement for Apartheid. The ANC had no Right Intention: Apartheid raised Black Living Standards to Highest in Africa. The ANC had No Proper Authority: The majority of Black South Africans did not want Black Rule. The ANC did not use Proportional Force: The ANC implemented a People’s War of Terror to terrorize the African population to join the ‘Liberation Struggle’. The ANC’s declaration of War was not a Last Resort: The ANC’s declaration of war was founded on the Frantz Fanon and Black Liberation Theology principles that the native’s colonized mind can only be liberated by violence on the rotting corpse of the settler.

[Afriforum v. Malema] Radical Honesty SA to SAIRR: Frans Cronje: Who; or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 5:36 PM
To: SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; Lucy Holborn - SAIRR;
CC: Steve Hofmeyr
Subject: [Afriforum v. Malema] Radical Honesty SA to SAIRR: Frans Cronje: Who; or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

Mr. Frans Cronje
SA Inst. of Race Relations (SAIRR)


BCC: SA Media Editors: Radio 702, Beeld, Burger, Business Day, Cape Argus, Carte Blanche, Citizen, City Press, Cape Times, Daily News, PRAAG, Daily Maverick, 3rd Degree, ETV, Financial Mail, IOL, M&G, News 24, Rapport, RSG, SABC, SANEF, SAPA, Sowetan, Sat Star, Sunday Times, Volksblad, New York Times, UK Telegraph; All Afriforum v. Malema Parties
(Ref: SAIRR Open Letter to Steve Hofmeyr; RE: ‘Afriforum v. Malema’ ‘Kaffir’)

Please find attached PDF: Who or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

Overview:

According to Mr. Sandile Memela:

• the meaning of any word is not in the word itself, but in people’s heads
  
• Kaffirs do exist! The biggest sin will always be: Who says it!
  
• The use of the K-word is something that most white guilt whites still need to discuss with their psychiatrists.
  
• The time may be right for a society that has been undergoing transition for the past 13 years to appreciate new methods of defining the meaning of words and understanding their use in blunt, intense and provocative public speech.
  
• Once 'kaffir' is out of the closet, pseudo-liberal forces both within the white community and their black imitators demand the person apologize, and put 'kaffir' back in the closet, to hush up any use of the word lest it raise the spectre of the apartheid past that haunts us.
  
• But the panic and hysteria that has been caused in the white social and cultural circles is a sad farce of good intentions. The conclusion that should be drawn on this matter is that it is a combination of white guilt and political correctness.
  
• This is part of our self-redefinition and expanding the meaning of words to fit into a new socio-cultural vocabulary that will help ultimately to break with white guilt, political correctness and a deep-seated inferiority complex.

Dr. Truth Challenge to South Africa: Who; or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

So, here is a ‘Dr. Truth’ free-Radical Honesty Therapy invitation to South Africa’s white guilt liberals who still need to discuss the word ‘kaffir’ with their psychiatrists.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA
Jus Sanguinis Petition Organizer
www.jussanguinis.com
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Tel: (044) 870 7239
Cel: (071) 170 1954

Should the Concourt Order The Citizen to Apologize to McBride?

[Guerrylla Law] [Concourt: #23-10] [Concourt #06-11]

Should the Concourt Order The Citizen to Apologize to McBride, for calling him a murderer?

Radical Honesty argues: Only if SA's TRC intentions are “an ever-rising tide of corporate and political bullshite” to coverup their TRC Fraud


16 March 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Radical Honesty submissions to the Constitutional Court, in the matter of The Citizen v. Robert McBride (CCT 23-10). In directions dated, 7 March, the Justices asked all parties to make submissions on whether they should order The Citizen to apologize to McBride. More specifically:

“Should the Court find that any statement The Citizen published about Mr. McBride was actionably defamatory, would it be appropriate, in view of the findings of the High Court and the nature of the submissions before the Supreme Court of Appeal and this Court, for the Court to order The Citizen to publish an apology?”

Radical Honesty Submission on Forced Apologies

Radical Honesty's submission (PDF) is as follows:

[2] As detailed in the First Amicus Heads of Argument: These submissions (a) address alternative legal arguments to those of both the Applicant and Respondent, i.e. from a Radical Honesty culture/religion perspective; (b) ‘argues points deemed too far reaching for emphasis by parties intent on winning their particular case’ ; (c) ‘apprises the court of broad-based legal, social, economic, ecological and cultural enquiry implications for its consideration to avoid unintended consequences for groups not before the court,’ (d) informs the court of information to base its decision on a larger, more comprehensive, and more accurate reality based natural law legal framework, so that the court’s final judgment shall include a fully-informed refined legal analysis, which provides equal protection to all SA’s tribes; and (e) provides a perspective from a culture practicing sincere sensate forgiveness.


First Amicus Cultural Forgiveness, Reconciliation and Apology Differences to Parties:

Pema Chodron: “The job of a spiritual friend is to insult you”

[3] First Amicus is not a member of either the Applicant (Citizen) or Respondent (McBride) culture of intellectual fake insincere ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’; nor its hyper-sensitivity to ‘insults’. Radical Honesty are far closer to Pema Chodron’s views of ‘insults’ – “The job of a spiritual friend is to insult you” -- as detailed in Pema Chodron: Troublemakers.

[4] In Radical Honesty we very brutally clearly define what we mean by forgiveness, and no Radical Honesty member would ever pretend to another that they have forgiven them, until they have gone through the process of reaching sensate forgiveness. Sincere forgiveness is also a process of acute personal responsibility; so that we can honestly forgive ourselves for our contribution to the misunderstanding.

[5] Nobody in the Radical Honesty community would ever force anyone to make an apology; or even recommend that such an apology be made; for we believe that the only apologies that contribute to meaningful sincere spontaneous and loving relationships are those that are totally 100% sincere, from the gut and the heart. We do not do public relations – i.e. bullshit the public -- with fake insincere apologies.

Radical Honesty Guru Scott Ginsberg describes Edward Bernaysian PR protocols as “the ever-rising tide of corporate and political bullshite”.

Amicus Applic. to Dewani’s Judge: SA is a criminal mafia parasite state: Descartian Jurisprudence does not exist in ‘Rainbow Hypocrisy SA’

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

London, UK (19-Jan-2011): An Application was filed with the City of Westminster Magistrates Court late yesterday, by a South African citizen in support of Dewani's case to oppose his extradition to South Africa. The Amicus Application accuses the South African Government of being a "criminal mafia parasite state that breeds and feeds crime, for political and financial benefit of the TRC FRAUD elite".

Shrien Dewani, 31 from Bristol is accused by the South African government of being the mastermind behind the murder of his wife, Anni Dewani (Hindocha), 28, when they were hijacked in Gugulethu, a township near Capetown on November 13, 2010.

The murder made world headlines, and four South Africans have been arrested, one (the taxidriver) sentenced to 18 years in prison. Dewani was allowed to return to Britain, but the SA Police subsequently charged him with being the mastermind. He says he is being used as a scapegoat to protect South Africa's tourism industry.

The Amicus supports a private prosecution of Mr. Dewani in UK Courts, with Impartial, Competent EU Judge and Jury, as the only means Hindocha & Dewani families will receive a free and fair trial, to determine Mr. Dewani’s guilt or innocence based on Descartian worldview concepts of evidence.

The Amicus Application states that the citizen's experience of going through multiple trials in South Africa, for the past nine years, where she has "never received anything remotely resembling a Descartian Heuristic / Western Civilization concept of a free and fair trial".

