“My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.. after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters.” -- Ann Coulter (Right Wing News)
Knights Templar: Honesty and Hypocrisy
Posted on July 25, 2011
by William Rome | Occidental Dissent
Darzee was a feather-brained little fellow who could never hold more than one idea at a time in his head; and just because he knew that Nagaina’s children were born in eggs like his own, he didn’t think at first that it was fair to kill them. But his wife was a sensible bird, and she knew that cobra’s eggs meant young cobras later on; so she flew off from the nest, and left Darzee to keep the babies warm, and continue his song about the death of Nag. Darzee was very like a man in some ways. -”Rikky Tikky Tavi” exerpt.
Alot of people are going to be infuriated by this post so I might as well get started early: I will not shed a single tear over the dead brats of Norway’s traitorous elite.
For over half a century the Evil Elites of the West have systematically brought tyranny to the people they rule over through non-white immigration, forced integration, forced busing, and Multicultural propaganda which has led to an endless malestrom of rape, robbery, assault, and murder. To top it off these evil elites also institute Hate-Crimes legislation to silence those who speak out against their tyranny.
Are the Evil Elite and their children effected by any of this? Of course not! They’re protected and hidden away in gated commnities and private schools. In other words for half a century the Evil Elites of the West have forced policies that they insulate themselves from.
The hands of this Evil Elite are dripping with the blood of their people from the assaults, rapes, and murders they have unleashed. The lives of countless families have been shattered because of the policies shoved down their people’s throats. Why should I shed one fucking tear when they finally get a taste of what they’ve unleashed? Sorry my tears are reserved for the people whose lives have been shattered by the policies of the Evil Elite not the Evil Elite themselves.
To paraphrase Marie Antionette, “Let them eat lead.”
As Hunter has pointed out Anders Behring Breivik didn’t simply pull off some Columbine-style massacre of teenagers for the hell of it (as much as many are making it out to be) but an attack on the next generation of traitors for Norway’s government. They weren’t attending a Salute Your Shorts Camp Anawanna but the training camp of 16-22 year olds for Norway’s ruling Multicult loving Leftist party. In other worlds he hit them where it hurt most: the training ground for their hand picked successors.
The Praetorian Gaurd killed Caligula's daughter.
That is why I included the quote from Rikky-Tikky Tavi in the beginning. Anders Behring Breivik (as all intelligent political thinkers once did) knew that eliminating the heirs was just as important as eliminating those currently in power. But many will say, “He killed kids! He’s an insane lunatic!” My question is since when does killing kids for political reasons right away mean lunacy? Roman emperors and Norman dukes killed their rival’s families. The Bolsheviks shot the Romanov children along with the Tsar and Tsarina. We bombed Gadaffi’s children in Libya. Does this mean every Roman emperor, Norman duke, the Bolshevik shooter, and the American pilots that killed children in the name of politics were batshit crazy? And lets not forget the murder of millions of children every year in the form of abortion which Leftist cheer as a “Human Right”. Is every white woman that gets an abortion a batshit crazy lunatic?
Maybe to gain Leftist sympathy he should call himself an extremely late-term abortionist.
I’m not jumping up and down cheering what he did but lets put the womanish sentimentalism aside. Is killing children for political reasons cold, cruel, and calculating? Absolutely. Does it mean mental illness? Absolutely not.
Even worse those knee-jerkingly calling Anders Behring Breivik a lunatic strenghten the old Marxist canard that all violence done against the Left is a sign of mental illness while Leftist violence such as the crimes of Che and Mandela are acceptable as misguided acts of political dedication. Why is it that violent Leftist are never mentally unstable?
While I won’t be toasting his actions tonight I also won’t be shedding tears for the loss of the future traitors who would grow up to continue their parents destruction of Norway. The Evil Elite brought this backlash on themselves with the policies they forced. That’s my honestly.
Now for the hypocrisy.
The reaction by the non-mainstream Right to the events in Norway has been jaw dropping. First off is the spectacle of those who worship Hitler denouncing Anders Behring Breivik for killing fellow whites. They scream, “How could a Nationalist kill his own people?!” This from the people who worship a man who killed millions of white people (Eastern Europeans) because they were Slavs? Such hypocrisy is stunning.
The next hypocrisy is from those who are doing everything imaginable to distance themselves from Anders Behring Breivik, saying he’s not one of us. Such self-survival is understandable and justified (especially those in Europe). But this distancing is coming from the same people who routinely denouncing mainstream conservatives for being too afraid to embrace and identify with the non-mainstream Right. They are doing the exact same thing they lambast mainstream conservatives for: being afraid to embrace their extremist like the Left does.
The third hypocrisy is from those who are saying Anders Behring Breivik should have attacked some Muslim rapists and he would have gained more sympathy. This from the same people who’ve said for years that we shouldn’t attack those the Evil Elite have invited in but the Evil Elite themselves. Anders Behring Breivik did just that and he’s being denounced by some for not doing the’ve always said not to do.
My fourth hypocrisy is one of cowardice. On this site and others there is continuous talk about the backlash and collapse of BRA here in America and Eurabia in Europe. How did you think this would play out? Debates on German philosophers? Essays on political theory? As much we may like to see ourselves as contemporary Voltaire’s, Thomas Paine’s, and Martin Luther’s our radical writings (like theirs) will have no teeth to them until they taken up with physical force. Am I calling for this physical force? Hell no! I know when it finally comes it will be violent and unpredictable. I’m not looking foreward to the day it comes but I know it’s coming and I know it won’t take the form of democratic elections or academic debates. Anders Behring Breivik is just the start of the form the backlash and collapse is going to take. Muslims in Eurabia and blacks in BRA are assaulting, raping, and murdering us while they riot, bomb, and burn our cities to the ground: did you not expect a backlash just as violent?
No system falls except in blood. The Roman Republic, Vatican control over Western Europe, British control over the American Colonies and Ireland, and the French and Russian monarchies all collapsed in blood. BRA and Eurabia will be no different. So unless the Armchair Revolutionaries denouncing Anders Behring Breivik while publically wanting the same thing (Muslims out of Europe) are ready to accept this they need to stop reading Harold Covington, listening to IRA rebel songs, admiring the American Revolutionary Fathers, and saying we’ll never vote ourselves out of this mess because they’re no different from the hated mainstream conservatives who say this country needs a revolution while also saying we shouldn’t be too extreme.
Anders Behring Breivik walked the walk you only talk.
» » » » [Occidental Dissent]
Between Thought and Action in Norway
July 25, 2011
by Jim Goad | TakiMag
When I first read Ted Kaczynski’s Industrial Society and its Future, better known as The Unabomber Manifesto, I was impressed with how logically dispassionate it was, especially its devastating dissection of leftist masochism and hostility. Each paragraph—sequentially numbered as if they were biblical verses—built upon the previous one with mathematical precision, and I found myself nodding along with Kaczynski’s premise that technology was potentially the biggest threat to personal freedom in world history.
And then, walking placidly through all that ice-cold logic, I stubbed my toe on this line: “In order to get our message before the public with some chance of making a lasting impression, we’ve had to kill people.”
A Norwegian police officer who assisted in Friday’s arrest of Anders Behring Breivik described Breivik’s demeanor as “cold as ice,” an especially disquieting observation when one considers he was talking about a man who’d just claimed the Spree Killing World Record by piling up at least 76 bodies—eight via a fertilizer car bomb in downtown Oslo and 68 using automatic weapons at a Labour Party youth camp on Utøya Island.
The downtown bombing preceded the island massacre by an hour or two. The New York Times, CBS News, and several other mainstream outlets initially reported that an Islamist group called “Helpers of Global Jihad” had claimed responsibility for the bombing. It wasn’t an entirely farfetched proposition, seeing as Norway has roughly 500 troops stationed in Afghanistan, a smattering of soldiers in Libya, and had also participated in the publishing of those infamous Muhammad cartoons a few years back. In 2004 and 2008, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s current leader, had publicly threatened Norway for its involvement in Afghanistan. And it’s not as if certain Scandinavian Muslims haven’t been acting a mite, shall we say, pushy and entitled of late.
Then, when reports began drifting in that the gunman on Utøya Island was a Norwegian national, the sort of press outlets who lectured us not to “jump to conclusions” during the Ft. Hood Massacre—and who always seemed careful never to describe Islamic terrorists as “brown-skinned and brown-eyed”—made a point of repeatedly noting the killer’s white skin, blond hair, and blue eyes.
When Breivik’s Internet postings and 1518-page manifesto went public, most of the press fairly exulted in describing him as a “right-wing Christian extremist,” which had me wondering when was the last time I heard anyone in America’s mainstream media describing anyone as “left-wing,” much less a “left-wing extremist.” Breivik appeared to be exactly the sort of terrorist that every Europhobic, Christophobic, conservaphobic, whitemaleophobe had been praying to Goddess would come along.
Breivik identifies himself as a conservative Christian, but the press didn’t make much mention of the fact that he also described himself as “anti-racist/pro-homosexual/pro-Israel” and that his writings repeatedly lumped Nazism in with Marxism and Islam as “hate ideologies.”
