Brad Blanton, Founder of Radical Honesty (www.radicalhonesty.com), author of Radical Honesty books, and former 'Honesty in Politics' Candidate for US Congress from Virginia.
According to City Press journalist (sic) Ms. Khadija Bradlow, a culture that practices sincere forgiveness and root cause problem solving is 'right wing'..... Would that mean an acknowledgement that a culture that practices fake posed 'forgiveness' and bandaid to braintumour problem solving is left wing?
Ms. Khadija Bradlow:
Ms. Bradlow used to be the story editor for SABC's Special Assignment, but "she resigned after being informed that she would have to undergo a lie-detector test to prove her innocence," after the "SABC launched an internal probe and opened a theft case with the police" about stolen documents leaked to the Mail and Guardian, where Ms. Bradlow was an occasional columnist. (SABC Steps Up Pressure in 'Leak' Probe, 29 September 2009, Business Day & AllAfrica).
According to the Commission for Gender Equality a Mail and Guardian article written by Ms. Bradlow about the CGE was "vindictive, malicious and untrue" ('There's no ducking of responsibility', Dec 16 2008 Mail & Guardian).
According to Its Almost Supernatural, Ms. Bradlow's writing about the Israel-Palestine issue is sheer nastiness, as a result of Ms. Bradlow hating complexity. They conclude that "Simple is as simple does Khadija."
Radical Honesty - RSA Amicus:
Document delays Reitz sentencing:Bloemfontein - The sentencing of the four former University of Free State students known as the Reitz Four was delayed on Friday morning.
Chief Magistrate Mziwonke Hinxa told the court that a crucial document has reached his office and that the defence and the State would first have to discuss this in chambers.
State prosecutor Johan Kruger also confirmed that he had these documents and that it was best to adjourn for a short time to discuss it in chambers. Hinxa then adjourned the court for them to meet in his chambers.
UFS victims smile after verdict:Media’s role
Earlier, sentencing was delayed for the magistrate and legal teams to discuss a document sent to court by Lara Johnstone from Radical Honesty SA.
Johnstone wanted the magistrate to take special notice of the media's role in finding the former students guilty before the trial and, among others, reprimand it for doing so.
Hinxa said the court took note of the document but it had no bearing on this week's proceedings.
Rightwing group tries to scupper Reitz trial
Khadija Bradlow, City Press
The sentencing of the Reitz Four was briefly postponed in the Bloemfontein magistrates court this morning after a little-known group calling itself “Radical Honesty” made an eleventh hour attempt to be admitted as a friend of the court.
In its founding affidavit the group accuses media of “spitting on cultures”, attacks the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and calls the trial against the four men “a grave injustice”.
[Excerpt from Amicus: “However it appears to the Applicant that there is a grave injustice being committed in this matter, amongst others, against the Defendants, by among others the media, who spit on cultures who practice sincere forgiveness, and root cause problem solving, such as the Radical Honesty culture, and who instead prefer Scapegoating and ‘If It bleads, it leads’ race war sensationalism, and that the Applicant must not remain silent in the face of this injustice.”]
By law the magistrate has to consider all such applications on their merits.
But after a brief adjournment the magistrate decided to proceed with sentencing. The men were each fined R20 000 or one year’s imprisonment. The magistrate said the men had “lost their moral compass”.
Speaking exclusively to City Press this morning, one of the victims said she was relieved the trial had finally drawn to a close and that she could move on with her life.
Schalk van der Merwe, Johnny Roberts, R.C Malherbe and Danie Grobler were found guilty of crimen injuria on Wednesday following the leaking to the public of a mock initiation video showing the four students humiliating five university cleaners.
According to Radical Honesty, the trial of the four men is politically motivated and is tantamount to the oppression of white Afrikaners.
The organisation’s Lara Johnstone says the men are used as scapegoats in a race war.
A senior legal figure present in court dismissed the last ditch application as a publicity stunt by a fringe group wanting to draw attention to themselves.
Lawyers for the four defendants asked the magistrate if the men could pay the fine in instalments of R500, prompting angry murmurs from a packed public gallery.
