Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

British Elite's Conspiracy of Silence: The Non-White Immigration Crisis!






Yesterday, the BBC, made the alleged controversial decision to allow Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party, to appear on the BBC's Question Time Show. I say 'controversial', because well -- allegedly -- Britain is a 'democracy' and as such, in democracies, it is alleged that all political parties are to be given the impartial, but critical, opportunity to share their platform message. It is assumed in a democracy, that the voters are adults, and that voters are capable of deciding whether any Politician is an idiot, and talking the biggest load of crap, or whether he sincerely represents the interests of the people he says he is speaking on behalf. Alternatively in autocracies, the elite, decide that the voters and electorate are emotional and political children, and therefore the elite need to act as shepherds and steer the sheep to vote for whomever the elite consider the most satisfactory candidate to be. Generally an autocratic elite consider the most satisfactory candidate or party to be, the party who is going to reward the elite with the most benefits. If you think back to the recent billion and trillion bank bailouts; to 'save the economy' (yeah right!), you may kinda get 'the idea'!

Personally, what has driven me to read more about the BNP, and to listen to what Mr. Griffin says, has been the amount of vilification and totaly irrational hate that is spewed in the BNP's direction. To read how these people who allegedly personify multi-culturalism and tolerance, could find not one little bit of iota or tolerance for the views of Mr. Griffin or the BNP; and whose multicultural 'respect' for all cultures views, are quite capable of embracing the view that Islam can be the future of Britain; but not that British Europeans may wish to keep their European British heritage, and culture; as the BNP, would like her to.

It just simply did not make sense. If you support the Aborigines, like multi-culturalists do, in stating that their country was overrun by white Australians, then the same is true for Britain; which is being overrun, by Third World Muslim and African immigration, and where European British Nationals who have lived in Britain for over a thousand years, will soon be minorities in their own country. Now you may also think that Britain was an Imperial Power, with colonies, to exploit and rape! Well take a look at Africa, and ask the average poor black man in Africa, whether he was better off under the British Benevolent Empire, or whether he is better of under Mugabe, or Idi Amin, et al. The British Empire, after all brought all its colonies, new concepts such as the Magna Carta (the Great Charter of Freedoms), and 'Trial by Jury' (PDF: International Development of the Jury: Role of the British Empire).

But to state this in public, as a fact, and to oppose this future Islamofascist reality (Jury Trials in Saudi Arabia??), as the cultural suicide of Britain, is -- according to the British 'tolerant' and 'multicultrual' elite -- 'racist' and fascist?

Mr. Griffin and the BNP, prefer thier own European British heritage and culture; the culture that is and has been for hundreds of years, uniquely British. They consider their culture, that gave them everything from Shakespeare, to Henry VIII, Cromwell and Lord Nelson, to be uniquely British heritage, which they do not want to replace to become a colony of the Islamic Caliphate. He is accused of considering British culture to be superior to Immigrant cultures, and a refusal to accept Immigrant cultures domination of British European culture; and this allegedly makes him a 'racist'. His argument is that like Churchill would not bow down to German culture, but fought for British culture against the Germans, he is fighting Immigrant cultures, predominantly Muslim, for the survival of British culture.

But those who accuse him, themselves consider thier multicultrual culture to be superior to his British Nationalist culture, and they refuse to accept British culture to remain uniquely European and British; but their sense of superiority about their multicultural views and domination of thier multi-culti (which will soon be Islamic) culture over British culture, does not make them 'racists'? Double Standards?

Nick Griffin, and the BNP, are the only British political party who have had the courage to stand up for British cultural heritage, and the cultural and civilisational values represented by Winston Churchill, to Queen Elizabeth, and all that made Britain uniquely Brittish. Furthermore, they are also the only British Political Party to have spoken publicly and frankly about the impending consequences of Peak Oil; and have been the coalmine canaries about stricter immigration policies, for decades.

But none of what they say, is remotely listened to with an impartial ear, none of it is responded to, as if the person is talking to another human being, with values worthy of discussion and enquiry.

Britain and the British people are confronting their 'Rainbow Britain' Rubicon; and they better listen to Nick Griffin and the British National Party, who are the canaries in the proverbial British coal mine. If they listen to these canaries they may avoid the mistakes made by South Africa and South Africans, who believed the 'non-racialism' and 'multicultural nirvana' and 'truth and reconciliation' lies of Mandela, De Klerk and Tutu.

If they don't listen to Nick Griffin and the BNP; then give or take 15 years or so, and those who were viciously betrayed by the Jack Straws and Bonnie Greers, the David Lammy's, will be fighting from their 'Why We are White British Refugees' blogs, for 'British White Refugee' convention status, into Canada, Greenland, Iceland, or the North Pole.






We must halt this conspiracy of silence over our immigration crisis

By Andrew Green, DailyMailUK
Last updated at 3:38 AM on 22nd October 2009




The figures on population trends mark a watershed in the debate on immigration.

They are the last estimates that will be made public before the election - and they make grim reading. Mass immigration, which has been encouraged by Labour's policy of open borders, has already brought three million immigrants to Britain since it came to power in 1997.


These projections confirm that immigration is driving our population to new heights. If nothing is done, we will have an extra 10million people within 25 years - and nearly 70 per cent of them as a result of new immigration.

The conspiracy of silence among the main political parties on this vitally important subject cannot be allowed to continue. They must face up to the huge impact that immigration will have on the future of our society - and especially on England, which is the destination for more than 90 per cent of foreign migrants.

Put simply, the increase in immigrants we face is the equivalent of the entire population of London or seven cities the size of Birmingham. More than one-third of new housing demand is due to immigration; we will have to build a home every six minutes, day and night, to house our new arrivals.

But where will we build all these homes? Of course there are rural parts that could be built over but these areas are not where immigrants want to go.

On current trends, two thirds of them will settle in London and the South East, which is already the most congested part of England. And remember that England itself is now the most crowded country in Europe.

There is also the question of who will pay for all this. We face the tightest public spending cuts for a generation. What is the sense of adding millions to our population when we are forced to cut billions from the budgets for our health, schooling and other public services?

In any case, why do we want immigration on anything like this scale? For years we have been bombarded with government propaganda about the economic value of immigration.

But the government case was blown apart last year when the Economic Affairs Committee of the House of Lords found unanimously that there was no evidence that net migration generated significant economic benefits for the existing UK population.


Meanwhile, there are very definite costs to uncontrolled immigration.
Trevor Phillips, head of the Human Rights and Equality Commission, has been warning for years that we are 'sleepwalking into segregation'. He has said we are a society which is becoming more divided by race and religion, almost without noticing it.

For stating this truth, he has been vilified by the Left and ignored by the Government. But the facts are on his side. In central London primary schools, only 20 per cent of pupils are now classified as 'white British'.

But while the politicians might ignore all this, the public are perfectly aware of the problem. The results of recent opinion polls are startling.

Eighty-four per cent are worried about our population hitting 70million in 20 years or so, including two thirds of our ethnic population. Seventy-one per cent are worried about the impact of immigration, including 45 per cent of the ethnic communities.

You might have thought that the political conference season was the perfect opportunity for the main parties to address these concerns and suggest policies to tackle them. Yet immigration was hardly mentioned.

Meanwhile, there are very definite costs to uncontrolled immigration.

Trevor Phillips, head of the Human Rights and Equality Commission, has been warning for years that we are 'sleepwalking into segregation'. He has said we are a society which is becoming more divided by race and religion, almost without noticing it.

For stating this truth, he has been vilified by the Left and ignored by the Government. But the facts are on his side. In central London primary schools, only 20 per cent of pupils are now classified as 'white British'.

But while the politicians might ignore all this, the public are perfectly aware of the problem. The results of recent opinion polls are startling.

Eighty-four per cent are worried about our population hitting 70million in 20 years or so, including two thirds of our ethnic population. Seventy-one per cent are worried about the impact of immigration, including 45 per cent of the ethnic communities.

You might have thought that the political conference season was the perfect opportunity for the main parties to address these concerns and suggest policies to tackle them. Yet immigration was hardly mentioned.

Source: Dail Mail (PDF)




Crowded Britain heading for 70m as migration causes population to rise faster than ever before

By Steve Doughty
Last updated at 6:45 AM on 22nd October 2009




Britain's population is rising at a speed unprecedented in history, official figures revealed yesterday.

It will pass the milestone of 70million - the point Immigration Minister Phil Woolas promised would never happen - in 20 years.


