Friday, January 27, 2012

SAIRR silent about Laboratory Depopulation Origins of AIDS in 'SA has lost 4.4m people to Aids' survey





SA has lost 4.4m people to Aids - survey

2012-01-23 22:35 | News 24




Witchcraft, Violence and Democracy in South Africa; By Adam Ashforth [*Amazon**Kalahari*]
“In communities where a witchcraft paradigm informs understandings about other peoples’ motives and capacities, life must be lived in terms of a presumption of malice.” -- AIDS, Witchcraft, and the Problem of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa, by Adam Ashforth
Johannesburg - There would be more than 4.4 million more people in South Africa if it were not for the Aids pandemic, according to a survey released on Monday.

"Currently, there are 50.6m people in the country. In the absence of Aids, this would have been 55m," said the SA Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR).

"The data shows that 31% of all deaths in 2011 were Aids-related. By 2015, this proportion will have risen to 33%. In 2025, there will be 121% more Aids deaths than there were in 2000," it said.

SAIRR said and estimated six million people would be living with HIV/Aids in 2015, double the number recorded in 2000.

Researcher Thuthukani Ndebele said HIV/Aids had resulted in a significantly slower population growth rate.

"Not only does HIV/Aids reduce life expectancy and increase mortality, but it is largely responsible for wider social ills such as orphanhood and child-headed households," he said.

The survey is based on data sourced from the Actuarial Society of South Africa and the Institute for Futures Research.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

'No Thanks We like Nudity Dominating Headlines' - DA Youth to Garden Route 11 Jan Invite for Serious Sincere Race Relations Problem Solving Discussion






DA Youth to Garden Route 11 Jan Invite for Serious Sincere Race Relations Problem Solving Discussion: No Thanks We like Nudity Dominating Headlines

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 25 January 2012



On 11 January 2012, Garden Route Survivalists Support Group sent out an invitation to dozens of Garden Route Companies, Organisations and National Political Parties, inviting them to participate in a Radical Honesty Race Relations Discussion Group.

Join our brutally honest discussions: we cannot solve problems by pretending they dont exist. If you don't like white, black or coloured people, thats okay. Come and meet some and speak to them honestly and tell them your reasons, and your experiences. Maybe you have never met an honest, honourable and sincere white/black/coloured person; you have only met two-faced lying deceiving fake white/black/coloured people. If so, then it is quite understandable that you would think that all black/white/coloured people are lying two faced deceivers.

TRC Fraud:

In communities still suffering from South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Fraud, which denied both white, coloured and black individuals and communities the opportunities to engage each other in sincere and serious honest race discussions, future economic collapse shall further strain the current toxic TRC 'lets all pretend to like each other' and 'lets all pretend to be nice to each other' and 'lets all pretend we are not 'racists' race relations paradigm.

Time for Radical Honesty Race Relations:

If our national, regional and local political leaders are too afraid to hold sincere serious brutally honest conversations about our race relations, then it is time for citizens to lead themselves to beginning to engage in Radical Honesty Race Relations discussions about our mutual past, present and future.


Invitations were sent to:
[ Helen Zille ] [ Democratic Alliance ] [ Democratic Alliance Youth ] [ Cape Party - Return the Cape to Independence ] [ Vryheidsfront Plus/Freedomfront Plus ] [ Dr. Pieter Mulder (VRYHEIDSFRONTplus) ] [ Inkatha Freedom Party Youth Brigade ] [ ANC YOUTH LEAGUE ] [ MyANC ] [ The Congress of the People (COPE) ]

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Question to ZA Financial & Business Elite: Will Peak Oil & NNR Induced World Economic Collapse excacerbate racial conflict?





Request to various ZA Financial Services Ombudsman: Req: Efficient Financial (1) definition of honesty & integity; (2) Will Peak Oil World Economic Collapse excacerbate racial conflict?

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugees | 18 Jan 2012




Subject: ZA Fin. Svc. Ombudsman: Req: Efficient Financial (1) def. of honesty & integity; (2) Will Peak Oil World Economic Collapse excacerbate racial conflict?
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:39 PM

Pension Funds Adjudicator
Long Term Insurance Ombudsman
Short Term Insurance
Financial Services Ombudsman

CC: Director: Dawie Roodt
Mng. Dir: Peter Hewett
Ex. Dir: Heiko Weidhase
Fin. Dir: Anton de Klerk
Ex. Dir: Harold Hopking
Efficient Financial Services (Pty) Ltd./ Efficient Advise
Tel.: +27 (012) 424 9635 | Fax: +27 (012) 346 6135

CC: Efficient Advise: Marius van Zyl; Schalk Grobler; Margie Hill; Johann Honeycomb; Charl ten Oever; Hennie Jonker; Cheryl van Rooyen; Stefan Schoeman; Leslie Meyer; Etienne Human; Business United SA (BUSA) CEO: Ms Nomaxabiso Majokweni, CEO: Prof Raymond Parsons, ExDir: Social Policy: Ms Vikashnee Harbhajan, ExDir: Trade Policy: Mr Gus Mandigora, ExDir: Transformation: Mr Kganki Matabane, ExDir: Economic Policy: Mr Coenraad Bezuidenhout, SnrMng: Trade Policy: Miss Cynthia Chikura, PR Comm Off: Ms Masego Lehihi

BCC: Bloomberg: Lauren Meller, Bloomberg: Patti Straus, Bloomberg Corporate: Ty Trippet, Bloomberg Law: Jill Goodkind, Bloomberg Sustainability: Angela Martin, Zerohedge: Tips; Zerohedge: Info, Zerohedge Legal; DE: Bloomberg: Rainer Buergin; DE: Bloomberg: Karin Matussek; CH: Brussels Journal; US: WSJ: Editorial Page; US: WSJ: News Editors; US: WSJ: Editorial Features; US: WashPost: Eugene Dob; US: Bloomberg: Mary Duenwald; US: Bloomberg: Antony Sguazzin


Dear Ombudsman,

Request for Information: (1) Financial Advisors Public Statements Code of Ethics: Definitions of ‘honesty’ and ‘integrity’; (2) Efficient Financial Services and Ombudsman’s Official Honest Opinion about whether the Impending World Economic Collapse shall massively exacerbate racial conflict?

Are Financial Service Providers in denial (lacking in self-honesty), or deliberately withholding information about the worlds impending Economic, and consequent Political and Cultural Collapse?

Monday, January 16, 2012

Zuma ANC Centenary Celebration Song: “Dubula ibhunu! (Kill the Boer)”






Zimbabwe: Kill the Boer Indeed!

The lasting memory was when Zuma's voice filtered from the giant stadium speakers doing justice to the anti-Apartheid song, "Dubula ibhunu! (Kill the Boer)" Yes that song that the South Africa Supreme Court tried to kill by declaring it "hate speech" rolled off Zuma's lips as Malema nodded along on the VIP stage.

Published by the government of Zimbabwe
Caesar Zvayi | 11 January 2012 | All Africa




Being one of the few Zimbabweans who got the chance to join the ANC in celebrating 100 years of existence in Mangaung, I stubbornly refuse to call it Bloemfontein, let me take this opportunity to wish my South African brother's a happy anniversary.

I hope you will have another 100 years of bringing meaningful change to the lives of the poor people in Kayelitsha, Alexandra and many other slums whose inhabitants do not hear, but listen to Letta Mbulu's classic hit, Not Yet Uhuru.

This powerful ditty not only captures the tragedy of many African countries that got the crown minus the crown jewels; but South Africa's unique condition of being a political and socio-economic binary.

In Mzansi the white minority has a stranglehold on the means of production while for many freedom, not independence, has just meant seeing black faces in government which explains the anger among the likes of Julius Malema.

Well it is not my place to try to spoil the spirit of the centenary. A hundred cheers to my fellow brothers!

In his address in Mangaung, ANC president Jacob Zuma rightly paid tribute to countries in southern Africa and many others as far afield as Cuba and the Nordic countries for the crucial role they played in bringing freedom to South Africa.

Its worth noting that in his 56 page speech, Msholozi made no mention of the countries that today pass themselves off as the originators and defenders of neo-liberal democracy the United States and Britain for rather than abet South Africa's cause for independence, these countries actually abetted apartheid.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

UPDATE: Zimbabwe policeman - Guy Taylor - is denied asylum in Britain... but Robert Mugabe torturer - Phillip Machemedze - can stay





UPDATE: Zimbabwe policeman is denied asylum in Britain... but Robert Mugabe torturer can stay



As previously reported: Guy Taylor's British great-grandfather fought for Britain in the Anglo Boer War and on the Somme before the family moved to Zimbabwe. Guy Taylor has now sought refuge in Britain, where he applied for asylum, fearing a return to Zimbabwe would leave him facing persecution, as a former policeman and member of the MDC.

Taylor's application for asylum was however dismissed by the immigration judges (he has since refiled new claims).

Taylor's case provoked fury as it occurred after the Immigration Judges decision to allow Phillip Machemedze, one of Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF torturers to stay in the UK indefinitely.

Machemedze, who joined the CIO in 1996, arrived in the UK in 2000 after he had “enough of the torture”, he told an immigration tribunal.

He admitted to smashing the jaw of an MDC activist with pliers before pulling out his tooth and stripping another naked and threatening to force him to rape his daughters if he did not give information.

He also confessed to electrocuting, slapping, beating and punching "to the point of being unconscious" a white farmer suspected of giving money to the MDC, and to "putting salt into the wounds" of a female MDC member who was imprisoned in an underground cell before being stripped naked and whipped.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

ANC Centenary Celebrations Conspiracy of Silence: ANC's Mbokodo Quatro Terror Torture Camps

*www.mbokodo-quatro-uncensored.co.nr*



ANC's Anti-Apartheid Movement:

Most Successful Stalinist Front Worldwide!