At last count, Breivik has killed at least thirty times as many people as Kaczynski did, and his manifesto—2083: A European Declaration of Independence—seems at least thirty times as long. The year 2083 is significant for Breivik because according to demographic calculations, it’s when Muslims are scheduled to exceed 50% of Europe’s population. Although 2083 includes several essays from other anti-Islamist writers—fully credited but presumably without permission—Breivik’s sprawling tome even plagiarizes and slightly alters a couple of Kaczynski’s paragraphs without crediting him.
But as with Kaczynski, I found myself agreeing with much of what Breivik had written.
And then you get to the parts where he says he has to kill people.
He condemns Nazism—saying he wished he had a time machine so he could go back to 1933 and kill Hitler himself—and the 10 to 20 million corpses it left in its wake. He also condemns Marxism and estimates it led to 100 million fatalities. He’s especially critical of Frankfurt School-styled “cultural Marxism” for opening Europe up to a mass influx of Muslims, adherents of a faith he accuses of murdering 300 million nonbelievers since its inception 1,400 years ago. Breivik claims that Western Europe only hosted 50,000 or so Muslims in the 1950s, whereas 25 million hyper-fertile Mohammedans currently call it home. In a creepily elaborate section of instructions for waging a New Crusade to purge Europe once and forever of Islam, he urges would-be Crusaders to focus their violence toward multiculturalist European “traitors” rather than the Muslims whose presence they sanction and encourage. Accordingly, his victims last Friday were overwhelmingly Nordic leftists rather than brown Islamists.
Anders Breivik: 'Labour Party Government failed the country' (00:32)
Breivik slams cultural Marxism for being innately racist, casting white Europeans as the source of all historical evil in the same way that Hitler scapegoated and dehumanized Jews. He notes that their mangled notions of cultural equality never demand that Saudi Arabia accept an influx of Christians or that Japan open its gates to millions of Caucasian immigrants. He depicts Oslo anthropologist Thomas Hylland Eriksen’s admonition to “deconstruct the majority…and do it thoroughly, so that it can never be called the majority any longer” as genocidal hate speech. He also accuses the Frankfurters’ ideological descendants of a fatal naiveté regarding Islam’s inevitably totalitarian tendencies, predicting that once Muslims win the demographic battle, Eurabia’s victorious Islamists will either forcibly convert all the suicidally tolerant kafirs or eat them alive.
He scoffs at the notion that Norway is a democracy, saying that all of the nation’s politicians and 99% of its mainstream media bend submissively before the multicultural gods and relentlessly defame all ideological dissenters as subhuman bigots who don’t deserve police protection no matter how often indigenous Norwegians get raped, beaten, or murdered by their Islamic colonizers. He claims that during his teens in Oslo, Muslims assaulted, threatened, and attempted robbing him. He says that over 20 of his acquaintances experienced similar attacks, including one girl who suffered a gang rape.
And every time, the authorities looked the other way. In their culturally brainwashed totalitarian minds, such things simply never happened.
Breivik notes that even Thomas Jefferson and John F. Kennedy claimed that tyrants often give their subjects no choice but to start spilling blood.
“The time for dialogue is over,” he writes. “We gave peace a chance.”
And that, apparently, is why he started killing people.
I asked two Norwegian friends about their experiences with Muslims and their take on Friday’s massacre.
Norseman #1:I used to be a member of that [Labour Party] youth group, something I’m usually a bit embarrassed about. I used to go to that summer camp. This is beyond fucked-up….I actually grew up with Muslim friends and neighbors in a small suburb outside my town. That was during the Khomeini years, but I had no idea about those things. It wasn’t until they tried to kill William Nygaard, Salman Rushdie’s Norwegian publisher, that I understood that something was wrong with Islam….But I base my opposition toward Islam not on personal feelings or experiences. It’s a different problem than that….I wouldn’t be able to have Muslim friends and acquaintances if all this was personal….I’m not even opposed to immigration….Now it’s apparently time to smoke out everyone who’s been critical of Islam. Fuck….I feel angry because he’s ruined it for anyone who’s even slightly worried about Islam.
Norseman #2:Many of my friends on both sides of the [political] fence have been beaten, robbed, raped, and are sitting back with the feeling that they don’t get a fair shake from the authorities in the aftermath….[I’ve seen] their violent ways. And not the occasional fist-swing that you find in every ethnic group, but their need to mark “their territory,” even if this means bringing in four carloads of relatives just to beat a single cowboy to a pulp….[I’ve seen] their everlasting tendency to act as if they own the place. Many of them combine intolerable ego with the claim that they are here to take over….Many of them are acting tough in bigger gangs, anti-white racial slurs and threats are common, but the second the gang is white, they claim persecution and the usual whines before anyone has so much as raised a right arm….No matter how you twist and turn this case, you can’t escape the fact that this guy deliberately shot and killed nearly a hundred kids….I also resent the prick for setting back the stabilizing of our political landscape for decades. We were just getting used to being able to make up personal opinions without having to (figuratively speaking) check with the leftist Politburo first, and now this happens. Most likely, we will have to accept that personal opinions will be received with hostility for some time to come. For the foreseeable future, we will probably have to get used to keeping our mouths shut when it comes to critique of everything this guy resented….
So it’s not as if Breivik’s beliefs upset them. On many points, they seem to agree with him.
It’s that he had to kill people.
» » » » [TakiMag]
Who Does Anders Behring Breivik & the Knights Templars consider Traitors?
2083 - European Declaration of Independence
3.44 Traitor – classification system – Category A, B and C traitors“The nation is divided, half patriots and half traitors, and no man can tell which from which.” - Mark Twain
This classification system is used to identify various individual cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist traitors. The intention of the system is to easier identify priority targets and will also serve as the foundation for the future “Nuremberg trials” once the European cultural conservatives reassert political and military control of any given country.
Any category A, B or C traitor is an individual who has deliberately used his or her influence in a way which makes him or her indirectly or directly guilty of the charges specified in this document: 1-8. Many of these individuals will attempt to claim ”ignorance” of the crimes they are accused of.
Category A traitor
- Political leaders (NGO leaders included)
- Media leaders (chief editors)
- Cultural leaders
- Industry leaders
Category A traitors are usually any current Heads of State, ministers/senators, directors and leaders of certain organisations/boards etc. who are guilty of charges 1-8. Category A traitors consist of the most influential and highest profile traitors.
10 per 1 million citizens.
Punishment: death penalty and expropriation of property/funds
Category B traitor
Category B traitors are cultural Marxist/multiculturalist politicians, primarily from the alliance of European political parties known as ”the MA 100” (parties who support multiculturalism) and EU parliamentarians. They can be elected and non-elected parliamentarians, their advisors and any public and/or corporate servant who has been and still are indirectly or directly implicated in committing the following acts.
Category B traitors can also be individuals from various professional groups (but not limited to): journalists, editors, teachers, lecturers, university professors, various school/university board members, publicists, radio commentators, writers of fiction, cartoonists, and artists/celebrities etc. They can also be individuals from other professional groups such as: technicians, scientists, doctors and even Church leaders. In addition, individuals (investors etc) who have directly or indirectly funded related activities. It’s important to note that the stereotypical ”socialists”, collectivists, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists, environmentalists etc are to be considered on an individual basis only. Not everyone who are associated with one of these groups or movements is to be considered as a cultural Marxist/multiculturalist.
Knights Templar 2083 by Anders Behring Breivik (12:23)
Former category A traitors; Heads of State, Ministers/Senators etc., directors and leaders of certain organisations/boards etc. can be re-classified as category B traitors for practical targeting reasons (they have lost influence and will not yield the same target value/effect as current category A traitors).
Certain ANTIFA leaders or organisers related to ANTIFA movements (and other dedicated members) are considered category B traitors. Non-essential members are considered category C traitors. Many professionals such as f. example journalists, influential sociologists or university professors etc. are considered and categorized as category B traitors as we consider them political activists and not merely professionals. They will of course claim ignorance and state that they are a-political. This strategy might work for them until the day where they are visited by a Justiciar Knight – their judge, jury and executioner.
1000 per 1 million citizens.
Punishment: death penalty and expropriation of property/funds. Punishment can be reduced under certain circumstances.
Category C traitor
Category C traitors are less influential and lower priority targets (often individuals who have facilitated category A and B traitors) but who are still guilty of charges 1-8.
10 000 per 1 million citizens.
Punishment: fines, incarceration, expropriation (considered as acceptable indirect casualties in larger operations where WMDs are involved).
Category D individuals
Category D individuals have little or no political influence but are facilitating category B and C traitors and/or MA100 political parties/media companies through various means. They are not guilty of charges 1-8 but work with or for individuals who are. The classification is of relevance when calculating/estimating indirect casualties concerning larger operations where WMDs are involved, as any category D individuals is not considered an innocent “civilian” but rather as a secondary servant/facilitator.
20 000-30 000 per 1 million citizens
Punishment: none (not considered civilian)
Number of Category A and B traitors on Western Europe
There are approximately 400 000 category A and B traitors in Western Europe using the current classification system (1010 per million).
France 65 650
Germany 82 820
United Kingdom 62 216
Netherlands 16 665
Belgium 10 807
Spain 47 167
Italy 60 600
Portugal 10 807
Greece 11 312
3.45 Added or diminished emphasis on flagged targets
This term can be used internally within any conservative military order (not that any cell in Phase 1 should be larger than 2 individuals).
Temporary Immunity (diminished emphasis)
Anders Breivik: One cannot allow one's country to be colonised by Muslims (01:09)
”Temporary immunity” is abbreviated TI and the level of significance ranges from 1-3. F example: TI1 indicates insignificant anti-Islamisation principles implemented, and where TI3 indicates considerable anti-Islamisation principles implemented. This type of temporary immunity can be ”awarded” to cultural Marxist/multiculturalist political parties, organisations and individuals who have shown indications of policy shift.
- TI1 Insignificant anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI declined)
- TI2 Some but minimal anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI declined)
- TI3 Considerable anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI granted)
No attacks should occur on TI3 candidates in phase 1. As for TI1-2 candidates, even though immunity has not been granted, any Justiciar Knight should consider other targets if possible. If there aren’t any equivalent targets which would yield the desired result, then TI-1-2 targets would still be the logical choice.
If the policy shift is significant enough over a long period permanent status change may be applied.
Focus Target (added emphasis)
”Focus Target” is abbreviated FT and indicates targets who will yield added results (high value targets) or can be used to flag ”unforgivable” political parties, organisations or individuals who has or still are committing grave crimes.
- FT1 Above average crimes or above average target/value
- FT2 Higher…
- FT3 Highest…
3.46 Killing women on the field of battle – directly or indirectly
Every female category A, B, C traitor or system protector out there is someone’s daughter, someone’s sister or mother. But then again, so are the victims of the current systems, f example the girl who committed suicide after being gang-raped by Muslims.
War isn’t pretty. It never has been. It is essential to know that approximately 60-70% of all cultural Marxists or suicidal humanist are female and up to 20% of police officers and military personnel (system protectors). Being a Justiciar Knight will involve killing our targets, or any system protector trying to stop us, indiscriminately. You will face women in battle and they will not hesitate to kill you. To them, you are just another armed criminal nut case as they will not know your true political agenda until after you have been slain or are apprehended. If you hesitate as much as a second due to the fact that your opponent is female you will fail. You must therefore embrace and familiarise yourself with the concept of killing women, even very attractive women.
It is not a secret that the average cultural conservative is a lot more chivalrous than the average person. After all, extreme feminism is a Marxist concept. As such, anti-Marxists usually have more traditional values and have been taught to revere women as they are the ones who will carry our offspring, the next generations. While being chivalrous is a good thing in ordinary day-to-day life, it will undoubtfully be fatal in any armed confrontation. If you are unable to think and act pragmatically and cynically you will most likely get yourself killed or arrested. Hesitation and doubt will lead to confusion which will severely endanger yourself and your operation. You have no choice but to use logical cynicism on the field of battle.
If you are unwilling or incapable of killing women due to the principles of chivalry you should probably steer away completely from the armed resistance movements and should probably consider creating yet another right wing blog instead.
On a personal level though; had it been up to me, women would not be encouraged to become system protectors at all – police officers nor military personnel. Females on average (of course; there are always exceptions) are physically and mentally inferior (aprox 20-30%) on a field of battle. I am not comfortable with the concept of killing females as they are simply too valuable to be put in harm’s way. However, we have little choice under the current regimes as they are encouraged and even positively discriminated against when applying to become system protectors in many countries.
In any case, all armed resistance fighters really have no choice but to get used to the idea.
[..] [Perfect Knights]
You will forever be celebrated by your people as a martyr for your country, protecting your culture and fighting for your kin and for Christendom. You will be remembered as a conservative revolutionary pioneer, one of the brave European Crusader heroes who said; enough is enough, it is time to take back our countries before our multiculturalist traitor elites actually manages to finalize their agenda and sell us all into Muslim slavery. Your sacrifice will be a great source of inspiration for generations of Europeans to come. You will become a role model for hundreds, perhaps thousands of new emerging martyrs fighting the good fight, our fight. And when we seize political and military power in Europe within a few decades, it will be pioneers and historical pioneers like you who will be celebrated with reverence. Revolutionary patriots like the Justiciar Knights will then be celebrated as destroyers of Marxism and the slayer of tyrants; the fearless and selfless protectors of Europe, The Perfect Knights. For there is no greater glory than dying selflessly while pro-actively protecting your people from persecution and gradual demographical annihilation.
» » » » [2083: The European Declaration of Independence (PDF)]