Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City Bomber, referred to the Death Penalty as “State Assisted Suicide.”“I knew I wanted this before it happened. I knew my objective was state-assisted suicide and when it happens, it's in your face, motherfuckers. You just did something you're trying to say should be illegal for medical personnel.”
Wiki:Capital punishment or the death penalty, is the execution of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (Latin caput). Hence, a capital crime was originally one punished by the severing of the head.
Capital punishment has been practiced in virtually every society, and thus can be considered to be a cultural universal or close to it, excluding those with state religious proscriptions against it. It is a matter of active controversy in various countries and states, and positions can vary within a single political ideology or cultural region. In the EU member states, Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union prohibits the use of capital punishment.[1]
Today, most countries are considered by Amnesty International as abolitionists,[2] which allowed a vote on a nonbinding resolution to the UN to promote the abolition of the death penalty.[3] But more than 60% of the worldwide population live in countries where executions take place insofar as the four most populous countries in the world (the People's Republic of China, India, United States and Indonesia) apply the death penalty and are unlikely to abolish it at any time soon.
 |
Do South Africans think the ANC regime is doing enough to stop violent crime?...Hell, no!
By Mike Smith
Below is a screenshot of the poll on www.iol.co.za news website of 23 September 2009.
According to the delusional, lame-arse ANC Marxist terrorist regime, they are winning against crime in South Africa, but what do the people of South Africa think?
As can be seen from the poll...91% of the people of South Africa feel that the ANC regime is not doing enough to stop violent crime. It seems that Brandon Huntley was right in his application to the Canadian Immigration and refugee board. He is certainly not alone in his opinion.
The ANC would want the Canadians and the world at large to believe that this perception amongst South Africans is false and that Brandon Huntley is a lone “nutter” and “chancer”. However...Every time these online polls are run, it comes out overwhelmingly in favour of everything Brandon Huntley has claimed so far and totally against the perceptions of the ANC and their academic lackeys in the tertiary institutions of South Africa.
How South Africans really feel about being refugees
The solution to solving violent crime in South Africa is obvious...
A man after my own heart!
Saturday, May 23, 2009
by Uncle Tom Rants
 Uncle Tom Rants was born and raised in GA: a “Colored Grady baby.” He tends to be ultraconservative, and is tired of hearing wimpy excuses why black folks, (“Kneegrows” included), can't make it. [Uncle Tom] |
After reading what Mr. George Lambus had to say while running for office in Mississippi, I whole heartly agree with him.“Incompetent negro Democrats at City Hall, negroes without civic pride, negro criminals and corrupt negro police officers have just about driven this city into the ground. Any negro Democrat running for mayor who tells you that he or she can reduce crime and bring jobs to Jackson is a damn lie. They only want to be mayor for the salary. Job creation is contingent upon the economy improving, and crime can only be alleviated by a noose and a stout tree limb. I will provide the noose, and when the economy improves, I will get the jobs here.”
He, like I, knows that in many cases you fight fire with fire. Some niggers will just not take heed of our laws, and must be dealt with differently. Spending more money attempting to rehabilitate these savages, is all for naught! Since they didn't care about human life when they did the killing, why should we care about how to get rid of them? The only way to put a stop to niggers from going wild, is to get rid of them as quick as possible, and that means a tall tree, and a short rope.
I promise you, after a few have been lynched, the rest will fall into line, because they don't won't to end up swinging from a tree. It worked in the past, and it can work again.
Source: Uncle Tom Rants
Black Mayoral Candidate Wants to Bring Back Lynching
Mar. 20, 2009
By BET.com News Staff
 Black Republican George Lambus wants to be the next mayor of Jackson, Miss. He says bringing lynching back will curb crime. |
If one Republican mayoral candidate has his way, lynching may make a legal comeback in Mississippi.
