Memo Refugee Issues: [I] S.A. White Refugees & ANC’s Crime of Apartheid; [II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize

Memo Refugee Issues: [I] S.A. White Refugees & ANC’s Crime of Apartheid; [II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize to United Nations High Commisioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (PDF), has also been sent to dozens of International, European Union etc. Refugee Agencies.

“What is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values-there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except -- breed. And how easy it is to do nothing.” -- Isaac Asimov

[I] South African White Refugees & the ANC’s Crime of Apartheid:

Please Note, For Your Records, as a National/International Refugee Issues Organisation; legal documents related to African White Refugee Issues:

• Doc A: High Court, W. Cape: # 19963-09: Application for Review; with particular reference to [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees, dated 23 September 2009 (www.kaffir-lily-commons.co.nr)
  
  
• Doc B: SA Human Rights Commission Complaint: WC-2009-0455BS: Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes Against the Peace, and Crime of Apartheid, dated 07 October 2009 (www.crime-of-apartheid.co.nr)

The High Court Review, informs you of State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees, including related evidentiary documentation.

The SA Human Rights Committee Complaint, requests your organisation to Take Notice of the Information Provided to You; in terms of the following References:

[1] Request for UNHCR to Refer Issue: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees, to UN Security Council, under Chapter VII of UN Charter; to Refer to ICC Prosecutor: Investigation.

[2] Ref: HC: WC-CT # 19963-09: [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees

Both aforementioned documents, result from the original Population Policy Common Sense Criminal Trial, in the Magistrates Court of Capetown: 14/1198/08 (www.kaffir-lily-riddle.co.nr):

Definitions and Clarifications:

French Riddle of the Lily Pond:

In this riddle, the lily pond has a potentially virulent lily that apparently will double in size each day. If the lily grows unchecked it will cover the entire pond in 30 days, choking off all other forms of life in the water by the time it covers the entire pond. If a skeptic waited until 50% of the pond was covered before taking any remedial action to save the pond, when would he act? The answer: on the 29th day of the month! But by then, it would be too late. (Crypto Gandhian French Lily Pond Riddle, Justification Defence: Political Necessity (PDF[6]))

Crime of Apartheid:

In SAHRC Complaint WC-2009-0455BS: Their preference for ‘collateral damage’ slave and cannon fodder breeding as a policy to secure their own aggrandizement -- as opposed to population policy common sense human rights, peace and social justice ecological carrying capacity advocacy -- “committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups… with the intention of maintaining that regime.”? (International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid; 18 July 1976, Article XV: Art. II (PDF[7]))

Original Etymology of ‘Kaffir’:

The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a pre-Islamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till earth and “cover up” seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth. (Decoding ‘Kaffir’: Prevailing Norms of Society, in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument: Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[8]))

[II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize

A. The Political Necessity Nuclear Coercion Commons:

B. “Nuclear Freedom is the Recognition of Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon Procreation Values Necessity”:

[A] The Political Necessity Nuclear Coercion Commons:

1968: Overpopulation and Nuclear War:

Tragedy of the Commons[9], by Garret Hardin (www.armigideon-titanic.co.nr)

At the end of a thoughtful article on the future of nuclear war, Wiesner and York (1) concluded that: "Both sides in the arms race are ... confronted by the dilemma of steadily increasing military power and steadily decreasing national security. It is our considered professional judgment that this dilemma has no technical solution. If the great powers continue to look for solutions in the area of science and technology only, the result will be to worsen the situation."

I would like to focus your attention not on the subject of the article (national security in a nuclear world) but on the kind of conclusion they reached, namely that there is no technical solution to the problem. An implicit and almost universal assumption of discussions published in professional and semipopular scientific journals is that the problem under discussion has a technical solution. A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality.

……….. If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if, thus, overbreeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line-- then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state (12), and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons.

In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts overbreeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement (13)? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.

The most important aspect of necessity that we must now recognize, is the necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding. No technical solution can rescue us from the misery of overpopulation. Freedom to breed will bring ruin to all.

The only way we can preserve and nurture other and more precious freedoms is by relinquishing the freedom to breed, and that very soon. "Freedom is the recognition of necessity"--and it is the role of education to reveal to all the necessity of abandoning the freedom to breed. Only so, can we put an end to this aspect of the tragedy of the commons.

1974: Overpopulation: National Security Resource Wars: Immigration, Refugees, Crime, etc.

