Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Monday, February 6, 2012

LHR: ANC Gov's new legal definition of "relevant" 'will undermine transparency'





New rules ‘will undermine transparency’

Lawyers for Human Rights warn new rules on what documents a person is entitled to when planning to challenge a government official’s decision in court will make it harder to hold government to account for its decisions

Franny Rabkin | Business Day | 2012/02/06 07:10:31 AM



NEW rules on what documents a person is entitled to when planning to challenge a government official’s decision in court will make it harder to hold government to account for its decisions, said Lawyers for Human Rights in court papers.

Effective judicial review is widely viewed as an essential part of ensuring the government acts lawfully when it takes administrative decisions — such as the awarding of mining rights or tenders.

The "record" of the official’s decision, the documents upon which the decision was based, is a key weapon in the arsenal of the person who wishes to challenge the decision in court. Obtaining the record is the first step of the court process to review and set aside an administrative decision.

The new rules, yet to come into force, say that before a person challenges an administrative decision, he is entitled to ask for only those documents that are "relevant" to his grounds for believing the decision to be unlawful. The decision maker decides what documents are relevant.

SA's Toxic TRC Fraud: Forgiveness Undefined: Is TRC S.A. 'Forgiveness': (i) Catholic: Indulgences 4 Sale; (ii) Lutheran: Spiritual Redemption; or (iii) Black Liberation Theology: Fanon Violence on Rotting Corpses of Settlers? (21:18)
Lawyers for Human Rights has said in court papers that this is a massive shift from the law as it now stands, which entitles the litigant, by right, to "every scrap of paper" that the decision maker had in front of him when the decision was made.

The legal advocacy organisation said the rules breach the constitutional right to just administrative action and other constitutional rights.

This argument has been hotly disputed by the Department of Justice, which argued the point of the new rules was to make judicial review "a sharp and focused instrument", ultimately making the process more efficient. The Rules of Procedure for Judicial Review of Administrative Action, enacted under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, were promulgated in 2009 and are meant to bring the court procedure in line with the act.

Under the law, Rule 53 of the Uniform Rules of Court, once a person has received the full record, it is possible (and it in fact often happens, says Lawyers for Human Rights) that the record will reveal even more grounds on which to argue that the decision was unlawful.

The litigant can then amend his court papers, asking the court to set aside the decision on those extra grounds as well.

But, said Lawyers for Human Rights, the new rules defined "relevant" documentation as only documents directly related to the ground of review that the litigant had originally specified — leaving no opportunity for the applicant to supplement his grounds.

In heads of argument, counsel for Lawyers for Human Rights, Steven Budlender and Carol Steinberg, said the rules "would reduce the accountability of the public administration by facilitating a more secretive process of administrative decision".

The department said the law as it stood did not require every scrap of paper to be given to the litigant and had always required only relevant documents to be handed over. In the experience of the state attorney’s office, when huge volumes of documentation have been handed over, it has usually been only a few of these that have actually been relevant in court, said counsel for government Willie Duminy SC in his heads of argument.

The case is set for the North Gauteng High Court today.

» » » » [Business Day]


No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: [jmc.pa.tf(at)gmail(dot)com]