Paul Trewhela, Mutinies in the Liberation Armies: Inside Quadro
(Searchlight South Africa, Vol 2, No 1: July 1990 p.30-35)




Excerpts: Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala - A Soldier's Story

by Mwezi Twala and Ed Bernard
Jonathan Ball Publishers




Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala - A Soldier's Story, by Mwezi Twala & Ed Bernard [*Amazon*]
In 1981 began a time of terror and death for ANC members in exile. In February a strong ANC National Executive Committee entourage which incuded President Tambo made the rounds of all ANC camps in Angola. Cadres were warned of the presence of a spy network and the need for vigilance was emphasised. Enemy agents and provocateurs were rudely warned by Piliso, in Xhosa, '.. I'll hang them by their balls.' An 'internal enemy' psychosis had been whipped up and whenever ANC leaders visited camps they were heavily guarded. Many men and women were apprehended on suspicion of dissidence were to be exterminated in the most brutal manner in the months ahead. Those disiullusioned MK cadres who returned from Rhodesia were the first to go.(p.49)

I became aware of these developments by word of mouth, but I was to discover later on, by personal experience, the terror of Quatro, to name but one death camp. People were removed from amongst us -- taken to Quatro or Camp 13 -- and disappeared forever without reason. Many of them were slaughtered by one means or another and their ultimate destination was a shallow grave. We heard rumours of execution by being buried alive, amongst many other techniques beyond civilized imagination. The purge created great fear amongst all of us, to the point where the smallest criticism, such as of badly prepared food, was seriously reconsidered by every individual, for one could never be certain that a 'best friend' would keep his mouth shut. (p.49)

Our own security people became exceedingly arrogant, to the point where an innocent slip of the tongue or even a simple gesture could land you in a torture cell at Quatro. Security men of the lowest rank and intelligence -- fourteen to eighteen year olds -- became our masters, with the power of life or death in their hands. They acted on a mood with impugnity. (p.49-50)

...

Oliver Tambo visited Pango [Camp] at the height of the terror. The path from the entrance to the admin building was lined -- like a scene from 'Spartacus' -- with men, bloodied and filthy, hanging from trees. When his entourage arrived at admin, where I was officer on duty, Tambo's chief of staff told us that there would be a meeting at 'the stage' (a clearing in the jungle... where we held meetings and discussions). Runners were sent out to notify everyone in the vicinity. On his way to the stage [Oliver Tambo] again passed the men tied to the trees. Being officer on duty, I could not attend the meeting, but my deputy went. After a while I saw guards come up from the stage, release the prisoners and take them to the meeting. There, my deputy told me, instead of objecting to their treatment, as I had hoped, Tambo berated them for their dissident behaviour and appeared to approve when Andrew Masondo declared that on the presidents next visit they would be in shallow graves behind the stage. The prisoners were returned to their trees.. where the president [Oliver Tambo] passed the unfortunate men without a glance on his way out, and they hung there for another three months -- followed by three months hard labour. (p.51-52)



Scene from 'Spartacus'
» » [Read Further]





Mutinies in the Liberation Armies: Inside Quadro

by Paul Trewhela, Searchlight South Africa,
Vol 2, No 1: July 1990 p.30-35)




The first-hand testimony by former combatants of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) about the ANC prison regime… are an event in South African history. Never before has such concentrated factual evidence been presented about the inner nature of the ANC and its eminence grise, the South African Communist Party.

If people wish to understand the operation of the ANC/SACP, they must look here. This is the view behind the proscenium arch, behind the scenery, where the machinery that runs the whole show is revealed in its actual workings.

The ANC/SACP did a very good job in preventing public knowledge of its secret history from emerging… Those who survived the Gulag system of the ANC/SACP did so knowing that to reveal what they had been through meant re-arrest, renewed tortures and in all probability, death. They had to sign a form committing them to silence..

This regime of terror, extending beyond the gates of the ANC/SACP ‘Buchenwald' of Quadro, was a necessary element in the total practice of repression and deception which made the Anti-Apartheid Movement the most successful Popular Front lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.

Friday, December 30, 2011

SCA: Malema v. Afriforum: Could ANC have won Anti-Apartheid struggle non-violently if Afrikaners were Honourable?





SCA: Malema v. Afriforum: Could ANC have won Anti-Apartheid struggle non-violently if Afrikaners were Honourable?

30 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugees




From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:23 PM
To: 'Byron Morris'; 'Adv. Maleka'
Subject: [SCA 815/11] Malema v. Afriforum: Amicus Applic: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument


JULIUS MALEMA & AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS

(1st & 2nd Applicants Attorneys)
Mr. Mkhabela Huntley
Adekeye Inc.
Tel: (011) 786 7303
Ref: Mr. Makebela or Byron Morris

(1st & 2nd Applicants Advocate)
Vincent Maleka SC
Doma Nokwe Group
Tel: (011) 282 3700 / 3772 | Fax: (011) 884 6453
Cell: (083) 260 0790

Dear Sirs,

Please find attached PDF’s:

* Notice of Motion: Application of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture & Religion, to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae
* Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone
* Heads of Argument: Written Submissions of Lara Johnstone (Radical Honesty – SA)

Kindly Notice the following 'Possible Error' Argument to the Submission made to Judge Colin Lamont:
Possible Error in Argument: Could the ANC have won their struggle against Apartheid non-violently, by demonstrating their honourable Just War Just Cause Population Policy Intentions to end their Breeding War?

KINDLY TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that –- Applicants observations of the lack of honour and ethical legal conduct from Afriforum and TAU-SA’s towards the Radical Honesty SA Application -- it is possible Applicant’s presumptions in the Heads of Argument, detailed in the Affidavit as: Could the ANC have won their struggle against Apartheid non-violently, by demonstrating their honourable Just War Just Cause Population Policy Intentions to end their Breeding War? (Affidavit paragraphs 44-48) may be incorrect. Put differently, if Afrikaner males from Afriforum and TAU-SA endorse the denial of due process and legal procedures to a white Boer woman, from the Radical Honesty culture, who chooses to live in accordance to ecological carrying capacity principles by refraining from participating in violent breeding war and ecological resource war consumption behaviours; the chances that these self same Afrikaners Apartheid predecessors, with the similar lack of honour and integrity, would honourably recognize the due process and legal procedural rights of black Africans, who choose to abide by ecological carrying capacity laws, would be almost zero. If Afriforum and TAU-SA Afrikaners refuse to recognize the due process and legal procedural rights of a white Boer woman refusing to participate in the violence of breeding wars and corporate resource consumption wars; then they also wouldn’t recognize black Africans who chose to refuse to participate in the violence of breeding wars and corporate resource consumption wars.

It accordingly remains to be seen whether Afriforum and TAU-SA, and/or any other ‘human rights’ groups in South Africa, do in fact consider it important to recognize the due process and legal procedural rights of any man or woman refusing to participate in the violence of breeding wars and corporate resource consumption wars.

Saturday, December 24, 2011

A Proposal for defining the Feminist vs Anti-Feminist Problem





A Proposal for defining the Feminist vs Anti-Feminist Problem

19 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik



I have been writing this post in response to my request for a discussion with Eivind Berge on the issue of Breivik, feminism and multiculturalism et al; for two days in my head now. Hopefully it comes out as clearly articulated as I manage to explain it to myself in my head!


Insincere KnowItAllers and Sincere Truthseekers:

In my worldview there are two types of people and you find these two types of people in any group, race, tribe, religion, nation, etc. There are insincere conservatives, liberals, communists, Christians, muslims, feminists, racists; and there are sincere conservatives, liberals, communists, Christians, muslims, feminists, racists. Put differently the Insincere could be called KnowItAllers and the sincere could be called Truthseekers. The degree of anyone’s KnowItAller vs Truthseeking cognitive communicative and listening capabilities on any issue/s is directly proportional to their Ego-Identity Psychological Investment into any strong group identity associated to that particular issue.

For example: I upset allot of people from feminists to anti-feminists, racists to anti-racists to black/white nationalists, Christians, muslims, liberals, conservatives, communists, capitalists, because I refuse to join either their own ideological, racial or religious group or its anti-thesis. If I refuse to join their own group, the least I can do is join their opposition and thereby provide them with opposing credibility.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Viennese Blood: Freedom Party: Heinz-Christian Strache on Preventing Islamization of Europe & a People's Right to Secession & a Motherland





Viennese Blood: Freedom Party: Heinz-Christian Strache on Preventing Islamization of Europe & a People's Right to Secession & a Motherland

23 November 2011 | Russia Today, via Crime of Apartheid



As the far-right Freedom Party takes the lead in Austria’s general election, its leader, Heinz-Christian Strache, has told RT what he thinks of EU immigration policy and expansion plans, and explained why he wants a national debate on Islamization.


­RT: Why are Austrians so concerned about Islam?

Heinz-Christian Strache: This is an area where there are too many thorny issues. The European crisis is our main problem now. We also face problems in our immigration policy. This largely concerns migration from non-European countries such as Turkey. More than 50% of Turkish immigrants don’t want to integrate into Austrian society. They don’t want to learn the language and organize parallel and opposing structures. The activities of radical Islamists have become visible in our society. They hinder its peaceful and democratic development. In this sense, we are certainly a political force that comes out against any such radicalization.


RT:EU states refused to work with your party when it was in power five years ago. What will be different this time?