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of World Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests[10], April 1974

NSSM 200 was the definitive interagency study of world population growth and its implications for U.S. and global security, requested by President Nixon in 1974. It concluded that sustained rapid world population growth had become a danger of the highest magnitude, calling for urgent measures to avoid severe damage to world economic, political and ecological systems, and to our humanitarian values.

Subsequently, President Ford reviewed the study and wrote recently, "I endorsed the 227 page NSSM 200 report in 1975, in National Security Decision Memorandum 314. My views are the same today."

“The President has reviewed the interagency response to NSSM 200 .... He believes that United States leadership is essential to combat population growth, to implement the World Population Plan of Action* and to advance United States security and overseas interests. The President endorses the policy recommendations contained in the Executive Summary of the NSSM 200 response...” – National Security Advisor, Brent Scowcroft

NSSM200, was to be the blueprint for a global population policy adopted by the nations attending the 1974 UN world Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania; however African countries walked out, resorting to their favourite argument, by calling it ‘racist’.

Feb 1986: Overpopulation as a root cause of Terrorism:

Public Report of the Vice Presidents Task Force on Combatting Terrorism

Arguably the most authoritative work on terrorism was the February 1986 Report of the Vice President's Task Force on Combatting Terrorism, chaired by Vice President George Bush, Sr. Yet no mention of the study has appeared in the press since September 11, 2001. On that day, the George Bush Library archivist, Melissa Walker, pulled it from her files in anticipation of interest by the media. But not until October 29th did she receive her first request. It was from CRPS. This report concludes that the root cause of terrorism is overpopulation

1995 - 96: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity: Direct Cause of Conflict & War

Parameters, US Army War College Quarterly, United States Army Senior Professional Journal.
The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict and War[11]:

Basic resources will prove inadequate for populations exploding beyond natural limits, and we may discover truths about ourselves that we do not wish to know. In the end, the greatest challenge may be to our moral order.

Resource scarcity will be a direct cause of confrontation, conflict, and war. The struggle to maintain access to critical resources will spark local and regional conflicts that will evolve into the most frequent conventional wars of the next century.

Today, the notion of resource wars leads the Westerner to think immediately of oil, but water will be the fundamental need of some states, anti-states, and peoples. We envision a need to preserve rainforests, but expanding populations will increasingly create regional shortages of food--especially when nature turns fickle. We are entering the century of "not enough," and we will bleed for things we previously could buy.

Gross overpopulation will destroy fragile possibilities for progress in much of the non-Western world, and much of this problem is the West's fault. Our well-intentioned introduction of relatively crude concepts of sanitation and disease control, combined with our determination to respond generously to local famines, has allowed populations to explode.

2006: Overpopulation as cause of Peak Debt, Peak Oil, Peak Inflation, et al

The Population Explosion: The Most Powerful Force on Earth[12] , Money & Markets

Ultimately, the population explosion is the most persistent but least understood factor underlying virtually everything we’ve been warning you about here in Money and Markets:

It is behind food prices… It is behind the cycle of debt. I’m talking about the greatest credit inflation the world has ever seen, including $41.7 billion in U.S. interest-bearing debts, $101.5 trillion in derivative debts, tens of trillions in U.S. government commitments for Medicare and Social Security, plus trillions more in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa.

Sometimes you may wonder: Why are nations so committed to economic growth at nearly any cost? Why do central banks continue to pump in so much money long after they recognize the inevitability of its inflationary consequences? Why has GDP growth become the supreme icon of most governments, businesses and investors? When debts and deficits run amuck, why don’t our leaders just slow down, take a breather, and focus on finding a more stable path? Your answers may be varied. But if you trace back through the chain of cause and effect, you will always return to one single, overriding factor: The population explosion colliding with finite resources. More mouths to feed. More demand. More pressure to perpetuate growth. More inflation.

Its why millions of immigrants are pouring into Western Europe from Africa, and millions more are streaming into the United States from Latin America. Its a key reason were beginning to see environmental destruction and uncontrollable epidemics on an unprecedented scale.

