Impossible for Dewani to get Fair Trial in Systemically Dysfunctional SA Justice System: Complaint to UK Min. of Justice

[4] If the Radical Honesty SA Application to proceed as an Amicus Curiae (Annex B) was approved; the Radical Honesty Amicus Curiae would prove beyond any reasonable doubt that:

1. It is legally impossible for the Plaintiffs to provide the Defendant with a free and fair trial; in South Africa
   

2. If the Systemic Intellectual, Moral and Legal Dysfunction of the SA Legal System as it exists today, was managed by White Afrikaner males; every single Anti-Apartheid ‘Human Rights’ Organisation in Europe would be screaming their lungs off, organising protests, filing Amicus Curiae objections, etc; arguing that Mr. Dewani was incapable of receiving a free and fair trial because the SA criminal justice system is a criminal injustice system; but when the current Systemic Dysfunction is far, far worse than under Apartheid (3,000 % worse in the case of farm murders; 25000% worse in the case of deaths in Police custody, etc, etc) and under the management of the corrupt, incompetent, unprofessional, ANC; the ‘Anti-Apartheid Human Rights (sic)’ organisations conduct is that of the 3 monkeys. It is submitted Mr. Dewani as an Indian would have stood a 3,000% better chance for a free and fair trial under a conservative White Afrikaner Apartheid Judge and Justice System.
   

3. Furthermore, on May 23, 2011, the US Supreme Court ruled that conditions in California's prisons violated the constitutional ban on "cruel and unusual punishment" and affirmed a lower court's order that the state drastically reduce its inmate population. The photo’s attached to Brown v. Plata convinced the Justice’s. As a former political prisoner under the ANC government; I can unequivocally and categorically inform you that California (where my former African American husband is and has been a prisoner since 1982) and SA prison conditions can be described respectively as: California five star cleanliness and discipline v. SA hellhole of filth and anarchy. The space between beds in SA prisons is about 30 cm, if prisoners are lucky to have a bed. Blankets, sheets and pillows are a luxury. Discipline and any complaints procedure simply does not exist. In the US Supreme Court decision, writing on behalf of the court's five-vote majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy noted that US Supreme Court’s unprecedented measure had become the only way to remedy the "serious" and "uncorrected" constitutional violations against inmates in the state's correctional facilities, particularly the sick and mentally ill.

RSA v. Dewani: Complaint filed with Her Majesty's Courts Svc, alleging Due Process Court Irregularities & Bias by Magistrate

20 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

On Monday, 14 February 2011, an Official Complaint was filed, in the matter of RSA v. Shrien Dewani, with Her Majesty's Courts Service: Customer Service Division.

The complaint was filed by South African citizen, Lara Johnstone, who had applied to the court to proceed as an Amicus Curiae, to oppose Dewani's extradition to South Africa; in that he would not receive a fair trial in SA; because South Africa is a "criminal mafia parasite state that breeds and feeds crime, for political and financial benefit of the TRC FRAUD elite". [Notice of Motion & Founding Affidavit (PDF)]

Johnstone's application was allegedly subsequently ruled to be 'inapropriate' by an anonymous Magistrate/Judge, who refuses to be named, or to provide Johnstone with a copy of his anonymously issued 'inapropriate' ruling.

Subsequent to filing her original Amicus application, the Clerk refused to provide any written status response thereto. Johnstone then filed a complaint to the UKIP, a libertarian party, who objected to Julian Assange’s extradition; who seek Britain’s withdrawal from the EU.

On 25 January 2011, Nigel Farage, UKIP MEP in the European Parliament, for South East Region requested City of Westminster Magistrates Court to please provide the courts response to the Amicus Curiae Application filed by Lara Johnstone in RSA v. Shrien Dewani. The UK Westminster Clerk of Court ignored Mr. Farage's request.

[www.guerrylla-law.co.nr] David vs Tutu Goliath's TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Corruption

[Concourt #23-10: Citizen v. McBride] :: [Concourt #06-11: Radical Honesty SA v SANEF & 87 Others]
[Bloemfontein Mag. Crt: State v. Reitz 4] :: [UK Westminster Mag. Crt: RSA v. Shrien Dewani]
[Scientific Journalism Ratings]

Concourt #23-10: The Citizen v. Robert McBride

Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae in Support of Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995

Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus:

• 26 Mar 2010: Radical Honesty Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court)
  
• 18 July 2010: Radical Honesty Amicus Heads of Argument
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: The legal, psychological, & socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’
  
• Expert Witness Dr. T. Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment connection
  
• Radical Honesty Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument: [Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of TRC Act] :: [Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon] :: [Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract Principles] :: [Population Policy Common Sense Principles] :: [TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History] :: [Radical Honesty: Culture and Religion, or Refugee Status?]

Q to Cape Law Soc: Which argument/s in Radical Honesty SA Amicus in RSA v. Dewani is/are ‘without substance or legal basis’?

02 February 2011

Ms. Nalini Gangen
Cape Law Society
ABSA Centre, 2 Riebeeck Street
Cape Town 8001
Tel: (021) 443 6700 | Fax: (021) 443 6751/2
Email: cls@capelawsoc.law.za

Dear Ms. Gangen,

RE: Law Societies statement that Radical Honesty SA Amicus Application in RSA v. Dewani is ‘without substance or legal basis’

I write regarding your statements in SA citizen challenges Dewani extradition, The South African, 01-02-2011, wherein Rob Boffard states the following:

Nalini Gangen, director of the Cape Law Society, says, however, that Ms Johnstone’s views are “without substance or legal basis”.

“There is no reason to doubt that Mr Dewani would receive a fair hearing. South Africa has one of the best constitutions in the world and the Constitution provides for the instruments of democracy to be protected. The Constitution provides for the separation of powers and in particular the independence of the judiciary.

“South African legal processes are clearly defined and any accused would have the freedom of choice of legal representation.

“We have confidence in our judiciary,” she added.

I’d appreciate it if you could please clarify the following issues for me:

Home Secretary & HM Court Svc. Req. City of Westminster's Clerk of Court to Respond to Dewani Amicus Application

Home Secretary's Office, Her Majesty's Court Service & UKIP Mr. Farage Request City of Westminster's Clerk of Court, to Respond to Dewani Amicus Application

Mr. Russell Meek, Case Worker, Complaints Handling and Enquiries Team, Customer Services Division, Her Majesty's Courts Service, Operations and Performance Directorate & Response to Mr. Meeks








UK Home Office: Chris OGD Transfers, Chris A Inger MBE, Direct Communications Unit, Correspondence Management Team

‘SA citizens - SA legal system is corrupt - Amicus challenge to Dewani extradition’ - The South African

SA citizen challenges Dewani extradition

A South African woman, who lodged an appeal against Dewani’s extradition with the Westminster Magistrate's Court, claims that SA’s legal system is corrupt

01 February 2011 7:15
Rob Boffard, The South African
editor@thesouthafrican.com

Lara Johnstone, 43, filed an Amicus Curiae application with the Westminster Magistrate’s Court from South Africa, presenting an argument that Dewani would not receive a fair trial if extradited to South Africa and should be allowed to stand trial in the UK. The case was presented at the start of Dewani’s extradition trial on 20 January, which was postponed to 8 February, due to Dewani’s health.

On Tuesday 1 February, Dewani's publicist Max Clifford said his client was still ill and would not be present at the 8 February hearing.

Johnstone, who works as a vermicompost worm farmer in George, South Africa, trained as a paralegal through Damelin, but has been unable to find work in the field since graduating.

Speaking to The South African, Johnstone said that she did not believe judicial standards in South Africa were the same as the UK. “I filed [the application] because I don’t think he’ll get a free and fair trial,” Johnstone said. “If we can’t give people free and fair trials, we should just set up bullets to the head.”

Nalini Gangen, director of the Cape Law Society, says, however, that Ms Johnstone’s views are “without substance or legal basis”.

“There is no reason to doubt that Mr Dewani would receive a fair hearing. South Africa has one of the best constitutions in the world and the Constitution provides for the instruments of democracy to be protected. The Constitution provides for the separation of powers and in particular the independence of the judiciary.

“South African legal processes are clearly defined and any accused would have the freedom of choice of legal representation.

“We have confidence in our judiciary,” she added.

Amicus Curiae, which translates as Friend Of The Court, refers to someone, unconnected to a case, who volunteers information to a court for a matter before it. It is filed in the form of an affidavit, and can be put to a court by any citizen or organisation at any time, even if they have no previous involvement in a case. Johnstone filed her application as a private citizen.

UK Ind. Party (UKIP) Request to City of Westminster Clerk of Court; RE: Dewani Amicus Curiae Application

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Nigel Farage, UKIP MEP in the European Parliament, for South East Region requested City of Westminster Magistrates Court to please provide the courts response to the Amicus Curiae Application filed by Lara Johnstone in RSA v. Shrien Dewani.

Mr. Farage believes that any applicant who files a legal application to the clerk of the court, should receive a written answer, even if such an application is unusual; and that he trusts that the court shall 'issue the requisite notice of a decision, without further delay.'

The UK Independence Party (UKIP) are a libertarian party seeking Britain's withdrawal from the European Union.

Johnstone filed an Application to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae in the Republic of South Africa (RSA) vs. Shrien Dewani Extradition matter (PDF), with the City of Westminster Magistrates Court Clerk of the Court, on 18 January, two days before the recent 20 January preliminary hearing.

Lara Johnstone is a direct descendant of United Kingdom citizen: JOHNSTONE, James Augustus who was born circa 1810 in Edinburgh (Dumpfries), Scotland, and was an 1820 settler to Port Elizabeth. His Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) descendant, Lara Johnstone is one of the Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Founding Petitioners, who filed a written petition and briefing paper appeal to their Progenitor/Stamvader nations (UK, Netherlands, France, Germany and Switzerland) for Political and Legal Recognition for a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; or in the absence thereof, for Jus Sanguinis citizenship from their respective progenitor European nations.

The General Secretariat Parliamentary Services Office of Hansheiri Inderkum, President of Switzerland's Council of States requested that a Printed Hardcopy of Boer Volkstaat Theses Petition, be submitted to the Swiss Embassy in Pretoria, who would forward it to the Committee for Legal Affairs of the Swiss Parliaments, for their consideration. The hardcopy petition and briefing paper is currently being processed for printing, and shall be delivered to all Jus Sanguinis Progenitor Nations, including NATO: Military Committee.

Amicus Applic. to Dewani’s Judge: SA is a criminal mafia parasite state: Descartian Jurisprudence does not exist in ‘Rainbow Hypocrisy SA’

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

London, UK (19-Jan-2011): An Application was filed with the City of Westminster Magistrates Court late yesterday, by a South African citizen in support of Dewani's case to oppose his extradition to South Africa. The Amicus Application accuses the South African Government of being a "criminal mafia parasite state that breeds and feeds crime, for political and financial benefit of the TRC FRAUD elite".

Shrien Dewani, 31 from Bristol is accused by the South African government of being the mastermind behind the murder of his wife, Anni Dewani (Hindocha), 28, when they were hijacked in Gugulethu, a township near Capetown on November 13, 2010.

The murder made world headlines, and four South Africans have been arrested, one (the taxidriver) sentenced to 18 years in prison. Dewani was allowed to return to Britain, but the SA Police subsequently charged him with being the mastermind. He says he is being used as a scapegoat to protect South Africa's tourism industry.

The Amicus supports a private prosecution of Mr. Dewani in UK Courts, with Impartial, Competent EU Judge and Jury, as the only means Hindocha & Dewani families will receive a free and fair trial, to determine Mr. Dewani’s guilt or innocence based on Descartian worldview concepts of evidence.

The Amicus Application states that the citizen's experience of going through multiple trials in South Africa, for the past nine years, where she has "never received anything remotely resembling a Descartian Heuristic / Western Civilization concept of a free and fair trial".

Radical Honesty SA Open Letter to Dewani and Hindocha families: Shrien Dewani has zero% chance of fair trial in South Africa.

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Radical Honesty SA Open Letter to Shrien Dewani and Anni Hindocha’s friends and family: Shrien Dewani has zero% chance of fair trial in South Africa.

Response to Open Letter to Shrien Dewani, from anonymous friends of Annie Dewani / Hindocha, published on 31/12/2010 in The Sun: Anni’s Pals: We want some answers, Shrien.

31 December 2010

Dear Anni’s Anonymous Friends,

My response to you addresses the following statements in your letter to Mr. Dewani. I would suggest that if you follow my recommendations, you are far more likely to provide Mr. Dewani with a free and fair trial, where you can find the honest answers to your questions:

We would ask you and your family to leave this case to the police and courts, rather than joining a media battle with your PR agents.

You state you're innocent of these allegations so please go back to Cape Town to prove to the South African police why they've got it wrong.

We have heard South African police give Tongo's version of events but we have yet to hear you publicly make clear your full explanation as to why he's lying.

We would like you to volunteer to go before a South African court and show how Tongo is lying. We believe that this would help the public understand the following questions:

* Why don't you voluntarily go to court and show South African police suspicions are wrong?

What we want is the truth to come out and justice to be served, which is possible only if you answer in front of South African Court of Justice.

If Anni had been murdered in any other country in the world, I might indeed agree with you that Mr. Dewani should return to South Africa to stand trial, where you would hear the truth. But Anni was murdered in South Africa, where our police and courts are that only in name, and where our government has been bullshitting the South African public and world with the most spectacular public relations TRC FRAUD publicity stunt.

The truth is that Shrien Dewani -- just like any and every other South African citizen -- stands 0% chance of a free and fair trial in South Africa. Unfortunately citizens voting for the ANC don’t seem to be bothered with free and fair trials, perhaps because they benefit from a corrupt police and courts justice system.

Similarly Anni’s friends and family stand 0% chance of ever hearing the truth about what happened to Anni, from any trial occurring in South Africa.