How many 2010 WC fans will leave SA burned, duped, fooled, conned, scammed and screwed over by Proudly SA Lies?

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Simplistically, I'd say that when it comes to 'Proudly South Africa' there are three groups of South Africans.

There are at least two groups who do not share the 'Proudly South African' sentiments, with the centrist 'Proudly South Africans'.

If I would classify the two extremes, I'd put them into 'black' and 'white' rather than 'left' or 'right'. Because there are blacks and whites, from both 'left' and 'right', who do not inhabit the 'Proudly South African' Hypocrisy on Steroids universe.

Predominantly, I'd say those who clearly and publicly do not classify themselves as 'Proudly South African', are those who value truth and values of honesty and integrity, above fake illusions of two faced hypocrisy unity, and patriotism founded upon lies and deception.

Many of them may have been sincerely willing to commit to the principles of Truth and Reconciliation, and a truly non-racial South Africa; only to find out that they had been betrayed, and deceived by the 'Truth and Reconciliation' Dog and Pony Show, and repeatedly subsequent thereto.

They found out that the ANC and Tutu's Truth and Reconciliation Illusion show, had no serious interest in exposing the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Apartheid: good and bad.

As Anthea Jeffery documents in The Truth About the Truth Commission (PDF), and I have documented in SA Human Rights Commission Complaint WC-2009-0455BS (PDF), the Truth & Reconciliation Commission were not committed to a fully impartial enquiry into the truth about Apartheid.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commissions mandate was, among others:

to establish the truth in relation to past events, as well as the motives for, and circumstances in which gross violations of human rights have occurred, and to make the findings known, in order to prevent a repetition of such acts in the future.... (a) To achieve the objectives of Truth and Reconciliation require facilitating and where necessary coordinating or initiating enquiries into gross violations of human rights, including violations which are part of a systematic patterns of abuse, the nature, causes and extent of gross violations of human rights, including the antecedents, circumstances, factors, context, motives and perspectives, which led to such violations; ....

Nowhere in the Truth and Reconciliation Hearings did any of the true motives for Apartheid ever surface, the motives for seperate development, the motives for providing seperate homelands for the different black tribes, who were significantly rooted in traditional culture, to be be "gradually" brought up to "standards of Western civilization." Nowhere in the Truth and Reconciliation Hearings was it ever admitted that black South Africans under apartheid, had better education, health, house and services, than any other blacks, in Africa, many of them under black governments.

“The ‘social contract’ is a socio-political and legal agreement between citizens and government. For the purpose of this matter, a healthy social-contract exists, when men and women in government respect the rights of its people, by guaranteeing and, in fact, encouraging their right to speak out, to criticize irresponsible leadership, and to hold their government accountable for its failures and actions.” -- Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D. evidencing ‘citizens privilege’ Nuremberg Principles of Civil Disobedience; in Support of Complaints: HC-WC 019963-09 & SAHRC WC-2009-0455BS” (PDF)

This is not to deny that violations and Human Rights abuses did occur against black South Africans, particularly after the ANC decided they could not be bothered with anything remotely resembling a non-violent struggle, like those bumbling pacifist non-violent idiots Martin Luther King or Mahatma Gandhi; but that instead they would follow the principles of Liberation Theology violence, not only against the White Apartheid goverment, but also against blacks in the townships, who realized that blacks in South Africa, under the Apartheid Goverment, were far better treated, by the Apartheid Goverment, than blacks were treated by Black Nationalist goverments in Africa, and accordingly did not support the ANC's fake 'liberation struggle'. Such blacks were speedily dealt with as 'traitors' by necklacing, so as to instill massive fear into any township resident who did not support the ANC's dictatorial Africanization Black Power goals. [ANC: VIP's of Violence :: Africanisation of South Africa & Peoples War :: Forsaking Gandhian Non-violence]

However most of Apartheids 'abuses' did occur against ANC terrorists, or those perceived to be providing the ANC's violent terrorist actions, with financial or any other form of assistance. Some however allege that not all of the abuses committed by Apartheid Forces were disclosed by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

For the TRC to have been truly and totally comitted to total Transparency and the Truth about Apartheid, all of these allegations should have been seriously and impartially considered by an impartial independent tribunal, which did not have any conflicts of interest. The TRC board was riddled with individuals with massive conflicts of interest. This did not bother the ANC, or -- it appears -- many individuals on the Board; whose agenda consequently was not credibility for Total Transparency and impartiality; but in effect, an agenda in accordance with their related conflicts of interest.

Inside Quatro: Uncovering the Exile History of the ANC and SWAPO, By Paul Trewhela [*Amazon**Kalahari*]

Consequently whites and blacks who value TRUTH and TRANSPARENCY, and HONOUR, and who were committed to those values, to building a truly non-racial society, were deceived and betrayed; by the lies and deception of a fake and fraudulent, Political Dog and Pony Show.

For many the realization may not have been immediate; they felt something was wrong, but they pressed on, they -- like everyone else -- wanted desperately to believe in the 'Rainbow Miracle'. But as the days wore on, and more lies and more deceptions, by the ANC and TRC; the realization gradually dawned on such individuals, that they were being massively betrayed.

Not many South Africans have the emotional, psychological and political courage to confront the reality about how large the TRC lie of betrayal was. For many millions, even the hint that they have been massively deceived is too frightening a possibility to confront their 'Proudly South African' identity with. It is to be reminded of Hitler's quote that massive lies work better than little ones.

However, there are a few who are willing to confront the 'TRC was a massive fraud' allegation. They are generally individuals who have enough of a sense of personal identity rooted in their own personal value systems, their character; who are willing to make an impartial enquiry into an allegation, without feeling personally threatened, if the allegation is indeed true.

To give you an example: If the TRC had been totally impartial and totally sincere; then any TRC leader who received any feedback providing the TRC with evidence for how the TRC was not living up to its mandate, would be honestly and sincerely welcomed to submit such information and evidence. That would demonstrate the sincerit and commitment of the TRC, to consider feedback constructively and impartialy, with an enquiry into its evidentiary worth.

Instead the TRC responded with either deliberate indifference; or vilification; a total and unequivocal refusal to receive any feedback, thereby only reinforcing the truth, that the TRC's agenda was not one of Truth, and total Transparency with a commitment towards Reconciliation; but that the TRC was simply conducting an image management Political Dog and Pony Show, to enable relevant individuals to be rewarded, for their obedience, with 'Nobel Peace Prize medals'.

Accordingly much of what occurred at Camp Quatro and the crimes committed by ANC cadres against dissenting ANC members, or IFP members or otherwise, on behalf of the ANC Politburo; the coercion of young African women to participate as slave and cannon fodder "Operation Production" Breeding factories on behalf of the ANC (behaviour vilified by the West, when conducted by Hitler) was covered up and never exposed by the TRC.

And as the reality of the Betrayal becomes more exposed in time, as a result of actions on behalf of thousands if not millions of South Africans, who do not feel free to be honest with each other, to engage in an honest conversation, individuals words and their actions contradict each other, more and more. And anyone with common sense knows the maxim: "Actions speak louder than words".

[Will South Africa Survive?] South Africa's Brave New World: The Beloved Country Since the End of Apartheid; By R.W. Johnson [*Amazon**Kalahari*]

So it is that thousands of South African corporations use the words 'Proudly South African' in their literature; not because they are Proudly South African Patriots, whose identity is driven in terms of their commitment to a Constitutional Republic; but because using the words, will absolve them from the allegation of 'racist', or help them to get a goverment tender. IN their words, they say they are 'Proudly South African', but their actions to defend the Constitution, are non-existant. Actions speak louder than words.

And so life continues in South Africa; the country where millions of South Africans are too emotionally, psychologically, politically and spiritually insecure, to confront the reality that their 'Proudly South African' Emperor's are marching around buttnaked.

'Proudly South Africa' and 'Rainbow Unity South Africa' are staging the most spectacular fraud and self deception show of 'Orwellian Hypocrisy':

"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their newspaper editors and schoolteachers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned... to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers."
-- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

I hate to burst the 2010 bubble, but …

Ray Hartley, The Times
January 1st, 2010

2010 is here and it is going to be a fantastic year for South Africa. We will host a very successful World Cup and we will believe that we are a winning nation that is taking its rightful place on the world stage.

Zuma’s used his New Year’s message to call on the nation to communicate only “positive messages“. His words were: “The year 2010 must be the year in which for the first time, we all communicate positive messages about our country to the world – the successes and possibilities. We have to put the culture of negativity behind us.”

Nice. But unfortunately, we have problems, very serious ones that must be aired. I’m sure the world – that part of it which we admire at any rate – would rather see a country where criticism is encouraged and tolerated than one which bursts at the seams with false admiration for itself.

Don’t kid yourself. The World Cup hype masks some serious problems in our politics, in our economy and in our social life. Once the World Cup is over what will this nation do to turn the marketing bonanza into something real that changes the lives of those struggling to survive?

Politically we are in a bad place. President Jacob Zuma has not proved an outright disaster and that’s a relief. But what kind of presidency is taking shape? The signs are ominous.

Zuma is rewarding his cronies, such as Mo Shaik – the man who made the disgraceful claim that Bulelani Ngucka was an Apartheid spy – with positions in government. He believes that Julius Malema is a future leader of the ANC. He visited Equatorial Guinea in one of his first official trips abroad. Zuma is forming an alliance with religious organisations that want to roll back aspects of the constitution. He has appointed Menzi Simelane, a man who openly believes prosecutions ought to be directed by politicians, as the head of the National Prosecuting Authority. The only possible reason for this is that Zuma wants – either directly or by proxy – to head off the prosecution of his political cronies.

‘There is a difference between posed, fake intellectual forgiveness, and sincere, sensate being forgiveness, and, this difference has been, so far, almost always avoided by politicians; including South Africa's alleged Truth & Reconciliation Peace Prize politicians.......’ -- “Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D. evidencing ‘citizens privilege’ Nuremberg Principles of Civil Disobedience; in Support of Complaints: HC-WC 019963-09 & SAHRC WC-2009-0455BS” (PDF)

All of these are not good portents. They suggest that there is no prospect that the decline of the state into a vehicle for the enrichment of the political elite will be arrested. Nowhere is this more apparent than when it comes to making policy. The focus ought to be on making South Africa a globally competitive investment destination with the sorts of policies that will build our industrial capacity and press home our dimming strategic advantages. Instead we are doomed to have no policy or a policy that is expressed in a myriad of hues to appease constituencies that the elite derives its power from without signifying anything.

It is fair to say that the economic policy “debate” has hit an all-time low. We are expected to enthusiastically discuss whether or not we should be nationalising the mines. We are, frankly, the laughing stock of the world as we pretend to ourselves that the option of state-driven social engineering is still a serious option.

There must be more to life than choosing between the naked populism of Julius Malema and the quaint statism of the SACP‘s Jeremy Cronin.

While this goes on our best hope for leadership out of the morass – Trevor Manuel – has been turned into a producer of green papers which he is forced to defend at every turn without any assistance from what is referred to as “the leadership”.

Hope that the anachronistic statist industrial policy driven by Alec Erwin will be replaced by an acknowledgement that we are now in the 21st century has faded.

Meanwhile the gap between rich and poor grows and the middle classes find themselves squeezed for every penny as the cost of replacing the state’s failing education, health and offering and its failing security services with private alternatives outstrips growth in salaries.

Yes, let’s celebrate the World Cup, let’s welcome our guests and show them a good time, let’s have a big football party [before the SS ZA-Titanic, hits the reality iceberg].

But let’s not forget that we are way behind the global eight-ball.

» » » » [Times Live]

Zuma says 2010 as important as 1994

By Staff Reporter, The Times
Jan 1, 2010 9:50 AM

South African President Jacob Zuma says this is the beginning of the most important year in the country since 1994.

In his speech marking the New Year President Zuma said the country was at its next most critical point since the year of its first democratic elections.

The people of the country had to unite and reconcile to make the most of the opportunity it had been given.

“Together as all South Africans, we must make this one of the most successful projects we have ever undertaken as a nation!” -- President Jacob Zuma

"We have won the greatest marketing opportunity of our time, the rights to host the 2010 FIFA Soccer World Cup.

Together as all South Africans, we must make this one of the most successful projects we have ever undertaken as a nation!

The World Cup must revive the spirit of unity and patriotism in the same manner that the 1995 Rugby World Cup brought the nation together," Zuma said.

He urged South Africans to make 2010 the year in which they all worked together to make the Soccer World Cup the biggest turning point in the marketing of the country.

"The year 2010 must be the year in which for the first time, we all communicate positive messages about our country to the world – the successes and possibilities. We have to put the culture of negativity behind us.

Together we must ensure long-lasting benefits for the country. There is a lot to be gained from the World Cup," he said.

» » » » [The Times]

The Greatest Branding Secret in the History of Modern Marketing

Scott Ginsberg
Thursday, February 26, 2009

“I was a Candidate for Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006. I am the Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church. I teach the Course in Honesty ; Power of Honesty and the Course in Honesty in the World. You can find out more at www.radicalhonesty.com.” -- Brad Blanton, Ph.D. [*Amazon**Kalahari*]

Nope, it’s got nothing to do with Google.

It’s much, MUCH simpler than that.

The Greatest Branding Secret in the History of Modern Marketing boils down to one word:

Honesty.

Yep. That’s it. Honesty.

Call the Marketing Department for an emergency meeting. This is groundbreaking stuff.

“How are you branding your honesty?”

That’s the question you need to answer. Whether you’re a Fortune 1000 on Wall Street, a thirty-person pizza joint in Decatur or a one-man show working out of your living room alongside your snoring pit bull, you MUST brand your honesty.

For three reasons...

1. People are tired of being lied to.
   
2. People are sick of wading through the ever-rising tide of corporate and political bullshite.
   
3. People are forever jaded from the countless times they’ve been burned, duped, fooled, conned, scammed and screwed over.
   

Like my friend Jeffrey Gitomer says, “If you lie to me, you LOSE me.”

LESSON LEARNED: Truth is currency.

» » » » [Hello My Name is Scott]