Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

“Only the facts M’am. Just give me the facts.”

JUST GIVE ME THE FACTS M’AM: Let’s stop feeding reality the comfort food of false hope

Tim Murray, Population Media Center
July 25th, 2010

In her book, “Titanic”, author Stephanie Barcszewski described the exchange between Captain John Smith and the ship’s designer Thomas Andrew just over ten minutes after the collision with the lethal iceberg.

“Smith asked Andrews how long the Titanic had left and Andrews did some quick calculations: An hour and a half, possibly two. Not much longer.” That quick calculation was not far off. The ship sank two hours and forty minutes after it hit the iceberg, or roughly two hours and twenty minutes after Andrews made that grim pronouncement.

As there was no PA system on board the ship, Captain Smith issued immediate instructions to his crew to have passengers board the lifeboats, beginning with 1st class passengers of course. The Titanic was, after all, a microcosm of Edwardian society and 70% of third class people never saw a lifeboat that night. But then again, 40% in 1st class did not survive either, and I suspect that is a much lower percentage than that will perish in the imminent sinking of RMS Affluent Society. Rich ticket-holders will evidently launch off the first lifeboats half empty because they don’t believe in the fallibility of the ship.

But the point is, Captain John Smith sought an honest assessment of his ship’s condition, accepted it, and took whatever action he could to mitigate the scale of the disaster.

Imagine however, if Bernie Segal, or some such guru of the self help industry, had been captain of the Titanic on the night of April 14, 1912. Assuming that he would have indeed ordered a damage report, rather than blithely persisted in a state of denial by thinking happy thoughts, would he have accepted it? I rather doubt it. Here would be the screenplay:

Thomas Andrews: “Captain Segal, Sir, the front six bulkheads have risen 14 feet in just ten minutes and at this rate of water intake the weight will carry the ship down within two hours.”

Captain Segal: “The fate of this ship will be determined by our positive expectations. If as a crew we visualize a positive outcome there will be a spontaneous remission of the flooding waters and the gash in the hull will be healed. Go away. I don’t need your negative energy. I need to work on my nomination speech for the leadership for the Green Party.”

Oh yes. Faith can move mountains, can’t it? That is what all the televangelists say. That is why Tony Robbins makes $30 million a year saying too. That is what Tojo and the Japanese Empire and the Kamikazes said as well, that faith could defeat an American war machine five times its strength. Mao had his troops believing that they could walk into an H bomb mushroom cloud to prove that radiation was a paper tiger. If you believe that renewable technologies will supply all of our current energy demands and that human ingenuity will provide a substitute for oceans of missing fish and biodiversity and depleted soil nutrients then you are indeed a candidate for faith healing. But just try healing Mother Earth. You’ll have as much luck as Captain Segal would have had healing that gash on the Titanic with his positive thinking.

The infantile disease of religion is still with us. Those who renounce its traditional forms still seek refuge and comfort in Pollyannaish, unscientific beliefs that do not follow from their scientific analysis. We are still children. We still need faith, apparently. Al Gore, ended his documentary on faith, and on June 7/08, in “The Age”, Maude Barlow was quoted as saying that “hope is a moral imperative”, for without it, there is no will to act for change.

These people confuse their roles. Are they truth-tellers or morale-boosters? Is their role to tell Captain Smith the facts about the Titanic or to sugar-coat them so as to not depress him too much? Are they his emotional care-taker or his reliable reporter?

Some have taken the line that the truth is too shocking for most, so let’s dispense false hope to remain in the good books of mainstream opinion, otherwise we won’t get a hearing and none of our ideas will be entertained. I won’t tell you the ship is going down in two hours but could you (whispering politely) remind passengers where the lifejackets are stored?

Former Liberal cabinet minister Brian Tobin was a master at trying to straddle the two fences of defending the environment but not telling the truth about it. He admonished environmentalists for depressing people with bad news when he said, they needed hope. Here I was under the impression that the worsening environment was responsible for depressing people. And that industry, whose portfolio he was in charge of, had much to do with that. MacLean’s magazine heralded his victory as Premier of Newfoundland in 1996 because “Tobin’s optimistic approach struck the right balance between realism and hope.”

A balance between “realism and hope.” Can anything be more absurd? When a doctor gets a lab report, does he want “realism balanced with hope”? When I take my car to my trusted auto mechanic “Mitch”, do I want to hear his realistic assessment about whether I need an engine rebuild or do I want him to “balance” that assessment with his “hopes”? When I go to my oncologist, am I going to a friggin priest, or to a guy who is going to give me a blunt and objective reading of the MRI and lab results together with his unemotional prognosis?
I am not a child anymore folks. I sent Santa Claus packing long ago. Same with his successors and Green wannabees. I don’t vote for political faith-healers. “Believe in me and I’ll make the ecological consequences of overpopulation go away by changing your attitude.” Like Sgt. Friday in the old TV series “Dragnet” used to say, “Only the facts M’am. Just give me the facts.”

