Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Friday, March 8, 2013

RH Liberal admits 'I never had, don't want, brutally honest relationship with black, muslim..'



RH Liberal admits 'I never had, don't want, brutally honest relationship with black, muslim..'



Lara | Radical Honoursty | 07 March 2013

I appreciate you for your response. I particularly – very much – appreciate you for saying: You do not want a brutally honest relationship with a Muslim, Mexican or black! I was fucking blown away by that.

I imagine many white guilt liberals and conservatives feel the same way, but are not nearly as honest as you are about that, hence they are white guilt liberals and conservatives, whereas you are not. I don’t have a problem with you not wanting a brutally honest relationship with a Muslim, Mexican or black. I simply wish more people who share your perspective, would also be honest about their lack of interest in such brutally honest relationships with blacks, muslims, Mexicans, etc.. and also – like you – not object or find objectionable, other europeans, like myself, who actually do want brutally honest relationships with other races, religions, etc.

**********

Seriously, I have never had a brutally honest relationship with a muslim, mexican, or black. Is that what you want? Though, I am not against it. Are you in hot water somehow because of this?

You do not want a brutally honest relationship with a muslim, mexcican or black???? Wow!! Holy fuck! That’s honest! Thanks for saying so.

My husband is black, and yes, I do want brutally honest relationships with all people’s of all colours and all races, and all religions, who are interested in brutally honest cultural, racial relationships.

I was deported from America for being radically honest with an Immigration officer.
I was imprisoned in South Africa, for a year, for being radically honest with a Prosecutor and a Magistrate in a court of law.
I was imprisoned in South Africa, for a month, for being radically honest with a Coloured Politician, in a telephone conversation.

RH Liberal admits 'I never had, don't want, brutally honest relationship with black, muslim..'



Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: 2 Short 'Yes' or 'No' questions for Brad


Hello Lara,

My name is ####### and I was added last fall 2012 to this email thread between you and Brad. I am curious about you. What do you do for rent and what do you do for fun? What area of the country do you live?

#########



Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: 2 Short 'Yes' or 'No' questions for Brad


Hi #####,

I have a bit of a different worldview, than most or many people.

Rent:
I don’t have a ‘rent’ worldview, I have a Mosuo family/tribe self sufficiency worldview:

I was most surprised when I found out about the Mosuo culture, who are a small culture in SW China. They have no murder, no rape, no suicide, no unemployment, no homeless, no courts, no police.

Simply put: They are a gender balanced culture, the matriarch is the head of the home/tribe. Men are political leaders. They live in large extended families, as a family tribe. The children are not kicked out of the home, to go and compete for scarce resources with another families children, to destroy the countryside and other species habitats, by building more and more unnecessary homes.

Upon return to South Africa, from America, I had many long discussions with my parents. I wanted to know why they had given birth to me? Why did they breed four children, to simply send them out into the world, to compete for other people’s resources, and to destroy the habitats of other species? Anyway, it was a long discussion, some of it very heated, but we came to an Mosuo-like agreement.

I live with my parents, take care of them, do stuff around the house, look after the house when they are away, take care of the dogs, grow food for us, make compost, etc. I have a small pedal powered wormery business, where I pick up allot of restaurant waste around town, with my bicycle and trailer, and then make lots of compost, for my family and my aunts family, for her garden. I also sell a bit of compost, but very little, mostly use for my families gardens. My aunt grows lots of veggies for them. So, I don’t pay any rent. The stuff I do, I do for the family, as my contribution to our self sufficiency, not essentially for ‘rent’.


Fun:

I don’t have a ‘this is fun’ and hence anything that is not ‘fun’ is put into a category of ‘not fun’.

I simply never ask myself the question is something ‘fun’, or think that ‘this is not fun’. I spent 14 years living in dozens of cultures around the world, and I don’t know if that contributed to my worldview that I don’t label events or activities as ‘fun’. If I did so, then logically, all activities that did not fall into ‘fun’, would be ‘not fun’ and I would set myself up for not enjoying doing those activities, or simply appreciating them, and my surroundings and my thoughts, while I am doing them.

