Renaissance Party of North America occupy SA's Toronto Consulate against Boer Genocide

Renaissance Party of North America occupy SA's Toronto Consulate against Boer Genocide

Renaissance Party of North America Stages One day Occupation Demo of South African Consulate in Toronto, Ontario on June 15, 2013; to draw attention to the genocide of Europeans underway in South Africa.

17 June 2013 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE

On 15 June 2013, members of the newly formed Renaissance Party of North America held an occupation demonstration outside South Africa's Toronto Embassy, to "Stop the Genocide of White South Africans."

The demonstration was attended by among others: RPN Executive Council members: RPN President, Mr. Sebastian Ronin; Mr. Chris Creighton, RPN's South Africa Liaison in Toronto; RPN supporters Max Macro; former candidate for MP in Calgary, Mr. Paul Fromm and his assistant: Sheri Zucker, and others. Renaissance Vanguard also have a local South African member from Capetown on their executive council: Mr. Sean Verster.

Mr. Paul Fromm is a radio journalist and former Western Block Party candidate for Calgary Southeast. Mr. Fromm is the editor of the Canadian Immigration Hotline, Canada’s best known immigration critic and is in demands as a lecturer across Canada, the U.S., Australia and New Zealand. He is also the director of CAFE: Canadian Association for Freedom of Expression, hosting its weekly show: For Our People.

Brandon Huntley's Next Canadian 'African White Refugee' Asylum Hearing within next 3 Months

Brandon Huntley's Next Canadian 'African White Refugee' Asylum Hearing within next 3 Months

Huntley's lawyer: Russell Kaplan is brother of Robert Kaplan, who was brutally assaulted, tortured and left for dead in his home in Johannesburg on 1 May 1997

05 July 2012 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | IOL: Noelene Barbeau

Brandon Huntley shall be having his second 'White Refugee' Asylum Hearing in Canada within the next three months.

In 2010 news of his former Asylum application was supported by 74% of white South Africans, who agreed with Huntley; while the ANC and liberals were deliberately indifferent to the issues of concern legitimizing Huntley’s White Refugee Status.

Huntley's lawyer Russell Kaplan is the brother of Robert Kaplan who was robbed, tortured and left for dead in his Johannesburg home on 1 May 1997: “Rob, who ran a computer training center for blacks, had been shot twice in the chest, stabbed, beaten, pistol-whipped and tortured for hours with a household heating iron by three Zulu-speaking robbers seeking the keys to a nonexistent safe.” Mr. Kaplan's sister, Lara testified on behalf of Huntley's asylum application detailing the realities of crime in South Africa, as experienced by her family, prior to her emigration to Canada.

Brandon Huntley File:
IRB RULING: MA8-04910: » 27 Aug: Transcript of Huntley IRB Ruling
FED. CRT. CANADA: IMM 4423-09: » 04 Sep '09: ‘Canada’ Applic. for Review || » 13 Sep '09: ‘White Refugee’ Petition to CA || » 30 Sep '09: ‘Canada’ Memo. of Argument || » 21 Oct '09: ‘White Refugee’ Petition Response || » 02 Nov '09: ‘Huntley’ Memo. of Fact and Law || » » Affidavit: Amina Sherazee || » » Affidavit: Stefanie Gude || » 10 Nov '09: ‘Canada’ Reply Memorandum || » 24 Nov '10: Judge James Russel Ruling

Huntley to appeal 'African White Refugee' Canadian asylum ruling; after African White Refugees Briefing Paper submitted to 160 EU Elite..

As detailed in 'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff; c/o SHAPE & NATO Sec. General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the African White Refugees Briefing Paper was submitted to 160 EU and NATO Officials between 05 to 16 December 2010.

Some of the officials who acknowledged receipt of the Briefing Paper include:

• Prime Minister David Cameron/10 Downing Street;
  
• Mr. Jean-Rene Germanier, President of the Swiss National Council;
  
• Rt. Hon. Michael Meacher MP. UK House of Commons;
  
• Lieutenant General André Blattmann, Chief of Swiss Armed Forces;
  
• Mark Laity, Chief of Strategic Communications, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE);
  
• Kingdom of Netherlands, French Republic and Swiss Confederation Embassies in Pretoria;
  
• Amnesty International;
  
• French Institute of International Relations - Ifri (Paris);
  
• France Terre d'Asile;
  
• Asylum Aid;
  
• International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC);
  
• Swiss Refugee Council.

The African White Refugees Briefing Paper naturally refers to, and details issues raised in Brandon Huntley's case, including evidence and arguments that:

1. Judge James Russell‟s African White Refugee Assertions of particular NGO Agencies and Goverment Departments being "credible and trustworthy sources‟ of "objective evidence" in the matter of African White Refugees was in error; because many of these agencies who support the ANC's narrative of Apartheid political history, have huge ideological prejudice towards ethno-cultural conservative/Apartheid Europeans;
   
2. the South African media and Political elite censor and suppress evidence of political and legal persecution of European South Africans such as the African White Refugees Documentation currently before the Constitutional Court (Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae detailing Persecution of Radical Honesty culture); and
   
3. that the UNHCR failed to submit the African White Refugee Petition to Federal Court Canada, Justice's via: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada; but failed to honourably inform the African White Refugee Petitioners of their refusal to do so. Consequently Judge James Russell was never provided with the African White Refugees petition; as a result of the UNHCR's refusal to forward it.

It is unknown whether the African White Refugees Briefing Paper arguments have anything to do with Huntley's decision to launch an appeal of Judge Russell's 24 November 2010 ruling.

READ/SIGN WHY WE ARE WHITE REFUGEES PETITION!

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff; c/o SHAPE & NATO Sec. General Anders Fogh Rasmussen

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees &
Jus Sanguinis
16 December 2010

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff.

The African White Refugees Petition, from 34 Founding Petitioners to Europe; was submitted to the Belguim Offices of NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, c/o: Mr. Mark Laity, Chief of Strategic Communications, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:47:27 +0100.

SHAPE Public Affairs Office acknowledged receipt thereof on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:06:00 +0100

NATO Secretary General Mr. Rasmussen is requested to officially forward the Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Petition and African White Refugees Briefing Paper to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff.

1. Brigadier General Maksim Malaj, Chief of the General Staff, Albania
   
2. General Charles-Henri Delcour, Chief of Defence, Belgium
   
3. General Simeon Hristov Simeonov, Chief of Defence, Bulgaria
   
4. General Walt Natynczyk, Chief of Defence, Canada
   
5. General Josip Lucic, Chief of General Staff, Croatia
   
6. General Vlastimil Picek, Chief of Defence, Czech Republic
   
7. General Knud Bartels, Chief of Defence, Denmark
   
8. Lieutenant General Ants Laaneots, Chief of Defence, Estonia
   
9. Admiral Edouard Guillaud, Chief of Defence Staff, France
   
10. General Volker Wieker, Chief of Defence, Germany
    
11. General Ioannis Giagkos, Chief of Defence, Greece
    
12. Lieutenant General Tibor Benko, Chief of Defence, Hungary
    
13. Thordur Bjarni Gudjonsson, Chief of Defence, Iceland
    
14. General Vincenzo Camporini, Chief of Defence, Italy
    
15. Major General Raimonds Graube, Chief of Defence, Latvia
    
16. Major General Arvydas Pocius, Chief of Defence, Lithuania
    
17. General Gaston Reinig, Chief of Defence, Luxembourg
    
18. General Peter van Uhm, Chief of Defence, Netherlands
    
19. General Harald Sunde, Chief of Defence, Norway
    
20. General Mieczyslaw Cieniuch, Chief of Defence, Poland
    
21. General Luis Valença Pinto, Chief of Defence, Portugal
    
22. Admiral Gheorghe Marin, Chief of Defence, Romania
    
23. General Lubomír Bulík, Chief of Defence, Slovakia
    
24. Major General Alojz Šteiner, Chief of Defence, Slovenia
    
25. Air Force General Julio Rodríguez, Chief of Defence, Spain
    
26. General Isik Kosaner, Chief of Defence, Turkey
    
27. Air Chief Marshal Jock Stirrup, Chief of Defence, UK
    
28. Admiral Mike Mullen, Chief of Defence, USA

Martial Monk Military Gospel ‘Law of Five’ Strategy Justifications for Forwarding Request:

Among others the petition letter to NATO Secretary General Rasmussen, requests NATO's Military Committee to clearly define what it means by 'success' of the NATO Mission; a future Eurabia, Paki-Canadia and Medellin-Americana; i.e. Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, European Countries for Everybody?

