Supreme Court of Appeal Values: EcoFeminist Sustainable Democracy Transparency TruthSeeking, or Masculine Insecurity War/Conflict Economy Parasite Leeching Tyranny?

Supreme Court of Appeal Values: EcoFeminist Sustainable Democracy Transparency TruthSeeking, or Masculine Insecurity War/Conflict Economy Parasite Leeching Tyranny?

Primary Parties are all Patriarchal: Patriarchal cultures suffer from different degrees of Masculine Insecurity, which is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of the worlds problems, due to (A) obstructing Radical Transparency communication problem solving, (B) is the cognitive foundation of the anti-Meritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) Paradigm; (C) hence propagandizes an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching -- ‘walking penis procreation’ overpopulation and ‘consume to demonstrate the size of my consumption penis’ overconsumption -- worldview.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Radical Honoursty | 18 July 2012

On 22 May 2012, the Supreme Court of Appeal responded to my Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae in the Afriforum v. Malema: Kill Boer matter. The SCA President refused my application to proceed as Amicus Curiae on the grounds that “it does not appear… that any value will be added to the arguments to be made by the parties legal representatives and thus will not be useful to the court.”

Today I filed an application for Permission to Appeal his decision to the Constitutional Court. Here follows excerpts of the application.

Radical Honesty culture herewith applies to the above Honourable Court, for the following orders:

[1] Permission to invoke cultural law in S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18; to enable the Applicant to honour the duty and responsibility to uphold the principles upon which the Radical Honesty culture is based; and Psychological Integrity in Section 12 ; the former which may require the application of choice of law rules.

[2] Permission to file an application to the Constitutional Court to Review the Honourable Supreme Court of Appeal’s 22 May 2012 decision to Refuse the Applicants Application to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae.

Conclusion:

IF: Supreme Court of Appeals Values endorse EcoFeminist Sustainable Democracy Transparency TruthSeeking Problem Solving: Applicant Should be Approved as an Amicus Curiae

IF: Supreme Court of Appeal Values Endorse Masculine Insecurity War/Conflict Economy Tyranny Public Relations Deception Management Parasite Leeching Pretend Problem Solving; Applicant Should be Refused to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae.

SCA: Malema v. Afriforum: Could ANC have won Anti-Apartheid struggle non-violently if Afrikaners were Honourable?

SCA: Malema v. Afriforum: Could ANC have won Anti-Apartheid struggle non-violently if Afrikaners were Honourable?

30 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugees

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:23 PM
To: 'Byron Morris'; 'Adv. Maleka'
Subject: [SCA 815/11] Malema v. Afriforum: Amicus Applic: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

JULIUS MALEMA & AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS

(1st & 2nd Applicants Attorneys)
Mr. Mkhabela Huntley
Adekeye Inc.
Tel: (011) 786 7303
Ref: Mr. Makebela or Byron Morris

(1st & 2nd Applicants Advocate)
Vincent Maleka SC
Doma Nokwe Group
Tel: (011) 282 3700 / 3772 | Fax: (011) 884 6453
Cell: (083) 260 0790

Dear Sirs,

Please find attached PDF’s:

* Notice of Motion: Application of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture & Religion, to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae
* Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone
* Heads of Argument: Written Submissions of Lara Johnstone (Radical Honesty – SA)

Kindly Notice the following 'Possible Error' Argument to the Submission made to Judge Colin Lamont:

Possible Error in Argument: Could the ANC have won their struggle against Apartheid non-violently, by demonstrating their honourable Just War Just Cause Population Policy Intentions to end their Breeding War?

KINDLY TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that –- Applicants observations of the lack of honour and ethical legal conduct from Afriforum and TAU-SA’s towards the Radical Honesty SA Application -- it is possible Applicant’s presumptions in the Heads of Argument, detailed in the Affidavit as: Could the ANC have won their struggle against Apartheid non-violently, by demonstrating their honourable Just War Just Cause Population Policy Intentions to end their Breeding War? (Affidavit paragraphs 44-48) may be incorrect. Put differently, if Afrikaner males from Afriforum and TAU-SA endorse the denial of due process and legal procedures to a white Boer woman, from the Radical Honesty culture, who chooses to live in accordance to ecological carrying capacity principles by refraining from participating in violent breeding war and ecological resource war consumption behaviours; the chances that these self same Afrikaners Apartheid predecessors, with the similar lack of honour and integrity, would honourably recognize the due process and legal procedural rights of black Africans, who choose to abide by ecological carrying capacity laws, would be almost zero. If Afriforum and TAU-SA Afrikaners refuse to recognize the due process and legal procedural rights of a white Boer woman refusing to participate in the violence of breeding wars and corporate resource consumption wars; then they also wouldn’t recognize black Africans who chose to refuse to participate in the violence of breeding wars and corporate resource consumption wars.

It accordingly remains to be seen whether Afriforum and TAU-SA, and/or any other ‘human rights’ groups in South Africa, do in fact consider it important to recognize the due process and legal procedural rights of any man or woman refusing to participate in the violence of breeding wars and corporate resource consumption wars.

Afrikaners (Afriforum & Christian Democratic Party) Oppose Malema's ‘Kaffir’ ‘Kill Boer’ Apartheid Free Speech Volkstaat Application to Concourt

Afrikaners (Afriforum & Christian Democratic Party) Oppose Malema's ‘Kaffir’ ‘Kill Boer’ Apartheid Free Speech Volkstaat Application to Concourt

EU-NL-FR-DE-UK-CH 'Boer/Settler' doc's filed in 'Kill Boers Hate Speech' Trial: Boer Volkstaat; & Jus Sanguinis Repatriation of Settlers?

15 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee

Consequently the Applicants In Forma Pauperis Amicus Curiae submission shall argue among others that:

1. ANC’s ‘liberation struggle’ violated Just War (Military Honour) Theory Principles of International Law
   
2. The TRC negligently or intentionally avoided enquiring into evidence showing the ANC’s liberation struggle to have violated Just War Principles
   
3. The ANC’s TRC was a falsification of history, and is the source of SA’s political and ecological systemic collapse braintumour; of which ‘Kill the Boer Hate Speech’ is simply one of many symptoms.
   
4. The ANC’s actions of poverty pimping population production breeding-war acts of war; speak far louder than their verbal diarrhoea platitudes of ‘commitment to non-violence and peace’.
   
5. Their psychological admiration for ‘liberation struggle violence’ is found in their masculine insecurity breeding war poverty pimping, and the psychological theories of Frantz Fanon (the native’s colonized mind can only be liberated through violence, he can only regain his self respect, on the rotting corpse of the settler) and Black Liberation Theology (Black Power advocacy of violent Marxist Elimination of Whiteness as the road to Salvation/Reconciliation)
   
6. Because Fundamentalist Black Liberation Theology ‘Anti-Whiteness’ Marxist Revolutionaries shall not rest until they achieve their Violent Marxist Cleansing Liberation / Reconciliation / Salvation on the Rotting Corpses of Boer/Settlers; the only way to enable Boer/Settlers to protect themselves is to:
   

   1. Implement 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination, by endorsing and supporting the work of the Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie to establish a Boer Volkstaat; and/or
      

   2. Initiate a Program of Jus Sanguinis Voluntary Repatriation of ‘Settlers’ to European Progenitor Nations, for Persecuted Settlers/African White Refugees who prefer to return to their Settler motherlands.

MI6 sends French Riddle Kaffir Lily Pond Crypto ‘Swop Humour Baking Belly Laugh Recipe for Bomb-Making War Recipe’ to Afriforum v. Malema?

In a recent Radical Honesty SA letter to SAIRR: Frans Cronje; on the issue of living in a TRC Fraud Liberal White Guilt One-Meaning-Only-for-Kaffir-Dictatorship: Who, or What is a Kaffir; Do Kaffirs Exist?; I wrote about the Radical Honesty perspectives between the difference between Humour Baking Belly Laugh Forgiveness Recipes vs. Culture of Breeding War Friction Bomb-Making War Recipes.

I stated that it appeared South Africa's TRC Fraud Liberal White Guilt One Meaning Only for Kaffir dictatorship were deliberately choosing to implement a Culture of Poverty Pimping Breeding War Friction Theory Bomb Making Road Kill Recipe for War, Murder, Rape Road Kill Stew.

In a subsequent Radical Honesty letter to Adv. Henno Viljoen; I asked him whether his decision to file a 'Kaffir' Complaint with MWeb was his own decision making or whether MI6 had psychotronically hacked into his psychological infant bicameral mind with instructions to him to file the complaint? Did he obey his 'thought instructions' from whomever had psychotronically hacked into his mind; or did he file the complaint as a result of conscious enquiry and decision-making?

I explained my evidence for Military Intelligence Agencies ability to psychotronically hack into anyone's mind; and that it was difficult to psychotronically hack into a member of the Radical Honesty culture's mind, because we do not consider our 'minds' to be who we are. So, it is difficult to psychotronically hack into my mind because I don't blindly obey the thoughts that are either subconsciously or psycholotronically generated in my mind.

I also explained the Radical Honesty perspective to 'insult to our dignity' that I had argued in Citizen v. Robert (bomb-maker) McBride; about how Mr. McBride's definition of Dignity; was that of a Psychological Infant; hence his demand for Sycophancy arse-kissing.

I furthermore explained the strange Interesting French Riddle of the Lily Pond K***r Moonwalk Belly Laugh Synchronicities, that had recently occurred surrounding the Afriforum v. Malema trial; which included Russian politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky confirming Manmade Earthquake Weapons, the possible manmade earthquakes in Knysna and Jhb; my work for former Committee of 300 Members (and their relationship to MI6); and a possible Spam Email from MI6.

I also asked Adv. Viljoen whether he suffered from Dunning and Kruger Effect Cognitive Bias, such as Primacy Effect; because it seemed he had only read the title, and had made conclusions based on the title of the Email; but had not made a full impartial enquiry of the entire contents of the email. People who suffer from the Primacy Effect, are people who draw conclusions from 'first impressions'.

I had a really good bellylaugh when I read in The Telegraph: FW de Klerk attacks Jacob Zuma for 'unacceptable' racial divisions:

Zizi Kodwa, spokesman for President Zuma, said Mr de Klerk had been misled by press headlines. He said: "Mr Zuma takes former president de Klerk very seriously but for him to just respond to headlines without checking the facts is very unfortunate."