H-CS: I think that Europe is living through a turning point in its development, just as the whole world is getting through a turning point and a period of democratization. I assume that the forthcoming elections in Europe, not only in Austria but also in France, Belgium, Italy and Germany, will cause a wave of wrath and pressure. People are going to give vent to their rage on long-standing parties at the polling stations. That will lead to political changes. Since we are well prepared from this side too, European governments will take these elections seriously and will respect their results, unlike in the Middle East, where the authorities tried to deter democratic transformation by imposing restrictions and with the help of other means which are out of line with the principles of democracy.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Afrikaners (Afriforum & Christian Democratic Party) Oppose Malema's ‘Kaffir’ ‘Kill Boer’ Apartheid Free Speech Volkstaat Application to Concourt





Afrikaners (Afriforum & Christian Democratic Party) Oppose Malema's ‘Kaffir’ ‘Kill Boer’ Apartheid Free Speech Volkstaat Application to Concourt

EU-NL-FR-DE-UK-CH 'Boer/Settler' doc's filed in 'Kill Boers Hate Speech' Trial: Boer Volkstaat; & Jus Sanguinis Repatriation of Settlers?

15 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee



Consequently the Applicants In Forma Pauperis Amicus Curiae submission shall argue among others that:
  1. ANC’s ‘liberation struggle’ violated Just War (Military Honour) Theory Principles of International Law
  2. The TRC negligently or intentionally avoided enquiring into evidence showing the ANC’s liberation struggle to have violated Just War Principles
  3. The ANC’s TRC was a falsification of history, and is the source of SA’s political and ecological systemic collapse braintumour; of which ‘Kill the Boer Hate Speech’ is simply one of many symptoms.
  4. The ANC’s actions of poverty pimping population production breeding-war acts of war; speak far louder than their verbal diarrhoea platitudes of ‘commitment to non-violence and peace’.
  5. Their psychological admiration for ‘liberation struggle violence’ is found in their masculine insecurity breeding war poverty pimping, and the psychological theories of Frantz Fanon (the native’s colonized mind can only be liberated through violence, he can only regain his self respect, on the rotting corpse of the settler) and Black Liberation Theology (Black Power advocacy of violent Marxist Elimination of Whiteness as the road to Salvation/Reconciliation)
  6. Because Fundamentalist Black Liberation Theology ‘Anti-Whiteness’ Marxist Revolutionaries shall not rest until they achieve their Violent Marxist Cleansing Liberation / Reconciliation / Salvation on the Rotting Corpses of Boer/Settlers; the only way to enable Boer/Settlers to protect themselves is to:

    1. Implement 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination, by endorsing and supporting the work of the Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie to establish a Boer Volkstaat; and/or

    2. Initiate a Program of Jus Sanguinis Voluntary Repatriation of ‘Settlers’ to European Progenitor Nations, for Persecuted Settlers/African White Refugees who prefer to return to their Settler motherlands.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Are Conservatives / White Racialists who accuse Breivik of being Insane 'uncommitted right wing types' who dilute the movement?





Does Gates of Vienna Oppose Breivik being given a Free and Fair Political Necessity Trial? Why?

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 09 December 2011 | Norway v. Breivik



The following comment was posted to Gates of Vienna: People like Fjordman; and then later deleted by Gates of Vienna admin.

Why do so many 'conservatives' who allegedly value the principle of personal responsibility, support Breivik being denied the right to a free and fair trial, to take personal responsibility for his actions? Why are so many 'conservatives' supporting liberal and communist values of shutting anyone up who does not follow their particular method of protest or action, by implementing communist political psychiatry?

Are these outspoken conservatives who are screaming from rooftops about how Breivik is allegedly insane; 'uncommitted rightwing types'; who dilute the movement; as Theodore Kaczynski described 'uncommitted leftwing types' who dilute the movement?
Kaczynski holds that the values of gender equality, pacifism, leisure time etc. while still admirable, are exactly the values of techno-industrial civilization and its promised techno-utopia. Second, he holds that having such an interpretation is counter-productive to the ultimate anti-civilization/anti-tech goal as it attracts "leftist types" who are by nature uncommitted and act to dilute the movement.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny






Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 07 December 2001




[News Publication Name],

For Your Information:

In the matter between: KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

An Application has been filed in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The application requests Judge Nina Opsahl to issue an order that (A) Anders Breivik be requested to provide his approval to the court to issue the following writs on his behalf:

[I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.

The writ of Habeus Mentem – the right of a wo/man to their own mind and culture – and writ of Review (of the Psychiatric Report) are invoked specifically against Anders Breivik’s attorney: Geir Lippestad, and Psychiatrists Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby; and indirectly against the Norwegian multi-culti liberal political, legal, academic and media establishment who appear to be deliberately and perhaps maliciously attempting to deny Anders Breivik a free and fair trial, by means of a fraudulent and politically motivated ‘political psychiatry’ ‘insanity’ report and public media statements, so as to deny Mr. Breivik his day in court.

Article posted at:
Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/12/oslo-district-court-norway-v-breivik.html


Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
http://fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

******************
******************

I saken mellom: KONGERIKET NORGE v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

En applikasjon har blitt arkivert i form av artikkel er 2, 4, 85, 100, 110A, 110B, av norske Grunnloven, og artikkel om 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 og 14 i Den europeiske konvensjon om beskyttelse av menneskerettighetene og de grunnleggende friheter

Søknaden ber dommer Nina Opsahl å utstede en ordre om at (A) Anders Breivik bli bedt om å gi sin godkjenning til retten til å utstede følgende forelegg på hans vegne:

[I] En stevning av habeas Mentem på vegne av Anders Breivik psyko-kulturelle integritet, retten til et fritt og rettferdig rettssak, og [II] stevning av Certiorari / Gjennomgang av Psykiatrisk Evaluation Report av Psykiatere: Synne Serheim og Torgeir Husby som til Mens Rea politisk nødvendighet straffansvar av Anders Breivik terrorhandlinger, 22. juli 2011.

Forelegget of habeas Mentem - høyre for en wo / mann til sitt eget sinn og kultur - og stevning av omtalen (av Psykiatrisk Report) er påberopt spesielt mot Anders Breivik advokat Geir Lippestad, og Psykiatere Synne Serheim og Torgeir Husby, og indirekte mot den norske multi-culti liberal politisk, juridisk, faglig og media etablering som synes å være bevisst og kanskje skadelig å forsøke å nekte Anders Breivik et fritt og rettferdig rettssak, ved hjelp av en bedragersk og politisk motivert "politisk psykiatri '' galskap 'rapport og offentlige media uttalelser, slik som å nekte Mr. Breivik sin dag i retten.

Artikkel lagt ut på:
Oslo tingrett: Norge v. Breivik: Dommer Nina Opsahl: Søknad om Writ av habeas Mentem & Certiorari / omtale
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/12/oslo-district-court-norway-v-breivik.html

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Notice to 330 NO Political Party Officials: NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny






Notice to 330 NO Political Party Officials: NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 07 December 2001




[Political Party] Members,

For Your Information:

In the matter between: KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

An Application has been filed in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The application requests Judge Nina Opsahl to issue an order that (A) Anders Breivik be requested to provide his approval to the court to issue the following writs on his behalf:

[I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.

The writ of Habeus Mentem – the right of a wo/man to their own mind and culture – and writ of Review (of the Psychiatric Report) are invoked specifically against Anders Breivik’s attorney: Geir Lippestad, and Psychiatrists Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby; and indirectly against the Norwegian multi-culti liberal political, legal, academic and media establishment who appear to be deliberately and perhaps maliciously attempting to deny Anders Breivik a free and fair trial, by means of a fraudulent and politically motivated ‘political psychiatry’ ‘insanity’ report and public media statements, so as to deny Mr. Breivik his day in court.

Article posted at:
Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/12/oslo-district-court-norway-v-breivik.html


Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
http://fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Notice to 680 EU MP's: NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny






680 EU MP's: NO v Breivik: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Review of Psych ‘Insanity’ Report

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 06 December 2001




Members of EU Parliament

For Your Information:

In the matter between: KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

An Application has been filed in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The application requests Judge Nina Opsahl to issue an order that (A) Anders Breivik be requested to provide his approval to the court to issue the following writs on his behalf:

[I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.

The writ of Habeus Mentem – the right of a wo/man to their own mind and culture – and writ of Review (of the Psychiatric Report) are invoked specifically against Anders Breivik’s attorney: Geir Lippestad, and Psychiatrists Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby; and indirectly against the Norwegian multi-culti liberal political, legal, academic and media establishment who appear to be deliberately and perhaps maliciously attempting to deny Anders Breivik a free and fair trial, by means of a fraudulent and politically motivated ‘political psychiatry’ ‘insanity’ report and public media statements, so as to deny Mr. Breivik his day in court.

Article posted at:
Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review
http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/12/oslo-district-court-norway-v-breivik.html


Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
http://fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review





Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review

01 December 2011 | White Refugee | Andrea Muhrrteyn



From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:35 PM
To: NO Oslo District Court: Sentralbord; NO Oslo District Court: Admin
Subject: Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Application: Respondent: Judge Nina Opsahl

ATTENTION:

REGISTRAR & FIRST & SECOND RESPONDENTS
Registrar of the Oslo District Court
Sorenskriver og administrasjon
Postadresse: Postboks 8023 Dep., 0030 Oslo
Besøksadresse: C.J. Hambros Plass 4, 0164 Oslo
Sentralbord 22 03 52 00
Tel/Faks: 22 03 5212 | 22 03 53 54
E-post: **********@domstol.no
E-post: **********@domstol.no

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

Application between:
LARA JOHNSTONE Applicant
JUDGE NINA OPSAHL First Respondent
ANDERS BREVICK Second Respondent
GEIR LIPPESTAD Third Respondent
SYNNE SERHEIM Fourth Respondent
TORGEIR HUSBY Fifth Respondent
TARJEI RYGNESTAD Sixth Respondent
SVEIN HOLDEN Seventh Respondent

Please find attached for your attention the following PDF documents: Application in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
  • Filing Sheet
  • Notice of Motion
  • Founding Affidavit

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the applicant herewith applies to this court for an order from Judge Nina Opsahl that (A) Anders Breivik be provided a copy of this application for his consideration, and to be ordered to provide the court with his personal written response to the application, to be documented into the court record.

(B) If approved by Anders Breivik, additional orders as follows:

[I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.

Please take notice that the accompanying affidavit of Lara Johnstone will be used in support of this application.

KINDLY place this matter before Judge Nina Opsahl for her consideration at her earliest convenience.

Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, this 29th day of November, 2011.

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se

Honourable Transparency Copies:
(A) Honourable Tore Schei, Chief Justice
(B) King Harald V, King of Norway
(C) Hon. Jens Stoltenberg, Prime Minister
(D) Hon. Dag Terje Andersen, President
(E) Gen. Harald Sunde, NATO: Military Comm.: Chief of Staff, Chief of Defence
(F) HE Tor Christian Hildan, Ambassador of Norway, Pretoria
(G) Professor Duarte Nuno Vieira (Portugal), European Council of Legal Medicine: Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal, I.P.[1]; and The International Academy of Legal Medicine[2]

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

[For Those who Object to my Language] We're Really Fu**ed: Beyond Hope: Giving Up Hope, Turn Away from Fear, Protect What You Love...





Beyond Hope: Giving Up Hope, Turn Away from Fear, Protect What You Love...

by Derrick Jensen | May/June 2006 | Orion magazine



THE MOST COMMON WORDS I hear spoken by any environmentalists anywhere are, We’re fucked. Most of these environmentalists are fighting desperately, using whatever tools they have—or rather whatever legal tools they have, which means whatever tools those in power grant them the right to use, which means whatever tools will be ultimately ineffective—to try to protect some piece of ground, to try to stop the manufacture or release of poisons, to try to stop civilized humans from tormenting some group of plants or animals. Sometimes they’re reduced to trying to protect just one tree.

Here’s how John Osborn, an extraordinary activist and friend, sums up his reasons for doing the work: “As things become increasingly chaotic, I want to make sure some doors remain open. If grizzly bears are still alive in twenty, thirty, and forty years, they may still be alive in fifty. If they’re gone in twenty, they’ll be gone forever.”

But no matter what environmentalists do, our best efforts are insufficient. We’re losing badly, on every front. Those in power are hell-bent on destroying the planet, and most people don’t care.

Derrick Jenson: Civilisation's Toxic Mimic's & Identification
Frankly, I don’t have much hope. But I think that’s a good thing. Hope is what keeps us chained to the system, the conglomerate of people and ideas and ideals that is causing the destruction of the Earth.

To start, there is the false hope that suddenly somehow the system may inexplicably change. Or technology will save us. Or the Great Mother. Or beings from Alpha Centauri. Or Jesus Christ. Or Santa Claus. All of these false hopes lead to inaction, or at least to ineffectiveness. One reason my mother stayed with my abusive father was that there were no battered women’s shelters in the ‘50s and ‘60s, but another was her false hope that he would change. False hopes bind us to unlivable situations, and blind us to real possibilities.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) ICC TRC Fraud Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal





PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) ICC TRC Fraud Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 29 November 2011



From: JusSanguinis
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:33 PM
To: Job Cohen; Job Cohen - PvdA; Geert Wilders - Tweedekamer; Geert Wilders - PVV; NL SGP - Kees van der Staaij; Kees van der Staaij (SGP); Mark Rutte (VVD); Mark Rutte (VVD) Tweedekamer
Cc: Netherlands Consul Capetown; Netherlands Embassy Pretoria; Jurgens, Wouter; SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers; Sadhia Rafi - Vluchtelingenwerk; Prof. Gerard-René de Groot; Elona Bokshi: ECRE Exec & Proj Off; Martin Watson - ECRE Advocacy; Adv. M Wladimiroff.
Subject: PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal

Prime Minister Mark Rutte

CC: HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa

Prime Minister Rutte,

On 23 November 2011 I filed a complaint to Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland of charges of fraud against Algemene Dagblad Editor: Casper Naber; C/O & VIA: Ambassador de Vos, Netherlands Embassy, Pretoria.
CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: Relevant Dutch Anti-Corruption law, in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption


Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:
Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

On 24 November and 25 November I requested Ambassador de Vos to confirm receipt, and to honourably inform me that he had forwarded my complaint to the Amsterdam Politie, to provide me with the relevant contact details, so that I could get a reference number.
Could you please confirm that you have honourably and professionally forwarded the complaint to the Amsterdam-Amstelland Politie, as requested; so that I can be issued a Complaint Reference Number for the matter; to report it to the ICC Prosecutor’s office, et al.

I also have not yet received the reply from Minister Rosenthal in response to: Request for (A) Written Reasons; or (B) Parliamentary Hearing: Request Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (I) Provide Full Written Reasons clarifying the alleged errors of fact or of law made in the Jus Sanguinis Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Netherlands (& EU Progenitor) Governments; or (II) Recommend Dutch or EU Parliament to hold a hearing on the Jus Sanguinis Petition issues to EU Stamvader nations to hear the available International and South African Expert Witness testimony, to determine (a) the factual and legal accuracy and if so seriousness of the issues raised in the Jus Sanguinis petition; and (b) consider all relevant options for resolving the issues; such as amending relevant (i) Foreign Policy laws by politically endorsing a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; and/or (ii) Nationality laws by enacting Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation for their African White Refugee 'settler' descendants, to return to their progenitors motherland/s. (PDF)

Does Minister Rosenthal ever intend providing any written reasons or a response; or how do Netherlands politicians conduct their political problem solving relationships? Do you just ignore any complaint that contradicts your political correct ideologies? If not, when may I expect a response from Minister Rosenthal?

Ambassador de Vos and Netherlands Embassy staff do not consider me worthy of honourable professional response.

Could you please clarify whether the Dutch Government ever intends to provide any honourable response to these matters; or whether you are just going to ignore these requests, as if they do not exist, and you never received them?

Are charges of FRAUD and CORRUPTION irrelevant in the Netherlands when such charges are made against Newspaper editors and journalists?

Are journalists and editors ABOVE THE LAW in the Netherlands?

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr


Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Pres. B. Obama; c/o & via: USA Emb, Pta: ICC-TRC FRAUD NYT Complaint, Incompetent US Embassy Staff, Gen. McChrystal & Project BW.PHI.618 AL'QANOON






Pres. B. Obama; c/o & via: USA Emb, Pta: ICC-TRC FRAUD NYT Complaint, Incompetent US Embassy Staff, Gen. McChrystal & Project BW.PHI.618 AL'QANOON

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 29 November 2011



From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:57 PM
To: United States Embassy
Cc: Celia Dugger - NYT-Africa; Arthur Brisbane - Public Editor; SPJ: Joe Skeel; McChrystal Group; Blackwater/XE; CENTCOM Insp. Gen.; Col. Bo Gritz; Dep Judge Adv Gen, US Navy; Karen Kiwatkowski; Kremlin Press Office; NATO Public Information Office; US Army Unified Quest: Lawrence Fowler; US Army Environmental Command
Subject: Pres. B. Obama; c/o & via: USA Embassy, Pretoria: ICC-TRC FRAUD NYT Complaint, Incompetent US Embassy Staff, Project BW.PHI.618 AL'QANOON

President Barrack Obama

c/o & via:
United States of America Embassy
Ambassador: HE Mr DH Gips

PO Box 9536, PRETORIA, 0001
877 Pretorius Street, Arcadia, PRETORIA
Tel: (012) 431 4000 / After Hrs 082 285 2341
Fax: (012) 342 2299 / 2199

President Obama,

On 23 November 2011 I filed a complaint to Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, NYPD; against the New York Times: Public Editor: Arthur Brisbane and Africa Bureau Chief: Celia Dugger.
CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: New York Penal Law Code Article 460: Enterprise Corruption and relevant law in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption


Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:
Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

On 24 November and 25 November I requested Ambassador Gips to confirm receipt, and to honourably inform me that he had forwarded my complaint to the NYPD, to provide me with the relevant NYPD contact, so that I could get a reference number.

Unfortunately your Ambassador and his Pretoria Embassy staff appear to be either (A) petrified of the New York Times, (B) corrupt cowardly motherfuckers; or (C) don’t provide Embassy services to honourable, honest professional Radical Honoursty world citizens (demonstrating they only serve lying corrupt cowards); (D) a combination of all of the above.

If these fuckers at the US Embassy in Pretoria cannot even forward a goddamn fucking complaint to the New York Police Department (which I imagine the most incompetent nigger post office master in Detroit could do); how the fuck am I supposed to communicate with such incompetent unprofessional dishonourable individuals in regards to: PROJECT BW.PHI.618 ALQANOON.

If you remove your most competent staff – for example General Stanley McChrystal – how the fuck do you expect to get any of your goals accomplished, with incompetent liberal arse kissing fuckwits? Or were you never serious about accomplishing any of the tasks you appointed McChrystal to do? Was it all just political PR BULLSHIT THE PUBLIC about Afghanistan, and McChrystal was TOO SERIOUS, TOO COMPETENT AND TOO PROFESSIONAL ABOUT GETTING THE JOB DONE? So you had to get rid of him?

If you are sincere about PROJECT BW.PHI.618 AL QANOON, I suggest you appoint General McChrstyal as US Ambassador in Pretoria, he can sort out the incompetent fuckwits you employed and stationed in Pretoria, who are incapable of honourable professional Information Operations response, and once so done we can proceed with PROJECT BW.PHI.618 AL QANOON.

Assuming of course you are serious about PROJECT BW.PHI.618 AL QANOON. If not, well in that case keep these incompetent fuckwits at the US Embassy in Pretoria and we can wait and see what the next President has to say about restoring HONOUR, COURAGE and ‘BUCK STOPS HERE: POLITICAL NECESSITY TO END THESE BREEDING WAR ACTS OF WAR’ VALUES to American foreign policy.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: [jmc.pa.tf(at)gmail(dot)com]