Primitivist Q's for Desmond Tutu & Templeton Prize Judges: RE: Tutu's & SA's Censorship of TRC Fraud

Primitivist Q's for Desmond Tutu & Templeton Prize Judges: RE: Tutu's & SA's Censorship of TRC Fraud

Questions to Archbishop Tutu; or if unanswered by Tutu and Prize Upheld by Templeton Prize Judges; (ii) Congratulations on Receipt of the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 04 April 2013 | SQSwans

RE: Questions to Archbishop Tutu; or if unanswered by Tutu and Prize Upheld by Templeton Prize Judges; (ii) Congratulations on Receipt of the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering.

Questions to Archbishop Desmond Tutu:

1. Please clarify in writing whether you believe the Templeton Judges are aware of the following Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement?

2. If the Templeton Judges are not aware of the following Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement, why are they ignorant of them?

3. If you (a) continue your policy of endorsing the censorship of the Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement, by refusing to transparently inform the Templeton Judges why you endorse the Anti-Apartheid movement and Constitutional Courts censorship of Radical Honoursty culture allegations of TRC Fraud; and (b) the Templeton Judges endorse your lack of honour and actions of censorship of your involvement in TRC Fraud; we could fairly conclude that (c) You have been awarded the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering?

Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement: Corrupt Censorship by SA Constitutional Court of Radical Honoursty culture’s Application for Review of South Africa’s TRC Fraud:

Mandela, Tutu, the ANC & Anti-Apartheid movement have censored and silenced the only South African who – for the past 12 years – has exposed South Africa’s Anthropocentric and Ideologically biased TRC Fraud, and advocated on behalf of a brutally honest sincere and ecologically and scientifically credible Truth and Reconciliation Commission, focussed on exposing the underlying psychological, cultural, racial, Compulsive Development and Scarcity induced factors contributing to Apartheid’s Political violence.

RE: Questions to Archbishop Tutu; or if unanswered by Tutu and Prize Upheld by Templeton Prize Judges; (ii) Congratulations on Receipt of the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering.

Dr. John M. Templeton, Jr. announces the 2013 Templeton Prize Laureate (10:14)

I am constantly amazed at the Liberal Supremacy establishment’s ability to totally and utterly ignore reality by imposing their Bullshit the Public Relations ‘Perception Management’ as their own subjective substitute for reality.

As you are aware, from my past correspondence over the past ten years, which you have and continue to ignore, as if I do not exist:

1. I am not a Liberal Supremacy house nigger, and most certainly psychologically, spiritually, emotionally prefer to side with Nat Turner, and physically I side with Harriett Tubman.

2. I do not practice or endorse Bullshit the Public Relations Image Management, but 100% transparency and radical honesty, to everyone, friend and enemy.

3. I give everyone – as I did you – the benefit of the doubt, and provide them with my honest criticism of their actions, to their face, to enable them to make an impartial transparent enquiry into the criticisms (which you refused to do, insisting on ignoring the TRC Fraud evidence I repeatedly sent you).

4. Finally, I have a Radical Honoursty communication values, which manifests as: (i) I have never ever ignored any individual contacting me with criticism of my actions; I always, and I mean always, provide every critic of mine with a brutal honest response to their criticism, and engage them in dialogue, of the evidence. (ii) I always provide every person whom I do criticize with an honourable copy of such criticism to their faces, for their response, should they have the honour or integrity to respond. It is the absolute minimum of what I consider ‘honourable communications’.

Questions to Archbishop Desmond Tutu:

1. Please clarify in writing whether you believe the Templeton Judges are aware of the following Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement?

2. If the Templeton Judges are not aware of the following Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement, why are they ignorant of them?

3. If you (a) continue your policy of endorsing the censorship of the Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement, by refusing to transparently inform the Templeton Judges why you endorse the Anti-Apartheid movement and Constitutional Courts censorship of Radical Honoursty culture allegations of TRC Fraud; and (b) the Templeton Judges endorse your lack of honour and actions of censorship of your involvement in TRC Fraud; we could fairly conclude that (c) You have been awarded the Multinational Corporate Resource and Cultural Imperialists Templeton Prize for excellence in House Nigger subservience to getting rid of Boer Anti-Imperialists, and making SA safe for ‘Compulsive Developmentism’ Imperialists (i) cultural colonization of indigenous cultures, and (ii) resource plundering?

Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement: Corrupt Censorship by SA Constitutional Court of Radical Honoursty culture’s Application for Review of South Africa’s TRC Fraud:

Mandela, Tutu, the ANC & Anti-Apartheid movement have censored and silenced the only South African who – for the past 12 years – has exposed South Africa’s Anthropocentric and Ideologically biased TRC Fraud, and advocated on behalf of a brutally honest sincere and ecologically and scientifically credible Truth and Reconciliation Commission, focussed on exposing the underlying psychological, cultural, racial, Compulsive Development and Scarcity induced factors contributing to Apartheid’s Political violence.

**********

The Bigotry and Treason of the Liberal Supremacist Elite:

“The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives…. Once the Negro learns to think for himself, he will no longer allow the white liberal to use him as a helpless football in the white man’s crooked game of “power politics.” The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.” -- Excerpts from 1963 speech by Malcolm X: “God’s Judgement of White America.”

Excerpts from Chris Hedges, The Treason of the Intellectuals:

"The power elite, especially the liberal elite, has always been willing to sacrifice integrity and truth for power, personal advancement, foundation grants, awards, tenured professorships, columns, book contracts, television appearances, generous lecture fees and social status. They know what they need to say. They know which ideology they have to serve. They know what lies must be told—the biggest being that they take moral stances on issues that aren’t safe and anodyne. They have been at this game a long time. And they will, should their careers require it, happily sell us out again."

“Nothing in my view is more reprehensible than those habits of mind in the intellectual that induce avoidance, that characteristic turning away from a difficult and principled position, which you know to be the right one, but which you decide not to take,” wrote the late Edward Said. “You do not want to appear too political; you are afraid of seeming controversial; you want to keep a reputation for being balanced, objective, moderate; your hope is to be asked back, to consult, to be on a board or prestigious committee, and so to remain within the responsible mainstream; someday you hope to get an honorary degree, a big prize, perhaps even an ambassadorship.”

Julien Benda argued in his 1927 book “The Treason of Intellectuals”—“La Trahison des Clercs”—that it is only when we are not in pursuit of practical aims or material advantages that we can serve as a conscience and a corrective. Those who transfer their allegiance to the practical aims of power and material advantage emasculate themselves intellectually and morally. Benda wrote that intellectuals were once supposed to be indifferent to popular passions. They “set an example of attachment to the purely disinterested activity of the mind and created a belief in the supreme value of this form of existence.”

“The desire to tell the truth,” wrote Paul Baran, the brilliant Marxist economist and author of “The Political Economy of Growth,” is “only one condition for being an intellectual. The other is courage, readiness to carry on rational inquiry to wherever it may lead … to withstand … comfortable and lucrative conformity.”

Those who doggedly challenge the orthodoxy of belief, who question the reigning political passions, who refuse to sacrifice their integrity to serve the cult of power, are pushed to the margins. They are denounced by the very people who, years later, will often claim these moral battles as their own. It is only the outcasts and the rebels who keep truth and intellectual inquiry alive. They alone name the crimes of the state. They alone give a voice to the victims of oppression. They alone ask the difficult questions. Most important, they expose the powerful, along with their liberal apologists, for what they are.

Questions for Anthropocentric Liberal Supremacist Anti-Apartheid, Pro-Imperialist Bigots:

A. Human Rights: Deaths in Police Custody:

1. Deaths in Police Custody: Apartheid 2.4 per year (1963-1994: 75)

a. Apartheid: 1963 – 1994: 75 Deaths in 31 Years = 2.4 Deaths per year

b. Throughout the entire apartheid-era up to 75 people died in police-custody throughout the period between 1963 and 1994. [The South African Police: Manager of Conflict or Party to the Conflict, Dr. Johan Olivier, Center for Study of Violence and Reconciliation; A Crime Against Humanity - Analysing the Repression of the Apartheid State, Edited by Max Coleman, a publication of the Human Rights Committee in South Africa: The Detention Weapon.]

2. ANC 'Freedumb': 2010: 566 Deaths in 11 months: increase of 25,725%

a. "Political parties yesterday called for a swift investigation into the deaths of 566 people at the hands of police in the current year. The call comes after the Independent Complaints Directorate (ICD) revealed yesterday that out of this overall national figure, 16 of those killed by police were innocent people. Many of the policemen involved have not even been suspended, let alone charged!" [Parties urge probe into 566 deaths, Canaan Mdletshe, Mhlaba Memela & Sibongile Mashaba, The Sowetan, 23 November 2010]

3. ANC 'Freedumb': 2011: 932 Deaths: increase of 38,833%

a. Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has revealed a report that about 932 people died in police custody in South Africa in 2011/12. [City Press: Police Stations of Death, 04 March 2013; Al Jazeera: Who Polices the Police?]

B. Boer Human Rights: Farm Murders:

1. Farm Murders rise 3,095% in ANC’s “TRC Rainbow Democracy”:

Political Climate of Farm Murders: According to (2.5 per year x 52 weeks x 16 years) Eugene Ney Terreblanche was murdered farmer number 2080 since the April 1994 TRC social contract brought S. Africans “peace and human rights” (sic). By way of comparison:

1. In the 1950‘s Mau Mau War in Kenya, the official number of “European settlers” killed was 32 , of which a dozen were said to be farmers.

2. During the 15 year Rhodesian war, 260 white farmers were murdered .



Human Rights Questions for Anthropocentric Liberal Supremacist Bigots:

1. If 2.4 deaths in custody per year by the Apartheid government, were ‘crimes against humanity’; what type of ‘crimes against humanity’ do you call an increase of 38,833 percent?

2. If the ANC was ‘at war’ with Boers, when 2.5 Boer farmers were being killed per year; what Tutu Spiritual traditions considers the murder of 73 farmers per year, to be ‘reconciliation’ and ‘peace’?

3. If Liberal Supremacists care enough about Africans to be honest with them; instead of using them as your token vote fodder; wouldn’t your policy be: “Take Note Dumb Kaffirs: Liberal Supremacists do not give a fuck about Africans ‘human rights’ if you are killed by an ANC African cop. African ANC cops can kill as many of you African fucks as they wish… cause you are not human, unless you are killed by a white Boer”?

4. If Anthropocentric Liberal Supremacists cared enough about their spirituality to give a fuck about their enemies human rights, including Boer Farmers to be honest with them; wouldn’t your policy be: “Take Note Dumb Boer Farmers: Liberal Supremacist Bigots do not give a fuck about Boer Farmers ‘human rights’; we support Mandela’s Frantz Fanon definition of ‘reconciliation’, that the ‘African’s colonized mind can only be liberated by violence on the rotting corpse of your boer settler bodies’?

************

Radical Honoursty TRC Fraud Fact Censored by Mandela, Tutu, ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movement: Corrupt Censorship by SA Constitutional Court of Radical Honoursty culture’s Application for Review of South Africa’s TRC Fraud.

Mandela, Tutu, the ANC & Anti-Apartheid movement have censored and silenced the only South African who – for the past 12 years – has exposed South Africa’s Anthropocentric and Ideologically biased TRC Fraud, and advocated on behalf of a brutally honest sincere and ecologically and scientifically credible Truth and Reconciliation Commission, focussed on exposing the underlying psychological, cultural, racial, Compulsive Development and Scarcity induced factors contributing to Apartheid’s Political violence.

There are dozens of letters written to Mandela, Tutu, the ANC and Anti-Apartheid movement, providing them with evidence of the Anti-Apartheid movement/ANC’s TRC Fraud, and requesting that they investigate the matter, and provide answers. I shall provide only one here, the final one, but am happy to provide copies of all the others, if requested.

After ten years, of letters ignored, legal applications ignored, suppressed and silenced, I finally filed an application with the South African Constitutional Court, for a Radical Honoursty culture review of South Africa’s TRC Fraud.

The South African Constitutional Court Justices continue to refuse to process the application, for a hearing as to its admissibility, or to respond to an appeal of their refusal to process the application. Archbishop Tutu, Nelson Mandela, the ANC and Anti-Apartheid movement have, so far, endorsed the Concourt’s corruption and denial of access to a court to investigate the matter of South Africa’s TRC Fraud.



Overview of Radical Honoursty Constitutional Court Application:

[1] On 27 November 2012, I filed a Pro Se application with the Constitutional Court Registrar, for an EcoFeminist Radical Honesty culture Review of the ‘Kill Boer’ Hate Speech Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum/TAU-SA and Julius Malema/ANC, wherein I specifically requested an order from the court, for the “Permission to invoke cultural law in S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18; to enable the Applicant to honour the duty and responsibility to uphold the principles upon which her Radical Honesty culture is based; and Psychological Integrity in Section 12 ; the former which may require the application of choice of law rules.”

[2] Invocation of Cultural Law: The South African Constitution is founded on the Apartheid premise that South Africa is a multicultural country, hence neither common law, nor cultural customary law are prima facie applicable in any dispute before any court. The Constitution provides for all citizens rights to invoke cultural law in S. 15(3) , 30 , 31 , and 18 . When any party invokes cultural law, the court is required to proceed in terms of application of choice of law rules, to determine the applicability of one or other legal system, or combination thereof, on the basis of its inquiry into the relevant parties particular cultures, as determined from their lifestyles .

[3] The invocation of Cultural Law automatically invokes a Conflict between Common/Dominant & Cultural/Minority Law; requiring the court to enquire into the appropriate balancing of ‘dominant’ law vs ‘minority law’, through an investigation of the relevant cultural law and cultural lifestyle of the minority culture applicant vs the dominant cultural law and cultural lifestyle of the dominant legal culture.

[4] The Registrar refused to process my application, demanding that I get legal representation, and demanding various ‘dominant’ cultural rules of court. I filed an appeal of her decision to the Concourt Justices, in that I had invoked cultural law, and that various Dominant Culture ‘Rules of Court’ violated my Ecocentric cultural values. Additionally I had been unable to find any lawyer in South Africa, willing to represent the Radical Honoursty culture. The Registrar refused to submit my appeal to the Concourt Justices, again citing obedience to the dominant culture’s ‘Rules of Court’, as being the Supreme Law of the land.

[5] I filed two complaints to the Commission for the Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities : one against the Concourt Registrar, and the other against SAPA and 11 mainstream media editors (for refusing to publish a Radical Honoursty culture press release to find out if any SA lawyers were willing to represent the Radical Honoursty culture).

[6] The CRL Rights Commission denied both complaints endorsing :

[6.1] the denial of cultural legal representation, and access to courts, to members of the Radical Honesty culture, and (b) the South African Media’s discrimination against Members of the Radical Honesty culture, by refusing to report the fact that a South African citizen member of the Radical Honesty culture, has been unable to find a lawyer to represent her, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, for the past ten years, and in a current case before the Constitutional Court. (Ref: 9/1/1/1/46)

[6.2] the Constitutional Court Registrar’s position that: South African AnthroCorpocentric Dominant Cultures ‘Rules of Court’ are the Supreme Law of the Land; If or when the AnthroCorpocentric Dominant Cultures ‘Rules of Court’ violate a Minority cultures right to practice their Ecocentric cultural practices, as enshrined in the Constitution Bill of Rights clauses granting citizens from minority cultures, access to courts (S 34), and rights to practice their culture (S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18). (Ref: 9/1/1/1/49)

[7] I filed appeals of both decisions to the CRL Rights Commission Chairperson: Reverent Mabuza , who has not acknowledged receipt, nor responded to the appeals.


Radical Honoursty Ecocentric Cultural and Gender Values:

[8] I am an adult Radical Honoursty Ecofeminist Guerrylla Law Sustainable Security practicing paralegal EcoFeminist, member of Friend of Wikileaks (FoWL) and the Radical Honourty culture ; resident in George, Southern Cape, South Africa; where I run a small EcoFeminist pedal-powered wormery business.

[9] I am married to African American prisoner Demian Emile Johnson, who has been incarcerated in the California Dept. of Corrections, on a sentence of 15-to-life for felony murder, since 1982. They met while she was working on providing educational information on rehabilitation issues to prisoners. (Sacramento County: Licence & Certificate of Marriage: Demian Emile Johnson and Lara Johnstone (PDF ); 31 May 1998: Sunday Times: US convict wins love and support in SA town (PDF ); 24 Sep 1998: YOU: Volksrust Farmgirl Doomed for Love of Black Convict)(PDF ).

[10] Radical Honoursty Culture: I am a member of the Radical Honoursty culture, based upon Radical Honesty dispute resolution principles, which is (a) a minority culture, (b) an Ecocentric culture, (c) practices Brutal Honesty Authentic Multiculturalism endorsing authentic diversity of cultures, and (d) does not endorse the homogenizing AnthroCorpocentric Egotist Consumptionism effects of Multinational GlobalCorp induced Globalization of cultures.

[..]

[12] I am neither anthropocentrically liberal nor conservative, nor an endorser of AnthroCorpocentric Legislative or Juristic Jurisprudence which only grants Humans and Corporations legal personhood, while denying legal personhood to all other animal and plant species and ecological rights to nature.

[13] I am the founder of CommonSism ideology -- Common Sense Guerrylla Laws for a Sustainable Commons -- and the unregistered Yshmael Guerrylla Law Political Party, the aim of which is to establish a Green License to Vote, to elect a Green President, to transition South Africa into a Sustainable Voluntaryist (Honourable Free Society of Men and Women capable of ruling themselves) Green Republic.

[14] The Yshmael Guerrylla Law (YGL) Political Party’s platform is based upon Guerrylla Law -- or CommonSism (Common Sense Laws for a Sustainable Commons) -- inspired by -- among others -- the Taker vs. Leaver ideas of the gorilla Ishmael, in Daniel Quinn's books: Ishmael and My Ishmael; and the Tragedy of the Commons ideas, as expressed by Garrett Hardin.

[15] CommonSism Guerrylla Laws regulate human procreation and resource utilization behaviour, by means of legally defining the procreation and consumption difference, and consequent related Sustainable Rights/Penalties, between a Leaver and a Taker, to ensure sustainability.

[16] CommonSism asserts that a majority of society's problems - crime, violence, unemployment, poverty, inflation, food shortages, political instability, vanishing species, garbage and pollution urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, energy and non-renewable resources (NNR) depletion and scarcity are symptoms of Ecological Overshoot, resulting from the AnthroCorpoCentric Consumptionist Left and Right Wing's war against nature, and the failures of AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence.

[17] Ecological Overshoot is a consequence of all other ideologies and their adherents failure to legally (a) define the difference between sustainable and unsustainable procreation and consumption behaviour; and (b) provide legal rights to sustainable practices, and legal penalties to unsustainable individuals, corporations and organisations.

[18] Guerrylla Laws (A) simply and very specifically clarify the difference between the consumption and procreation behaviour of an Unsustainable Taker (Scarcity Combatant) vs a Sustainable Leaver (Eco-Innocent); and are (B) used in courts to (a) provide legal rights and socio-political rewards of recognition to Sustainable Leaver's for their Heroic lifestyle choices and practices; (b) confront Taker Scarcity Combatants of their Breeding / Consumption combatant behaviours aggravation of Scarcity induced socio-economic problems, by means of aggravated legal penalties, in accordance to their 'Taker Scarcity Combatant' status.

[19] Guerrylla Laws define the Eco/Ego Footprint procreation and consumption behaviour of an individual as a Sustainable Leaver (aka Eco-Innocent) or Unsustainable Taker (aka Scarcity-Combatant), based upon a sustainable consumption bio-capacity of 1 global hectare (gha) (60 % of 1.8 gha) in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan ; multiplied by an individuals Breeding footprint factor of 20 per child.

[20] Sustainable Leaver / Eco-Innocent: 0 children, consumption < 20 gha (Intn'l Biocapacity (1 gha) x 20); or 1 child, consumption < 1 gha. [21] Unsustainable Taker / Scarcity-Combatant: 0 children, consumption > 20 gha; or 1 child, consumption > 1 gha.

[22] For example: Complainant’s Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 12.75 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. Amici has no children, consequently my procreation factor is 0 x 20* = 0. [(Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20 )]. My Consumption (12.75) x Procreation (0) = Eco Footprint of 12.75/0 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like me, we would need 0.81 earths. Conversely, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Jacob Zuma, we would need 2090 earths .

[23] Sustainable Security: Sustainability is Security: “There is no security without sustainability” : In the absence of an international new moral order where Ecocentric laws are implemented to regulate and reduce human procreation and resource utilization behaviour, towards a sustainable, pre-industrial lifestyle paradigm; “overpopulation” and resource scarcity will result in conflict and war (perhaps nuclear ) confronting regions at an accelerated pace , and “collapse of the global economic system and every market-oriented national economy” by 2050 .

CONTINUED IN PDF .....

» » » » [PDF]