SARS, CIPRO & Illegal Immigrant Corruption Hijacking the State

“South Africa risks gaining a reputation as one of the most corrupt countries in the world if we do not nip the scourge in the bud. In the midst of abject poverty and hunger, greed and the speedy accumulation of wealth have become the most defining characteristics of South Africa's post-apartheid democracy.” -- Sunday Times Editorial, Nov 22, 2009

“Corruption in the public service is so rife, so endemic, so all-pervasive, that ordinary South Africans regard it as the normal way of doing things. In the municipalities, virtually no tender is awarded without some politician’s or official’s relative, friend or business associate being in on the game. If they are not, a bribe is paid. In queues for government services, even when dealing with the police, bribes change hands as a matter of course.”

“That culture starts at the top and permeates the whole system. Morality, values, have all disappeared. It is everyone for himself. That is why ministers believe they have a “right” to put extras in their official cars, such as television sets. It is the culture.”

“This is how the failed states of Nigeria, the DR Congo and others were born. The culture of bribery, lack of service delivery and impunity of public officials took hold. That is where we are headed unless something is done — soon.”
-- -- Justice Malala, Black Politicians Fiddle as SA Burns

Why & How Rainbow & WC 2010 PR Propaganda Addiction, will be Toxic...

Overview: Psychological Infant Insecurity of Nelson Mandela: » » Secret Affairs of Nelson Mandela Surface || Football Fever: Terror & Famine Go Unreported: : » » ‘July 12 all the whites will be killed’ threat || The Dark Side of Optimism: Why Looking on the Bright Side keeps us from Thinking Critically

Psychological Infant Insecurity of Nelson Mandela

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

The Principle of Monarchy

The Mandela myth was mainly the creation of the South African Communist Party. As the most important organizer of ANC politics within the country and internationally for thirty years, especially through the media, the SACP in the late 1950s and early 1960s set about the creation of a very specific cult of personality.

The 'M Plan' of 1953, in which 'M' stood for Mandela, did more to surround the leader's name with a mystique than reorganize the ANC on a cell-system, as it was supposed to do. Ten years later, alter the arrest of members of the High Command of Umkhonto we Sizwe at Lilliesleaf Farm in Rivonia, the emphasis was not principally on a collective call: 'Free the Rivonia nine.' The fate of an entire generation of political victims was absorbed into the fate of a single individual: 'Free Mandela.' Such personification of thousands of individual acts of imprisonment by the state might have been good media politics, but it was the negation of democratic accountability. It represented the introduction of the monarchical principle as a staple into modern South African political life. More urgently, it was a trivializing of politics which took the issue away from matters of substance and concentrated attention on the persona of one man.
-- A Death in South Africa: The Killing of Sipho Phungulwa, by Paul Trewhela

Correspondence: (i) SA Editor & CODESA Politician Admits he Never Forgave AWB; (ii) AWB Rule-of-Law Request...

(i) SA Editor & CODESA Politician Admits he Never Forgave AWB; (ii) AWB Rule-of-Law Request correspondence to (i) Editor of Leadership Online, Mr. Piet Coertze, former CODESA National Party Politician Negotiator; (2) Carte Blanche: Mr. Derrick Watts; (iii) Mr. Rian Malan, alleged Afrikaner 'truth-teller' author of My Traitors Heart; (3) Justice Malala, Sunday Times Columnist

» » [Why a 'Kaffir-sussie' demands Justice for Mr. Eugene Ney Terre'Blanche]
» » [SA Media Conspiratorial ‘What Bleads, Leads’ role in SA’s Race War]
» » [Bucham/Mighty Men: (a) Truth & Forgiveness Leadership, (b) ET Murder & Rule-of-Law]

ZA Top 20 Dangerous Travel Destinations: Beware: SA is Violent: UK, US, AU et al warn citizens: “Exercise Highest Degree of Caution”

Backed by travel advice issued by the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), London's The Telegraph newspaper has placed South Africa alongside Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Colombia, Haiti, Eritrea, Pakistan, Burundi, Nigeria and the DRC in terms of danger to travellers.

According to the FCO, South Africa has "an underlying threat from terrorism".

Beware: SA is violent: UK, US and Australia warn citizens visiting South Africa

South Africa's spiralling crime figures may have deterred more than 22 million tourists from visiting the country over the past five years, its tourism minister said this week.

