We were better off under apartheid‚ say EC villagers

We were better off under apartheid‚ say EC villagers

Malibongwe Dayimani | 21 July, 2016 18:24 | Sunday Times |

"We shot ourselves in the foot by toppling the apartheid government‚" residents of an Eastern Cape village said on Thursday.

Tsholomnqa villagers had been waiting for a tarred road and decent houses for decades‚ said community leader‚ Wele Ntshongola.

He said the dawn of democracy had marked the beginning of the collapse of quality service delivery for the Eastern Cape rural area which is situated on the R72 outside East London.

"This village was in a good state under the Ciskei homeland led by LL Sebe. We used to have a tarred road... with workers who used to maintain it as well as free seed‚ crops and livestock." He said they celebrated when democracy dawned. "Little did we know that democracy would bring more oppression.

This democracy is not for everyone and poor rural dwellers are bearing the brunt." Ntshongola claims the villagers of are mostly ANC supporters and should be prioritised by the government.

"I am not saying that I agree with the policies or laws of apartheid‚ but at least we were getting service delivery back then."

King of Zulu's: SA Democracy was better off under Apartheid

King Of The Zulus: Slams ‘So-Called’ South African Democracy, Says Country Was Better Off Under Apartheid

Oliver JJ Lane | 09 Dec 2015 | Breitbart |

The head of the royal household of the Zulus has landed in the centre of a political storm after he made favourable comments about the former white minority government of South Africa.

King Goodwill Zwelithini spoke while visiting a cattle auction and gave a speech reflecting on his life and 44 years on the throne of the Zulu tribe. Straying into potentially controversial territory, the King remarked on the quality education in farming he had received from the white Afrikaners and the genuine respect he had been treated with by the former white rulers of the nation, reports South Africa’s Times.

The King also praised South Africa’s strong army and economy during Afrikaner minority rule, and lamented the declining state of the nation since black majority rule. Commenting on the sudden wave of anti-colonial feeling sweeping the country which has seen statues to the fathers of the nation torn down, King Zwelithini compared the people of the country to arsonists who “loved to use matches” to destroy apartheid-era infrastructure.

Eco Innocent -vs- Ego Scarcity Combatant Procreation & Consumption Footprints

Eco Innocent v Ego Man Scarcity Combatant’s and their Crime of Aggression Acts of War Footprints

Eco Innocents: Anders Breivik, Dylann Storm Roof, Aaron Alexis, Chris Harper-Mercer, Beate Zchape, Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh
Ego Scarcity Combatants: Jacob Zuma, Cliven Bundy, Brad Blanton, Dennis Banks, Martin Luther King, Julian Assange, Mark Zuckerberg, William Windsor.


08 October 2015 | Andrea Muhrrteyn

An individuals Ego/Eco Footprint is determined from their:
Consumption Footprint x Procreation Factor.

Consumption Footprint: An Individuals Consumption Footprint is a measure of their consumption of renewable natural resources. The total area of productive land or sea required to produce all the crops, meat, seafood, wood and fibre the individual consumes, to sustain its energy consumption and to give space for its infrastructure. The individuals consumption habits (size of house, consumption habits, etc need to be collected) are submitted to a Footprint Quiz calculator.

Procreation Factor: The procreation factor is '20' for every child. For every child the citizen has procreated, their consumption footprint must be multiplied by a factor of 20; i.e. (1 child, multiply by '20'; 2 children, multiply by 40; and so on)

These Footprint analysis and conclusions have been submitted to scientific Footprint experts for their feedback and confirmation to International Criminal Court; in the matter of EoP PoW -v- Nobel Peace Laurettes, et al.

Large

Apartheid and EU Downfall: Addiction to Cheap Labour

Putin: EU [Islam Lebensraum Hijrah] Refugee Crisis Absolutely Expected

Cracker Lebensraum Colonization Dots: Multinational's cultural Imperialist Importation of Migrant-Refugee cheap labour

"As I write this, I am reminded of how we often forget what the primitive person had to work with for tools; namely wood, bone and stone implements. It is amazing how quickly one can destroy and travel down the wrong path with the white man's axe, shovel and saw." -- Brent Ladd, Realities of Going Primitive

'Energy consumption is the foundation of industrial development; since in the industrial paradigm or worldview energy use is equivalent to development; where 'development' refers [not to the individual's or society's character, or values development; but] solely to the individual and societies economic -- resource use -- development. How much of societies resources s/he consumes. The power generated by muscles and motors is ultimately and necessarily dissipated by rubbing against the resources in the environment. This is why the GNP of a country should be roughly proportional to the amount of fuel burned in that country. Increased efficiency leads to more energy use. Since the earth’s non-renewable resources are finite, and its renewable resources can only be exploited on a finite level equivalent to carrying capacity regeneration; this trend cannot continue.' -- The constructal law of design and evolution in nature: Adrian Bejan.