‘Huntley accomplished ‘African White Refugee’ objectives’ - Russel Kaplan

Russell Kaplan
Former Attorney for Brandon Huntley

I have been contacted by reporters already who have asked me for my reaction to the Huntley ruling on November 24, 2010. Having gone through the entire refugee claim myself and through the entire judicial review proceeding (the “appeal”) with co-counsel Mr. Galati, here is my reaction.


Mr. Huntley had two objectives when he brought his refugee claim:

1. That he finds protection in Canada and
   
   
2. That he informs the world what a sickly place South Africa is for many white South Africans.

As far as his first objective is concerned, Mr. Huntley is still in Canada. He has an opportunity for a new hearing and also some other remedies that can ensure his safety in Canada.

As far as his second objective is concerned, in my view, he has succeeded. This case has contributed towards placing the plight of many white South Africans in South Africa on the world stage. Further, the court clearly and expressly stated that while the evidentiary foundation might have been lacking in Mr. Huntley’s case, in another case, a white South African could qualify for refugee protection. You need to go no further than paragraph 234 of the decision to realize this. For convenience, paragraph 234 is reproduced below:

IMM-4423-09: Judge James Russell 24 November 2010 Ruling: Min. of Immig. v. Brandon Huntley

See also: Your Right2Know: 140 SA Elite Confirm: Kill African Whitey Refugees. It’s the Right Thing to Do...

Judge Russell considers Amnesty International to be an 'independent' body! This is the same Amnesty International, who had so little 'independent critical thinking faculties' that when the ANC were torturing, murdering, and executing their own ANC members in Camp Quatro, etc; Amnesty International REFUSED TO MAKE ANY INVESTIGATION.

Only when Amnesty International were threatened to be exposed as ENDORSING THE MURDER, EXECUTION AND TORTURE OF THE ANC AT CAMP QUATRO, by the socialist democratic publication Searchlight South Africa -- THE ONLY LIBERAL NEWS PUBLICATION THAT OBJECTED TO THE ANC'S TORTURE, MURDER AND EXECUTION OF THEIR OWN ANC MEMBERS -- did they finally issue their report -- a verbatim copy of Searchlight South Africa's findings -- about ANC atrocities.

Unlike Dr. Brad Blanton; Amnesty International have REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO MAKE ANY ENQUIRY INTO FARM MURDERS, OR ANY BLACK ON WHITE CRIME IN SA.

Judge Russell clearly is CLUELESS about racial reality in South Africa. He may be a Judge, but when it comes to RACE REALITY in S.Africa, he is the village idiot. Not his fault, his experience of racial realities is that of Canada and England; NOT SOUTH AFRICA.

Judge Russell rules in favour of the Gov's Review application; and refers Huntley's Application for Refugee status, to be re-heard in a new hearing.

READ/SIGN: WHY WE ARE WHITE REFUGEES PETITION!

Canada Min. gives SA White Refugees Middle Finger ...

Canada's Minister of Immigration and Citizenship is basically says 'F U' to all SA citizens affected by SA crime, because the truth is that if it sets a white refugee legal precedent; the effects thereof would force SA Gov.; if they really gave a flying rats ass about SA citizens affected by crime, which they don't (but if they did), to do something about Safety and Security; i.e. about appointing SAPS officers on merit, not AA & BEE; i.e. incompetence. But Canada don't care; Canada has no problem with SA becoming Zimbabwe II, so Canada is basically saying 'Screw you to all SA's affected by crime, white and black.' So, not only are the ANC giving SA citizens an Abner Louima; but Canada is saying 'No Problem'. Nice Canadian Friends huh?

SA 'refugee' faces ejection

'Crime, affirmative action' may not be enough to stay in Canada

Apr 10, 2010 10:11 PM
By Kim Hawkey, Sunday Times

Race "refugee" Brandon Huntley is having a hard time convincing the Canadian government of his "plight" as a white South African.

The 31-year-old made international headlines in August when the Canadian immigration board granted him refugee status after it found him to be a victim of crime, genocide and affirmative action back home.

Huntley - a Cape Town-born martial arts fanatic - was declared a refugee after claiming he had been robbed, and stabbed seven times by attackers, who had called him a "white dog" and a "settler".

Huntley Should be Granted White Refugee Status -- IOL Readers Survey

From September, but worth a rethink; I think:

A South African man has been granted refugee status in Canada, where an immigration board found "clear and convincing proof" he was persecuted for being white.

Most IOL readers thought there was nothing wrong with applying for foreign citizenship on racial grounds.

IOL asked its readers: Is applying for foreign citizenship on racial grounds justified?

Of the 1 064 people who participated in the 65 percent (691 votes) said "Yes", and 35 percent (373 votes) said "No".

IMM-4423-09: Applicants Reply Memorandum: Min of Citizenship & Immigration and Brandon C. Huntley

Of course there was political pressure. If this had been a non-white applying, the ANC wouldn't have paid any notice but since this was a white man making the statement that the new ANC-utopia was all but a haven of brotherly love, the ANC regime immediately objected and only AFTER the objections from the South African government did the Canadian government announce that it would appeal. The time line of events is quite clear.

The Canadian government has rubbished Brandon Huntley's claims that it was pressurised into challenging his "white crime refugee" status by South African authorities.

Lawyers for Canadian Immigration Minister Jason Kenney maintain that the judgment that gave Huntley asylum, on the basis of the alleged persecution he suffered as a white South African, was so ludicrous that they could not let it stand.

IMM-4423-09: 'Canada' vs. Huntley: Respondents Memorandum of Fact and Law

“Immediately following the positive decision, reaction from the South African government was swift and hostile, and that government threatened that diplomatic relations would be threatened, if the decision were not reversed. The decision was further termed “racist” and “in support of Apartheid.”

-- Stefanie Gude, Assistant of Mr. Rocco Galati, Huntley's Review Lawyer

“[H]ad it not been for the explosive, hostile, and “racist” - allegation - ridden pressure of the South African government, and the public diplomatic threats made, and allegations of “racism”, that the Minister would not seek judicial review of such a decision, which rests on anemic factual complaints on evidence and factual issue(s) of effective state protection, tied to the extreme, conceded facts of Mr Huntley's ordeal, in what he suffered by way of physical attack(s).”

-- Amina Sherazee, Barrister and Solicitor, practicing exclusively in Immigration and Refugee Law.

IMM-4423-09: 'Canada' vs. Huntley: Affidavit of Amina Sherazee, in Support of Respondents (Huntley) Memorandum of Fact and Law

“[H]ad it not been for the explosive, hostile, and “racist” - allegation - ridden pressure of the South African government, and the public diplomatic threats made, and allegations of “racism”, that the Minister would not seek judicial review of such a decision, which rests on anemic factual complaints on evidence and factual issue(s) of effective state protection, tied to the extreme, conceded facts of Mr Huntley's ordeal, in what he suffered by way of physical attack(s).”

-- Amina Sherazee, Barrister and Solicitor, practicing exclusively in Immigration and Refugee Law.

IMM-4423-09: 'Canada' vs. Huntley: Affidavit of Stefanie Gude, in Support of Respondents (Huntley) Memorandum of Fact and Law

“Immediately following the positive decision, reaction from the South African government was swift and hostile, and that government threatened that diplomatic relations would be threatened, if the decision were not reversed. The decision was further termed “racist” and “in support of Apartheid.”

-- Stefanie Gude, Assistant of Mr. Rocco Galati, Huntley's Review Lawyer

According to the RSA Media (The Star): Huntley's lawyers play the PC card

Respondents Memorandum of Fact and Law (PDF:1963K) -- or as referred to by The Star below “Huntley's Affidavit” -- is the response from the Respondent (Huntley) legal representatives (Russel Kaplan and Rocco Galati), to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration: Mr. Jason Kenney's Application for Review: Memorandum (WwAwR Response).

Minister Kenney's Application for Review, was launched in response to the politically correct International Political and Media outrage to the 'White Refugee IRB ruling', by and on behalf of, the South African Goverment, to the 27 August 2009 ruling of Immigration and Refugee Board Member, Mr. William Davis, in favour of Huntley's Convention Refugee Status.

Huntley's Memorandum states the grounds for justification that the Application for Review be denied, in that the Min. Kenney's Application for Review is an abuse of process; is politically motivated on the part of both the Canadian and South African goverments; and would never have been applied for, had it not been for the pressure placed on the Canadian Goverment, by the South African goverment, et al.

Huntley's Memorandum of Fact and Law (PDF)is supported by the following Affidavits:

Law Times: Second Opinion: Conflicted lawyer (Kaplan) should withdraw from (Huntley) refugee case

“This means that recourse to this legal excuse to avoid public discussion of an issue – a favourite ploy of politicians – is no longer valid and those using it can be called to account.” The judge declared that the principle enunciated in the judgment would seem to apply whenever the exercise of press freedom is sought to be restricted in protection of another right. RSA Newspapers no longer bound by 'sub judice' law

The following article, critiquing Huntley's lawyer, Robert Kaplan's legal strategy, states among others:

In many cases, lawyers are frustrated by the board’s refusal to accept claims supported by human rights reports from organizations such as the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch.

Of course, none of these organizations have produced reports on the persecution of whites in South Africa, so Kaplan did what any diligent lawyer would do: he looked for the best evidence he could find to support his client’s claim by finding a white South African who was willing to testify about the alleged persecution she had experienced.

I recently sent a Legal Memo to about a hundred International and National Refugee Agencies, including UNHCR (PDF), Amnesty International: Refugee and Migrants Team (PDF) (not yet to HRW and the State Dept., still busy); Memo For Your Refugee Issues Records [I] South African White Refugees & the ANC’s Crime of Apartheid; [II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize. Most responded with 'read' responses; although I am not sure how many actually read the contents of the memo.

Official response to Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism on the Brandon Huntley case

By Mike Smith

“Reports emanating from the Institute for Race Relations (IRR) indicated that about a fifth of white South Africans had immigrated over the past 10 years with the main reasons given by immigrants were crime and affirmative action, so said Democratic Alliance leader Tony Leon in Cape Town. He accuses the ANC government of being indifferent to the lot of minorities, especially whites, and has expressed hostility to their interest” » » » » Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB): 27 August 2009 ruling: Brandon Huntley

The Canadian Government in the form of minister of Citizenship, Immigration, and Multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, is seeking a review against their own Immigration and Refugee Board’s decision to grant Brandon Huntley refugee status and compiled a “Memorandum of Argument” (PDF) slamming their own IRB.


Having read their memo, I have to conclude that I have in my entire life never seen such vague liberal and politically correct propaganda that smacks of confirmation bias, one-sidedness and partiality. It is enough to make one wants to vomit.


It is clear that this squad of blinkered egalitarian cultural relativists in the Canadian government has made up their mind long before they drew up their MOA and had absolutely no interest in the facts presented to them about South Africa, but chose to side with the Marxist, socialist academics and terrorist sympathisers who drew up an open letter full of lies and untruths that can be seen here Liberal Academic lies in an open letter to Canada

Memorandum of Argument: Min. of Citizenship & Immigration and Brandon Huntley

Transcript of the Memorandum of Argument: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Mr. Jason Kenney) vs. Brandon Huntley.

Why We Are White Refugees response: Official response to Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism on the Brandon Huntley case, by Mike Smith

SA Media Bias & Canada Seeks Huntley Case Review

Given reporters' penchant for proclaiming to "tell both sides," to render all the news that's fit to print, to answer who? what? where? when? and why?, this leads naturally to the question: Why do reporters avoid the population issue so steadfastly? » » » » How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, University of Southwestern Louisiana

The liberal South African media are cheerleading Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Hon. Jason Kenney's Memorandum of Argument (PDF), in the Canadian Goverments Application for Review, of Immigration and Refugee Board, Mr. William Davis' decision (PDF).