Marthinus van Schalkwyk said government research showed that more than a third of potential tourists had cited safety concerns as a reason for not visiting South Africa since 2002.

South Africa: 'Flawed Democracy' Slips in Governance Rankings

Which way is governance going on the African continent and particularly in South Africa? According to the newly released 2009 African Governance Report (AGR-II), put together by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, it seems that many of the continent’s newly-established democracies are suffering from an authoritarian hangover.

These figures should ring alarm bells. South Africa faces many governance challenges. These were highlighted in the country’s 2007 African Peer Review Mechanism report, and include “unemployment rates; capacity constraints and poor service delivery; poverty and inequality; land reform; violence against women and children; HIV/Aids pandemic; corruption; crime; racism and xenophobia; and, managing diversity.”

Combined with the fact that South Africa has been making international and African headlines for all the wrong reasons lately (corruption trials of high-standing public figures, xenophobic attacks, refusal of a visa to the Dalai Lama, accusations of abuse of state organs), sinking rankings negatively affect its international image.

Warm Welcome to Post Apartheid SA: Crooked Crime Stats in the SA for Corruption-Gold Rush Olympics

“South Africa risks gaining a reputation as one of the most corrupt countries in the world if we do not nip the scourge in the bud. In the midst of abject poverty and hunger, greed and the speedy accumulation of wealth have become the most defining characteristics of South Africa's post-apartheid democracy.” -- Sunday Times Editorial, Nov 22, 2009 [» » Getting Away with Murder & Rape: RSA Wins Gold in Rapes & Silver in Murder at Crime Olympics » » SA's reputation in Europe is Cratering]

“Corruption in the public service is so rife, so endemic, so all-pervasive, that ordinary South Africans regard it as the normal way of doing things. In the municipalities, virtually no tender is awarded without some politician’s or official’s relative, friend or business associate being in on the game. If they are not, a bribe is paid. In queues for government services, even when dealing with the police, bribes change hands as a matter of course.”

“That culture starts at the top and permeates the whole system. Morality, values, have all disappeared. It is everyone for himself. That is why ministers believe they have a “right” to put extras in their official cars, such as television sets. It is the culture.”

“This is how the failed states of Nigeria, the DR Congo and others were born. The culture of bribery, lack of service delivery and impunity of public officials took hold. That is where we are headed unless something is done — soon.”
-- -- Justice Malala, Black Politicians Fiddle as SA Burns

South Africa's Reputation in Europe is Cratering...

“South Africa risks gaining a reputation as one of the most corrupt countries in the world if we do not nip the scourge in the bud. In the midst of abject poverty and hunger, greed and the speedy accumulation of wealth have become the most defining characteristics of South Africa's post-apartheid democracy.” -- Sunday Times Editorial, Nov 22, 2009 [» » An Entitlement Culture of Corruption » » Getting Away with Murder and Rape: RSA Wins Gold in Rapes and Silver in Murder at the Crime Olympics]

“I have been attacked at my home where the 2 black male assailents were laying in waiting. They shoved a pistol into my mouth and pulled the trigger. Luckily I survived but then to my horror realised that the Police could not be bothered to investigate the attempted murder. They did noyt bother to take statements from me or collect the evidence - bullets, shelld, hammer, belaclava. I had to phone them. 2 years after the bullet have been removed from my head they still have not bothered to collect it for evidence....... Please, we plead with you - whites are being attacked on a daily basis and we need to know the world will help us- don't let another Zimbabwe develop here.”
-- G. Joubert, Dec 15, 10:28 White Refugees Petitioner # 191

“I left South Africa due to the racist policies of AA/BEE and the continued persecution of the white people of South Africa. Rampant crime, corruption and nepotism have made South Africa unsafe to move back to. I support Mr. Huntley's applicatrion for refugee status!”
John Kerlen, United Kingdom, Sep 17, 2009; White Refugees Petitioner # 60