Ouch! Zizi tells De Klerk he is so stupid he doesn't even know he is stupid (Dunning and Kruger), because he suffers from the Primacy Effect of reading headlines and drawing conclusions on first impressions.

Imagine my bellylaugh when I read about MI6's “Operation Cupcake”in The Telegraph: MI6 replaces al-Qaeda bomb instructions with cupcake recipes: British intelligence officials have hacked into an al-Qaeda website and replaced bomb-making tips with instruction on how to make cupcakes.

Is MI6 sending a French Riddle of the Kaffir Lily Pond: Swop Humour Baking Belly Laugh Forgiveness Recipe for Bomb-Making War Recipes Crypto-Message to Afriforum v. Malema Parties?

Afriforum v. Malema: 'Kaffir' Struggle Activism: RH Correspondence to, and from, Steve Hofmeyr

From: Steve Hofmeyr
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 11:50 AM
To: Lara Johnstone
Subject: RE: Jhb. Bar Soc.: Complaint: Req. for Info: RE: Adv. Henno Viljoen, Advocates Group 21, Mweb K****r Complaint

Lara

Thank you. I have reread your initial bulky post. We don’t really do this (my consuming inbox will astound you) unless what enters are contracts we await or unless we are served by law. I must admit, I’m not quite sure what you are wanting to say. Definition discrepancies or an attack on the modus operandi of my campaign?

But I can not be radicalised by straw men set up from things I did not say.

I can not be told that I am racist when I'm NOT and have 46 years of South African living to proof it. I am an old drama school commie, extremely liberal (the first TUT black student was in my class I’m proud to say!) and I have yet to insult any South African for their skin colour per se. What I do get is non-Afrikaners prescribing to me what kind of mortality rate we should learn to accept and what kind of bullying young Afrikaner farmer-families should accept as karma for some bygone era.

I have not and will not use the K word (not even in historical or statistical correct context as I would have) & have as a reconciliatory gesture, dropped it from the song. Should courts give Malema and the ANC the green light for hate speech such as KILL THE BOER (which simply hasnt enter your thoughts, has it?), it will be open season on national insults. With or without my help. This was the point and condition of my threat. Off course, that same Monday judge Leon Halgryn deemed KILL THE BOER môre than hate speech, it “enticed murder”.

It has to be said that my “racial” definition of the K word has ample historical backing, libraries of proof of voluminous historical usage and I don’t believe you are radically honest if you think your definition is absolutely and solely, the one. As the hate speech court accepts, there are indeed different contextual uses of terminology.

I reply only because I can see you do treat the subject with serious concern. But please remember that the multicultural nation is an ideal, NOT a lot of South Africans assimilating to YOUR culture, lifestyle, values and mother tongue. That is wishful thinking.

Lastly, you must know that this is the worse time in history to prescribe to other tribes and nations on how to react to their loses, how much to mourn their dead and how high the hairs in their necks should stand up at what were are witnessing around us. I can not acclimatize to our continuous and hopeless index failure worldwide.

Am I still reading you wrong? Hope not. Have you misread me? Maybe. But a short summary of your intensions, as well as those of Adv. Henno Viljoen, Advocates Group 21, will be welcomed.

Thanks
Steve Hofmeyr

Radical Honesty SA to FW de Klerk: TRC Fraud Elite's One-Meaning-Only-Kaffir-Dictatorship

War as a general social release. This is a psychosocial function, serving the same purpose for a society as do the holiday, the celebration, and the orgy for the individual---the release and redistribution of undifferentiated tensions. War provides for the periodic necessary readjustment of standards of social behaviour (the "moral climate") and for the dissipation of general boredom, one of the most consistently undervalued and unrecognized of social phenomena.

War fills certain functions essential to the stability of our society; until other ways of filling them are developed, the war system must be maintained -- and improved in effectiveness.

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:53 PM
To: Center for Constitutional Rights; Adv. Nikki de Havilland; Dave Steward - FW de Klerk Foundation; Desmond Tutu; Tutu Peace Ctr; Verne Sheldon Harris - Nelson Mandela Foundation; Nelson Mandela Foundation; Sello Hatang - Nelson Mandela Foundation; Norwegian Nobel Institute; Evita Bezuidenhout
Subject: [Afriforum v. Malema] RH-2-FW de Klerk Fnd: Nobel-TRC-Fraud-Peace Elite's One Meaning Only for Kaffir Dictatorship

TO: FW de Klerk & FW de Klerk Foundation
TO: Nelson Mandela & Nelson Mandela Foundation
TO Archbishop Desmond Tutu & Tutu Peace Center
TO: Norwegian Nobel Committee
TO: Evita Bezuidenhout
BCC: Afriforum v. Malema Parties; Steve Hofmeyr;
BCC: SAIRR; Jhb Soc. Of Advocates, General Council of Bar of SA, Advocates Group 21 (via R Stockwell)

Please find attached following PDF’s:

• 11-05-23: Letter to FW de Klerk Foundation: The TRC Fraud Elite’s One Meaning Only for Kaffir Dictatorship
  
• Encl A: 09-08-23: Invitation to Evita for President, to be an expert witness evidencing the Funigalore RDP Vaseline and History of the K-word, in Proudly DeKaffirNated: Europeans Only Demockery Intercourse
  
• Encl B: 09-09-07: Die Burger: Rassistiese SMS’e was glo in kodetaal; 09-08-13: Die Burger: George-vrou skuldig na rassistiese SMS’e aan De Lille.
  
• Encl C: 10-02-22: FW de Klerk Foundation & Center for Constitutional Rights Endorsement of ‘Liberal White Guilt One Racial Meaning Only for Kaffir’ Dictatorship: No ‘Kaffir’ Freedom of Speech
  
• Encl D: 10-03-21: White Refugee Guerrilla-Law Social Science Enquiry Report: 140 of SA’s Political, Media & Academic Elite: ‘One-Racial-Definition-Only-for-Kaffir’ Dictatorship
  
• Encl E: 1967: Report from Iron Mountain: On the Possibility and Desirability for Peace, Dial Press

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA
Jus Sanguinis Petition Organizer
www.jussanguinis.com
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Tel: (044) 870 7239
Cel: (071) 170 1954

Adv. Henno Viljoen, Advocates Group 21 ‘One-Meaning-Only-for-Kaffir’ Dictatorship’ Complaint

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 4:25 PM
To: Jhb. Bar Soc.; General Council of the Bar of SA; MWeb Abuse & Security Team;
Adv. Henno Viljoen, c/o: Adv. Robbie Stockwell, SC, Advocates Group 21
CC: Afriforum v. Malema Parties; Steve Hofmeyr
Subject: Jhb. Bar Soc.: Complaint: Req. for Info: RE: Adv. Henno Viljoen, Advocates Group 21, Mweb K****r Complaint

TO: The Johannesburg Society of Advocates
Administrative Officer &/or Maria Ferreira

TO: General Council of the Bar of SA (GCB)

TO: Adv. Henno Viljoen
c/o: Adv. Robbie Stockwell, SC
Advocates Group 21

TO: Ashley Anthony & Quinton Davids (Case CAS-862066-11T1FP)]
MWEB Operations: E-mail Centre
Technical Support Team
MWEB Abuse & Security Team

BCC: Afriforum v. Malema Parties; Steve Hofmeyr
BCC: RWF MacWilliam, Cape Bar: Pro Bono Committee; & Anton Katz, Cape Bar: Human Rights Committee (Reference: Footnote 29):

Please find attached PDF’s:

• Radical Honesty SA Complaint to Jhb Bar Assoc: Request for Information: Re: Adv. Henno Viljoen, Advocates Group 21, ‘Kaffir’ Complaint to MWeb, including Annexures (A) to (C)
  
• Cape Bar Annexure, referred to in Footnote 29: 13 August 2009: Request for Impartial Record Keeping of Documentation: State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009; submitted to RWF MacWilliam, Cape Bar: Pro Bono Committee; c/o Anton Katz, Cape Bar: Human Rights Committee: Re: ‘Kaffir’ Crimen Inuria Trial documents.

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA
Tel: (044) 870 7239
Cel: (071) 170 1954

[Afriforum v. Malema] Radical Honesty SA to SAIRR: Frans Cronje: Who; or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 5:36 PM
To: SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; Lucy Holborn - SAIRR;
CC: Steve Hofmeyr
Subject: [Afriforum v. Malema] Radical Honesty SA to SAIRR: Frans Cronje: Who; or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

Mr. Frans Cronje
SA Inst. of Race Relations (SAIRR)


BCC: SA Media Editors: Radio 702, Beeld, Burger, Business Day, Cape Argus, Carte Blanche, Citizen, City Press, Cape Times, Daily News, PRAAG, Daily Maverick, 3rd Degree, ETV, Financial Mail, IOL, M&G, News 24, Rapport, RSG, SABC, SANEF, SAPA, Sowetan, Sat Star, Sunday Times, Volksblad, New York Times, UK Telegraph; All Afriforum v. Malema Parties
(Ref: SAIRR Open Letter to Steve Hofmeyr; RE: ‘Afriforum v. Malema’ ‘Kaffir’)

Please find attached PDF: Who or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

Overview:

According to Mr. Sandile Memela:

• the meaning of any word is not in the word itself, but in people’s heads
  
• Kaffirs do exist! The biggest sin will always be: Who says it!
  
• The use of the K-word is something that most white guilt whites still need to discuss with their psychiatrists.
  
• The time may be right for a society that has been undergoing transition for the past 13 years to appreciate new methods of defining the meaning of words and understanding their use in blunt, intense and provocative public speech.
  
• Once 'kaffir' is out of the closet, pseudo-liberal forces both within the white community and their black imitators demand the person apologize, and put 'kaffir' back in the closet, to hush up any use of the word lest it raise the spectre of the apartheid past that haunts us.
  
• But the panic and hysteria that has been caused in the white social and cultural circles is a sad farce of good intentions. The conclusion that should be drawn on this matter is that it is a combination of white guilt and political correctness.
  
• This is part of our self-redefinition and expanding the meaning of words to fit into a new socio-cultural vocabulary that will help ultimately to break with white guilt, political correctness and a deep-seated inferiority complex.

Dr. Truth Challenge to South Africa: Who; or What is a Kaffir? Do Kaffirs Exist?

So, here is a ‘Dr. Truth’ free-Radical Honesty Therapy invitation to South Africa’s white guilt liberals who still need to discuss the word ‘kaffir’ with their psychiatrists.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA
Jus Sanguinis Petition Organizer
www.jussanguinis.com
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Tel: (044) 870 7239
Cel: (071) 170 1954

[Afriforum v. Malema] Radical Honesty SA to Steve Hofmeyr: To Be; Or Not to Be: A Kaffir!

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 5:43 PM
To: Steve Hofmeyr
Subject: [Afriforum v. Malema] Radical Honesty SA to Steve Hofmeyr: To Be; Or Not to Be: A Kaffir!

Mr. Steve Hofmeyr,

BCC: SA Media Editors: Radio 702, Beeld, Cape Argus, Carte Blanche, Citizen, City Press, Cape Times, Daily News, PRAAG, Daily Maverick, 3rd Degree, ETV, Financial Mail, IOL, M&G, News 24, Rapport, RSG, SABC, SANEF, SAPA, Sowetan, Sat Star, Sunday Times, Volksblad, New York Times, UK Telegraph; All Afriforum v. Malema Parties (Ref: Steve Hofmeyr pens Boer struggle song)

BCC: YNetNews (Ref: Yoram Ettinger: 12/05/2011)

Please find attached PDF: Radical Honesty SA to Steve Hofmeyr: To Be; Or Not to Be: A Kaffir!

Overview:

Notice to Steve Hofmeyr (CC: Afriforum v. Malema):

“Radical Honesty SA does not share Steve Hofmeyr’s definition of ‘Kaffirs’ as being African/black people. Radical Honesty’s definitions of ‘Kaffir’ are NOT RACIAL; they ARE BEHAVIOURAL. Put differently, in Radical Honesty an individual - like you, Mr. Hofmeyr - has a CHOICE to be a KAFFIR; or NOT.

“A man like Brad Blanton or Demian Emile Johnson who has the courage and honour to express his anger face-to-face to resolve it; is an honourable Just War Warrior. Men like Steve Hofmeyr, Kallie Kriel, Julius Malema, Robert McBride, Martin Brassey, Derek Hanekom, Jacob Zuma, Gwede Mantashe, etc; are no more than masculine insecurity poverty pimping slave and cannon fodder breeding walking penis’s; with delusions of ‘warrior grandeur’. You lack the guts and courage to honourably and honesty express your anger non-violently face-to-face; condemning those who do have such honourable courage; but want to believe you are ‘warriors’ because you find courage, behind a machine gun or Policeman! Gutless fucking slave and cannon fodder breeding poverty pimping cowards!” - Francis Marion Braidfute

Is Yoram Ettinger’s Time for new diplomacy: Israel should adopt defiant, politically incorrect but principle-driven strategy; a response to Jus Sanguinis Defiant; Politically Incorrect but Principle-Driven Strategy Petition to Israel?

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA
Jus Sanguinis Petition Organizer
www.jussanguinis.com
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Cel: (071) 170 1954

Steve Hofmeyr uses ‘Kaffir’ in Pro-AWB song; in “Kaffir Lily Riddle” Radical Honesty Amicus in Afriforum v. Malema Context?

[Afriforum v. Malema][Kaffir Lily Riddle]

Mr. Hofmeyr: Request Clarification Context & Definitions of “kaffer”

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:23 PM
To: Steve Hofmeyr
Subject: Mr. Hofmeyr: Request Clarification Context & Definitions of “kaffer”


Mr. Hofmeyr,

I read the article on Channel 24: Steve Hofmeyr uses 'k' word, and the article on your website: This is gonna hurt a little - Façade 42: It is time for Julius Malema and the ANC to admit....

“Hofmeyr confirmed that "that k-word" does appear in the lyrics of his new song Ons sal dit oorleef, but "in a certain context".”

“It is time for Julius Malema to admit to the sometimes mutual incompatibility between hatespeech and traditional songs, the way Afrikaners had to sacrifice traditional terms like “kaffer”. He can not have his cake and eat it. If some can chant “kill the Boer”, others will gladly reciprocate by revoking the vocable.”

I am not aware of your ‘certain context’; however your reference to “the way Afrikaners had to sacrifice traditional terms like “kaffer”” would appear that your definition of ‘kaffir’ would be a racial definition; i.e describing black people?

Is your usage of ‘kaffir’ in accordance with the pejorative meaning for a black person?


Confirmation Your Usage is Not in Accordance to Radical Honesty Definitions:

Radical Honesty definitions of ‘kaffir’ are not racial, but anyone befitting any of the Radical Honesty ‘kaffir’ definitions can be called a ‘kaffir’ irrespective of race, religion, culture. As stated in court documents (CCT 23-10, CCT 06-11, 07-2010 EQ JHB, ICC 09 May 2011 Radical Honesty Genocide complaint), to among others Afriforum, whom you are closely associated with; I imagine you are aware of them; the Radical Honesty culture’s definitions for ‘Kaffir’ are:


‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition:

Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc.


‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for ‘Kaffir’:

The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a pre-Islamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth.


‘Kaffir Legislation’ = Inalienable Right to Breed’ Poverty, Misery and War legislation; pretending it advocates for ‘peace’ and ‘human rights’.

Kaffir Law/Legislation provides citizens with the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed’ and Vote but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc, etc.

Kaffir Legislation covers up that an ‘Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control policy + No Social Welfare policies or practices provides for an equilibrium carrying capacity; whereas Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control within a welfare state, results in Runaway Growth, and ultimately greater misery, poverty and war.