George Lambus is canvassing mostly White neighborhoods in Jackson, Miss., with campaign fliers that blast Democratic city leaders and call for “a noose and stout tree limb” to combat crime. The flier reads:“Incompetent negro Democrats at City Hall, negroes without civic pride, negro criminals and corrupt negro police officers have just about driven this city into the ground. Any negro Democrat running for mayor who tells you that he or she can reduce crime and bring jobs to Jackson is a damn lie. They only want to be mayor for the salary. Job creation is contingent upon the economy improving, and crime can only be alleviated by a noose and a stout tree limb. I will provide the noose, and when the economy improves, I will get the jobs here.”
Lambus, who is Black, has never held public office, and according to WAPT-16 TV in Jackson, he founded the Jackson Vigilance Committee, and in 1983 ran for the Mississippi Senate registered as a Democrat. Lambus also says he is a criminology graduate student at Jackson State University. He is among several candidates in the mayoral race to succeed current mayor Frank Melton, who is facing federal civil rights violations for alleged attacks on known crack houses in the city. Melton won over voters on a platform that was tough on crime, and Lambus appears to be following that lead. But it is his approach, which also includes repeated use of the word ‘negro’ that is causing a stir.
"The situation is bad now, but it's going to get worse," Lambus told WAPT. “All those Black people who are offended by that, they can't sit on their porches at night."
Lambus is considered a long-shot in the race.
Source: BET
South African's Petition to Bring Back Death Penalty
Bring back the death penalty.
Help South Africa put a stop to crime and make your vote count.
Sign Petition
Bring back the death penalty!
March 9th, 2008
In a recent talk, Jacob Zuma said he would support a referendum on whether to bring back the death penalty or not. This of course has further convinced me that he is just a demagogue and not a man of principles, but it has also made me think about the death penalty. So this week I am going to jump on the bandwagon and give my support to bringing back the death penalty. With the rampant crime in this country the death penalty is the only option and as I will argue the only truly effective deterrent for crime.
First off, it is important to decide which crimes should carry the death penalty. I think the death penalty should be optional for any theft of larger than R1 million and compulsory if the person already has property worth more than R1 million. The criminals that are to be targeted are rich, educated businessman/company directors who commit fraud, embezzlement or dodgy accounting. I believe that by implementing the death penalty this sort of heinous crime can be eliminated almost overnight. Why is this sort of crime so heinous and deserving of the death penalty? Firstly the perpetrators are normally fairly well educated and should therefore know better. They are often wealthy before they even commit the crime and are capable of earning a decent living without resorting to crime. The victims of the crime are normally numerous and are the weak, gullible, poor, elderly and uneducated. Since their crime is therefore motivated entirely by greed with defenceless victims, it a particularly odious sort of crime. You know the story, there have been enough of them lately – some company director with his multimillion Rand houses and cars runs a company into the ground by moving all its money into offshore bank accounts, and then the poor employees and pensioners are left with nothing.
Why would the death penalty be so effective? Unlike most crimes of poverty that are normally the target of the death penalty, these guys actually have something to lose. They have a generally nice life and I am sure that they would miss it more than some poor gang member who has no choices and no future in his life. The threat of the death penalty will therefore be far more effective in deterring these white collar criminals than the slap on the wrist and month or two in a health spa prison that they currently get. Secondly since they are wealthy they are able to afford the expensive legal fees required to challenge your death penalty conviction. A lot of the people on death row in America are too poor to afford proper legal counsel and many innocent people sit on death row purely because they couldn’t afford a good lawyer. The white collar criminal will of course only have the best legal representation and therefore there will be almost no one on death row who was wrongly convicted. Then for the actual execution, they will be able to seek the best medical advice on the quickest and most painless way to die and will be able to employ a well qualified executioner who won’t botch the procedure. None of this grisly hanging or electrocution stuff or lethal injection which may hurt like hell, but no one knows because they paralyse you first.
So join me in my campaign to bring back the death penalty for greedy money-grabbers who know better but still callously steal from the defenceless… And also bring it back for anyone who still believes that the death penalty is an effective and efficient way of deterring crime.
Source: Pete Nixon
No comments:
Post a Comment