Dr. Truth: ‘TRC was a fraudulent dog and pony show PR publicity stunt’

Honesty in Politics: Dr. Truth Brad Blanton's Affidavit (below) was filed in the High Court, Western Cape, in ‘White Refugee’ Case # 19963-09. Dr. Blanton is the author of Practicing Radical Honesty; wherein he clarifies what he means by Radical Honesty About Anger and Sincere Forgiveness. Among others, Dr. Blanton's affidavit makes the following allegations:

• SA is Not a Democracy: If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent; it is not a democratic country.
  
  
• SA practices legal & political persecution: Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant.
  
  
• SA denies citizens the opportunity to experience sincere forgiveness: Getting Over being offended, is sincere forgiveness: The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors. Put differently, any society that values the principle of ‘crimen injuria’; is one that values protecting the right of people with fragile ego's to not be offended as more important; than protecting the right of Galileo's and Voltaire's to offend.
  
  
• SA does not value Honesty, Truth-Tellers or Forgiveness: The South African government are deliberately and intentionally punishing the defendant for practicing her culture and religion of Radical Honesty: non-violently telling another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.
  
  
• SA denies Defendant a valid Internationally Recognized Defence: The South African government are deliberately and intentionally denying the defendant her right to a defence; and ignoring the justification and accuracy of her non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence.
  
  
• SA's TRC was a fake, dog and pony political PR show: That there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, including South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians.

Memo Refugee Issues: [I] S.A. White Refugees & ANC’s Crime of Apartheid; [II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize

Memo Refugee Issues: [I] S.A. White Refugees & ANC’s Crime of Apartheid; [II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize to United Nations High Commisioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (PDF), has also been sent to dozens of International, European Union etc. Refugee Agencies.

“What is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values-there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except -- breed. And how easy it is to do nothing.” -- Isaac Asimov

White Refugee Documents Legally submitted to High Court, Western Cape & Federal Court, Canada

by Lara Johnstone

In a Notice of Intention: Application for Leave and for Judicial Review, filed with the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape, Capetown, on 22 September 2009, I cited the Minister of Citizenship, Canada, and the Nobel Institute, Norwegian Nobel Committee as Respondents Nine and Ten, requesting them to take notice of the State of Effective Emergency, regarding South Africa's Unrepresented White Refugees.

Other respondents in the matter, include, among others, Respondent Two: The Director of National Prosecutions; Three: Hon. Patricia de Lille; Four: Former President Thabo Mbeki; Five: Former NPA Nat. Director, Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka; Six: Former SAPS Commissoner Jackie Selebi; Seven: Former Min. of Corrections BM Skosana; and Eight: Former President Nelson Mandela.

Specifically, the Notice requests Respondents Nine and Ten, to take particular notice of the White Refugee Issues cited, under the Notice of Intention's points, [10], [11], [12] and [13], among others:

[10] For the Record: State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees: The Tyranny, Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the State, has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended, as a result of corruption, incompetence and indifference. South Africa is heading towards a socio-economic, political and military failed state of Zimbabwefication. For example, South African Law Commission Issue Paper Six, alleged the Criminal Justice System to have a severe Legitimacy and Inefficiency Crisis, in that:

1. Communities are intimidated by the legal system, and ignorant of how it works.
   
2. Legal representation is inadequate and discriminatory.
   
3. Legal aid has not been able to serve its intended purpose.
   
4. The justice system's inaccessibility means it is perceived as illegitimate, ineffective, unfriendly, resulting in alternative dispute resolution whether legal or illegal.
   
5. Unnecessary complexities brought into access to justice and the mystifying language used.

[10a] Since 18 June 2002, the Applicant has accused Official Legislative, Judicial and Executive Officers of the State that their actions of commission and omission have, and continue to, demonstrate an intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests; by implementing policies which negligently, intentionally and deliberately foster and support criminal activity, ethnic and social conflict, tyranny and anarchy.

[10b] The repeated response from these State authorities, to these allegations was simply more actions of commission and omission unwillingness and indifference to its constitutional social contract duties and responsibilities; including repeatedly, by Respondents Two to Eight.