Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Steve Sailor's conservative hypocrisy: A critic of liberals who persecute conservatives, while he covertly endorses NYT persecution of white Africans

According to Wikipedia: “Steven Ernest Sailer is an American journalist and movie critic for The American Conservative, a blogger, a columnist, and a former correspondent for UPI. He writes about race relations, gender issues, politics, immigration, IQ, genetics, movies, and sports.”

I am neither a conventional liberal or conservative. I am a truthseeker: many of my working hypotheses on social, political, ecological and many other issues include ideas from the vast spectrum of ideologies, whether liberal, conservative, nationalist, green, libertarian, etc. I evaluate a principle based upon the evidence that supports it, and that is it. I do not practice political correct ideological arse-kissing, simply so that I can be allowed into some ideological group, and now feel happy, cause I can call myself a 'blah blah-ist'. I have plenty of time for a sincere liberal, conservative, black, green, pink. I fucking hate hypocrits, who demand from others, that which they do not practice themselves.

My knowledge of Steve Sailor is that he is an avid critic of liberal hypocrisy. I have no problem with hypocrisy being critized and exposed, whether it is black, white, liberal or conservative.

One of the principles I love about what conservatism allegedly stands for (at least it does for some people, but clearly not for Mr. Sailor) is that an individual or idea is evaluated upon its merit. Not its colour, not its political correctness, not the size of its PR account, ITS MERIT. That means that if you are a sincere conservative who practices this principle of evaluation of any individual, based on their merit (the quality of their character or the factual evidence for the principle), then you do not care one iota for whether Tom Thumb or Galileo has zero followers to adhere to their principle or idea; because you evaluate the principle and idea on its merit.

In my opinion, those whom I consider CREDIBLE in thier exposure of hypocrisy; are those who practice what they preach. Who hold themselves to the same standards that they demand of those whom they criticise and expose.

For if you are not capable of holding yourself to a particular standard of conduct; but demand that others live up to that particular standard of conduct; and if they don't you call them a hypocrit; what does that make you, if you don't even live upto this standard you demand of others?

A few days ago, Mr. Sailor posted an article to his blog, which was also posted to VDare, criticising the New York Times for censoring information or arguments related to surplus populations.

The article Notice Anything Missing was about a New York Times OpEd, by Herbert J. Gans: The Superfluous Worker. It deals with surplus workers, and examines the reasons for why the economy is incapable of providing enough work for the surplus workers.

Mr. Sailor criticises the article for avoiding including immigration as one of the reasons for why America has surplus workers. A valid criticism of censorship by the New York Times of politically incorrect information and evidence, regarding the political controversial issue of immigraiton, it would prefer not to discuss in its article.

I posted a comment to Mr. Sailor's article, detailing the information about the complaint and charges filed against the New York Times, for fraud, in regarding its censorship of charges filed against it at the ICC for censoring South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Fraud (which deals extensively about how and why the TRC deliberatley avoided confronting the surplus population problem in its TRC enquiry, to examine how this surplus population was manufactured and politically manipulated to foster political violence):
Fraud & Corruption Charges filed against New York Times: Arthur Brisbane & Celia Dugger; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud at ICC:

Excerpt: Radical Honesty Charges at ICC against, among others New York Times:

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

Mr. Sailor proceeded to CENSOR the comment; exactly like the New York Times censored the argument about immigration as a contribution to America's surplus employment problem.

Mr. Sailor does not like the New York Times censorship about issues contributing to the surplus population problem, but is quite happy to censor such issues from comments on his blog.
Note to Mr. Sailor, posted as comment to: Notice anything missing:

Please take note of the following article: Steve Sailor's conservative hypocrisy: A critic of liberals who persecute conservatives, while he covertly endorses NYT persecution of white Africans.

As a blogger who practices honourable constructive criticism; you are provided the opportunity of response, and your response shall be published in full; should you wish to discuss the allegations against yourself.

27 November 2011 17:20 (GMT+2)

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: []