SA Concourt seeks Radical Honesty lawyer
Application to the Constitutional Court, for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum, TAU-SA, Julius Malema and the ANC, is seeking a 'Radical Honesty' lawyer.
09 December 2012 | Link2Media | Andrea Muhrrteyn
An Application to the Constitutional Court, for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum, TAU-SA, Julius Malema and the ANC, is seeking a 'Radical Honesty' lawyer.
The Pro Se application was filed with the Constitutional Court Registrar on 27 November, by an EcoFeminist paralegal and South Africa's only member of the Radical Honesty culture. The respondents are: Afriforum, Transvaal Agricultural Union, Julius Malema, African National Congress, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Former Presidents Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk, CRL Rights Commission, Norwegian Nobel Committee: Chair, Central Intelligence Agency: Director, and David Petraeus.
The application requests the Court to issue orders: (1) allowing the applicant to invoke cultural law on behalf of her Radical Honesty culture; (2) to review the ambiguity and lack of clarity of the Afriforum-Malema SCA Negotiated Agreement, (3) alleges that the ‘TRC Fraud’ evidence submitted to the Equality and Supreme Court of Appeal by the Applicant was censored and ignored by the primary parties and that the agreement is not a credible peace agreement; (4) that a credible proactive peace plan requires confronting Peak Non-renewable Resources (NNR) and Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict; (5) Alternatively; to order all South African’s to prepare for SA’s Race and Class War in the impending Peak NNR Crisis of Conflict.
The Concourt Registrar responded by suggesting the Applicant seek legal advice on the matter. The applicant asserts that she has been unable to find a South African attorney or advocate willing to represent her, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, for the past ten years; however that she would contact the Law Societies and Bar Associations to establish whether they did have any attorneys and/or advocates willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.
None of the Bar Associations or Law Societies contacted have yet been able to confirm that they had any lawyer or advocate member who was willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.
The Radical Honesty culture and religion was founded by Dr. Brad Blanton, who is the President and CEO of The Center for Radical Honesty, dedicated to promoting honesty in the world; a former candidate for Congress in 2004 and 2006, on the platform of “Honesty in Politics” and a bestselling author of the ‘Radical Honesty’ series of books.
Radical Honesty’s commitment to transparency makes Wikileaks and Assange look like amateurs.
In Radical Honesty the foundation of trust and strong relationships relies on transparency and clear communication: “being specific about anger and forgiveness”.
Futilitarians do not practice Bullshit-the-Public Relations sycophancy to anyone, since ‘diplomacy’ or ‘ettiquette’ or ‘manners’ or ‘public relations’ are considered to be lying and manipulative deception.
A lawyer representing an individual from the Radical Honesty culture would be required to place transparency, truth telling and truth seeking as a higher priority than ‘winning’ the case.
Futilitarians believe a ‘true win-win’ in any dispute occurs when the dispute resolution process does not censor information – pretending controversial or politically incorrect evidence, or emotions is ‘irrelevant’ or such shit -- that embarrasses or exposes flaws in either party’s arguments. Finding the Truth is what matters, wherever that search leads.
Radical Honesty Futilitarians believe Enlightenment and Personal (or Social) Transformation can only occur in a being who is willing to give up their Bullshit the Public Relations image management, the person they pretend to be, while hiding their true selves; in exchange for radical honesty transparent relationships, which exposes both our strengths and weaknesses, our naked self in the moment.
As Blanton argues in Practicing Radical Honesty: “Your neuroses, your limiting beliefs, your defenses, your paranoia, and your hypersensitivity can all become useful tools once your perspective on them changes.”
The Concourt Justices and Deputy Minister of Justice were informed on 07 December 2012, that none of the Law Societies or Bar Associations could confirm whether any of their members were willing to represent an individual, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture.
The Constitutional Court has not yet decided how to proceed in the matter.
Interested 'Radical Honesty' lawyers may contact the applicant on (071) 170 1954.
Case info: www.sqswans.co.nr
Brad Blanton: www.youtu.be/Gx-OVdTkwvA
Radical Honesty: www.radicalhonesty.com
» » » » [Link 2 Media :: Large Screenshot: L2M :: SAPA]