Open Letter to Foxy Liberal Hypocrit: Trevor Manuel

Mr. Manuel: You Sanctimonious Self-Righteous Two-Faced Hypocrit

So, can you now understand why it is my conclusion that you are furious that Mr. Manyi blurted the ANC’s official demographic policy of hegemony out for all to hear, by confirming it to every ignorant idiot, who lacked Hendrik Verwoerd’s knowledge about the role of demographics and geography, equalling a culture or races destiny.

You want Mr. Manyi to Shut the Fuck Up and stop Waking People up to the reality of the ANC’s Africa for Africans policies and political itnentions. You lack Mr. Manyi’s – cohones – to tell the truth about the ANC’s real Africa for African intentions. You are a gutless two-faced hypocrite and coward, Foxy Liberal Traitor to your people, a token Rainbow Coloured to bullshit and deceive your people about the ANC’s alleged ‘non-racialism’.

So, I don’t know if Mr. Manyi is indeed ‘racist’, and hence worthy of moral condemnation. It depends on how you define racist. I have not yet drawn any conclusions as to whether Mr. Manyi is or is not a ‘racist’, in accordance to Dr. Gedaliah Braun’s definition of Racism and Racists. Unlike Foxy Liberals, I make impartial enquiries into whether the actions of the alleged ‘racist’ individual, measure up to beyond reasonable doubt evidence of guilt in accordance to the definition of ‘racist’.

So, how do you Trevor Manuel define ‘racist’ or don’t you; is it just an easy political football label to throw around?

04 March 2011

Mr. Trevor Manuel,

Unfortunately unlike yourself, I am not able to drop my – African White Refugee - title, for it is not a title of prestige. It is the result of living in a country where I have not been welcome in, since I returned to it in 2002.

The Constitution has been interpreted in SA Courts as one for real Africans and another for non-Africans. One in favour of lying two-faced Poverty Pimping hypocrites; and one who discriminates against honest root cause problem solvers. One in favour of those willing to financially or politically purchase Ubuntu Legal Indulgence Innocence For Sale; and another which discriminates against those who refuse to purchase Legal Indulgences, because they support Rule of Law Jurisprudence. Unfortunately I am both white, an honest root cause problem solver, and refuse to purchase Legal Indulgence, because I endorse the Rule of Law. Accordingly the Ubuntu Hypocrisy on Steroids Favouring Justice system which hates honest politically or financially incorruptible whites, has deemed me as unworthy of any rights in the SA constitution.

As you know, I am a member of the Radical Honesty Culture, and every single South African court, including the Constitutional Court , wherein I attempted to invoke my cultural law rights in accordance to S. 15 (3), 30, 31, and 185 of the Constitution, or my free speech rights, or my psychological integrity rights, or my simple Free and Fair Trial rights; responded with the Middle Finger: Fuck your Rights Honest Whitey! Shut the Fuck Up, Nobody in Ubuntu Justice Courts Gives a Flying Fuck what you think!

In fact, I didn’t even come close to being a commodity, with cultural rights, let alone a person with cultural rights. As far as the courts were concerned, I simply do not exist; arrest warrants were irrelevant, my evidence was irrelevant, my expert witnesses were irrelevant. Who gives a flying fuck about the innocence of root cause problem solving Whiteys?

As the only member of the Radical Honesty culture in South Africa; I was informed by a member of the Dept. of Safety and Security ‘Just Fuck Off and commit suicide and save us the trouble’.

Did you express any outrage, that South Africa does not belong to all those who live in it; that certain root cause problem solving cultures are considered non-existent and not worthy of any Constitutional Rights; such as members of Radical Honesty culture??

In fact, it appears that Black Africans had far greater access to invoking their cultural rights under that honest root cause problem solver Hendrik Verwoerd’s Apartheid, than I do, under the ANC’s ‘Non-Racial’ (sic) Rainbow Duhmockery.

Can you imagine; the one culture in South Africa that practices 100 % transparency, brutal honesty, and a commitment to sincere forgiveness; IS DENIED THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EXISTENCE BY THE 'TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION' (SIC) SOUTH AFRICAN COURTS, POLITICIANS AND GOVERNMENT?

Hence I write as an African White Refugee, hated, despised, ignored, vilified and legally and politically persecuted in Rainbow Hypocrisy on Steroids South Africa.


Foxy Liberal Manuel vilifying Growling Wolf Manyi for Telling the Truth about ANC Africanist Population Production Policy

Jimmy Manyi on overconcentration of coloureds in W.Cape

Unlike Foxy Liberals I do not live in denial, and I do not expect everyone to have the same beliefs as I do. When I come across people with other beliefs, cultures or ideas; then I find the most effective means of resolving disagreements is to do so with individuals who are brutally honest. You cannot solve problems of disagreement by discussing them with two-faced hypocrite liberals who refuse to acknowledge the root causes of the problems, who insist on applying never-ending bandaids and aspirins to their braintumour problems.

Consequently I appreciate Mr. Manyi for having the honour to at least partially admit the truth about the ANC’s policy. So, in that sense I can say: Thank You Mr. Manyi for honestly admitting the truth about the ANC’s Africanist Population Production Policy. At least I now officially know where I stand. Its been quite obvious for anyone with two braincells, but now some politician with cohones has had the courage to practice some honesty. Thanks.

While Mr Manyi is not a black conservative, his brutal honesty does remind me of the Growling Wolf in Malcolm X’s story about Foxy Liberals:

The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.

Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.

Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the politics of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These “leaders” sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These “leaders” are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders….

Once the Negro learns to think for himself, he will no longer allow the white liberal to use him as a helpless football in the white man’s crooked game of “power politics.”

The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.

The white liberals control the Negro and the Negro vote by controlling the Negro civil rights leaders. As long as they control the Negro civil rights leaders, they can also control and contain the Negro’s struggle, and they can control the Negro’s so-called revolt.

-- An excerpt from a 1963 speech by Malcolm X entitled “God’s Judgement of White America.”

How Honourable Growling Wolves Honestly Resolve Africa for Africans Policy:

It would be extremely helpful and appreciated if those who agree with Mr. Manyi would have the courage to come forward to discuss ways in which the ‘Africa for Africans’ issue can be honourably resolved for honourable Africa for Africans and Europe for Europeans Race Realists.

Are there any Honourable Africa for African leaders who do not suffer from African Manhood Inferiority Complexes, but who can publicly support an Official Request to European Stamvader/Progenitor Nations to promulgate Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) Right of Return laws, so that those of us who are perceived to be European settlers –- not welcome in Africa for Africans South Africa (no offence taken by myself to such Africa for Africans Race Realist views) -- can honourably return to Europe?

Or do Africa for African’s Uhuru blood lust desires for Frantz Fanon liberation on the rotting corpse of the settler; dwarf any voices of conscience to resolve their Africa for Africans desires honourably?


Foxy Liberal’s Endorsement of ANC Africanist Population Production Policy

Mr. Manuel: Why don’t you tell your coloured brethren that you are used by the ANC as one of their token Coloured Smiling Foxes, to bullshit coloureds into voting for the ANC. Mr. Manyi has been far more Growling Wolf honest with coloureds than you have; for which they can thank him, because at least they know where they stand.

Your true anger towards Mr. Manyi has nothing to do with the content of his ‘over-concentration of coloureds’ statements being “against the letter and spirit of the South African Constitution”. You have known since 1994 that what Mr. Manyi describes as the ANCs policy of Africa for Africans demographic hegemony is official – although covert – ANC policy.

Your own official financial policy and budget – Poverty Pimping, social grants (especially for children) have encouraged African and Coloured teenagers and unmarried women to have children on a large scale, truly an abnormal government-sponsored population explosion, of moral degeneration and social disintegration - decisions contributed to that explicit, although covert, breeding war policy.

This ANC ‘swart gevaar’ breeding war policy was not a new 1994 invention, I might remind you. Or have you conveniently forgotten how Black Liberation Theology – the official ANC theological liberation policy -- Black Power called for blacks to engage in a ‘breeding war’?

“Population control will be difficult enough to achieve peacefully if society has merely to deal with families that differ in their desire to have children. If groups larger than the family assert their intention to exceed community norms, the difficulty in achieving population control will be greatly compounded. This problem is often stated as a racial problem. Some exponents of “Black Power” identify all proposals to control population as “genocide” and call upon blacks to engage in a breeding war” -- Garrett Hardin, Stalking the Wild Taboo: Population, Biology and the Law, p.231

What were your objections to the ANC’s ‘Operation Production’ ANC slavery and cannon fodder breeding war policies?

[..] Especially evening assemblies girls had to attend as well: “They would come into the house and tell us we should go. They didn't ask your mother they just said ‘come let's go.’ You would just have to go with them. They would threaten you with their belts and ultimately you would think that if you refused, they would beat you. Our parents were afraid of them” (quoted by Delius 1996:189).

All those opposing the wishes of the young men were reminded, that it was every woman’s obligation to give birth to new “soldiers”, in order to replace those warriors killed in the liberation struggle. The idiom of the adolescents referred to these patriotic efforts as “operation production”. Because of exactly this reason it was forbidden for the girls to use contraceptives. (Delius 1996:189; Niehaus 1999:250)

-- Witchcraft and the State in South Africa, by Johannes Harnischfeger

What were your objections to the ANC endorsing all MK soldiers ‘rights’ to fornicate with any ANC women member? What were your objections to the testimony of Sam Mngqibisa, an Umkhonto we Sizwe soldier, wherein he described the education of an Mbokodo officer in a poem he presented to the Commission of Inquiry into human rights abuses in ANC detention camps, chaired by Mr Sam Motsuenyane:

Give a young boy —16 years old— from the ghetto of Soweto,
an opportunity to drive a car for the first time in his life.
This boy is from a poor working class family.
Give him money to buy any type of liquor and good, expensive clothes.
This boy left South Africa during the Soweto schools uprising in 1976.
He doesn't know what is an employer.
He never tasted employer-exploitation.
Give him the right to sleep with all these women.
Give him the opportunity to study in Party Schools and well-off military academies in Eastern Europe.
Teach him Marxism-Leninism and tell him to defend the revolution against counter-revolutionaries.
Send him to the Stasi to train him to extract information by force from enemy agents. He turns to be a torturer and executioner by firing squad.
All these are the luxuries and the dream-come-true he never thought of for his lifetime...
This Security becomes the law unto itself
-- Sexual Abuse of Young Women in the ANC Camps, Olefile Samuel Mngqibisa, Searchlight South Africa, Number 11 October 1993 (p.11-16)

And if you objected to such racial breeding war social engineering; and really gave a flying rat’s ass about Black Consciousness and encouraging Black and Coloured people to be liberated to self-sufficiency and personal responsibility; rather than ANC Poverty Pimping Foxy Liberal co-dependency; why didn’t you rather suggest that social grants be given to the young men and women who want to liberate themselves into education; and -- like honourable Moeletsi Mbeki and Meschak Magoboane -- tell the ANC’s welfare vote farm breeders that you were not going to be supporting their Poverty Pimping co-dependency on the ANC to stimulate their poverty stricken inferiority complexes?

Absorbing millions of foreigners into a country that is still relatively poor, and in which more people are increasingly dependent on state grants for basic subsistence, is unpatriotic, dishonest and ridiculous. These foreigners come from countries that squander their resources and deliberately destroy economies — let alone develop them. A genuine regional power would address this.

These issues are not moral but material. The ruling regime encourages teenage girls, for example, to have children — for which the state pays child grants of R100bn a year — and this is presented as “human rights” and “welfare”.

Now millions of poor foreigners produce babies to receive child grants too, and compete for jobs and houses — the universal causes of real xenophobia. Such welfare programmes will stir real xenophobic attacks, as some of these “human rights” have engendered social degeneration.

-- (Welfare State gives rise to Xenophobic Violence, Meshack Mabogoane, Business Day, 14 July 2010.)

That South Africa has the highest Aids infection and death rates is neither altogether Mbeki's doing, nor coincidental. Legislation and other government-driven policies and programmes have engendered an environment that has escalated the pandemic.

For example, the permissive pregnancy rules and social grants (especially for children) introduced by the Constitution and government have encouraged teenagers and unmarried women to have children on a large scale. The spread of Aids has been a consequence; the evidence is there for all to see. And so too there is a high correlation between this abnormal government-sponsored population explosion, on the one hand, and the deepening of the Aids crisis, of Malthusian poverty aggravation, moral degeneration and social disintegration on the other.

[..] The crisis induced by the axing of Mbeki is an occasion to review liberal democracy and the Constitution -- that uneasy, syncretistic mixture of a hollow Westminster system and Soviet-like party dominance. It is time to explore and formulate a system that will vest power in people and not invest in the empty shells or Trojan horses that parties have become in Africa, including this country. A federal system, with constituency-based representation, would be appropriate for this diverse and complex land and it would free us from a cabal that is bent on retaining power for its own benefit, at the expense of the state and society.

-- (Mbeki’s Legacy Not His Alone, Meshack Mabogoane, 08 October 2008, Mail & Guardian)

This grant will reach three million of South Africa's poorest children, rather than the 300,000 who presently receive the state maintenance grant.

Unlike the old maintenance grant, this grant will not be limited to a certain number of children in one family. Because the grant is made to the child, through the care-giver, a child will not suffer because of the size of his or her family.

-- (Welfare Laws Amendment Bill, 1997: Social Assistance Act African National Congress)

Johannesburg - Social grant expenditure is estimated at R89bn in the current fiscal year, a figure large enough to prompt some commentators to call South Africa the "biggest welfare state" in the world.

The 2010/11 allowance for social grants represents a 12% increase year-on-year.
[..] News agency Sapa cited economist Mike Schüssler as being critical of the grant system.

"Look at South Africa's dependency ratio - it's three people to one taxpayer and it's unsustainable," Schüssler reportedly said.

Andile Sokomani from the Institute of Security Studies said that the extent of state support is unlikely to discourage low-income earners from being self-reliant.

-- (SA world’s biggest welfare state, Svetlana Doneva, Finance 24, 21 February 2010)

Do you want intelligent South Africans to believe that you had sweet buggerall to do with encouraging poor black Africans and Coloureds to act as your breeding vote farm cattle, to breed themselves more poverty stricken children, which you wanted to add to the ANC’s voters roll?

Only your poverty stricken ignorant African and Coloured vote farm breeding factories, are oblivious to the reality of the ANC’s BREEDING WAR intentions, which have sweet fuck all to do with Black Consciousness to liberate Black or Coloured people to becoming Self-Sufficient and Personally Responsible for their lives, but are all about encouraging their never ending Poverty Pimping Dependency on the ANC; so the ANC can benefit from manipulating their Inferiority complexes!

• More welfare recipients than workers – Schussler, Sapa/Politicsweb, 01 July 2010;
  
• SA biggest welfare state in world: economist, Mail & Guardian, 2010-02-18;
  
• Welfare recipients outnumber workers, Fin24, 1 July 2010;
  
• South Africa has highest unemployment ratio in Africa IB Times, 1 July 2010: Almost 60 % unemployed & 25% choose not to participate in economy; 13.8 million receive welfare payments from 5 million taxpayers.
  
• ANC regarded as employment agency, News 24, 21 September 2010: People join ANC to gain access to resources & amass wealth – Mantashe.
  
• SA has world’s largest cabinet, Censorbugbear, 7/11/2010: South Africa’s recently enlarged cabinet is among the world’s largest in relation to the size of its population. It now has 68 Ministers and Deputies for 47-million residents – compared to the USA’s 15 Ministers for 300-million people or Nigeria’s 38 Ministers for 150-million people… Each Cabinet Minister earns at least R1-million annually, the deputies about R800,000.
  
• SA becoming welfare state - SAIRR, 31/01/2011, News 24: The number of social grant beneficiaries has increased by more than 300% in last 9 years, says SAIRR. In the 2009/10 financial year the country had nearly 14 million social grant beneficiaries. The child-support grant made up the highest share with over nine million beneficiaries. The old-age grant was second highest, with over two million beneficiaries. By 2012 the national treasury predicted there would be 16 million beneficiaries.

From: MOELETSI MBEKI: Wealth creation: Only a matter of time before the hand grenade explodes (Business Day, Published: 2011/02/10 07:01:41 AM):

I can predict when South Africa’s “Tunisia Day” will arrive. Tunisia Day is when the masses rise against the powers that be, as happened recently in Tunisia. The year will be 2020, give or take a couple of years.

The year 2020 is when China estimates that its minerals-intensive industrialisation phase will be concluded.

For South Africa, this will mean the ANC government will have to cut back on social grants, which it uses to placate the black poor and to get their votes. China’s industrialisation phase has forced up the prices of South Africa’s minerals, which has enabled the government to finance social welfare programmes.

The ANC inherited a flawed, complex society it barely understood; its tinkerings with it are turning it into an explosive cocktail.

Former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher once commented that whoever thought that the ANC could rule South Africa was living in cloud-cuckoo-land.

Why was she right? In 16 years of ANC rule, all the symptoms of a government out of its depth have grown worse:

• Life expectancy has slid from 65 to 53 since the ANC came to power.
  
• In 2007, South Africa became a net food importer for the first time.
  
• The elimination of agricultural subsidies led to a loss of 600 000 farmworkers’ jobs and the eviction from commercial farming of 2.4 million people between 1997 and 2007.
  
• The ANC stopped controlling the borders, leading to a flood of poor people into South Africa.

[..] BEE promotes extremely negative socio-economic trends. It promotes a class of politicians dependent on big business and therefore promotes big business’s interests in the upper echelons of government.

Second, BEE promotes an anti-entrepreneurial culture among the black middle class by legitimising an environment of entitlement.

Third, affirmative action, a subset of BEE, promotes incompetence and corruption in the public sector by using ruling party allegiance and connections as the criteria for entry and promotion in the public service.

[..] The third worrying trend is that the ANC-controlled state has internalised the BEE model. We are seeing the state trying to implement the same model that the conglomerates developed.

What is the state distributing? It is distributing jobs to party faithful and social welfare to the poor. This is a recipe for incompetence and corruption.

This explains the service delivery upheavals that are becoming a normal part of our environment.

Mr. Manuel: Where was your outspoken support for Mr. Moeletsi Mbeki or Mr. Meshack Magoboane's Self Sufficiency and Personal Responsibility African Liberation Consciousness?

Did your alleged commitment to ‘non-racialism’ demand that the racial population demographics of 1994, of which 20% were whites, be retained; or did you support the ANC’s policies to reduce white demographics, to what it is now: 8%? Did you voice any objections to the ANC’s policy of reducing the concentration of SA whites from 20% to 8%?

Do you want to tell me you don’t understand the principles of exponential population growth or decline; in a finite resource environment? That you are a clueless dimwit about the competitive exclusion principle; about different cultures or ethnicities breeding at different rates of growth in a finite resource environment? BULLSHIT!

The meaning of the competitive exclusion principle can be easily explained in a strictly biological setting. Suppose one introduces into the same region two different species that inhabit the same “ecological niche”. If, by hypothesis, two species occupy exactly the same ecological niche, then all that one species needs to know to predict the ultimate outcome of their competition is the rates at which they reproduce in this ecological niche. If one of them reproduces at a rate of 2 percent per year while the other reproduces at a rate of 3 percent, the ratio of the numbers of the faster reproducing species to the numbers of the slower will increase year by year. In fact, since their rates of reproduction, like compound interest, are exponential functions, a little algebra shows that the ratio of the two exponential functions is itself an exponential function. The ratio of the faster species to the slower species increases without limit. If the environment is finite – and it always is finite – the total number of organisms that can be supported by this environment is also finite. Since the size of the population of a species can never be less than one individual, this means that ultimately the slower breeding species will be completely eliminated from the environment. This will be true no matter how slight the difference in the rate of reproduction of the two species. Only a mathematically exact quality in their rates would ensure their continued coexistence, and such an exact equality is inconceivable in the real world. As a consequence, two species that occupy exactly the same ecological niche cannot coexist indefinitely in the same geographical area.

-- Stalking the Wild Taboo, by Garrett Hardin: Part 4: Competition: (20) Competition, a Tabooed Idea in Sociology; (21) The Cybernetics of Competition; (22) Population, Biology and the Law; (23) Population Skeletons in the Environmental Closet; (24) The Survival of Nations and Civilisations (www.garretthardinsociety.org)

What is the rate of reproduction of whites vs black Africans in South Africa, Mr. Non-Racialist Manuel? Who were being paid -- with your budgets and endorsement – to reduce the concentration of SA whites from 20% to 8%; by increasing the concentration of 'Africans' from 80% to 92%?

Foxy Liberal ANC’s Policy to Keep the ANC’s Vote-Farm Breeding War Black and Coloured African cattle stuck in their Poverty stricken Inferiority Complexes:

What Mr. Manuel was your – “battle against forgetting” - response to the Open Letter to Archbishop Desmond Tutu: Why do you endorse SA Media’s blacklisting of Radical Honesty SA? regarding Archbishop Tutu's endorsement for the censorship of TRC Fraud evidence before the SA Constitutional Court?

Do you want poor black Africans to remain stuck in their inferiority complex problems; because you benefit from their ignorance, victimhood and inferiority complexes; and you can use their anger and hopelessness and direct it towards blaming apartheid, and thereby cover up your TRC FRAUD?

Surely if you cared – really and sincerely cared in your gut – about black Africans problems, you would care enough about them to tell them the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, about how to solve their problems?

Surely you would tell them that problems can only be solved by individuals who take full personal, psychological, emotional and spiritual responsibility; and are courageous enough to confront reality and the root cause of their problems?

But instead you prefer to keep them victims, to encourage them to avoid taking personal responsibility, to avoid confronting reality, so that they forever remain helpless blaming their inferiority complexes, on white people and apartheid; instead of confronting their own beliefs, choices and behaviours!

Why do you lie to the ignorant black African youth, and deny them the truth that Apartheid provided poor black South Africans with not only the highest living standards on the continent of Africa; but that poor black Africans under apartheid had higher living standards than middle class white people in every single Communist country on planet earth? If you disagree: Why don’t you demand the ANC hold a referendum for all black and coloured people over the age of 50, and ask them whether their lives were better under apartheid than under the ANC?

When whites arrived in South Africa, blacks had no written language, no legal system, no schools, no universities, etc; etc; so how did whites ‘oppress’ blacks by bringing them all these educational and legal benefits of civilisation? When have blacks ever said ‘THANK YOU’!?

In 1868, whites were 50% of the population and blacks and coloureds were 50% of the South African population. The majority of white people chose to focus their lives on getting an education, keeping a job, and only procreating children once they were in a committed loving relationship. They focussed on concentrating their wealth, by saving their earnings and investing it, what is known as financial personal responsibility. Blacks - and coloureds to a lesser extent - on the other hand chose to focus their lives on avoiding getting an education, and instead on breeding as many children by as many partners as possible, avoid committing to one loving relationship, and avoid saving and concentrating their wealth. What they earned was predominantly spent at the bottle store, in a yet further search to totally avoid taking personal responsibility for their misery.

Imagine if the ANC had been sincere about liberating Black Africans out of their poverty and misery, it could simply have started a non-violent cultural campaign to educate them to change their values: to value the importance of education, the importance of avoiding procreating until married in a committed loving relationship; the importance of concentrating wealth by saving, the importance of small committed families, dedicated to nurturing their children, to accept personal responsibility for their lives. If more Africans had adopted these value systems, they would have had no problem lifting themselves out of poverty, without any help from any white person, and they would not be suffering from any inferiority complexes as a result of BEE policies. They would know they earned their worth, by studying and hard work. They would also have sent the Apartheid voters and government a strong message that Africans were starting to take personal responsibility for their families, for how they breed, for their children's future, that such responsibility was worthy of national political suffrage reward for those individuals. They would have said – we are willing to take personal responsibility for our children’s future, by our actions, and we prove this to you, we are worthy of the vote.

If the ANC had done that: South Africa would currently be populated by 10 million people, 50% whites, and 50% blacks and coloureds, the majority of them educated, middle class and from small loving families. It would be a country similar to any in Europe demographically and politically and socio-culturally.

Instead the ANC chose to instruct their poor black Africans to conduct a breeding war, and so South Africa sits with millions of poor black Africans in thousands of squatter camps, all with inferiority complexes, thanks to the decision-making of black political and religious ‘leaders’. The ANC decided to encourage blacks to breed like rabbits, to keep them in misery and poverty, because they could blame the poor blacks poverty and misery on apartheid and whites, and the more blacks bred more poverty-stricken black babies, the more their leaders could blame the poverty and misery on apartheid and whites. And the more blacks avoided taking personal responsibility, the less able they are to help themselves, the greater grew their inferiority complexes. So the cycle of poverty and misery and inferiority complexes continued, thanks to ANC decision-making, all conveniently blamed on Apartheid and whites. You lie to them, bribe them to breed to keep them in poverty, so that you can blame their poverty on apartheid and white people!

Its just so much easier to avoid taking personal responsibility and blame all your problems on apartheid, isn’t it? Don’t you know that is what inferior incompetent minds do? Avoid taking personal responsibility?

And this behaviour of deception and lies to your own people – you want white people to respect!? You treat your own people worse than any white farmer treats his cattle, and you want us to respect you, cause you treat your own people like cattle breeding slaves and cannon fodder?

According to Desmond Tutu, to provide blacks who lived in huts, squatted on the ground, had no written language, with an education, a legal system, schools, houses, running water, engineering, philosophy, an example of a culture that practices personal responsibility, and a commitment to a democratic future for their children, etc; is ‘oppression’?

The truth is Archbishop Tutu; what you secretly mean by ‘oppression’ is white people telling black people the truth!

According to Desmond Tutu: To tell a black African person, the truth, is to oppress them!

That is how little blacks value honest, constructive criticism; THEY DON’T. They wish to avoid any and all honest feedback, because they are addicted to being lied to, which enable them to avoid taking personal responsibility for their behaviour and beliefs, which only further increases their lack of self respect and inferiority complexes!

Foxy Liberal ANC’s Policy to Bastardize and Betray Black Consciousness Ideals of liberating Africans to Self-Sufficiency and Personal Responsibility, by keeping the ANC’s Vote-Farm Breeding War Black and Coloured African cattle stuck in their Poverty stricken Inferiority Complexes:

What Mr. Manuel was your – Black Consciousness - response to the Open Letter to Archbishop Desmond Tutu: Why do you endorse SA Media’s blacklisting of Radical Honesty SA? regarding Archbishop Tutu's endorsement for the ANC's parasitic TRC fraud elite feeding and leeching off poor Black and Coloureds Inferiority Complexes?

Why do blacks suffer from psychological insecurity complexes; that they are incapable of hearing honest constructive criticism? What is the source of African’s inferiority complexes?

Do black Africans prefer to live in Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela and the ANC’s insane illusion and fantasy that they are not required to take personal responsibility for their behaviour; because they can simply be awarded the ‘right’ to be ‘equal’ without making any effort towards attaining that standard of behaviour?

Imagine if you told a fat woman, that she is not fat, because everyone must simply pretend she is thin, and that is how you solve her psychological insecurity problem that she is fat? She can have the ‘right’ to be thin, because everyone will be required to lie to her, and pretend that they think she is thin. This is her ‘right to be equally thin’. She does not have to take any personal responsibility for eating healthily or exercising she can simply demand her right that everyone considers her equally thin to them. If anyone tells her honestly ‘you are fat’; she can accuse them of ‘oppressing’ her!

If a doctor diagnosed her overweight problem by instructing her to eat more chocolates, would he accurately diagnose the root cause of her problem; or be aggravating her problem? If a doctor knowingly falsely diagnosed her obesity-disease, the doctor would be committing fraud, because the doctor wants the patient to continue to remain overweight, so that the doctor can continue to financially benefit from her overweight problem.

When you Desmond Tutu diagnose Africans inferiority complex problems by instructing them to blame apartheid, instead of taking personal responsibility; you are not accurately diagnosing their psychological inferiority complex problem, but you are directly aggravating it and worsening it. Similarly if you are knowingly providing black Africans with this fraudulent psychological advice, you are committing fraud, because you want your inferiority complex TRC fraud patients to continue to suffer from their inferiority complex problems, so that you can continue to blame apartheid, which enhances your socio-political status!

Why should I help a black person, who does not want to lift their own fingers to help themselves, who only wants to spread their legs and breed like a rabbit on viagra? Don’t you know Desmond Tutu that helping people who do not want to help themselves is NOT PSYCHOLOGICALLY HEALTHY? It encourages their dependency and incompetency to help themselves! To help someone who does not respect themselves enough to sincerely want to help themselves is – psychologically speaking – the worst thing you can do for their inferiority complex, it makes their inferiority complex worse!

But you – Desmond Tutu – are encouraging whites to help blacks, who don’t care enough about themselves to help themselves. Then when such ignorant do-gooder whites do help these blacks who don’t want to help themselves – remember Amy Biehl? – it increases blacks psychological dependency on whites, and their hatred for whites, and further increases their inferiority complexes! Thanks to Desmond Tutu’s psychological advice!

Your advice increases blacks self-hatred, victimhood and inferiority complexes! How can you consider yourself a ‘friend’ of the black people of South Africa, when your advice to them feeds and breeds their own self-hatred, victimhood and inferiority complexes? No wonder black Africa is in the state it is in, when two of its most admired leaders – you and Nelson Mandela – don’t advise your ignorant followers to take personal responsibility; when you are not interested in gaining the skills and knowledge from cultures who have no rapists and murderers, when you endorse the censorship and blacklisting of individuals from cultures which are clearly superior to yours when it comes to abstaining from rape, murder and deception, not to mention taking personal responsibility.

Mr. Manuel: You Sanctimonious Self-Righteous Two-Faced Hypocrit

So, can you now understand why it is my conclusion that you are furious that Mr. Manyi blurted the ANC’s official demographic policy of hegemony out for all to hear, by confirming it to every ignorant idiot, who lacked Hendrik Verwoerd’s knowledge about the role of demographics and geography, equalling a culture or races destiny.

You want Mr. Manyi to Shut the Fuck Up and stop Waking People up to the reality of the ANC’s Africa for Africans policies and political itnentions. You lack Mr. Manyi’s – cohones – to tell the truth about the ANC’s real Africa for African intentions. You are a gutless two-faced hypocrite and coward, Foxy Liberal Traitor to your people, a token Rainbow Coloured to bullshit and deceive your people about the ANC’s alleged ‘non-racialism’.

So, I don’t know if Mr. Manyi is indeed ‘racist’, and hence worthy of moral condemnation. It depends on how you define racist. I have not yet drawn any conclusions as to whether Mr. Manyi is or is not a ‘racist’, in accordance to Dr. Gedaliah Braun’s definition of Racism and Racists. Unlike Foxy Liberals, I make impartial enquiries into whether the actions of the alleged ‘racist’ individual, measure up to beyond reasonable doubt evidence of guilt in accordance to the definition of ‘racist’.

So, how do you Trevor Manuel define ‘racist’ or don’t you; is it just an easy political football label to throw around?

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

PS: Don’t expect to read this letter verbatim in any Foxy Liberal Poverty Pimping Newspaper; Radical Honesty SA’s I Say What I Think Honest Root Cause Problem Solving Liberation Consciousness Ideas are Blacklisted from SA Media Publications. The blacklist of Radical Honesty SA’s I Say What I Think Honest Root Cause Problem Solving Liberation Consciousness Ideas has the blessing of the entire bench of Constitutional Court Justices (CCT 06-11).