PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) ICC TRC Fraud Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal
Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 29 November 2011
From: JusSanguinis
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:33 PM
To: Job Cohen; Job Cohen - PvdA; Geert Wilders - Tweedekamer; Geert Wilders - PVV; NL SGP - Kees van der Staaij; Kees van der Staaij (SGP); Mark Rutte (VVD); Mark Rutte (VVD) Tweedekamer
Cc: Netherlands Consul Capetown; Netherlands Embassy Pretoria; Jurgens, Wouter; SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers; Sadhia Rafi - Vluchtelingenwerk; Prof. Gerard-René de Groot; Elona Bokshi: ECRE Exec & Proj Off; Martin Watson - ECRE Advocacy; Adv. M Wladimiroff.
Subject: PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal
Prime Minister Mark Rutte
CC: HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa
Prime Minister Rutte,
On 23 November 2011 I filed a complaint to Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland of charges of fraud against Algemene Dagblad Editor: Casper Naber; C/O & VIA: Ambassador de Vos, Netherlands Embassy, Pretoria.CHARGES:
Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.
Corruption: Relevant Dutch Anti-Corruption law, in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption
Complaint:
On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.
The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.
All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.
On 24 November and 25 November I requested Ambassador de Vos to confirm receipt, and to honourably inform me that he had forwarded my complaint to the Amsterdam Politie, to provide me with the relevant contact details, so that I could get a reference number.Could you please confirm that you have honourably and professionally forwarded the complaint to the Amsterdam-Amstelland Politie, as requested; so that I can be issued a Complaint Reference Number for the matter; to report it to the ICC Prosecutor’s office, et al.
I also have not yet received the reply from Minister Rosenthal in response to: Request for (A) Written Reasons; or (B) Parliamentary Hearing: Request Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (I) Provide Full Written Reasons clarifying the alleged errors of fact or of law made in the Jus Sanguinis Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Netherlands (& EU Progenitor) Governments; or (II) Recommend Dutch or EU Parliament to hold a hearing on the Jus Sanguinis Petition issues to EU Stamvader nations to hear the available International and South African Expert Witness testimony, to determine (a) the factual and legal accuracy and if so seriousness of the issues raised in the Jus Sanguinis petition; and (b) consider all relevant options for resolving the issues; such as amending relevant (i) Foreign Policy laws by politically endorsing a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; and/or (ii) Nationality laws by enacting Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation for their African White Refugee 'settler' descendants, to return to their progenitors motherland/s. (PDF)
Does Minister Rosenthal ever intend providing any written reasons or a response; or how do Netherlands politicians conduct their political problem solving relationships? Do you just ignore any complaint that contradicts your political correct ideologies? If not, when may I expect a response from Minister Rosenthal?
Ambassador de Vos and Netherlands Embassy staff do not consider me worthy of honourable professional response.
Could you please clarify whether the Dutch Government ever intends to provide any honourable response to these matters; or whether you are just going to ignore these requests, as if they do not exist, and you never received them?
Are charges of FRAUD and CORRUPTION irrelevant in the Netherlands when such charges are made against Newspaper editors and journalists?
Are journalists and editors ABOVE THE LAW in the Netherlands?
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
_____________________
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:58 AM
To: Nederland Consul, Capetown; Nederland Embassy, Pretoria; Political Affairs: Jurgens, Wouter
Cc: SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers
Subject: Att: Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland; c/o NL Amb de Vos, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Algemene Dagblad
Importance: High
Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland
Postbus 2287
1000 CG AMSTERDAM
Complaint submitted c/o & via:
HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa
Dear Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland,
REQ: INVESTIGATION OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION CHARGES AGAINST ALGEMENE DAGBLAD EDITOR
Please could you be so kind as to forward the attached complaint to the relevant investigating officer.
CHARGES AGAINST:
CASPER NABER: ALGEMENE DAGBLAD EDITOR
CHARGES:
Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.
Corruption: Relevant Dutch Anti-Corruption law, in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption
Complaint:
On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.
The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.
All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
Professor William K Black led the investigations of the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980-90′s, and put 1000 executive crooks in jail. Professor Black explains that fraud typically underlies virtually all major financial failures: financial collapses are caused by fraud (criminal activity) rather than mismanagement or accident. (15:56) |
Dan Rather: The Corrupt Corporate Media: The News Stops with Making a Profit! (06:26) |
________________________________
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 1:25 PM
To: Dutch Consul, Capetown; Dutch Embassy, Pretoria; Political Office: Jurgens, Wouter
Subject: Amb de Vos, NL Emb: ICC Prosecutor's Office: Art 15 Rome Statute Complaint (RSA SAP Case 823-08-2010)
Importance: High
Z.E. dhr. Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy, SA
CC: Netherlands Consulate
PO Box 346, Kaapstad 8000
Tel: +27-21-4215660
Fax: +27-21-4182690
CC: Mr. Wouter Jurgens
Netherlands Embassy
Political Section
Ambassador de Vos & Ms. Jurgens,
Update to: 09 May 2010: TRC Fraud Complaint ITO of Art. 15 of Rome Statute, filed with ICC
Please find attached additional information submitted to SAP complaint (Case 823-08-2010), in regards to the aforementioned complaint filed with the ICC Prosecutors Office, against relevant Accessories to Censorship of South Africa’s TRC FRAUD.