The Office for National Statistics said that by 2033 there will be ten million more people in the country than now. More than two thirds of the increase, seven million, will be either migrants or the children of migrants, its report said.

This will put pressure on housing, transport, water and key public services.

According to the projections, the bulk of the population increase - 9.2million by 2033 - will be in England. Growth in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland is likely to be less than a million.

England is already the third-most-crowded major country in the world and the most crowded country in Europe except for the island of Malta, according to British and UN figures.

Most immigrants gravitate to London and the South East, which is by far the most populous part of the country.

Chris Huhne, home affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, yesterday warned that these areas are now at 'the limit of environmental sustainability'.

Over the next ten years, the ONS expects the population to rise by four million from its present 61.4million.

Despite claims by Labour ministers that population growth is slowing because immigration is on a downward trend, the ONS said that for the foreseeable future the population will grow by 180,000 a year because of higher numbers of immigrants over emigrants. Two years ago the state statisticians put the immigration gain at 190,000 a year.

The ONS forecast contradicts claims by Mr Woolas, who a year ago said: 'At some point we will be able to set a limit on migration. This Government isn't going to allow the population of this country to go up to 70million.

'There has to be a balance between the number of people coming in and the number of people leaving.'
In July this year, Home Secretary Alan Johnson told the Home Affairs Select Committee: 'I do not lie awake at night worrying about a population of 70million. I'm happy to live in a multicultural society where we not only welcome those coming to live and work in this country, but where we can go and live and work in other countries.'

Guy Goodwin, director of population statistics at the ONS, said: 'The additional numbers are the equivalent of taking the current population of Scotland, Wales and most of Northern Ireland and putting it into England.

'The population is projected to increase by 420,000 a year, which is the equivalent of adding the population of Bristol to the UK every year.

'Whereas it took 57 years for the population to get from 50million to 60million, it is projected to take 24 years to get from 60million to 70million.'

The population reached 50million in 1948 and 60million in 2005. If the ONS projections prove accurate, in 2033 there will be 465 people for every square kilometre in England, and 295 for every square kilometre in the UK.

Peter Madden of Forum for the Future, an environmental group launched by one-time Government adviser Sir Jonathon Porritt, warned: 'Population growth will put greater pressure on our public services and increase competition for housing.

'Protecting our environment and meeting climate change targets will become even harder. And unless it is handled properly, social cohesion will suffer. These projections are a wake-up call for politicians.' However, Mr Woolas insisted: 'The projections show that population growth is starting to slow down.

'The impacts of the radical reforms we have made to the immigration system over the last two years are working. Last year saw a 44 per cent fall in net migration and we expect that fall to be sustained and reflected in future projections.
'Our new flexible points-based system is giving us greater control on those coming to work or study from outside Europe, ensuring that only those that Britain need can come.'

Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green said: 'This shows how irresponsible Alan Johnson was when he said that he did not lie awake at night worrying about a population of 70million.

'The failure of Labour to control immigration has left us in this difficult position. A Conservative government would introduce a limit on the numbers allowed to come here to work, as well as other measures to fight illegal immigration.'

Labour MP Frank Field and Tory Nicholas Soames, leaders of the Cross-Party Group on Balanced Migration, said: 'We are on course for an unsustainable and unacceptable rise in population. If politicians want to rebuild trust and counter extremism, they must stop ignoring the public's deep concern about this.'

And the number of over-85s will doubleThe number of very old people in the country is expected to more than double over the next two-and-a-half decades, the ONS said.

It estimated that there will be 3.3million over-85s by 2033 compared with 1.3million last year.

The ranks of people aged over 100 will multiply, with seven time more centenarians, the projections said. There will, according to the estimates, be 80,000 people aged over 100 in 2033 against 11,000 in 2008.

Despite the rise in the state pension age, which will be equal for men and women at 66 by 2033, numbers of pensioners will go up sharply. There will be 15.6million by the mid-2030s, the ONS said, compared with 11.8 million now.

The increase will mean that everybody of working age will have more pensioners to support.

The ratio of working age people to pensioners, currently 3.2 workers for each pensioner, will drop to 2.8 workers for each pensioner in 2033.

But without the increase in the age at which people are expected to retire, there would have been only 2.2 workers available to support each pensioner.

Source: Daily Mail (PDF)


No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: [jmc.pa.tf(at)gmail(dot)com]