Please would you confirm that your usage was not in accordance to Radical Honesty culture definitions and meanings; so as to avoid any misunderstandings.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

Kiddi Malema Amin's “Kill Boers” and “All Whites are Criminals” demagoguery

[SA Farm Attacks]

“We in the ANC have declared all white farms war-zones… white men, women and children are targets, they are part of the military and paramilitary units and the local police force…” -- BBC Monitoring, July 10 1987 and October 28 1986; Transcript of Radio Freedom broadcast on MK's landmine campaign, October 24 1986; Why we're targeting white farmers - ANC (Transcript of Radio Freedom broadcast on MK's landmine campaign, October 24 1986, BBC Monitoring)

“Killing whites is an action that gives hope to blacks and makes white South Africans used to bleeding… such deaths can be beneficial. When blacks have learnt that a white has died in the violence, that kind of thing comes like the drop of rain after a long drought.” – Oliver Tambo to Trevor Huddlestone, New York Times, 24 Jan 1987; Radical Honesty Amicus in Afriforum v. Malema: Mandela & Fanon’s Black Liberation: Absolute Necessity of Violence on Rotting Corpse of Settler

• Malema has all the makings of a demagogue - TAU SA, Politicsweb, 10 May 2011
  
  
• South Africa youth leader says 'criminal' whites stole land from blacks, Telegraph.UK, 09 May 2011
  
  
• Separating Free Speech From Hate in South Africa, New York Times, 30 April 2011
  
  
• Malema: White people are criminals, IOL, 08 May 2011
  
  
• Threat to TAU-SA Advocate family in Malema case, Pretoria News, 18 April 2011

TRC Fraud Genocide Charges filed to ICC against: Mandela, Tutu, de Klerk, Nobel Committee, 88 SA media, New York Times, Telegraph & Algemene Dagblad

The Complainants hereby request the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.

Charges Filed Against:

Archbishop Desmond Tutu Reverend Alex Boraine Former President Nelson Mandela Nelson Mandela Foundation Former President F.W. de Klerk F.W. de Klerk Foundation Norwegian Nobel Committee Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo Dep. Ch. Justice Dikgang Moseneke	Justice Edwin Cameron Justice Johan Froneman Justice Chris Jafta Justice Sisi Khampepe Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng Justice Bess Nkabinde Justice Johann van der Westhuizen Justice Zak Yacoob
SA National Editors Forum (SANEF) Mondli Makhanya (SANEF Chair) SA Press Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe SA Press Appeals Panel: Judge Ralph Zulman SA Dep. Press Ombudsman: Johan Retief SA Press Association (SAPA) Mark van der Velden (SAPA Editor) Business Day Peter Bruce (Bus. Day Editor) Business Report Jabulani Sikhakane (Bus. Report Editor) Cape Argus Chris Witfield (Cape Argus Editor) Cape Times Alide Dasnois (Cape Times Editor) City Press Ferial Haffajee (City Press Editor) The Citizen Martin Williams (Citizen Editor) Daily Dispatch Andrew Trench (Daily Dispatch Editor) Daily Maverick Brkic Branko (Daily Maverick Editor) Daily News Alan Dunn (Daily News Editor) East Coast Radio (ECR) Diane MacPherson (ECR Editor) Eyetwitness News Katy Katapodis (Eyewitness News Editor) Independent Online (IOL) Adrian Ephram (IOL Editor) Mail and Guardian Nic Dawes (M&G Editor) The Mercury Angela Quintal (Mercury Editor) News 24 Jannie Momberg (News 24 Editor) Pretoria News Zingisa Mkhuma (Pretoria News Editor) SA Star Moegsien Williams (SA Star Editor) Sunday Independent Makhudu Sefara (Sun. Ind. Editor)	Sunday Tribune Philani Mgwaba(Sun Tribune Editor) Sunday Times/Times Live Ray Hartley (Sun Times Editor) 3rd Degree Debora Patta (3rd Degree Exec. Prod.) Beeld Tim du Plessis (Beeld Editor) Daily Sun Themba Khumalo (Daily Sun Editor) Die Burger Henry Jeffery (Burger Editor) Bun Booysen (Burger Editor) E-News Patrick Conroy (Head of News) Financial Mail Barney Mthombothi (Fin. Mail Editor) Finweek Colleen Naude (Finweek Editor) The George Herald Mandi Botha (George Herald Editor) Independent on Saturday Trevor Bruce (Ind. on Sat. Editor) 702 Radio Pheladi Gwangwa (702 Radio Prod.) Rapport Lisa Albrecht (Rapport Editor) The Saturday Star Brendan Seery (Sat. Star Editor) Sowetan Bongani Keswa (Sowetan Editor) The Herald Jeremy McCabe (Herald Editor) Volksblad Ainsley Moos (Volksblad Editor) Rod Amner (Rhodes Journo Lecturer) Robert Brand (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Guy Berger (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Harry Dugmore (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Harold Gess (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Jane Duncan (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Anton Harber (Wits Journo Prof.) Franz Kruger (Wits Journo Prof.) William Bird, Media Monitoring Africa Projourn Steering Committee
New York Times Celia Dugger (NYT) Arthur Brisbane (NYT) The Daily Telegraph	Ainslinn Laing (DT) Tony Gallagher (DT) Algemene Dagblad Casper Naber (AD)

