Why does the ANC demand you get a licence for a stable bicycle trailer; but no stability test/skill licence to breed or vote?

“Why does the government demand I need a licence for my bicycle trailer, which needs to be stable; but I don't need any stability test or skills to prove I can get a licence to breed or vote????” -- Question to Mr. Hector Eliott, Head of Ministry, Transport and Public Works, Provincial Government Western Cape

Today I filed an Application with the George Magistrates Court (GRC Case 3052/11) to ask the Magistrate to issue an Order that gives me a Temporary Permit to operate my Bicycle Trailer on Public Roads in Eden District Municipality, pending the resolution of my Petition to the Dept. of Transport for a Permanent Bicycle Trailer Permit. This was in response to a letter from the WC Dept. of Transport that informed me that the Vehicle Technical Committee (VTC) had decided -- without doing any tests or investigations whatsoever; purely by thumb-sucking decision-making -- that my bicycle trailer was unstable; and hence I should be a denied a licence for it; after the IPP had approved my petition, pending the decision of the VTC.

So, on Tuesday, July 05, 2011 7:35 PM; I filed a Request to Mr. Arendse for further evidence and information from the VTC: Request Vehicle Technical Committee (VTC) ‘Unstability’ Evidentiary Info; for Appeal to be filed with Mr. Philip Magagane of NDoT: RE: Petition to use Haulin Colin Bike Trailers on a Public Road. (Annex D). I also informed him that I “shall also be filing an application with the local Magistrates court for an order, granting me a temporary permit to use my bicycle trailer, until this matter is finally resolved with the Dept of Transport.”

Please could the VTC provide me with the results of their investigation, and the detailed report as to how and why they allege bicycles and trailers are unstable; and how exactly they define ‘unstable’; particularly the tests done by the VTC on the safety aspects, including stability tests which are the foundation for their allegations that a combination of bicycle and trailer are unstable.

Are they alleging that bicycle’s and trailers are only unstable in South Africa? Or which other countries in the world -- where bicycles and trailers of all sizes and makes are legal and used by ecologically conscious persons and poor people every day of the week for the past almost 200 odd years since the invention of the bicycle in 1830 -- does the VTC allege that bicycles and trailers are also unstable in?

Please could you also provide me with the legislation that states that it is a citizens responsibility to provide evidence of stability for a vehicle; which is considered stable anywhere and everywhere else in the world; and not the Committee who disputes such stability’s responsibility to provide their evidence for their allegations.

The Globalists' Worst Nightmare: Self-Sufficiency: a Universal solution to the globalist problem...

Self-Sufficiency: a universal solution to the globalist problem.

11 March 2011
Tony Cartalucci | Land Destroyer

Introduction

A vision of self-sufficiency in Thailand. Agrarian values and the self-reliance they engender are the hallmarks of real freedom.

When thinking about "solutions" many are quick to cite organizing a protest and taking to the streets. Let's for a moment consider the mechanics of a protest, what it might accomplish, and what it may leave to be desired.

Take Glenn Beck's feckless and disingenuous 2010 "Restoring Honor" event in Washington D.C. It drew thousands of honest, well-intentioned people from all over the United States. Indeed, thousands of people filled up their Fortune 500 made cars with gas from Fortune 500 oil companies, drove countless miles, stopping along the way at Fortune 500 fast food restaurants, stayed at Fortune 500 run hotels, and stocked up on supplies purchased at Fortune 500 Walmart. They slaked their thirst under the hot August sun with cans of Fortune 500 Pepsi and Coke, and at the end of the day, they drove home, paid their Fortune 500 cable subscriptions to watch their Fortune 500 media reports, most likely on News Corporation's Fox News, a Council on Foreign Relations corporate member.

At best, all a protest will lead to, while we are so hopelessly dependent on this system, is a round of musical chairs inside the political arena, with perhaps superficial concessions made to the people. The vector sum however, will still be decidedly in favor of the global corporate-financier oligarchy.

If we understand that the fundamental problem facing not only America, but the entire world, is a global corporate-financier oligarchy that has criminally consolidated their wealth by "liberalizing" their own activities while strangling ours through regulations, taxes, and laws, we should then understand why events like Beck's "Restoring Honor" are not only fruitless, but in fact, counterproductive. We should also realize that any activity we commit ourselves to must be directed at this corporate-financier oligarchy rather than the governments they have co-opted and positioned as buffers between themselves and the masses.

While people understand something is wrong and recognize the necessity to do "something," figuring out what that "something" should be becomes incredibly difficult when so few understand how power really works and how to strip it away from the oligarchs that have criminally consolidated it.

Response to BNP: Newcastle Upon Tyne: Mr. Keith McFarlane: “Just found out your a red. and you were married to a n*gg*r. bye you filthy race traitor.”

Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:22 AM
To: BNP Scotland; BNP North East; BNP Head Office
Subject: Please Forward to BNP: Newcastle Upon Tyne: Mr. Keith McFarlane

Please forward to Mr. Keith McFarlane; believed to be BNP Member: Newcastle Upon Tyne. Many thanks. Commendations to BNP for having such an honest honourable member as Mr. McFarlane who share their constructive criticism to a persons face, not behind your back. A salute to Mr. McFarlane for his honourable act of criticism.

Mr. Keith McFarlane
Newcastle Upon Tyne
British National Party

Dear Mr. McFarlane,

I write in response to your Facebook message: “Just found out your a red. and you were married to a n*gg*r. bye you filthy race traitor...”

Many thanks for what I interpret as your brutally honest angry statement. If your intention was to insult me; you are going to have to try a little harder! ;-)

It is almost impossible to insult me. I imagine the reason why it is so difficult to insult me, is because I know that whenever I give someone an honest blunt criticism piece of my mind, I share it sincerely as constructive criticism. I may be angry with them, but my intentions are not dishonourable. I want to share my anger with them, and get over it, and understand the source of our misunderstanding.

I assume, I know my intentions for sharing my anger are not malicious; hence I always give others the benefit of the doubt that their sharing of their anger is also with honourable constructive criticism intention. In Radical Honesty, to share constructive criticism is the highest form of respect and love. I know other cultures don’t share this perspective to constructive criticism, but I prefer to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. So, I appreciate your courage to confront me to my face with your honest blunt opinion about me – whether founded in fact or not – so that we can resolve our misunderstanding, and I can learn from your constructive criticism (if proven to be worthy).

Please herewith find my response to your statement as follows: (1) Married to an Honourable Nigger; (2) Correction: Member of Radical Honesty Culture; not a ‘Red/Communist’; (3) Correction: Only Social Contract I swore allegiance to (and can be a traitor to) is the Radical Honesty Social Contract.

Continued in attached PDF

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA