Exclusive: Dutch Ambassador Acknowledges Receipt of Boere-Volkstaat Secession for African White Refugees Petition to Netherlands Gov.

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
06 December 2010

The Offices of Ambassador Rob de Vos and Consul David de Wall, acknowledged receipt of the African White Refugees Petition, from 34 Founding Petitioners to Europe; 14 of whom are petitioning the Netherlands Government.

Ambassador de Vos is requested to transparently officially forward the Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Petition and African White Refugees Briefing Paper to Officials and citizens of the Kingdom of Netherlands.

Petition letters delivered to the Dutch Embassy were addressed to: The Dutch Royal Family: Queen Beatrix, the Prince of Orange, Prince Constantijn, Prince Laurentien, Princess Magriet, Princess Maxima, and Mr. Pieter van Vollenhoven; leaders of political parties: Geert Wilders (Partij voor de Vrijheid - PVV), Kees van der Staaij (Staatkundige Gereformeerde partij - SGP), Mark Rutte (People's Party for Freedom and Democracy - VVD), and Job Cohen (Labour Party - PvdA).

Other recipients of the petition included European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) and European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) organisations and legal experts on Refugee and Nationality law in Holland: Sadhia Rafi (ELENA), Prof. Ben Vermeulen and Dr. Thomas Spijkerboer (ELENA - Vrije Univ. Amsterdam), Prof. Cees Groendijk (ELENA - Katholieke Univ), Prof. Gerard-Rene de Groot (Nationality Law - Maastricht Univ), various Refugee Agencies, including the UN High Commission Regional Refugee Office in The Hague.

The Petition reads as follows:

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Founding Petitioners descended from Kingdom of Netherlands / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Stamvaders/Progenitors: Hermanus BOSMAN, Andreas Lutgerus KOLVER, Arnoldus Mauritius MEIRING, Meindert Jansz NOOME, Hendrik Cornelisz OLIVIER, Jan Harmensz STEENKAMP, Bartus VAN TIL, Willem VAN ZYL and Gysbert VERWEY; hereby petition the Kingdom of Netherlands / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden: Queen Beatrix and the Dutch Royal Family, Government Officials, business, media, academic, religious and civil society citizens, and former Anti-Apartheid Movement Activists for:

How Wikileaks exposes Cult of Secrecy Political Parasites Honesty Incompetence!

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Many eon's ago, the father of modern warfare, Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War, “Know thine enemy better than one knows thyself”.

It appears clear to me that the conspiratorial parasitic Political Class, frothing at the mouth like dogs with rabies by Assange/Wikileaks disclosure of their gutless cowardly ecosystem of corruption not only don't know their enemy, but they don't know themselves.

For a start it is totally clear that most do not share Assange's intentions about how leaking and transparency can benefit honest businessmen and companies; which is probably one of the greatest factors that contribute to the job of a statesman: to nurture an ecosystem of peaceful sustainability.

In Andy Greenberg's Forbes Interview of Assange, he asks Assange: What do you think WikiLeaks mean for business? How do businesses need to adjust to a world where WikiLeaks exists?

WikiLeaks means it’s easier to run a good business and harder to run a bad business, and all CEOs should be encouraged by this. I think about the case in China where milk powder companies started cutting the protein in milk powder with plastics. That happened at a number of separate manufacturers.

Let’s say you want to run a good company. It’s nice to have an ethical workplace. Your employees are much less likely to screw you over if they’re not screwing other people over.

Review of Thilo Sarrazin's Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion, by Dr. Frank Ellis, Former Professor of Russian and Slavonic Studies at Leeds Univ. UK

Review of Thilo Sarrazin's Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion, by Dr. Frank Ellis, Former Professor of Russian and Slavonic Studies at Leeds Univ. UK

Mut is der Wind, der zu fernen Küsten treibt, der Schlüssel zu allen Schätzen, der Hammer, der groβe Reiche schmiedet, der Schild, ohne den keine Kultur besteht [...] Zum Teufel mit einer Zeit, die uns den Mut und die Männer nehmen will!

Ernst Jünger

© Frank Ellis 2010

Introduction to the Reviewer’s Commentary and Analysis

Publication in Germany earlier this year of Thilo Sarrazin’s Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen (Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion: How we are Putting Our Country at Risk) has made it possible for Germans to talk openly for the first time about themes which have been publicly censored in Germany over the last five decades. Having read this work very closely, I have no doubt that Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion may well be the book that finally smashes taboos about race, immigration and integration which have exerted such an insidious influence on German intellectual life since the end of World War Two. In fact, the influence of Sarrazin’s book will extend way beyond Germany. This book is not just about the future and fate of Germany: it is about the very survival of Europe.

Concerns over the magnitude and speed of population growth, as well as the racial and cultural changes brought about by mass immigration are nothing new. What is new is the manner in which the political establishments of virtually all Western states have abandoned, with complete disregard for the legitimate fears and well being of their own indigenous populations, any form of immigration controls. In the USA and Western Europe, a very large proportion of the political class have tried to justify this mass influx of foreigners with the claim that we need the labour, skilled or otherwise; that the mass movement of people is a necessary part of a globalised economy; that in some vague, sentimental way the prosperous nations of the north have an obligation to throw open their doors to the surplus populations of the Third World. Until quite recently, this mass movement of the unemployed and unemployable from the slums of the Middle East, Africa and the Indian sub-continent, with a fair proportion of actual and would-be terrorists among them, used to be justified by the obviously preposterous claim that the white indigenous populations of northern Europe would somehow benefit from the influx of millions of foreigners into their countries. Indeed, we were told – though not so much these days – that immigrants were bearers of the remarkable gift of diversity; that their presence enriched us.