I guess this may explain it better. My brothers have a western worldview of ‘fun’ activities, and ‘not fun/work’ activities. For a long time they always invited me to their ‘fun’ activities, getting drunk, or a party or socializing, which meant gossiping about someone ad talking about shit about all the material possessions we purchased and how the purchase of those possessions increased the size of our penis/vagina.

Bores me to fucking tears, I would go, and give my honest opinions on the issues, they would get upset, and so it was easier for them to decide that I am ‘crazy’, and ‘mad’ and such shit. Long time ago, when I was massively psychologically insecure, and wanted to ‘fit in’ and ‘be fun’, and such shit, I used to go to such stuff, and be the star of the party, willing to get unbelievably drunk, to numb my psychological insecurities, about my fears that nobody would like me, if I was simply honest and myself.

These days, I don’t give a flying fuck if nobody likes me, for being me.

So, I’d say, making up a category of ‘this is fun’, would – and certainly was for me – be a good way, to remove yourself from experiencing whatever you are doing, experiencing thinking the thoughts you have at that moment, and just being totally present: noticing thoughts and sensations while doing whatever you are doing, without having to label it as ‘this is fun’ or ‘this is not fun’, which removes you from being present to the moment, and learning or experiencing it, simply as it is.

Not sure if any of that helped, you to understand better! ;-)

What about you? Why did brad add you to the discussion? What do you want to learn, or what is your mission?

Why are you curious about what I do for rent or fun? ;-)

I live in the Southern Cape, of South Africa; in a town named George.

Lara

PS: By the way, there was a follow up to that discussion. I filed a complaint with the FBI against Brad.
http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2012/12/121223_rh-guru-trainers.html




Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: 2 Short 'Yes' or 'No' questions for Brad


Hi Lara,

The Mosuo worldview is new to me. I had to look it up.

If anyone left their window open at night around here they would freeze to death.

I wonder what you mean when you say, "we came to an Mosuo-like agreement'.

I do not know why brad added me to the discussion.
Though when I read what you wrote in the previous emails I imagined you as an intelligent person with drive and direction.

When you say you filed a complaint with the FBI against brad I wonder what your mission in life is and how this tactic advances you.

Whats your involvement with that website you listed? Seems quite radical. Like radical honesty.

When you say, ' I spent 14 years living in dozens of cultures around the world,' I am curious how that happened.

Did you grow up in South Africa and go to school there?

How did you meet brad? Since you filed a complaint with the fbi against brad I imagine you are not on the best terms with him. How did that happen?

When I asked you about money and fun that was the best thing I could come up with that says Hey, You! What's your story?

I want to learn more on self-sufficiency. That brings up another question on otherness.
Is self-sufficiency devoid of involvement with those who are doing wrong, for example does one stand by and let others hurt those one loves?
Is this called other-sufficiency?
Is justice what connects self and other?
Is the substance of justice -enforcement of boundaries - and laws and those tools that suport that enforcement?
When love is treating another as one's own is justice an active agent in that treaty?
Must I have an 'own' before I can love?
Rather 'Enough'.
Are love and enough one and the same?
trading owns for what
Does one come after the other..
enough
do they dance together?
love
I am open to learn

#############



Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: 2 Short 'Yes' or 'No' questions for Brad


Hi #######,

CC: Brad (transparency)

Yes. The Mosuo worldview is not something anthrocorpocentric patriarchy, including patriarchal feminists want widely known.

The last thing they want everyone to know, is that there are indeed cultures (and there were other Aryan cultures, way back in Europe, thousands of years, who practiced very similar gender balanced, family tribal arrangements like the Mosuo), who live both in harmony with nature and in harmony with other humans.

Not sure what you were trying to say with “If anyone left their window open at night around here they would freeze to death.”

Where you live it is cold? How does that fit in with Mosuo or other conversation issues? Sorry, I don’t get it.