2008: Overpopulation Nuclear Coercion: Mutually Agreed Procreation Values Necessity:

“Nuclear Freedom is the Recognition of Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon Procreation Values Necessity”[14]

Buffalo Bill DMW Mutually Agreed Nuclear Coercion:

Five suitcase nukes to be activated in five different cities, on the same day. Cities to be fairly decided as follows: All cities of minimum 2.55 million inhabitants per city, -- in the Eastern Hemisphere -- names, excluding Japanese cities, to be placed in a hat. Cities to be suitcase nuked, to be drawn from the hat, by ‘Buffalo Bill DMW’, at the NSA, in the presence of Admiral William Fallon, Admiral Michael Mullen, General Anthony Zinni, and the Russian Federation Ambassador, DC; on anniversary of Bush White House’s acknowledgement of Disclosure Project.[15]

RRR Zhivago Hunter Mutually Agreed Nuclear Coercion:

A further five suitcase nukes to be activated in five different cities on the same day, as above. Remaining four cities to be fairly decided as above, from all relevant Western Hemisphere cities, the fifth being Johannesburg. Cities to be suitcase nuked, to be drawn from a hat, by ‘RRR Zhivago Hunter’, at the Kremlin, in the presence of the Kremlin High Command, and the Ambassadors of Iran, China and Pakistan, on anniversary of Tzar N’enay Nenyts Yuriatin.[16]

[B] “Nuclear Freedom is the Recognition of Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon Procreation Values Necessity”:

22 July 2008:

Tragedy of the Commons Nuclear Coercion [2.55] National Security Population Policy Common Sense Suggestions[17] to TRC-RSA Leaders, and all Foreign High Commissioners & Ambassadors in RSA (PDF[18])

23 Feb 2009:

The Ozymandias, ‘My country Tis of Thee’ Parade: Why President Obama went to Sign Stimulus Bill in Mile High City: Denver[19], Email to Whitehouse, c/o Prince Hall Masons; CC: Pentagon & Kremlin.

06 June 2009:

Legal & Political ‘African White Refugees/Population Policy Common Sense’ Notice to Norwegian Nobel Institute[20]; CC: to Kremlin & Pentagon[21] [Ref: 2.55] (PDF[22]) (Received:PDF[23]) (www.rrrint-poker.co.nr)

23 August 2009:

MI6Whisper32 Letter to Pres. & First Lady Obama: Political Necessity of Shock Doctrine ‘Tough Love’ Population Policy Common Sense Nuclear Coercion![24] (PDF[25])

22 September 2009:

Cape Argus: US Security Alert in SA: Diplomatic Offices and Embassy Shut Down Amid Threat (PDF[27])
US embassy spokeswoman Sharon Hudson-Dean said today : “Based on information recently received by the regional security office, all US government facilities in South Africa will be closed on Tuesday, September 22, 2009”

African White Refugees High Court, Western Cape (File: 19963-09); Application for Review; Respondent Nine: Minister of Citizenship & Immigration, Canada; & Respondent Ten: Norwegian Nobel Institute[28], served on Nobel Institute, care of Royal Norwegian Consulate, Capetown (PDF[29]) (Proof of Service:PDF[30])

09 October 2009:

Norwegian Nobel Inst. award President Obama, with Nobel Peace Prize, for his “vision of, and work for, a world without nuclear weapons”.[31]

12 October 2009:

Cape Argus: ‘SA not ready’ 2010 Terror: ‘Intelligence Services woefully unprepared’[32] (PDF[33]):
The Weekend Argus reported that the US Government had closed its embassy in Pretoria and all other US government facilities for two days last month because intelligence agencies had intercepted a call from Khayelitsha to the Al-Qaeda linked Al-Shabaab extremist group in Somalia, discussing a plot to blow up American interests.

Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): re: South African leaders Tragedy of the Commons Slave and Cannon Fodder Breeding Crimes of Apartheid[34]; CC: (i) International Criminal Court at The Hague: Information & Evidence Unit; and (ii) US Navy Judge Advocate General’s Office (JAG); [7 Oct: Ref: Tzar N’enay Nenyts Yuriatin (Volodya’s 2.55 Nuclear Coercion)] (PDF:Proof of Service[35]) (www.crime-of-apartheid.co.nr)

14 October 2009:

Russia Declares Official Pre-emptive Nuclear Strike Doctrine[36], Pravda.ru, 14 Oct ‘09

Nikolai Patrushev, the head of Russia’s Security Council, said in an interview with the Izvestia newspaper that Russia would consider an opportunity of using nuclear arms depending on circumstances and intentions of a potential enemy.

“In situations critical for national security, a preventive nuclear strike against the aggressor is not ruled out,” he said.

“It will be a transparent military doctrine, to let everyone know which security measures we elaborate in Russia and abroad, which goals we have and how we are going to achieve them,” Patrushev said.

“What is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values-there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except -- breed. And how easy it is to do nothing.”
-- Isaac Asimov

» » » » [PDF Letter to UNHCR]
» » [DMW Zhivago Commons: List of EU Refugee Agencies Contacted]