SAIRR CEO John Kane Berman Orders Researcher Lucy Holborn to Ignore Radical Honesty SA Request to SAIRR for Clarification of SAIRR 'Genocide' Statements in Big Issue Article, RE: SA Project 'Stop SA Genocide' Protest in US Capitals on 27 Feb 2012
Evidence of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing of White South Africans, and TRC Fraud Honourably submitted to Anti Apartheid Movement Organisations for Investigation and Discussion, only to be Censored and Ignored | Anti-Apartheid Movement, African and ‘Foxy Liberals’ Resentment for Being Exposed as TRC Fraud Hypocrits | Proportional Majority of Crime is Against Whites: SAIRR ignore evidence & studies | Racially Motivated Crime Statistics: Anti-Apartheid Movement, Africans and 'Foxy Liberals' ignore violence and cruelty of black on white attacks motivation: racial hatred &/or gang status | Foxy Liberal Whites in Anti-Apartheid Movement consider blacks to be psychologically / spiritually / culturally or morally inferior; by demanding blacks be held to lower moral standards than whites.
Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 29 February 2012
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:16 PM
To: Lucy Holborn - SAIRR; SA Project: Michael Myers; Modesto Anarcho; Occupy Oakland; Big Issue Editor
Cc: Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; SAIRR; ; Susie Eusman - SAIRR CEO)
Subject: SAIRR | Big Issue | SA Project | Modesto Anarcho | Occupy Oakland >> RE: Evidence of SA's TRC Fraud & Ethnic Cleansing
Ms. Lucy Holborne, SA Inst. Race Relations
Ms. Rebekah Burke, Big Issue (@BigIssueSA)
CC: Michael Myers, South Africa Project
CC: Modesto Anarcho & Occupy Oakland (@OccupyOakland)
Dear Ms. Holborne,
RE: Request Clarification for SAIRR 'Genocide' Statements in Big Issue, RE: SA Project 'Stop SA Genocide' Protest in US Capitals on 27 Feb 2012 (PDF attached)
Questions to SAIRR: regarding:
* Genocide: Anti-Apartheid Movements Censorship of Honourable Genocide complaints submitted to AAM for Investigation and Discussion
* Ethnic Cleansing of White South Africans: Anti-Apartheid Movements Censorship of Honourable Ethnic Cleansing Complaints submitted to AAM for Investigation and Discussion
* Reconciliation: Sincere or Fraud? Re: Anti-Apartheid Movements Censorship of Honourable TRC Fraud complaints submitted to AAM for Investigation and Discussion
* Anti-Apartheid Movement, African and ‘Foxy Liberals’ Resentment for Being Exposed as TRC Fraud Hypocrits
* Proportional Majority of Crime is Against Blacks: Anti-Apartheid Movement Ignores Studies and Evidence to the Contrary:
* Racially Motivated Crime Statistics: Anti-Apartheid Movement, Africans and 'Foxy Liberals' ignore violence and cruelty of black on white attacks motivation: racial hatred &/or gang status.
* Foxy Liberal Whites in Anti-Apartheid Movement consider blacks to be psychologically / spiritually / culturally or morally inferior; by demanding blacks be held to lower moral standards than whites.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty Multiculti Feminist
SQ Worm Sosiety
-----------
From: John Kane-Berman
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:18 PM
To: Lara Johnstone; Lucy Holborn - SAIRR; SA Project: Michael Myers; Modesto Anarcho; Occupy Oakland; Big Issue Editor
Cc: Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; SAIRR; ; Susie Eusman - SAIRR CEO)
Subject: RE: SAIRR | Big Issue | SA Project | Modesto Anarcho | Occupy Oakland >> RE: Evidence of SA's TRC Fraud & Ethnic Cleansing
Lucy: this e-mail must be ignored.
J S Kane-Berman
Chief Executive
South African Institute of Race Relations
 |
Request Clarification for SAIRR 'Genocide' Statements in Big Issue, RE: SA Project 'Stop SA Genocide' Protest in US Capitals on 27 Feb 2012
SA's Toxic TRC Fraud: Forgiveness Undefined: Is TRC S.A. 'Forgiveness': (i) Catholic: Indulgences 4 Sale; (ii) Lutheran: Spiritual Redemption; or (iii) Black Liberation Theology: Fanon Violence on Rotting Corpses of Settlers? [(I: 21:18)(II: 15:14)] |
Big Issue's article: Americans march in solidarity with boer brethren to protest ‘racist’ crime in SA, reported, among others, as follows:Lucy Holborn, Research Manager at the South African Institute of Race Relations, said the American group has no legitimate claim for genocide against white South Africans.
“There’s no evidence to suggest that’s the case,” she said in a telephone interview from Johannesburg.
Claims that white South Africans are facing an organised attempt at ethnic cleansing is detrimental to the reconciliation work people have done since the end of apartheid, Holborn added.
“There is a danger in suggesting genocide is going on…it builds resentment in the other direction,” she said. “The more people hear white people complain about their situation, the more goodwill, promoted by people like Mandela, will fade. For a lot of people that’s frustrating, because in most cases crime is still happening in greater numbers against blacks.”
Holborn pointed out that while white farmers have been the victims of violent crime, research shows 80% of these attacks were motivated by robbery, while only two % were racially driven.
Questions to SAIRR:
RE: GENOCIDE: ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENTS CENSORSHIP OF HONOURABLE GENOCIDE COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED TO AAM FOR INVESTIGATION AND DISCUSSION:
SAIRR CEO to Staff: Ignore TRC Fraud & Genocide Evidence (02:21) |
[1] If SAIRR definition of GENOCIDE is different to that of Genocide Watch; what is the SA Institute of Race Relations definition for 'Genocide'?
[2] Why did the SA Institute of Race Relations not provide a public discourse response to the Genocide evidence in the Radical Honesty - SA Genocide complaint to the International Criminal Court?Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute:
The Complainants Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:
Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.
[3] According to the SAIRR: What evidence in the aforementioned Radical Honesty - SA Genocide Complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC) is factually incorrect, or according to SAIRR incorrectly interpreted?
RE: ETHNIC CLEANSING OF WHITE SOUTH AFRICANS: ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENTS CENSORSHIP OF HONOURABLE ETHNIC CLEANSING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED TO AAM FOR INVESTIGATION AND DISCUSSION:
Fox40: SAProject 'Stop SA Genocide' Protest: Occupy Oakland Assault 2 Police & SAP-CA (01:57) |
[4] What was the South African Anti-Apartheid Movements response to the Radical Honesty SA letter to Mr. Trevor Manuel: "Open Letter to Foxy Liberal Hypocrit: Trevor Manuel RE: Do you Deny your Endorsement of ANC’s Africa-for-Africans Operation-Population-Production Policies?"Did your alleged commitment to ‘non-racialism’ demand that the racial population demographics of 1994, of which 20% were whites, be retained; or did you support the ANC’s policies to reduce white demographics, to what it is now: 8%? Did you voice any objections to the ANC’s policy of reducing the concentration of SA whites from 20% to 8%?
.......
What is the rate of reproduction of whites vs black Africans in South Africa, Mr. Non-Racialist Manuel? Who were being paid -- with your budgets and endorsement – to reduce the concentration of SA whites from 20% to 8%; by increasing the concentration of 'Africans' from 80% to 92%?
[5] Why has the SAIRR not provided any evidence to the Official Request that was sent to all South African and International Anti-Apartheid Organisations: Letter to EU Anti-Apartheid Org's: Could the ANC have won liberation struggle Honourably and Non-violently; by ending their Swart Gevaar Breeding War?"Request for Information from ANC &/or Anti-Apartheid Officials: Prior to the ANC’s M-Plan declaration of War against Apartheid; Did the ANC at any time launch a non-violent cultural and political campaign to stop their African ‘swart gevaar’ breeding-war population explosion, to demonstrate their honourable Just War Just Cause Intentions?"
Jus Sanguinis argue that the TRC was fraudulent, because the ANC (a) did not have a just cause, (b) did not declare war on Apartheid as a last resort, (c) the ANC’s war against apartheid was not declared by proper authority; (d) ANC did not possess right intention, (e) ANC did not have a reasonable chance of success, and (f) ANC did not use proportional force; (f) Post Bellum: ANC are doing all in their power -- including the continuation of their breeding war against whites in South Africa – to facilitate the destruction of Boer-Afrikaner and other minority cultures, some of whom (the Radical Honesty culture) have absolutely no standing whatsoever in SA’s alleged ‘multi-culti’ courtrooms; (g) the ANC repeatedly reneged upon its promises of Amnesty destroying all trust in future political agreements.
One particular issue the TRC failed to make an impartial enquiry into were the population policy motives and causes for Afrikaners implementing the political policy of Apartheid as an act of Just War Self Defense against African cultures population explosion breeding war.
In fact when it comes to population policy issues, the TRC made no effort whatsoever to enquire into any population policy related matters, as causal political, economic or psychological factors for Apartheids political violence; even though it is common knowledge that countries with large populations of idle young men, known as youth bulges , account for 70 – 90 percent of all civil conflicts.
- Prior to the ANC’s M-Plan declaration of War against Apartheid: Did the ANC at any time launch a non-violent cultural and political campaign to stop their African ‘swart gevaar’ breeding-war population explosion, to demonstrate their honourable Just War Just Cause Intentions?
- If (a) it was abundantly clear that the major fundamental motive for establishing Apartheid was fear of the ‘swart gevaar’; (2) Apartheid Officials and citizens ‘swart gevaar’ population policy fears are not only legally and ecologically justifiable, but common sense; (3) the ANC and Anti-Apartheid movement were culturally honourably concerned with Just War practices; (4) why did the ANC not consider launching a non-violent cultural and political campaign to stop their African ‘swart gevaar’ breeding-war population explosion, to demonstrate their honourable Just War Just Cause Intentions to ‘swart gevaar’ Apartheid Officials and citizens?
- What role did population growth factors play in South Africa’s Apartheid violence? If understanding demographic roots is a prerequisite for understanding their subsequent symptomatic political violence, and hence preventing their future re-occurrence, why was this not a priority for the TRC to enquire into in its enquiry to determine “as complete a picture as possible of the nature, causes” of Apartheid political violence??
- What role did the ANC play in contributing to the Population Explosion of Cannon Fodder and Resource War Violence? Why was the ANC not required to take responsibility for their population production of poverty stricken cannon fodder?
- Is Meshack Magobogoane the only black man in South Africa concerned about how the ANC are deliberately sponsoring SA’s Moral Holocaust, through its “abnormal government-sponsored population explosion of Malthusian poverty aggravation, moral degeneration and social disintegration" ?
RE: RECONCILIATION: SINCERE OR FRAUD? RE: ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENTS CENSORSHIP OF HONOURABLE TRC FRAUD COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED TO AAM FOR INVESTIGATION AND DISCUSSION:
[6] What has been SA Anti-Apartheid Movement Organisations Honourable Official Public Discourse response to Radical Honesty SA allegations of SA’s TRC FRAUD?[I] 06 June 2009: Complaint to Norwegian Nobel Committee (PDF):
Notice of Legal and Political Request to: (I) Withdraw Nobel Peace Prize’s from Nelson Mandela, F.W. de Klerk, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu, for (a) Intellectual Dishonesty & Hypocrisy; (b) Moral, Political and Religious Prostitution; and (c) ‘TRC-RSA’ Fraud and Betrayal; and (II) Accept Nobel Peace Prize Nominations for Dr. Albert Bartlett; Dr. Garret James Harden, and Dr. M. King Hubbert, for Intellectually Honest and Politically Honourable Ecologically Sustainable, Human Rights, Peace and Social Justice Advocacy.
Encl. to Mandela, de Klerk & Tutu: Final Honourable Notice of Legal and Political Delivery: Elimination of ‘TRC-RSA’ Nobel Peace Prize Recipients Plausible Deniability, to allegations that your Human Rights Advocacy is guilty of (i) Intellectual Dishonesty and Hypocrisy; (ii) Moral, Political and Religious Prostitution; and (iii) ‘TRC-RSA’ Fraud and Betrayal.
[II] 18 July 2010: Constitutional Court: Citizen v. McBride (CCT 23-10) (PDF)
First Amicus Heads of Argument in Support of Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995
(III) 2010-2012: Equality Court. South Gauteng (07-2010 EQ JHB)(PDF) & Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA 815/11)(PDF): Afriforum v. Malema
Heads of Argument of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture; ‘Boer/Settler’ descendant of among others Dutch, French Huguenot, British, German and Norwegian ‘Settlers’ to the Cape Province..... In Support of ‘Political Necessity French Riddle of the Kaffir Lily Pond’ Application of the Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of ANC’s ‘TRC Social Contract Fraud’; Recommendation to Constitutional Court to Resolve ‘Kill Boer/Settler Hate Speech’ Descartian v. Ubuntu Conformist Cultural Friction by Implementing: (A) 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination to provide Boers with a ‘Kaffir’ Free Speech Volkstaat; and each African (Zulu/Xhosa) tribe their ‘Kill Boer’ Free Speech Volkstaats; and/or (B) Jus Sanguinis Repatriation of ‘Settlers’ to European Progenitor Nations.
(IV) International Criminal Court: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute (PDF).
The Complainants Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:
Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.
(V) 16 December 2010: Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat, or Right-of-Return to EU Petition to Progenitor Nations (NL-FR-DE-CH-NO-UK) & NATO Military Committee. (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr)
Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis EU Citizenship for African White Refugees Founding Petitioners Hereby Petition their Relevant EU Progenitor Nations for:
[A] International and EU Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; Or in the absence thereof
[B] Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by all relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugees descendants.
Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Justifications:
(i) International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Right-of-Return, International Covenant on Civil, Political, Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, etc;
(ii) S. 235 of the SA Constitution & Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party;
(iii) Just War TRC Fraud: ANC & Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth & Reconciliation Fraud.
(iv) Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Economic Relocalisation.
RE: ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT, AFRICAN AND ‘FOXY LIBERALS’ RESENTMENT FOR BEING EXPOSED AS TRC FRAUD HYPOCRITS
Maya Angelou's Boer Family Members TRC Fraud Evidence (02:21) |
If South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation was sincere and honourable… then individuals such as Archbishop Tutu and Reverend Boraine, and any Government Official who professes that the Truth and Reconciliation was sincere and honourable, would have no objections to hearing constructive criticism feedback, from individuals or organisations who had information or evidence which could enhance the sincerity and honourable integrity of the TRC process.
In an honourable Reconciliation process: Constructive criticism and feedback is WELCOMED WITH OPEN ARMS, for it is the essence of enabling the process to find the ‘real truth and real sincere reconciliation’.
If however a Reconciliation process is being faked, for political or religious or other propaganda purposes, then those in charge have no interest in any constructive criticism or feedback which diverts from the official propaganda dogma and doctrine.
If Reconciliation is sincere.. and there is feedback as to how it could be made more sincere, such feedback is welcomed, NOT RESENTED. It is put forward for discussion and debate and investigation… NOT CENSORED.
In the case of South Africa’s alleged ‘Truth and Reconcilaition’… all constructive criticism and feedback from Radical Honesty SA has NOT BEEN WELCOMED FOR DEBATE OR INVESTIGATION, BUT HAS BEEN CENSORED AND IGNORED.
The plausible conclusion for such behaviour is that South Africa’s so-called Truth and Reconciliation was A FRAUD, and that those who have committed this fraud, covered it up, now resent being exposed as FRAUDULENT HYPOCRITS.
If Mandela was sincere about his so-called ‘goodwill’; why has Mandela and the NM Foundation censored and ignored all constructive criticism that could enhance the reconciliation process to real sincere reconciliation?
The following excerpt of Radical Honesty SA processes for achieving sincere honourable sensate forgiveness between individuals can be found in the aforementioned legal documents recently submitted to among others the Constitutional Court and currently the Supreme Court of Appeal: 18 July 2010: Constitutional Court: Citizen v. McBride (CCT 23-10)(PDF) and Equality Court. South Gauteng (07-2010 EQ JHB)(PDF) & Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA 815/11)(PDF): Afriforum v. Malema:Radical Honesty Overview: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness
26. In Practicing Radical Honesty, Dr. Blanton qualifies the conflict between intellectual fairness and sensate forgiveness:
Many of us are concerned about fairness and use the principle of fairness as our primary rationalization for withholding anger. Advanced instruction in this principle creates lawyers who are miserable people. Divorces handled by lawyers often result in children shot back and forth like missiles between hostile camps. If you force yourself to be fair while still angry, you are a fool, and any agreements you make in such a state won't work for you. Judges and lawyers ignore this fact. Judges and lawyers exist for people who can't handle their anger. A judge tells you what to do, based on what he or she thinks is fair, whether you like it or not, because you haven't been able to work things out on your own.
27. The Radical Honesty Methodology or Process or definition of Sincere Sensate Forgiveness is explained in depth in Practicing Radical Honesty , also referred to as the Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract , with the six minimal requirements, none of which may be skipped, being:
- You have to tell the truth about the specific behavior you resent, to the person, face-to-face;
- You have to be verbally and vocally unrestrained with regard to volume and propriety;
- You have to pay attention to the feelings and sensations in your body and to the other person as you speak;
- You have to express any appreciations for the person that come up in the process, with the same attention to your feelings and to the other person as when you are expressing resentments;
- You have to stay with any feelings that emerge in the process, like tears or laughter, regardless of any evaluations you may have about how it makes you look; and let the tears or laughter or pain or anger not be interrupted by your mind until they go naturally to completion;
- You have to stay with the discussion until you no longer feel resentful of the other person.
28. Dr. Blanton -- the worlds expert on sincere sensate forgiveness -- concludes, with great emphasis, that is not to be contradicted by any lawyer, priest, psychotherapist, diplomat, bureaucrat, democrat, labour leader, company executive, head of government or any other patrolman, that: “Then, and only then, are you ready to talk about the future, make arrangements for the future, or make any agreements.”
RE: PROPORTIONAL MAJORITY OF CRIME IS AGAINST BLACKS: ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT IGNORES STUDIES AND EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY:
Mandela's ANC: Pol. Prisoners: Tom Manning, Marilyn Buck & Jaan Laaman do not exist (02:21) |
[7] Do you dispute the following statistics cited by James Myburgh, and the Jus Sanguinis argument?Did 142 academics & others get it wrong on crime? (James Myburgh | POLITICSWEB | 15 September 2009 ):
In the letter, addressed to the Charge d’Affaires of Canada in South Africa, the signatories protested that “it is simply untrue that white people are being targeted disproportionately. Black South Africans are much more likely to be victims of crime, largely because they are less able to afford the protections and security measures which most white South Africans, as still privileged citizens, are able to acquire.”
Given the eminence of the signatories, their sheer weight in numbers, and its apparent plausibility, this assertion has gone largely unquestioned. But is it true? A number of crime victimisation surveys have been conducted over the past decade. Do they support, or contradict, the claims of this combination of learned academics?
~!~
It is an open question whether such racialist propaganda would have given the green light to criminals to cross over the colour line en masse. However, at the end of 1999 an HSRC survey found that 39% of white respondents had experienced crime over the previous year, as opposed to 16% of black respondents. As the HSRC research report noted, “When analysed by population group, distinct differences emerge. White and Indian respondents report substantially higher victimisation rates than black or coloured respondents”
~!~
More recent surveys continue to suggest that the prosperous racial minorities were still more likely to fall victim to crime, despite the extensive security measures that they may have invested in. In April/May 2007 Markinor asked crime victimisation questions in its regular omnibus survey. These found that a disproportionate number of whites (20%) and Indians (22%) had fallen victim to crime over the past six months, as compared to black (9%) and coloured (9%) respondents.
~!~
Conclusion
Thus, all these surveys show that, over the past decade, white (and latterly Indian) South Africans have been “much more likely to be victims of crime” than black South Africans. It is possible that there are other surveys out there which contradict the findings above. Politicsweb did contact four of the signatories asking for the sources for their claims on crime. At the time of publication this had not been supplied.
Excerpt from: Request for Transparent Official Forwarding of African White Refugees Petition to Officials and citizens of the [CH-DE-FR-NL-UK]: Volkstaat Secession in South Africa; or Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) [CH-DE-FR-NL-UK]: Citizenship for African White Refugees. (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr)[8] The argument that asserts that simply because black South Africans are equally the victims of crime in South Africa, means whites should ‘shut up, go blue in the face, f**k off, or endure rape, torture and murder with a smile on their faces, or be deemed ‘racists’; totally ignores the reality that IF black South Africans are remotely sincerely upset or concerned about crime; they are the demographic majority and capable of electing alternative political parties or leaders who are serious and sincere about the importance of a competent ethical police force, justice system and government to seriously, competently and impartially deal with everyone and anyone alleged to be guilty of any crime. White South Africans are not politically capable of removing the corrupt and incompetent ANC; only black South Africans are; and black South Africans couldn’t care less about doing so.
RE: RACIALLY MOTIVATED CRIME STATISTICS: ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT, AFRICANS AND ‘FOXY LIBERALS’ IGNORE VIOLENCE AND CRUELTY OF BLACK ON WHITE ATTACKS MOTIVATION: RACIAL HATRED &/OR GANG STATUS.
[8] Does SAIRR dispute the conclusions of Genocide Watch and the State Prosecutors, who argue that where there is violence and cruelty involved in any alleged robbery, such violence and cruelty should be attributed to ‘racial hatred’? (www.sa-farm-attacks.co.nr)“Racial hatred is the main cause of the incredibly high violence- and cruelty level which specifically target the primarily Afrikaner victims of farm attacks,” is one of the findings of the long-awaited farm attack report, which Beeld newspaper managed to publish in spite of the decision yesterday by the South African government security and safety Minister to “hold back its publication.” -- GenocideWatch Report, Aug 2003
“The Committee also interviewed 15 prosecutors -- all of them state advocates -- in Bloemfontein, Capetown, Kimberley, Pietermaritzburg and Pretoria. They were unanimously of the view that .... the degree of violence and cruelty during farm attacks was exceedingly high. Most state advocates attributed this extreme violence to racial hatred.” -- Report: Comm. of Enquiry into Farm Attacks, July 2003
[9] The Foxy Liberals of the Anti-Apartheid Movement have avoided any and all investigation into how many criminal acts against whites and white farmers are motivated by Gang Culture Doctrine and Socio Status Rewards for Attacks on Farmers and Violence against Whites; particularly Afrikaners:“In New South Africa, those who act on the ANC’s cultural heritage of ‘Kill Farmers’, are accorded with automatic membership -- prison and street-cred status -- of the 27’s gang.”
According to Johnny Steinberg, in his book The Number, in New South Africa, those who act on the ANC’s cultural heritage of ‘Kill Farmers’, are accorded with automatic membership -- prison and street-cred status -- of the 27’s gang. Put differently, if you adhere to gangculture and in accordance with such gang culture, Kill a Farmer in South Africa, then you are rewarded with automatic membership of the 27's gang. In Nongoloza's Children: W. Cape Prison Gangs, Steinberg states:Over the past two decades, news of the strange world behind the bars of South Africa's prisons has been spilling out in dribs and drabs. Among the things we have learned is that the so-called "Number gangs"—the 26s, 27s and 28s—are about 100 years old, that they originated in the jails, mine compounds and informal settlements of turn-of-the-century Johannesburg, and that today they constitute a formidable force in every prison across the country.
We know, too, that the world of the Number gangs is one of staggering brutality. Its self-styled judiciaries sentence inmates to death, to gang rape, to beatings with prison mugs, padlocks and bars of soap; among the prerequisites of joining the "soldier lines" of the gangs is the taking of a warder's or a non-gangster's blood; leaving a prison gang, sharing a gang's secrets with a warder, or talking casually about the gang's workings to the non-initiated are all punishable crimes.
In Death and the Mielieboer: The Eugène Terre’Blanche Murder & Poor-White Canon-fodder in South Africa, Michael Schmidt admits how many blacks and so-called ‘anti-racists’ celebrate the murder of Afrikaners or Boers (I have never celebrated the murder of anyone, far left or right or center. It appears to me that anyone who does celebrate the murder of another, cannot call themelves an ‘anti-racist’.):The murder, apparently at the hands of two black farm-labourers, of thuggish AWB leader Eugene Terre’Blanche on March 20 in what was once South Africa’s white supremacist Western Transvaal heartland, was celebrated by anti-racists the world over.
~!~
This is not to say that there have not been numerous well-documented, well-publicised cases of Boers torturing and killing poor rural blacks – but the point is that extreme violence committed on the Boers is almost totally ignored by the mainstream media which props up the statist-democratic farce. In one grim example, when two elderly white women in a small Free State town were gang-raped a year ago, allegedly by a black gang, tortured to death and the severed breast of one woman used to paint anti-white slogans on the wall, not a single media outlet named this a hate crime. Only one newspaper even covered the atrocity, the Afrikaans-language Volksblad – and then only to decry the “hate-speech” of the women’s traumatised relatives calling for a return of the death penalty for murder. Only with Terre’Blanche’s death is the mainstream belatedly making a tentative link between ANC hate speech calling for the killing of the Boers and, well, the actual killing of Boers.
RE: FOXY LIBERAL WHITES IN ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT CONSIDER BLACKS TO BE PSYCHOLOGICALLY / SPIRITUALLY / CULTURALLY OR MORALLY INFERIOR:
If the Anti-Apartheid Movement is really ‘non-racial’, it would hold everyone to the same standards of behaviour; and recognize the accomplishments of individuals, organisations or cultures who hold themselves to a higher standard of behaviour (How many cultures in SA have accomplished real sincere reconciliation between its members?). However the Foxy Liberal Anti-Apartheid Movement holds African blacks (Mandela, Tutu, etc) to lower standards of behaviour; hence implying that blacks are inferior and incapable of being held to the same standards as whites.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty Multiculti Feminist
SQ Worm Sosiety (www.sqworms.co.nr)
» » » » [PDF]
From: Lara [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Lucy Holborn - SAIRR; SA Project: Michael Myers; Modesto Anarcho; Occupy Oakland; Big Issue Editor
Cc: Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; SAIRR; ; Susie Eusman - SAIRR CEO)
Subject: RE: SAIRR | Big Issue | SA Project | Modesto Anarcho | Occupy Oakland >> RE: Evidence of SA's TRC Fraud & Ethnic Cleansing
Care to provide any reasons for why EVIDENCE should be ignored, Mr. Berman??
Care to provide evidence for why certain segments of SA society and certain cultures are so despised they are not entitled to honourable recognition for their contribution or opinions, Mr. Berman?
If any of the Radical Honesty SA evidence submitted is erroneous, why not honourably prove it so, and demonstrate SAIRR integrity, Mr. Berman?
Or do you have a problem with me and my opinions that blacks are quite as capable of being held to the same standards as whites, cause I was married to an honourable Oakland ghetto 'nigger', who was capable of practicing real sincere forgiveness with his white Afrikaner 'cracker' wife?
Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty Multiculti Feminist
---------------------
From: John Kane-Berman
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 7:05 AM
To: Lucy Holborn - SAIRR; SA Project: Michael Myers; Modesto Anarcho; Occupy Oakland; Big Issue Editor
Cc: Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; SAIRR; ; Susie Eusman - SAIRR CEO)
Subject: RE: SAIRR | Big Issue | SA Project | Modesto Anarcho | Occupy Oakland >> RE: Evidence of SA's TRC Fraud & Ethnic Cleansing
No, thank you.
J S Kane-Berman
Phone: [27][0][11] 482-7221 extension 2020
Fax: 086-500-6851
e-mail: jkb@sairr.org.za
Chief Executive
South African Institute of Race Relations
2 Clamart Rd
Richmond, Johannesburg, South Africa
2092
---------------------
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:23 AM
To: Lucy Holborn - SAIRR; SA Project: Michael Myers; Modesto Anarcho; Occupy Oakland; Big Issue Editor
Cc: Kerwin Lebone - SAIRR; SAIRR - John Kane Berman; SAIRR - Franz Cronje; SAIRR - Anthea Jeffery; SAIRR; ; Susie Eusman - SAIRR CEO)
Subject: RE: SAIRR | Big Issue | SA Project | Modesto Anarcho | Occupy Oakland >> RE: Evidence of SA's TRC Fraud & Ethnic Cleansing
SAIRR CEO Orders Researcher to ignore evidence of TRC Fraud and White
Genocide
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-756053@r2kcampaign @lunchout2 @Die_Burger @NBC @AP SAIRR CEO Orders Researcher: ignore evidence of TRC Fraud & White Genocide
— Serpico Savage (@Habeus_4_Mentem) March 1, 2012
bit.ly/yUnbQh@SmithInAfrica@baldaufji @ianbirrell @cnn SAIRR CEO Orders Researcher: ignore evidence of TRC Fraud & White Genocide
— Radical Honoursty (@WhiteRefugee) March 1, 2012
bit.ly/yUnbQh
» » » » [Habeus Mentem: 175187634321231872 :: White Refugee: 175185046716690432]
1 comment:
Videos Uploaded Again....
Helen Suzman: Democracy was better under Apartheid
http://youtu.be/YsSUixBrf3M
Walter Williams: Blacks Were Better off Under Apartheid
http://youtu.be/yx33u6deN_0
SA's Toxic TRC Fraud: AIDS (01): ANC & PAC Laboratory Origins of AIDS Conspiracy of Silence
http://youtu.be/_ThFIM1W_Rc
SAIRR CEO to Staff: Ignore TRC Fraud & Genocide Evidence
http://youtu.be/s7H7kPJTp_4
Post a Comment