Just give me the number of people this planet and this country can support indefinitely at a given lifestyle. And cut the crap.

My state of mind has no bearing on that figure and neither does yours, Mary Poppins.

» » » » [Population Media Center]


Mike Smith said...

Yeah, I agree. Be specific. Cut the crap and tell us who are the races overpopulating the earth...Not the White Race I can assure you. More like Blacks, Indians and Chinese...

To me it seems as if Whites can control their population perfectly well. It is the others who can't.

So cut the crap and tell us what are we to do about them? Just the facts Ma'am...

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Hi Mr. Smith,

I have posted on that before, but shall reiterate.

In my view, white people who don't want to be swamped by other races need to create for them their own volkstaat, by means of secession. On this I have made many suggestions.

Once they have seceded and even today (although being in the multiculti state this is more difficult) they need to stop aiding and abetting their own racial suicide.

They need to stop providing massive doses of food aid, and medical aid and all other kinds of aid to feed the population explosion of thier racial enemies, who have no such noble intentions towards whites.

The Amicus before the Concourt argues that Apartheid was a just war for demographic survival, and that the TRC is guilty of fraud.

* Are white South Africans and Zimbabweans the World Demographic Coalmine Canary's?
* Titans to Lemmings: Suicide of White Race
* Facebook deletes Population Policy Common Sense
* Mencken – Licenced to Breed DieOff – Monkeylaw Prophets
* African Lawyer: African Population Explosion of unemployment, poverty, hunger & squatters is a Timebomb
* Wake Up Whitey! deleted from FAcebook

* Yes, Africa Must Go To Hell.. Africa Dysfunction is African!
* Africans to Bono: “For God’s Sake, Please STOP!”
* Charity & the Savage: Africa is Giving Nothing to Anyone - Apart from AIDS
* “For God's Sake, Please STOP the AID to Africa!” - Kenyan Economics Expert James Shikwati

Those are some of them...

Once in a volkstaat that volkstaat should simply let Africa be, let Africans control their own populations, as they do in Swaziland, as written recently by Mike Smith, at Why SA Sucks! ;-)

Mike Smith said...

I do however feel that preaching population control to whites will further hamper their reproduction.

They seem to be the only people on earth seriously practicing population control.

By all means, preach population control to Blacks, Chinese and Indians, but to Whites you should encourage them to actually breed MORE. It irks me tremendously when I see white women in their fourties who never had any children. It is, because of white women practicing birth control to a rediculous degree that we whites are in the shit today.

The seccesion idea is one I support myself. I further fully support the FULL independence of all Black tribes on earth. But then it means FULL INDEPENDENCE to every letter. No more begging from whites.

The critical question still remains. What to do with the existing Blacks, Chinese and Indians who overpopulate the world?

In China they practice a one child per family policy, forced abortions and sterilisation. It might be harsh, but it might also be the only solution.

It seems as if everyone knows what the solutions are, but nobody discusses it...probably out of fear of being branded a Nazi or racist...Well in that case the Chinese are all racists.

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

I totally agree whites are the only ones seriously practicing population control.

I don't think its advisable (I could be wrong) for whites to just adopt black/yellow/brown policies of breeding like rabbits. In accordance with tragedy of the commons principles, if they did, they would simply increase their stupidity ratio and become more and more stupid. Because the stupid would breed faster and more stupid than the intelligent, and they would be so stuck in poverty,they would not be able to raise their intelligence. Population control benefits whites, including poor whites, by helping htem get out of poverty by education etc. Obviously not where the employment factor is stacked against htem like in SA at the moment, but they can still get an education and leave.

Some whites are addressing the issue, such as here is one idea about the question you had, that the WHO has adopted.

I totally agree with the full independence secession idea.

Agreed about china's policy...

and about very few discussing what needs to be done...

I think we are all racists.. and that racism is natural, and has been an aspect of our gene's taht helped us to survive. It's not healthy not to be wary or to discriminate against those who may do you harm, or whom statistically are more liable to do you harm.. Simply take a look at how 'racist', the alleged 'anti-racists' are towards 'racists'! the whole 'racist' argument is just pointless, i think. Who cares? if the evidentiary facts I provide for my 'racism' are true, and reality; why may I not have the views I do? Utter nonsense for people who have no critical thinking faculties.. and prefer woolly thinking! I was one, thank goodness I managed to cure myself! ;-)

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: []