[Afriforum v. Malema]: Press Ombudsman: SANEF censoring Black Liberation Theology TRC ‘violence on the rotting corpses of settlers’ RH argument

[SA Farm Attacks] :: [Farm Attack Report] :: [Afriforum v. Malema] :: [African White Refugees]

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 11:12 AM
To: 'HC-SG Registrar: Alida van Deventer'
Subject: HC-SG: Registrar: A van Deventer: [07-2010 EQ JHB] Applic. to Proceed as Amicus: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

Registrar of the High Court: South Gauteng:
Tel: (011) 332 8278 | Fax: (011) 332 8214
Registrar: Alida van Deventer
HC-SG Registrar: Alida van Deventer (*****@justice.gov.za)

Dear Registrar: Ms. Van Deventer,

[07-2010 EQ JHB] AFRIFORUM V. MALEMA: Applic. to Proceed as Amicus: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

Presented for Filing in (.doc) and (.pdf):

• Filing Sheet
  
  
• Notice of Motion: Application of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture & Religion, to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae
  
  
• Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone
  
  
• Heads of Argument: Written Submissions of Lara Johnstone (Radical Honesty – SA)
  
  
• Affidavit of Proof of Service: NOI, NOM, FAFFIDAVIT & HOA

Respectfully Submitted,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se

[Afriforum v. Malema]; HC-SG: Judge C. Lamont 28 April 2011 Order via Registrar van Dewenter

[SA Farm Attacks] :: [Farm Attack Report] :: [Afriforum v. Malema] :: [African White Refugees]

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 11:12 AM
To: 'HC-SG Registrar: Alida van Deventer'
Subject: HC-SG: Registrar: A van Deventer: [07-2010 EQ JHB] Applic. to Proceed as Amicus: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

Registrar of the High Court: South Gauteng:
Tel: (011) 332 8278 | Fax: (011) 332 8214
Registrar: Alida van Deventer
HC-SG Registrar: Alida van Deventer (*****@justice.gov.za)

Dear Registrar: Ms. Van Deventer,

[07-2010 EQ JHB] AFRIFORUM V. MALEMA: Applic. to Proceed as Amicus: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

Presented for Filing in (.doc) and (.pdf):

• Filing Sheet
  
  
• Notice of Motion: Application of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture & Religion, to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae
  
  
• Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone
  
  
• Heads of Argument: Written Submissions of Lara Johnstone (Radical Honesty – SA)
  
  
• Affidavit of Proof of Service: NOI, NOM, FAFFIDAVIT & HOA

Respectfully Submitted,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se

Radical Honesty SA Response to ANC Sec. Gen. Gwede Mantashe & Afrikanerbond

Now if Apartheid had honourably expressed their justifications for discriminating against African poverty pimping breeding war cultures; and they are considered to be evil; what should we call the ANC who have not yet provided any justification whatsoever for its discrimination against Radical Honesty culture?

So, next time you wonder why your culture suffers from inferiority complexes; take a look in the mirror Sec. General Mantashe and ask yourself a few questions:

• Do you have the honour to acknowledge receipt of correspondence sent to you?
  
  
• Do you have the honour to be a man, who refuses to live a lie? (Pastor Manning: Seven Reasons why Black People Have no Honour)
  
  
• Do you have the honour to want – because of your commitment to searching for the truth, and holding yourself and your culture accountable – from the depths of your being, to do all in your power to enquire whether Apartheids justifications for their discrimination against your African poverty pimping breeding war cultures was justified? If not; what are you afraid of, Sir?

Mandela & Fanon’s Black Liberation: Absolute Necessity of Violence on Rotting Corpse of Settler

[Afriforum v. Malema] [Truth about Truth Commission] [Boer Volkstaat: Jus Sanguinis]

Excerpt from Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument, filed in Afriforum v. Malema:

IV. JUST WAR & TRAGEDY OF ANC’S BREEDING WAR COMMONS

1. Apartheid: Crime Against Humanity; or Just War for Boer Demographic Survival?
   
2. ANC’s Liberation Struggle violated Just War (Honour) Theory Principles
   
3. No Just Cause: ANC refused to non-violently end their Breeding War
   
4. No Right Intention: Apartheid raised black Living Standards to Highest in Africa
   
5. No Proper Authority: Did Black South Africans want Black Rule?
   
6. No Proportional Force: People’s War to coerce support for ‘liberation struggle’
   
7. No Proportional Force: ANC’s Mbokodo Quatro Torture Camps
   
8. War No Last Resort: Violence a Liberating force’ on Rotting Corpse of Settler

“Apartheid was a Just War for Boer Survival”; Excerpts from Radical Honesty SA Amicus in Afriforum v. Malema

[Afriforum v. Malema] [Truth about Truth Commission] [Boer Volkstaat: Jus Sanguinis]

Excerpt from Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument, filed in Afriforum v. Malema:

IV. JUST WAR & TRAGEDY OF ANC’S BREEDING WAR COMMONS

1. Apartheid: Crime Against Humanity; or Just War for Boer Demographic Survival?
   
2. ANC’s Liberation Struggle violated Just War (Honour) Theory Principles
   
3. No Just Cause: ANC refused to non-violently end their Breeding War
   
4. No Right Intention: Apartheid raised black Living Standards to Highest in Africa
   
5. No Proper Authority: Did Black South Africans want Black Rule?
   
6. No Proportional Force: People’s War to coerce support for ‘liberation struggle’
   
7. No Proportional Force: ANC’s Mbokodo Quatro Torture Camps
   
8. War No Last Resort: Violence a Liberating force’ on Rotting Corpse of Settler

Winnie Joins Zuma in Sowetho to sing Awulethu’ Mshini Wami (Bring me my Machine Gun)

Winnie joins Zuma in Soweto

Jacob Zuma got the crowd to its feet by singing Awulethu’ Mshini Wami (Bring me my Machine Gun)

Apr 26, 2011
Sapa & Sowetan

President Jacob Zuma told ANC supporters not to throw away their vote, as he campaigned in Soweto ahead of the May local government elections.

Speaking in Zulu, Zuma said it was very important to vote for a party that was going to win. Any other vote would be a “silent vote”, he said.

Although in Soweto, he had a message for the Western Cape: “It (Cape Town) is so entrenched in apartheid. Die tyd het gekom (the time has come),” Zuma told hundreds of ANC supporters at the Hector Pieterson memorial.

Zuma then got the crowd to its feet by singing Awulethu’ Mshini Wami (Bring me my Machine Gun).

He was accompanied by ANC MP Winnie Madikizela-Mandela and other ANC officials.

Madikizela-Mandela earlier screamed “Viva ANC Youth League, Viva” to the crowd. She has been at ANC Youth League president Julius Malema’s side since the start of his hate speech trial.

Afriforum v. Malema: Judge Colin Lamont confirms Receipt of Radical Honesty SA Amicus: Boer Volkstaat, via VVK; or Jus Sanguinis Repatriation

[SA Farm Attacks] :: [Farm Attack Report] :: [Afriforum v. Malema] :: [African White Refugees]

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 11:12 AM
To: 'HC-SG Registrar: Alida van Deventer'
Subject: HC-SG: Registrar: A van Deventer: [07-2010 EQ JHB] Applic. to Proceed as Amicus: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

Registrar of the High Court: South Gauteng:
Tel: (011) 332 8278 | Fax: (011) 332 8214
Registrar: Alida van Deventer
HC-SG Registrar: Alida van Deventer (*****@justice.gov.za)

Dear Registrar: Ms. Van Deventer,

[07-2010 EQ JHB] AFRIFORUM V. MALEMA: Applic. to Proceed as Amicus: Notice of Motion, FAffidavit & Heads of Argument

Presented for Filing in (.doc) and (.pdf):

• Filing Sheet
  
  
• Notice of Motion: Application of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture & Religion, to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae
  
  
• Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone
  
  
• Heads of Argument: Written Submissions of Lara Johnstone (Radical Honesty – SA)
  
  
• Affidavit of Proof of Service: NOI, NOM, FAFFIDAVIT & HOA

Respectfully Submitted,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se

‘Russia (RU) Promotes “Survival of White Race”!!’ -- Independent.UK

[SA Farm Attacks] :: [Farm Attack Report] :: [Afriforum v. Malema] :: [African White Refugees]

Hegelian Dialectic Q: After 'Survival of White Race Censored by SA Media' Email to RU Emb.; RU declares to Int. Media: RU promoting 'survival of white race'?

Hegelian Dialectic: Georg Wilhelm Friederich Hegel (1770-1831), the famous eighteenth century German philosopher, elaborated a revolution in thought based on “dialectical logic”. Political scientists, including Communists Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, were largely credited with having perfected the logic's practice in dialectical propaganda.

That is, Hegel advanced the logic that two opposite realities negate each other; yet, the two are expressed in a third condition of human experience he termed “synthesis”. It was this “synthesis”, Hegel reasoned, that gave rise to human “intellect,” or more accurately in terms of political propagandists, synthesized or artificial intelligence.

"Konstantin Poltoranin, the chief spokesman for Russia's Federal Migration Service, said he did not understand the immigration policy of western European countries. "We want to make sure the mixing of blood happens in the right way here, and not the way it has happened in western Europe where the results have not been good," Mr Poltoranin said.

He added that Russia needed Slavic immigrants to counter its declining population. "What is at stake here is the survival of the white race, and we feel this in Russia," he said." -- Russian immigration official sacked for promoting 'survival of white race'

"Heads of Argument of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture; ‘Boer/Settler’ descendant of Dutch, French Huguenot and British ‘Settlers’: Hermanus Bosman, Andreus Lutgerus Kolver; Jacques de Villiers and James Augustus Johnstone; In Support of ‘Political Necessity French Riddle of the Kaffir Lily Pond’ Application of the Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of ANC’s ‘TRC Social Contract Fraud’; Recommendation to Constitutional Court to Resolve ‘Kill Boer/Settler Hate Speech’ Descartian v. Ubuntu Conformist Cultural Friction by Implementing: (A) 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination to provide Boers with a ‘Kaffir’ Free Speech Volkstaat; and/or (B) Jus Sanguinis Repatriation of ‘Settlers’ to European Progenitor Nations."-- Email to Russian Ambassador Mr. Anatoly A. MAKAROV and Defense Attache: Col. Sergey S. KRIVUSHIN, Russian Embassy, Pretoria: RE: [EU: NL-FR-DE-UK-CH] ‘Boer/Settler’ Applic. filed in Afriforum v Malema (Censored by Media)