Complaint reads as follows:
On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.
The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.
All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African citizens.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
________________________________________
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:29 AM
To: ICC: Office of Prosecutor
Cc: NATO: SHAPE; US Navy JAG
Subject: ICC Prosecutor's Office: Art 15 Rome Statute Complaint (RSA SAP Case 823-08-2010)
TO: INT’L CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
Per Email
CC: NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE: CHIEFS OF DEFENCE
Per Email (via SHAPE)
CC: US NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S OFFICE (JAG)
Per Email
Additional Evidence to: Notice of Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute, filed on 09 May 2011
Please find attached additional information submitted to SAP complaint (Case 823-08-2010), in regards to the aforementioned complaint filed with the ICC Prosecutors Office, against relevant Accessories to Censorship of South Africa’s TRC FRAUD.
Complaint reads as follows:
On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.
The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.
All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African citizens.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
» » » » [11-11-22: Amsterdam Polizei Complaint: Algemene Dagblad ICC-TRC Fraud (PDF)]
From: Naber, Caspar
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:00 AM
To: Lara Johnstone
Subject: RE: Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland; c/o NL Amb de Vos, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Algemene Dagblad
Hi Lara,
What’s this all about? I don’t have the slightest idea to be honest. Could you explain to me please?
Kind regards,
Caspar Naber
________________________________
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:39 PM
To: 'Naber, Caspar'
Cc: Dutch Consul: Capetown; Dutch Embassy: Pretoria; Political Office: Jurgens, Wouter
Subject: RE: Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland; c/o NL Amb de Vos, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Algemene Dagblad
Mr. Naber,
Exactly what part of the fraud and corruption, and censorship of SA’s TRC FRAUD, as detailed in the complaint to the ICC, which was delivered to yourself and Algemene Dagblad 6 months ago, do you not understand?
Did you inform your readers about it? When have you informed your readers that charges were filed with the Norwegian Committee to withdraw Mandela, Tutu and De Klerks TRC Fraud Nobel Whoredom Peace Prizes? When did you inform your readers that charges were filed at the ICC against South Africa’s TRC FRAUD elite?
I shall be happy to explain whatever it is you allegedly don’t understand, if you tell me what exactly you don’t understand.
As for being honest: I have spent a year in a prison cell, because I refused to lie to a Magistrate. Is that what you mean when you say ‘to be honest’? That you “tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the goddamn truth, 24 hours, 7 days a week, 365 days a year”?
If not, what do you mean when you say ‘to be honest’?
Please be 100% HONEST (THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE GODDAMN TRUTH) with me and tell me exactly what part of the complaint you do not understand, and I shall happily provide you with clarification on that aspect.
Respectfully,
Lara Johnstone
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
________________________________
From: Lara Johnstone [SS]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 4:13 PM
To: Dutch Consul - Capetown; Dutch Embassy - Pretoria; Jurgens, Wouter
Cc: SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers
Subject: RE: Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland; c/o NL Amb de Vos, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Algemene Dagblad
HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa
Ambassador de Vos,
Could you please confirm that you have honourably and professionally forwarded the complaint to the Amsterdam-Amstelland Politie, as requested; so that I can be issued a Complaint Reference Number for the matter; to report it to the ICC Prosecutor’s office, et al.
Many thanks,
Lara Johnstone
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
____________________________
From: Lara Johnstone [SS]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 11:35 AM
To: Duthc Consul - Capetown; Dutch Embassy - Pretoria; Jurgens, Wouter
Cc: SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers
Subject: RE: Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland; c/o NL Amb de Vos, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Algemene Dagblad
HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa
Ambassador de Vos,
Could you please confirm that you have honourably and professionally forwarded the complaint to the Amsterdam-Amstelland Politie, as requested; so that I can be issued a Complaint Reference Number for the matter; to report it to the ICC Prosecutor’s office, et al.
I also have not yet received the reply from Minister Rosenthal in response to: Request for (A) Written Reasons; or (B) Parliamentary Hearing: Request Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (I) Provide Full Written Reasons clarifying the alleged errors of fact or of law made in the Jus Sanguinis Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Netherlands (& EU Progenitor) Governments; or (II) Recommend Dutch or EU Parliament to hold a hearing on the Jus Sanguinis Petition issues to EU Stamvader nations to hear the available International and South African Expert Witness testimony, to determine (a) the factual and legal accuracy and if so seriousness of the issues raised in the Jus Sanguinis petition; and (b) consider all relevant options for resolving the issues; such as amending relevant (i) Foreign Policy laws by politically endorsing a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; and/or (ii) Nationality laws by enacting Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation for their African White Refugee 'settler' descendants, to return to their progenitors motherland/s. (PDF)
Does Minister Rosenthal ever intend providing any written reasons or a response; or how do Netherlands politicians conduct their political problem solving relationships? Do you just ignore any complaint that contradicts your political correct ideologies? If not, when may I expect a response from Minister Rosenthal?
If you consider me to be unworthy of a response (FYI: Not even my worst enemy has ever been considered unworthy of an honourable response from myself; even if that response included the words FIND SOME HONOUR KAFFIR, OR GO FUCK YOURSELF); do you have the honour to inform me to fuck off; or should I assume you don’t have the integrity and courage to be an honourable honest Ambassador?
Many thanks,
Lara Johnstone
Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment