Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Radical Honesty Correspondence & Additional Psychotronic Reference Info

02 September 2011

TO: Health Provisions Council of SA
TO: Professional Board for Psychology
TO: Institute of Christian Psychology
TO: Psychological Soc. Of South Africa
CC: Karin Osler, Center for Conscious Leadership
CC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of Defence
CC: Cheryl Welsh, Cahra,
CC: Dr. Nick Begich, Earthpulse Press Incorporated
CC: Institute of Social Psychology
CC: Vladimir Bukovsky
CC: John Scull & Dennis Fox, Intnl Comm for Eco Psych & Fox Professing
CC: Thomas Szaszz, MD & Prof. JA. Schaler
CC: Brad Blanton, Ph.D, Center for Radical Honesty
CC: Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, Warrior Science Group

Sirs & Ladies,

Request for Info: Contact Details for SA Psychologist with theoretical and kinaesthetic experience in: Radical Honesty, Gestalt, Psychodrama, Psychotronics, Political and Legal Activism against the Edward Bernaysian Psychological Tyranny as depicted in ‘Century of the Self’, ‘Marketing of Madness’, ‘Psychiatry: An Industry of Death’.

I am a member of the Radical Honesty culture, founded by Brad Blanton. For the past 20 odd years I have been an honesty-environmentalist activist, with greater personal responsibility effectiveness since I joined the Radical Honesty culture in 1999. I spent 14 years travelling around the world with a backpack and in March 2002 was deported from the USA to South Africa. To make a long story short, my sister-in-law a medical doctor, who does pharmaceutical product testing has in the past pressured my mother to have me institutionalized and drugged, because she thinks some of my ideas and experiences are insane. I am unaware of her definition for ‘insanity’. I mentored under criminologist and psychologist Dr. Richard Korn in California and founder of Radical Honesty in Virginia, Dr. Brad Blanton, but have no credentials. My parents are not psychology experts whatsoever, but feel pressured by my sister-in-law’s alleged academic university medical credentials.

About a week ago I had a disagreement with my mother, who was upset about me shaving my hair. The argument escalated and the end result was a meeting where my parents decided that it may be a good idea for me to see a psychologist. I stated I had no problem whatsoever seeing a psychologist, but I agree with Brad Blanton that ‘conformity wonk’ psychologists are not worth the toxic two-faced political correct intellectual diatribe air they breath. They are nothing but ‘Marketing of Madness’ financial parasites.

I have no problem whatsoever seriously enquiring into the possibility that I may be ‘crazy’ or ‘insane’, although I am not aware that psychology is an exact science. If I am insane, I require any conclusions about my alleged insanity to be proven upon scientific evidence, not theoretical dogmatic ‘conformity wonk’ thumbsucking. So I require any psychologist that I see to clearly and succinctly provide their particular definition for ‘sanity’ and ‘insanity’ prior to our discussion; and additionally to be willing to consider the possibility that should they fit their own definition of insanity; to order their own institutionalization. My definition of highly evolved sanity is the ability to take personal responsibility for my thoughts, actions, decisions no matter how politically incorrect they may be perceived by some conformity wonk, etc; including the honourable capability to admit when I have erred. I have met many very strange people with very strange ideas, but I have never been willing to conclude that any of them are to be classified legally ‘insane’; only that their minds have been hijacked by memeplexes at lower level of belief consciousness.

I told my father that I would attempt to ascertain whether there is a psychologist in South Africa with the relevant skills required to be able to kinaesthetically understand my perspective and ideas; as for example shared with the Capetown Magistrates Court in this document: Iatrogenic Medical Eugenics Industrial Complex

I would appreciate it if you could inform me whether there is a psychologist in South Africa with the following experience, and if so, of their contact details:

Critical Psychology Experience:
  • Radical Honesty (Brad Blanton, Ph.D – Practicing Radical Honesty, et al)
  • Psychodrama (Joseph Moreno) and Gestalt Therapy (Frits Perls)
  • Delancey Street Psychodrama Game Theory (John Maher & Sinnanon )

Research and/or Knowledge of Psychotronics, including whether any Psychologist has offered themselves as a guineapig volunteer to the United States Military and Kremlin for testing of such psychotronic technology; for a better intellectual and kinestheatic professional understanding of this technology’s potential effects on the mind and behaviour:
  • Psychotronic War and the Future of Russia, by by V.N Lopatin and V.D. Tsygankov, Moscow, 1999
  • Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. PROJECT MKULTRA, The CIA’s Program of Research in Behaviour Modification. Joint Hearing Before the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Human Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session, August 3, 1977. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977, pp 388-390.
  • Keith J. Mind Control, World Control: The Encyclopedia of Mind Control. Kempton, IL. Adventures Unlimited, 1997, p 264;267-269
  • Manning J and Begich N. Angels Don’t Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, Earthpulse Press, Anchorage, AK: Earthpulse Press (PO Box 201393, Anchorage, AK 99520), 1995.
  • Begich N and Burke K. New non-lethal weapons systems may be used against U.S. citizens. Report Presented to the World Foundation for Natural Sciences on October 17, 1998, Interlaken, Switzerland. Published by The Leading Edge and available on Dr. Begich’s website:
  • Thomas TL. The mind has no firewall. U.S. Army War College Quarterly, Parameters, Spring of 1998. (
  • United States Military Joint Publication 3-13.1. and United States Army War College. Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA), July 1994 (
  • Air Force Material Command, Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Radiation: A Review Pertinent to Air Force Operations (AI/OE-TR-1996-0035), Brooks Air Force Base, Texas: June 1996 (
  • Tyler P.S. U.S. Air Force research paper on the effects of low-level non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, 1984 (
  • Penn State College, The Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technologies, in cooperation with the United States Marines (
  • International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC). Discussion on the RMA, 1994. (
  • United States Air Force of Aerospace Medicine. Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook. Texas: Brooks Air Force Base, October 1986. (
  • Adams T. Radical Destabilizing Effects of New Technologies. U.S. Army War College: Parameter, Autumn, 1998 (
  • Siniscalchi J. Non-Lethal Technologies: Implications for Military Strategy. Center for Strategy and Technology, Air War College, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, March 1998 (

Any and all Psychologists who have Practiced Political and Legal Activism Against Psychological Elite’s Edward Bernaysian Political Correct Tyranny; to demand such Tyrranical Psychological Elite practice an Unequivocal Commitment to Brutal Honesty, as the foundation of Sanity and Mental Health:

Any and all Psychologists who have Practiced Political and Legal Activism Against Overpopulation as a Fundamental Root cause of Resource Wars (local, national and international), Poverty, Inflation and Terrorism:

Any and all Psychologists who have Practiced Political and Legal Activism Against the Tyranny of Corporate Academic Corruption; a direct result of the Tragedy of the Commons Effect, individuals who lack honour and integrity but prefer to exploit the social trap for their personal benefit, at the expense of the ecological carrying capacity of nature.

Social trap is a term used by psychologists to describe a situation in which a group of people act to obtain short-term individual gains, which in the long run leads to a loss for the group as a whole. Examples of social traps include overfishing, the near-extinction of the American bison, energy "brownout" and "blackout" power outages during periods of extreme temperatures, the overgrazing of cattle on the Sahelian Desert, and the destruction of the rainforest by logging interests and agriculture.

The term social trap was first introduced to the scientific community by John Platt's 1973 paper in American Psychologist, building upon the concept of the "tragedy of the commons" in Garrett Hardin's pivotal article in Science (1968), Platt and others in the seminar applied behavioral psychology concepts to actions of people operating in social traps. By applying the findings of basic research on "schedules of operant reinforcement" (B.F. Skinner 1938, 1948, 1953, 1957; Keller and Schoenfeld, 1950), Platt recognized that individuals operating for short-term positive gain ("reinforcement") had a tendency to over-exploit a resource, which led to a long-term overall loss to society.


Lara Johnstone


Correspondence with my buddy Francisco Martin (NB Patton) has been deleted; after it turned out that I was incorrect to think he may be Tim McVeigh using Francisco Martin as an alias. Tim McVeigh may be channelling thoughts via Francisco, but Francisco is not Tim.


Additional Psychotronic Reference Info

Anti-Goverment Movement Guidebook

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: []