When you no longer fear death.. your worldview changes allot. I confronted my parents that (a) they brought me into this world, (b) they ignorantly go along as brood sows and sperm donors for a breeding war debt slavery culture destroying the planet; (c) and then want to send their children off into the world to do the same to go and wage war against other sperm donors and brood sows children for an ever shrinking amount of resources.

So.. I am not willing to compromise my principles and join this breeding war human factory farming death factory cult… either (a) I voluntarily and lovingly depart, and say my farewells, and go to some other planet, and do whatever happens after you die… or (b) if they object and don’t want me to leave, then they must take responsibility for their roles in procreating me on a planet that was already very fucking overpopulated, and we arrange a Mosuo like family/tribal arrangement where we as a family take care of each other; where I make my contributions towards our self sufficiency: grow food, and so on; and in my spare time, I can devote my time towards sowing seeds of ideas, for alternative worldviews of living in harmony with nature and other humans…

In a Mosuo-like family… you don’t breed children to send them out into the world to go and destroy it by building new homes and new businesses and exterminate the habitats of other species… In a Mosuo-like family, if you breed a child, the family/tribe are responsible for that child, and every other member of the family, till death…. That child remains part of the tribe, grows up to make their contribution to the tribe’s self-sufficiency….. and caretaking of other subsequent children… and dies as a member of the family/tribe.

That is what I mean when I say we came to a Mosuo-like agreement. I am more committed to it than they are, but they are slowly coming around to the idea, that their cultural way of doing things was and is fucked up.

“I do not know why brad added me to the discussion.”

I don’t know either. Not a problem, I was just curious. What is your relationship with Radical Honesty? Brad?

“Though when I read what you wrote in the previous emails I imagined you as an intelligent person with drive and direction.”

Thanks.

“When you say you filed a complaint with the FBI against brad I wonder what your mission in life is and how this tactic advances you.”

My mission: to be honest with myself and others, 24/07; and to provide others the love of honesty also. Brad – in my opinion is being a gutless two faced hypocrite and fraud on those issues – and either (a) should publicly retract his opinions about people should ‘offend’ others and so on, or (b) put his money where his mouth is and stop being such a gutless coward about supporting the law to recognize Radical honesty as ‘religious’ or ‘cultural’ speech.

Brad, however spends most of his time ‘offending’ white liberals….. and is petrified of ‘radical honesty’ offending blacks or muslims or Mexicans and so on…. Others who actually put ‘radical honesty’ to use in multicultural environments, who want brutal honest relationships with blacks, muslims, Mexicans, etc…. run into the danger zone of being accused of ‘hate speech’ and so on. Well, Brad does not appear to give a flying fuck, about radical honesty with other races….

If I did not hold Brad accountable for his fraud and hypocrisy, then I would be just like every other fucked up culture, who are too gutless to hold hteir own leaders accountable. Fuck that! Holding Brad accountable for his shit, is the most loving act a real friend can do. If I excuse brad to be a lying two faced gutless wonder hypocrit, then I would not be his true friend.

A true friend – in my opinion – is not one of those radical honesty imbeciles crawling up Brad’s ass… but someone who holds his feet to the fire, to practice what he fucking preaches.

“Whats your involvement with that website you listed? Seems quite radical. Like radical honesty.”

It is my website, I am the editor.

More on the rest later….

Lara



Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 10:54 PM
Cc: 'Brad Blanton'
Subject: RE: 2 Short 'Yes' or 'No' questions for Brad


Hi #######,

I put on a back-pack and basically hitch-hiked around the world, working on yachts, as a nanny and so on, for 14 odd years.

Yes, I grew up in South Africa and went to school here.

I was in Oakland, and sick to death about living in a society founded on hypocrisy, when I saw an ad about a radical honesty group. I called them, Bob, and he said I would have to read Brad’s book, and then I could join their weekly practice group. I loved Brad’s book, joined the practice group, and slowly confronted my own hypocrisies… and learnt how to live transparently and practice radical honesty. I met Brad at a 3 day weekend workshop he held in San Francisco. Later he hired a CEO, called Wendy, who was also South African, and invited me to come and work at Radical Honesty. So, I moved to Virginia and started working for Radical Honesty. Later me and Brad had a disagreement about our interpretations of my employment agreement, which became quite heated for a while; and he fired me; although we later resolved it, and he asked me to stay. But by then, I had already packed up my car, to move back to California; and so I decided that it was a good impetus to go and sort out stuff, back in California, that I needed to do. My husband is in prison in California, still is, and was when we got married. Long story.

I don’t consider myself in bad terms with Brad; I don’t know if Brad considers himself to be in bad terms with me. I love Brad…., and in my perspective Brad is acting like a massive hypocrit on this issue, as detailed in the letter to Brad and RH trainers.

“When I asked you about money and fun that was the best thing I could come up with that says Hey, You! What's your story? “

When I hear a question like ‘whats your story’, the thought that occurs to me, is what kind of fucked up vague question is that? I have no problem answering any specific question asked, no matter how embarrassing; but if there is one thing I fucking cannot stand it is talking shit about myself, while someone (my interpretation) pretends to listen and be interested.

I want to learn more on self-sufficiency. That brings up another question on otherness.

Well.. if you really do want to, you will do so. If not, maybe you are just bullshitting yourself, that it would be cool to do so? Lots of liberal white guilt type’s think its ‘cool’ and ‘fashionable’ to be self-sufficient, or pretend that they are.. it’s a bunch of self deception lifestyle activism… to silence their white consumptionist guilt… But if you really want to, and its something you really care about, then you will do so, I imagine.

Is self-sufficiency devoid of involvement with those who are doing wrong, for example does one stand by and let others hurt those one loves?

Sorry.. that’s way too vague for me. What is your understanding of ‘self-sufficiency’? By ‘doing wrong’ do you mean those whose consumption/procreation behaviours are not ‘self sufficient’? You’d have to be more specific with a detailed example, and I could only give you my personal opinion, about what I would do, which is based on my preferences, is not some moral law.

I imagine what follows was your free flow poem on the issue? Sounds nice… but I would not pretend that I remotely accurately interpret what you meant by it, when you wrote it… way too many abstract concepts that we undoubtedly have very different definitions for….

What is your definition of ‘justice’, ‘self’ and ‘other’?

Is the substance of justice -enforcement of boundaries - and laws and those tools that suport that enforcement?

Very very interesting question? I had not thought of the substance of justice, in quiet that perspective… I’d have to digest it a bit more…

When you say ‘laws’ do you refer to laws in writing, cultural or legal laws, and/or personal moral laws?

In some ways I am a bit of a libertarian. For example, I have been working on this new concept of ‘jurisprudence’ which I have named Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence. Put it simply, you can do whatever the fuck you want, as long as (a) you procreate and consume below carrying capacity (Equilibriæx); and (b) your actions – whether cannibalism, or whatever the weird fucking shit you want to do -- with other humans are based upon fully informed consent (Aquilibriæx).

Is this called other-sufficiency?
Is justice what connects self and other?
Is the substance of justice -enforcement of boundaries - and laws and those tools that suport that enforcement?
When love is treating another as one's own is justice an active agent in that treaty?
Must I have an 'own' before I can love?
Rather 'Enough'.
Are love and enough one and the same?
trading owns for what
Does one come after the other..
enough
do they dance together?
love
I am open to learn


As for the rest… I don’t pretend to have answers to my own questions… I ain’t gonna pretend to have answers to yours! ;-) Your questions are indeed interesting though…



Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:40 AM
Cc: Brad Blanton
Subject: act 1


Hi Lara,

Not sure what you were trying to say with “If anyone left their window open at night around here they would freeze to death.”

I was reffering to the Mosuo women and how they leave their windows open at night when they want a lover to come over at night.
Anyway, I read it on a tavel website about the Mosuo culture near the Tibetian border in SW China.

What is your relationship with Radical Honesty? Brad?

I met brad about about eight years ago when I attended an eight-day workshop at his home in the shenandoah valley.
I speak with brad about once or twice a year since I have met him. I consider him my friend.

My mission: to be honest with myself and others, 24/07; and to provide others the love of honesty also. Brad – in my opinion is being a gutless two faced hypocrite and fraud on those issues – and either (a) should publicly retract his opinions about people should ‘offend’ others and so on, or (b) put his money where his mouth is and stop being such a gutless coward about supporting the law to recognize Radical honesty as ‘religious’ or ‘cultural’ speech.

You would like Brad to be honest with himself, provide others the love of honesty, retract his opinions about people and what they SHOULD do which is 'offend ' others and so on, and lastly get the government to support radical honesty as a religion.

First of all I do not believe that Brad seaks to teach the art of offending others. Honesty I see as a process of pealing back layers of oneself. Sometimes what one finds and what others see pushes a button, (causes, reacts) to offend themselves and blame others for what they themselves created within themselves (a sensation labeled 'offended').

More dimensions than this?

So your going to found the futilitarian church?
Your bound to succeed. Am I lying? seriously, was that your idea?

Brad, however spends most of his time ‘offending’ white liberals….. and is petrified of ‘radical honesty’ offending blacks or muslims or Mexicans and so on…

Like I said, most find outside sources to give their power away to. (blame others for the sensations one feels)

. Others who actually put ‘radical honesty’ to use in multicultural environments, who want brutal honest relationships with blacks, muslims, Mexicans, etc…. run into the danger zone of being accused of ‘hate speech’ and so on. Well, Brad does not appear to give a flying fuck, about radical honesty with other races….

That reminds me when the UND students attached wings to dildos! The new aircraft codenamed: The Flying Fuck.
After much mainstream marketing and random sample test groups they decided drone fit the bill better because thats the sound it makes when the duracell bunny keeps going and going...

Seriously, I have never had a brutally honest relationship with a muslim, mexican, or black. Is that what you want? Though, I am not against it. Are you in hot water somehow because of this?

If I did not hold Brad accountable for his fraud and hypocrisy, then I would be just like every other fucked up culture, who are too gutless to hold hteir own leaders accountable. Fuck that! Holding Brad accountable for his shit, is the most loving act a real friend can do. If I excuse brad to be a lying two faced gutless wonder hypocrit, then I would not be his true friend. \

Sounds like Brad's RH as it is isnt living up to your standards and he SHOULD be protecting you by making it law. If your ultimate desire is to make RH law do you really need Brad to do that? Seems as though Brad may not hold your views on government reform.

_#######




Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 12:55 PM
Cc: 'Brad Blanton'; radical-honesty-coaching-blog
Subject: [Radical Honesty Coaching Blog: 835] RE: act 1


Hi ##########,

CC: Radical Honesty Coaching Blog (I imagine my friend Francisco may be interested in some of these issues)

I appreciate you for your response. I particularly – very much – appreciate you for saying: You do not want a brutally honest relationship with a Muslim, Mexican or black! I was fucking blown away by that.

I imagine many white guilt liberals and conservatives feel the same way, but are not nearly as honest as you are about that, hence they are white guilt liberals and conservatives, whereas you are not. I don’t have a problem with you not wanting a brutally honest relationship with a Muslim, Mexican or black. I simply wish more people who share your perspective, would also be honest about their lack of interest in such brutally honest relationships with blacks, muslims, Mexicans, etc.. and also – like you – not object or find objectionable, other europeans, like myself, who actually do want brutally honest relationships with other races, religions, etc.


Not sure what you were trying to say with “If anyone left their window open at night around here they would freeze to death.”

I was reffering to the Mosuo women and how they leave their windows open at night when they want a lover to come over at night.
Anyway, I read it on a tavel website about the Mosuo culture near the Tibetian border in SW China.


I have never read that in any academic works on Mosou culture; where Mosuo women have for the most part long term partners; however if a Mosuo woman wants to indicate her interest in a new man, she may either flirt with him, or go through various other communication invitations to invite him to enter into a relationship with her. Ain’t heard about the ‘open window at night’ part, considering that China is also a very cold place, and the Mosuo culture is high up in the mountains, I don’t know how accurate that is. But its quite possible. Thanks, didn’t know that part.
http://radical-honoursty.blogspot.com/2012/02/mosuo-womens-kingdom-matriarchal.html


My mission: to be honest with myself and others, 24/07; and to provide others the love of honesty also. Brad – in my opinion is being a gutless two faced hypocrite and fraud on those issues – and either (a) should publicly retract his opinions about people should ‘offend’ others and so on, or (b) put his money where his mouth is and stop being such a gutless coward about supporting the law to recognize Radical honesty as ‘religious’ or ‘cultural’ speech.

You would like Brad to be honest with himself, provide others the love of honesty, retract his opinions about people and what they SHOULD do which is 'offend ' others and so on, and lastly get the government to support radical honesty as a religion.

First of all I do not believe that Brad seaks to teach the art of offending others.


Q: Is it possible to be completely honest without hurting a person’s feelings?
A: Probably not. If you are in an ongoing relationship with any person there will probably be times when you hurt their feelings. Probably the most often used rationalization for lying is “I didn’t want to hurt anybody’s feelings.” I recommend you hurt people’s feelings and stay with them past the hurt. I also recommend that you offend people. We can all get over having our feelings hurt and we can get over being offended. These are not permanent conditions; they are feelings that come and go. On the other side of that reaction is a conversation in which your mutual honesty creates an intimacy not possible if you are hiding something for the sake of someone’s feelings.
Radical Honesty FAQ:

Interviews with Brad, where he specifically recommends offending people with your honest opinions:
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6kSUgvPpyQ
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TscxOFuXRwQ

Ask Brad whether he recommends offending only white guilt liberals; or all people, from all races and cultures, with your honest opinions?


Honesty I see as a process of pealing back layers of oneself. Sometimes what one finds and what others see pushes a button, (causes, reacts) to offend themselves and blame others for what they themselves created within themselves (a sensation labeled 'offended').

If I am interpreting you accurately, you are referring to the process that occurs in the listener, subsequent to having heard a speaker, say words, the content of which ‘pushes a button within themselves’. I would not disagree with that, but that is not the focus of my attention.

My focus of attention is in the – mens rea / actus reus / honourable or dishonourable intentions -- consciousness of the speaker, prior to, and at the time of sharing their honest – possibly offending – opinions to the listener.

In a case of radical honesty between two people of different culture’s/races/religions: I would imagine that there is a fucking huge significant difference between a ‘radical honesty’ speaker and a ‘radical bigot’ speaker, the difference being (a) the motive: constructive criticism and end point forgiveness and racial honest relationships vs racial superiority/denigration; and (b) sticking with the conversation vs verbal drive by.

If or where a ‘radical honesty’ person is engaged with someone from a different culture, or race; and deliberately chooses to withhold honest opinions or information from the other person, in order to avoid offending them; I do not perceive such behaviour as ‘love’, but as ‘paternalism/hate’, to believe the other person is culturally or racially inferior and incapable of hearing the honest constructive criticism opinions and engaging in dialogue about those opinions.

So.. you are in the mind/consciousness of the ‘receiver/listener’.. and I am in the mind of the ‘speaker’.

As a listener: There is almost sweet fuck all that offends me. Certainly not someone’s brutally honest constructive criticism opinions, no matter how harsh. What I do get offended about is sycophancy, but that is my problem, and if I get offended by it, I inform the speaker.

However, my focus in my argument with brad, has very little to do with the state of consciousness of the listener, and almost all to do with the state of consciousness, and mostly the mens rea motivations of the speaker.


More dimensions than this?

???? Don’t know what you mean


So your going to found the futilitarian church?

I am going to found the futilitarian church? You mean in my applications to courts?


Your bound to succeed. Am I lying? seriously, was that your idea?

Are you lying about what? Was ‘what exactly’ seriously my idea?

Brad, however spends most of his time ‘offending’ white liberals….. and is petrified of ‘radical honesty’ offending blacks or muslims or Mexicans and so on…

Like I said, most find outside sources to give their power away to. (blame others for the sensations one feels)

I have sweet fuck all fear of offending blacks or muslims or Mexicans with my honest constructive criticisms and to remain in such conversations with them, to build honest race relations conversations. Even spent a year in a fucking prison cell, cause I refuse to lie to a black or brown person.

If or where I may have such fear.. I invite anyone to clearly clarify such for me, and I – unlike Brad and his white guilt liberal brigade – am more than happy to investigate the issue.


Others who actually put ‘radical honesty’ to use in multicultural environments, who want brutal honest relationships with blacks, muslims, Mexicans, etc…. run into the danger zone of being accused of ‘hate speech’ and so on. Well, Brad does not appear to give a flying fuck, about radical honesty with other races….

That reminds me when the UND students attached wings to dildos! The new aircraft codenamed: The Flying Fuck.
After much mainstream marketing and random sample test groups they decided drone fit the bill better because thats the sound it makes when the duracell bunny keeps going and going...

Seriously, I have never had a brutally honest relationship with a muslim, mexican, or black. Is that what you want? Though, I am not against it. Are you in hot water somehow because of this?



You do not want a brutally honest relationship with a muslim, mexcican or black???? Wow!! Holy fuck! That’s honest! Thanks for saying so.

My husband is black, and yes, I do want brutally honest relationships with all people’s of all colours and all races, and all religions, who are interested in brutally honest cultural, racial relationships.

I was deported from America for being radically honest with an Immigration officer.
I was imprisoned in South Africa, for a year, for being radically honest with a Prosecutor and a Magistrate in a court of law.
I was imprisoned in South Africa, for a month, for being radically honest with a Coloured Politician, in a telephone conversation.


If I did not hold Brad accountable for his fraud and hypocrisy, then I would be just like every other fucked up culture, who are too gutless to hold hteir own leaders accountable. Fuck that! Holding Brad accountable for his shit, is the most loving act a real friend can do. If I excuse brad to be a lying two faced gutless wonder hypocrit, then I would not be his true friend. \

Sounds like Brad's RH as it is isnt living up to your standards and he SHOULD be protecting you by making it law. If your ultimate desire is to make RH law do you really need Brad to do that? Seems as though Brad may not hold your views on government reform.

Brad’s RH is not living up to Brad’s RH standards.

If Brad’s ‘Radical Honesty’ cult is only a cult for left wing white guilt liberals; not a problem!!

He should take responsibility and fucking say so, loud and fucking clear.

When any individual joins his cult who is not a left wing white guilt liberal, who believes that his ‘radical honesty’ message is a universal message, meant for all races, cultures and religions to have brutal honest conversations, then he should tell that fucking naïve moron imbecile to

FUCK OFF, BRAD BLANTON’S RADICAL HONESTY CULT IS ONLY FOR WHITE GUILT LIBERALS!


Brad and Government Reform: I ain’t got no problem if Brad does not support government reform.

If Brad does not hold my views on government reform; he should stop his pathetic lifestyle activism bullshit of getting arrested, to be sent to jail for a few hours once or twice a year, to curb his white guilt consumptionist conscience. He should be honest with all those occupy people and all the other people he engages in activism, that he has fuck all interest in government reform, and that his ‘activism’ is just lifestyle activism bullshit, he does not mean it sincerely.

Right Lifestyle refers to both Lifestyle Activism and Lifestyle Politics, which avoids any examination of the consumptionist focus of the lifestyle, which involves maximizing physical, psychological social comfort and material acquisition, by getting involved in acts of Lifestyle Activism or Lifestyle Politics, as a feel good way to be involved in shallow activities which pretend to solve the worlds problems; while actively avoiding addressing any root causes of the problems, to implement social structural changes.

Open Left’s article: Self Delusion and the Lies of Lifestyle activism: Core Dilemmas of Community Organizing.


Lara

» » » » [Radical Honesty]

1 comment:

Яша said...

well that's nice, proves that not every liberal is insane.

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]
FAIR USE NOTICE: The White Refugee blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board's (IRB) ‘White Refugee’ ruling. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to White Refugee Blog at: [jmc.pa.tf(at)gmail(dot)com]