Taking a look at their pages, they all provide links to the 142 Academics Open Letter to Canada (PDF), distancing themselves from Huntley as a 'racist' and alleging that there is no racially motivated crime in South Africa, nor that white South Africans feel particularly targetted. This was subsequently debunked: 142 Academics Get It Wrong on Crime (PDF); but none of these mainstream news media, make any effort whatsoever to attempt to even pretend they are trying to be impartial, and providing for all views to be heard.

Both aforementioned documents, and the latters evidentiary documents to substantiate its debunking claims against the Academics, were submitted to Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Mr. Jason Kenney, as Respondent Ten, in High Court, Western Cape: #19963-09, Application for Review, with particular reference to [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa's Unrepresented White Refugees (PDF) (PDF:Proof of Service).

Communist Mr. McEvoy: 'Take our Rednecks, Please!'

Below you will find the article, by Mr. Chris McEvoy, Take our Rednecks, Please.

It appeared to me, Mr. McEvoy, hates 'rednecks', as much as he thinks rednecks hate blacks. And although Rednecks are expected never to admit they don't like blacks, or to ask Zimbabwe to 'Take Our Blacks, Please!' because that -- of course -- would demonstrate their extreme 'racism'; this logic does not apply to Liberals or, as he calls himself, communists.

To get your response to Mr. McEvoy published, email it to: publishme@sa.24.com; they may publish it, I don't know.

Alternatively you can comment. I left the following comment, because I was curious how many of these people, including Mr. McEvoy, who rant and rave about this issue, are actually interested in informing Canadian Goverment Officials of their opinions. If given the opportunity to put their name and opinion on a petition that is going to the Canadian Goverment, what would they say? Anything? If nothing, what are they ranting about? [Note: the Petition comments were at #116, at my time of comment to Ms. McEvoy] So, hence my comment:

White Refugee @ 10/17/2009 10:40 AM
Why We Are White Refugees Petition to Federal Court Canada Justices, is at:
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.co.nr/; if anyone is interested in informing the Canadian Govemrent of their opinion in this matter.

The Canadian Goverment were informed of the petition, in legal documentation submitted to them, care of the UNCHR. More info, here:
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/white-refugee-documents-legally.html

Refugees: Does it Matter if they are Black or White?

Between 30 and 40 newspaper clippings were presented as evidence of life in South Africa. “One article exhibited was published in [the Daily Sun in 2004] by Africa Ka Mahamba. [It was] entitled ‘Taking from whites is not a crime’,” Kaplan said. The article quotes the leader of the “Uhuru cultural club” as telling youngsters who attended a Human Rights Day celebration to steal from whites because “it is the right thing to do”. Canada: Immigration & Refugee Board Ruling: MA8-04910: Brandon Huntley

My Email to journalist, for the Chronicle Herald, Canada, in response to her Article: Refugees: Does it Matter if they're black or white?

Ms. Joan Baxter,

RE: Refugees: Does it matter if they are black or white?

Some information for Ms. Baxter, if you are interested in reasonably impartial reports, as opposed to ANC propaganda:

It depends on whether you are concerned about their assimilation into your native Canadian culture. If you are not concerned and you don't particulary like your own culture nor want to preserve it, by assimilating like minded people who appreciate your values.. then no it does not matter.

Perhaps you are unaware of the many documented blowback consequences from ethnically different immigrants to the host country's backlash, who refuse to assimilate: There are many, here is a recent one:

[Daily Mail.co.uk] A generation of outsiders [1/28/07]

How much worse can immigration get when the younger generation is not only less assimilated than their parents, they are actively hostile and want to blow the place up? That's the situation where Britain finds itself today.The doctrine of multi-culturalism has alienated an entire generation of young Muslims and made them increasingly radical, a report has found.

Canadian Immigration Reformists Perspective to 'White Refugees'....

The following two Huntley related posts are from the blog: Canadian Immigration Reform; which provide an interesting perspective, from a Canadian concerned about the consquences of Immigration on Canada.

Totally understandable concerns for anyone remotely aware of population policy matters, and the consequences of overpopulation colliding with scarce or finite resources.