» » » » [City Press]
Radical Honesty - RSA Amicus filed in Reitz Four matter
by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees
An Application was filed by Radical Honesty - RSA, to Chief Magistrate Mziwonke Hinxa, in the Reits Four crimen injuria matter being heard in Bloemfontein Magistrates Court Case # 21-709-08, in the State v. Schalk van der Merwe (1st), Johnny Roberts (2nd), RC Malherbe (3rd), Danie Grobler (4th).
Amicus Orders Requested from Court
The Notice Of Motion requests the following orders from Chief Magistrate Mziwonke Hinxa:
1) To admit the Applicant as a Radical Honesty – RSA Amici Curiae (i.e. member of the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion) in the above proceedings in terms of Rule 41 and 42 of the Magistrates Courts Act, 32 of 1994; and the Constitutional Entitlement to invoking cultural law in S. 15 (3), 30, 31, and 185, which require the application of choice of law rules.
2) Grant Applicant the opportunity to submit this written argument in the above matter, as follows:
3) To confirm that the Court, Plaintiffs and Defendants have taken notice of the Radical Honesty – RSA Amicus Curiae filed before the Constitutional Court, in the matter of The Citizen v. McBride, the contents of which may have been relevant to the decision making of the Plaintiffs and/or Defendants, if either party had been aware of their contents, but which are being massively censored by the corrupt South African media. Among others the Radical Honesty RSA Amicus Curiae before the Constitutional Court alleges:a) That the ‘TRC social contract’ is founded on Truth and Reconciliation Commission fraud, as a result of, among others:i) Negligent or Intentional Avoidance of Key Concepts Cultural Definitions: Conflict of Law Definitions, Fundamental Concepts were not defined.
ii) Truth and Reconciliation was not Seen to Be Done, but was selective, biased, and discriminated against, among others, the SADF, the IFP and ANC members who had been detained, tortured, raped and executed in ANC prison camps such as Camp Quatro, in Angola.
iii) How the Liberation Struggle could not have been considered a ‘just war’, within Just War Legal principles, when Apartheid had raised poor black living standards to the highest in Africa;
iv) That Apartheid was not a Crime Against Humanity, but a Just War for Afrikaner Demographic Survival; and that the ANC-TRC deliberately covered up this information and censored it, in favour of declaring Apartheid a ‘crime against humanity’.
v) That Farm Murders provide the evidence that South Africans – Afrikaners in particular -- do not live under a ‘Rainbow TRC Peace’ social contract, but under a Racial Hatred War Reality.
b) Media Corruption: Massive ‘If It Bleads, it Leads’ Media stoking of South Africa’s Race War, including the evidence for how 40 of SA’s Media Editors endorse Legal and Political Persecution of White Refugees, i.e. they admit that they are “deliberate indifferent to certain people of certain ethnicities and/or ideologies and/or cultures and/or religions being politically and legally persecuted and prosecuted…”;
4) Furthermore confirmation/an order that the Plaintiffs and Defendants are aware that the Radical Honesty – RSA Amicus Curiae (PDF) before the Constitutional Court requests the Constitutional Court to provide the following relief:a) Confirmation that Radical Honesty is a religion/culture, not a refugee status.
b) Acknowledge that forgiveness, closure, ubuntu, amnesty, truth, reconciliation, interpreted in accordance to Radical Honesty definitions, renders the TRC social contract: A TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History;
c) Acknowledge that the absence of multi-cultural legal definitions (let alone choice of law rules) for many TRC social contract’s foundational multi-cultural concepts –- forgiveness, closure, reconciliation, ubuntu, -- eliminates any Non-Descartian (I am, therefore I think) citizens ‘right to certainty in TRC ‘rainbow jurisprudence’ administration of justice’ .
d) Issue a judgement requiring that relevant choice of law rules (where two or more conflicting legal systems aims have to be met) be implemented: to give detailed guidance to courts and citizens on the application of cultural laws; eg. where and when is a defendant to be treated as a member of a particular cultural community in which particular practices, are cultural rights and obligations obtained, allowing sufficient flexibility to cater for the peculiarities of individual cases.
5) For an Order from the court clarifying whether the Defendants and Plaintiffs belong to different culture’s and whether they were informed by their counsel of their constitutional rights to invoking cultural law in S. 15 (3), 30, 31, and 185, and which require the application of choice of law rules, and if not their Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977: S. 105A. Plea and sentence agreements: (9) (d). rights
Founding Affidavit Statements
The Founding Affidavit clarifies the interests of the Radical Honesty RSA Amicus Curiae Application as follows:
And Nothing But the Truth: Television Interview about Brad Blanton's Campaign for Congress & Honesty in Politics
I am the only member – to my knowledge – of the Radical Honesty culture and religion currently living in South Africa. The Radical Honesty culture and religion is open to anyone from any culture or religion, nationality or ideology; the only pre-requisite being a commitment to Radical Honesty: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness processes, i.e. the Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract (PDF) , as excerpted from Dr. Brad Blanton’s book, Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help from Your Friends (PDF).
I am a former employee of Dr. Brad Blanton: (1) President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises Sparrowhawk Book Publishing and The Center for Radical Honesty, both dedicated to promoting honesty in the world; (2) former candidate for Congress in 2004 and 2006, on the platform of ‘Honesty in Politics’; (3) Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church; i.e. “Dr. Truth” ; and (4) author of (i) Radical Honesty: How To Transform your Life by Telling the Truth; (ii) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help from Your Friends, (iii) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that Can Change the World, with Neale Donald Walsh, author of the Conversations with God books; (iv) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; (v) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and (vi) Beyond Good and Evil: The Eternal Split-Second-Sound-Light-Being; (vii) Some New Kind of Trailer Trash.
Applicants Rainbow Rule-of-Law Freedom of Speech Search for Truth Culture Credibility :
Radical Honesty: How To Transform Your Life By Telling The Truth, by Brad Blanton
Applicant supports the maxim of the non-violent anti-slavery publication the North Starh, whose Republican editor, Frederick Douglass was fond of saying: “I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.” As a rule-of-law political activist, I endorsed the rule-of-law for all, rich, poor, white, black, left and right, religious or atheist. I filed my submission to the TRC on 18 January 1999, wherein I detailed my willingness to donate my entire inheritance to facilitate sincere Truth and Forgiveness. I am separated (filed for divorce) from Demian Emile Johnson, who is, and has been, incarcerated in California Dept. of Corrections, for the entire duration of our marriage. In addition to Radical Honesty I have been involved in non-violent civil disobedience actions on behalf of my former husband, Greenpeace, Amnesty Int’l, Pacific Inst. for Criminal Justice, Jericho 98, Crack the CIA, The Disclosure Project, New Abolitionist, Justice for Timothy McVeigh, Alliance for Democracy, Boycott 2010 World Cup, Right of Return to Europe for African White Refugees, et al. I am 43 years old, have never been on welfare, have used an IUD as contraception since the age of 19, and hence have never been pregnant, nor had an abortion. I have lived an ecological small footprint life; to avoid aggravating overpopulation, resource wars; materialist consumerism and resource depletion.
Applicant Applied to the Chief Justice [#001] of the Constitutional Court to proceed as an In Forma Pauperis Amicus, member of the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion, arguing that the ‘TRC was a fraudulent PR publicity stunt negligently conducted by SA’s political, academic, media and legal elite’ . Applicant was approved to proceed as an Amicus, by the Chief Justice, and denied In Forma Pauperis council.
The Applicant believes that certain aspects of the Applicants Radical Honesty – RSA Amicus before the Constitutional Court, may have affected the Plaintiffs or Defendants decision-making, in this matter, had they been aware of it. However as a result of massive media censorship, they are not. Accordingly Applicant wants to make sure that they are, should Applicants concerns be accurate.
Beyond Good and Evil: The Eternal Split-Second Sound-Light Being; By Brad Blanton
Furthermore if such issues would not have affected Plaintiffs or Defendants, it also may have affected the Magistrates decision-making, during conviction proceedings, to clearly ascertain for the record, which cultures the Plaintiffs and Defendants belonged to, and to clarify which legal system was being applied in the matter.
For brevity purposes the Radical Honesty RSA Amicus Curiae is not included here, but can be provided to any party so requesting by email, or be downloaded at: Concourt 23-10: First Amicus: Radical Honesty -RSA: www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/2303313
The Applicants Radical Honesty – RSA Amicus Curiae to the Constitutional Court is supported by the following expert witness Affidavits and Statements:A. Written Statement by Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness [PDF]
B. Written Statement by Consent of T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [PDF]
C. Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test; in terms of Criminal Procedure Act 51, of 1977: § 213: Proof of Written Statement by Consent; & § 171 & 172: Evidence on Commission [PDF]
11. In the circumstances, applicant sincere requests an order as set out in the notice of motion.
Practicing Radical Honesty: Part I
Practicing Radical Honesty: Part II
Practicing Radical Honesty: Part III
 In Ex Parte Minister of Native Affairs in re: Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A) Schreiner J.A. said lifestyle of is a choice of law factor. “Aside from an express choice of laws all connecting factors with conflict of personal laws are designed to determine, in an objective manner, the cultural orientation of the parties. Because the laws involved are conceived in terms of culture .... the connecting factors must be conceived in like terms. The most direct access to a person’s cultural leanings would clearly be his or her lifestyle.”
 Submission to ‘Register of Reconciliation’ and donation to Presidents Fund for Reparations to assist victims of gross violations of human rights dated 18 January 199917 [PDF]
 RSA OVERSEAS: South African on hunger strike in California, by Ilda Jacobs
 In Easter 1993, she was arrested with a few dozen Greenpeace activists in a Save Our Seas anti-nuclear demonstration at Sellafield, Nuclear Power station, in Scotland, for trespassing. She was neither charged nor prosecuted. See: Greenpeace’s Campaign Against Ocean Dumping of Radio-Active Waste, 1978 – 1998 (www.greenpeace.org).
 98-07-04 Miami Herald: Police action harms image as protectors [PDF]
 Jericho 98 is the movement to Free America’s Political Prisoners. She participated in Jericho 98, wrote to President Mandela to request his support for the many Anti-Apartheid Activists whom the ANC conveniently forgot, rotting away in America’s prisons: Marilyn Buck, Jaan Laaman, Tom Manning, etc. She visited Marilyn Buck in prison a few times, helped where she could.
 99-03-16: San Francisco Chronicle: CIA Class Action Suit For Not Reporting Drug Trade [PDF]
 Presidential UFO: George W. Bush’s UFO Mail: Are You Ready for the Revolution? [PDF]
 New Abolitionist: Race Traitor: Zero Tolerance [PDF]
 April 2001: New Abolitionist: Tim McVeigh and Me [PDF]
 In 2000, she was arrested & detained for 3 hours, with Brad Blanton, Ronny Dugger (founding editor of Texas Observer and Alliance for Democracy), & others in the Wash, DC, Capital of the Rotunda. Issue: Campaign Finance Reform. District Attorney declined to Prosecute.
 09-12-17: IOL Tech.: Anti-SA Smear Campaign on Facebook [PDF]
 10-04-23: Algemene Dagblad: Zuid Afrikanen Smeken Om Wilders Hulp [PDF]; 10-04-25:
Sunday Argus: SA family seeks repatriation to Netherlands [PDF]; 10-04-30: Mail & Guardian:
Persecuted Afrikaners Talk of Returning Home [PDF]; 10-05-17: Christian Science Monitor: White South Africans use Facebook in Campaign to Return to Holland [PDF]
 On 17 Dec 1998, she was arrested at Oakland Federal Building, with anti-war protestors, who shut down the Federal Building for two hours. She was detained by Oakland Police for an hour, before being released. Alameda Co. District Attorney declined to prosecute. 1998-12-19 Beeld: SA `plaasmeisie' vas in VSA oor Golf-protes [PDF]
 The ecological footprint is a measure of human demand on the Earth's ecosystems. It compares human demand with planet Earth's ecological capacity to regenerate. It represents the amount of biologically productive land and sea area needed to regenerate the resources a human population consumes and to absorb and render harmless the corresponding waste. Using this assessment, it is possible to estimate how much of the Earth (or # of Earths) it would take to support humanity if everybody lived a given lifestyle. All we do, buy and breed has ecological consequences. Ecological Footprint, excluding ‘Child-Free’ factor (www.myfootprint.org/en/) is 13.16 gha.
Andrea Muhrrteyn is the nom-de-plume for Lara Johnstone, the Radical Honesty - RSA Amicus Curiae in this matter.
» » » » [Radical Honesty - RSA Reits4 Amicus Curiae (PDF)]