EU Refugee crisis absolutely expected - Putin: "If Putin had wanted to better understand this idea of natural resources and national security, he would have looked for specialists on the issue. He would naturally have come across the leading specialist on the subject, a geologist and director of the prestigious St. Petersburg Mining Institute, Vladimir Stefanovich Litvinenko. Litvinenko informs Putin that the world is running out of resources, and makes a point that we, Russians, cannot waste our own resources; and as we tap them, we should ensure they are continuously replaced or otherwise we are going to quickly deplete them." -- Russia Today: EU Crisis Absolutely Expected - Putin; Brookins Inst: The Mystery of Vladimir Putin's [Peak NNR] Dissertation

"As [the Peak NNR: Non-renewable Natural Resources] scenario unfolds, increasingly large segments of humanity will become aware of the fact that NNRs enable our industrialized way of life, and that ever-increasing NNR scarcity is the fundamental cause underlying our continuously declining economic output (GDP) and societal wellbeing levels, both domestically (US) and, by that time, globally as well. Historically prevalent public attitudes of generosity and forbearance, which were made possible by abundant and cheap NNRs during our epoch of “continuously more and more”, will be displaced by public intolerance: * Childbirth will be condemned rather than celebrated; * All immigration will be outlawed; * Traditionally unquestioned resource uses—from “social entitlements” and universally accessible healthcare, to professional sports and cosmetics—will be considered “unfair” or “wasteful”, and ultimately eliminated; and * “Excessive wealth” will be appropriated for “the public good”. Previously sporadic social unrest and resource wars will degenerate—seemingly instantaneously—into full fledged conflicts among nations, classes, and ultimately individuals for remaining natural resources and real wealth. It will become universally understood that the only way to “stay even” within a continuously contracting operating environment—much less to improve one’s lot—is to take from somebody else. Life will become a “negative sum game” within the “shrinking pie” of “continuously less and less”. Social institutions will dissolve; law and order will cease to exist; and chaos will fill the void— nations will collapse." - Chris Clugston: Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter

South Africa is a 'less equal place' now than under apartheid, author says

South Africa is a 'less equal place' now than under apartheid, author says

January 14, 2015 · 3:15 PM EST | Jeb Sharp | PRI's The World

JS: Is South Africa a more equal place (now)?

KN: No it isn’t. It’s a less equal place. You’ve seen huge eruptions of inequality develop where education is playing a huge role in determining where people end up in the occupational sphere. Of course, South Africa is not unusual in that. What has happened is South Africa has now joined the rest of the developed world in seeing this galloping inequality. But once upon a time, because of apartheid, race would have been the defining line. Now class is an incredibly important dividing line. It’s not that race doesn’t matter. It has everything to do with whether you’re likely to be in a good school and learn English and have opportunities for the kind of cultural capital that will give you a leg up in the labor market. But those divisions are now erupting within racial groups. So you’ll have two people side by side who in the past would be condemned to the same terrible life, and now their pathways are diverging, and that in turn has huge implications for their confidence in democracy. Because when poor blacks see what has happened among the affluent, who are turning their backs on what needs to happen for the poorest of poor, they feel the promise of democracy has been vastly diluted, if not a failure.

Manning court wants Evidence of Amnesty Int-HRW-Nobel Comm's Ecology-of-Peace credibility

Manning Judge: Nobel Comm / Human Rights Watch / Amnesty Int'l have no Ecology of Peace Credibility?

Individuals associated with the (i) International Peace Bureau; (ii) Norwegian Nobel Committee; (iii) Amnesty International; (iv) Human Rights Watch have made public alleged ‘Peace’ declarations regarding US v Manning court proceedings. They are hereby invited to provide the convening authority, court, prosecution and defence whether their ‘Peace’ declarations were credible MILINT Ecology of Peace declarations. If so, to provide the court with a detailed MILINT Ecology of Peace Analysis of their Members Myfootprint.org Consumption footprint and Procreation footprints, by 17:00 HRS (PST) on 23 July 2013.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 20 July 2013

Submission to International Peace Bureau Co-Presidents and Board; Amnesty International: Executive Committee, Secretary General and International Secretariat; Human Rights Watch: Senior Management and Board of Directors; Major General Jeffery S. Buchanan, Convening Authority Commander, US Army Ft. George Mead Garrison, Maryland; Plaintiff: United States Government: Captain Chad M. Fisher; Defendant: Pfc Bradley Manning, c/o: David Coombs Esq; US Army First Judicial Court Military Judge: Judge Denise Lind.

Individuals associated with the (i) International Peace Bureau; (ii) Norwegian Nobel Committee; (iii) Amnesty International; (iv) Human Rights Watch have made public alleged ‘Peace’ declarations regarding US v Manning court proceedings. They are hereby invited to provide the convening authority, court, prosecution and defence whether their ‘Peace’ declarations were credible MILINT Ecology of Peace declarations. If so, to provide the court with a detailed MILINT Ecology of Peace Analysis of their Members Myfootprint.org Consumption footprint and Procreation footprints, by 17:00 HRS (PST) on 23 July 2013.

In the absence of such credible MILINT Ecology of Peace Walk Your Footprint Talk to the Support the Troops evidence, the court, prosecution and defence, may honourably conclude that their ‘Peace’ declarations in this matter were War is Peace Whore Verbal Diarrhoea Parasitism; and that their organisations are secret members of the Ecologically Illiterate Scarcity Combatant Taker Flat Earth society.

Ecology of Peace Theses urges ANC-HPCSA to dismiss charges against Wouter Basson

Ecology of Peace Theses urges ANC-HPCSA to dismiss charges against Wouter Basson

The proceedings against Mr. Wouter Basson should be suspended until (a) the South African Constitutional Court has ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence of TRC fraud submitted to it, in Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs Afriforum, et al

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 17 July 2013 | TYGAE

Electronic Filing to The Registrar, Health Professions Council of South Africa; HPCSA Prosecutor: Salie Joubert SC; Dr. Basson Council: Jaap Cilliers SC, Brooklyn Advocate Chambers; Dr. Wouter Basson - Cardiologist. CC: Transparency: Concourt Case: Alien v. Afriforum et al Parties

[1] The proceedings against Mr. Wouter Basson should be suspended until (a) the South African Constitutional Court has ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence of TRC fraud submitted to it, in Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs Afriforum, et al; and/or (b) foreign international courts have ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence that civilized patriarchy’s legal matrix jurisprudence is based upon fraudulent social contracts between civilized patriarchy nations and their citizens.

South Africa’s Civilized Patriarchy TRC Fraud:

[2] On 27 November 2012 a Pro Se application was filed for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal ‘Kill Boere Hate Speech’ Mediation Agreement between: ANC, Mr. Malema, Afriforum and TAU-SA. The Ecology of Peace application argues that: (A) The Agreement ignores SA’s TRC Fraud Failure to Clearly Define ‘Reconciliation’ and address Ecological Overshoot induced Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict Issues; and (B) Any ‘Peace’ Agreement that Ignores Ecological Overshoot and Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict is not a Credible Peace Agreement. South African Bar Associations and Law Societies have, for the past ten years, been unable to find a South African lawyer who is willing to represent me in accordance to my Ecology of Peace – “Thou shalt not legislate laws that allow citizens to procreate or consume above carrying capacity limits” – gender and inter-species equality jurisprudence principles. The media have so far refused to publish an appeal to South African attorneys to find an attorney to represent a South African citizen whose gender balanced cultural jurisprudence is based on Ecology of Peace principles. The Constitutional Court registrar refused to process the application, even though the Commission for Gender Equality and the South African Human Rights Commission have respectively ruled the Concourt registrars actions were an act of error and maladministration and referred the matter to the Public Protector and Media Ombudsman.

SAHRC Ruling Referral: Maladministration by Concourt Registrar in Kill Boere Review Application to Concourt

SAHRC Ruling Referral: Maladministration by Concourt Registrar in Kill Boere Review Application to Concourt

SAHRC refers Concourt Registrar's maladministration refusal to process the Radical Honesty culture's review of Equality Court case between Afri-Forum, TAU-SA, Malema and the ANC, to the Office of the Public Protector.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 10 July 2013 | SQSwans

Response from SAHRC to complaints filed on 28 February 2013 with the Commission for Gender Equality, SA Human Rights Commission and Public Protector in Kill the Boer Concourt matter of Alien on Pale Blue v. Afriforum et al.

Complaint: AnthroCorpocentric Patriarchal Dominant culture/s Cultural and Gender discrimination, by: (1) SA Concourt Registrar & Director; (2) SAPA & SA Media Editors; (3) CRL Rights Commission: Chair, against Ecocentric Gender Balanced Radical Honoursty culture member.

SAHRC Referral Ruling: After careful assessment, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC or the Commission) has found that your complaint should be dealt with by other institutions namely the Press Ombudsman and the Office of the Public Protector.

In regard to your complaint against the refusal by the Registrar of the Constitutional Court to issue your review application and your appeal against the refusal to issue the review application the SAHRC has determined that your complaint relates to alleged maladministration by a government official and that accordingly that the Office of the Public Protector is the more appropriate body to deal with such a complaint.

In regards to the aforementioned allegations relating to the press the Commission has determined that the Press Ombudsman is the most appropriate organisation that should deal with your matter.

MI6: Is Queen's Westminster Abbey Mandela Memorial Service decision fully informed?

MI6: Is Queen's Westminster Abbey Mandela Memorial Service decision fully informed?

Confirmation (i) Britain's Memorial Service at Westminster Abbey for Nelson Mandela is a fully informed decision: Prime Minister, MI5 & MI6 and ANC, Mandela & Mandela Foundation honourably and transparently informed Buckingham Palace of Media Suppressed Facts/Info regarding Mandela/ANC/TRC Fraud; (ii) Invitation to MI6 to join NSA, CIA, Mossad and KGB, to establish gender balanced MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace paradigm.

TYGAE | 01 July 2013 | Andrea Muhrrteyn

Correspondence to Her Majesty: The Queen, Buckingham Palace, c/o: Duncan Jeffery, Westminster Abbey. CC: President Putin, Kremlin Press Office, President Barack Obama, c/o: DNI: James Clapper, PM Benjamin Netanyahu, Knesset, Nelson Mandela, c/o: Nelson Mandela Foundation, PM Cameron, c/o Sec. Def: Philip Hammond, UK Dep. Of Defence, MI5 & MI6
Subject: HM Queen, c/o Duncan Jeffery, Westminster Abbey: Confirmation Mandela Memorial Service is fully informed decision

Your Majesty,

Please find attached PDF: Confirmation (i) Britain's Memorial Service at Westminster Abbey for Nelson Mandela is a fully informed decision: Prime Minister, MI5 & MI6 and ANC, Mandela & Mandela Foundation honourably and transparently informed Buckingham Palace of Media Suppressed Facts/Info regarding Mandela/ANC/TRC Fraud; (ii) Invitation to MI6 to join NSA, CIA, Mossad and KGB, to establish gender balanced MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace paradigm.

Please Note: Mandela, ANC and Anti-Apartheid movement, emphatically do not endorse the Ecology of Peace paradigm. Mandela and Tutu – like Assange, Snowden and Manning – believe that the Earth is flat and white/western men don’t have to take control of their psychological penises and consume below carrying capacity; and black/brown men don’t have to take control of their physical penises and breed below carrying capacity. War has nothing to do with jurisprudence that enables transgression of carrying capacity, ecological overshoot, and scarcity induced conflict. White conservative men cause war!

Renaissance Party of North America occupy SA's Toronto Consulate against Boer Genocide

Renaissance Party of North America occupy SA's Toronto Consulate against Boer Genocide

Renaissance Party of North America Stages One day Occupation Demo of South African Consulate in Toronto, Ontario on June 15, 2013; to draw attention to the genocide of Europeans underway in South Africa.

17 June 2013 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE

On 15 June 2013, members of the newly formed Renaissance Party of North America held an occupation demonstration outside South Africa's Toronto Embassy, to "Stop the Genocide of White South Africans."

The demonstration was attended by among others: RPN Executive Council members: RPN President, Mr. Sebastian Ronin; Mr. Chris Creighton, RPN's South Africa Liaison in Toronto; RPN supporters Max Macro; former candidate for MP in Calgary, Mr. Paul Fromm and his assistant: Sheri Zucker, and others. Renaissance Vanguard also have a local South African member from Capetown on their executive council: Mr. Sean Verster.

Mr. Paul Fromm is a radio journalist and former Western Block Party candidate for Calgary Southeast. Mr. Fromm is the editor of the Canadian Immigration Hotline, Canada’s best known immigration critic and is in demands as a lecturer across Canada, the U.S., Australia and New Zealand. He is also the director of CAFE: Canadian Association for Freedom of Expression, hosting its weekly show: For Our People.

Felix Dzerzhinsky: F**k Mandela, the Blood Thirsty Foxy Liberals Capitalist Pawn; let the Corporate C**k-S*cking War is Peace Whore Patriarchal Terrorist die in peace

Felix Dzerzhinsky: Mandela & Foxy Liberal Capitalist Media: A mutual Deep Throat love affair of War is Peace Whore Corporate-Sycophants

TYGAE MILINT Earth Day and CommonSism Anarcho Primitivist Ecologists and Feminists Press Release: F**k Mandela, the Blood Thirsty Foxy Liberals Capitalist Pawn; let the Corporate C**k-S*cking War is Peace Whore Patriarchal Terrorist die in peace.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 13 June 2013

Memo to South African and International White/Black Consumptionist Guilt Corporate Whore Editors and Journalists: TYGAE MILINT Earth Day and CommonSism Anarcho Primitivist Ecologists and Feminists Press Release: F**k Mandela, the Blood Thirsty Foxy Liberals Capitalist Pawn; let the Corporate C**k-S*cking War is Peace Whore Patriarchal Terrorist die in peace.

South African and International Liberal Capitalist Civilized Patriarchal Media War is Peace Whores – such as the Mail and Guardian – want the world to believe South Africans are 'watching and waiting' for news on Mandela’s Health, 'at his bedside united in hope'.

For the Record:

CommonSism Primitivist Ecologists and Feminists consider Mandela to be a Foxy Liberal Capitalists Pawn: a two-faced War is Peace Whore Civilized Patriarchal Terrorist. Let the Civilized Patriarch Corporate Dirt Capitalist Terrorist War is Peace Whore die in peace.

[I] Blood Thirsty Foxy Liberals Capitalist Terrorist Pawn: Mandela could have ended Apartheid Non-Violently by negotiating a peace settlement with the Apartheid regime, whereby Africans offered to breed below carrying capacity, in exchange for Boers consuming below carrying capacity. Boer history is proof of conservative Boers willingness to live simply off the land, it is English and Afrikaner corporate capitalist liberals who prefer to consume as if the earth is flat and resources are infinite, while breeding more and more impoverished slaves on their welfare vote farm slavery plantations; to keep themselves in power.

[II] Capitalist $ Worshipping Dirt Terrorist: Unlike Felix Dzerzhinsky, Mandela was no Terrorist in support of Communism; Mandela was a terrorist to become a Millionaire, the dirt of modern life. You want a real Communist Terrorist Hero: Try Felix Dzerzhinsky, he lived and died, poor living simply, for his Communist Principles. Mandela shall die a Multi-Millionaire Corporate C**k-s*cking Dirt Terrorist. Felix Dzerzhinsky died as a poor honourable Communist Terrorist.

[III] Civilized Patriarch: Mandela’s Civilized Patriarchy GDP/Growth Agenda: Lord$ of War profit from the ethnic/religious/etc conflict resulting from – generally speaking – African/Islamic/etc Breeding War civilized patriarchs incapacity to breed below carrying capacity & Western/etc Consumption War civilized patriarchs incapacity to consume below carrying capacity.

[IV] War is Peace Whore: Since 1994 Mandela, and the Mandela Foundation have ignored, silenced and endorsed the censorship of evidence proving Tutu’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission to have been a fraud, which deliberately ignored the ecological evidence for overshoot and its consequent scarcity induced by overconsumption and overpopulation, as a source for South Africa’s political violence. Mandela and the Mandela Foundation continue to endorse Constitutional Court Corruption, by Concourt Justices who refuse to process an application for review of Tutu’s TRC Fraud (CCT: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v. Afriforum, TAU-SA, ANC, Mandela, Tutu, De Klerk, et al)

Detailed Evidence for aforementioned arguments included in PDF Press Release.

SAPS Comm: How many SA citizens Walking their Talk to combat Crime?

SAPS Comm: Sanitation-Scarcity-Conflict: How SA citizens can ‘Walk our Talk to Support Our Police to lessen scarcity induced crime’

In fact in the United States, dozens of Generals and Admirals have challenged citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting the Troops’; by lowering their Ecological footprint (consumption and procreation practices: ie. Consuming less energy, water etc, and breeding less children); to lessen scarcity induced conflict.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 11 June 2013

Correspondence to SAPS Commissioner: WC: Lt Gen AH Lamoer | EC: Comm CC Binta | FS: Comm KJ Sitole | GA: Comm M Petros | KZN: Comm BM Ngobeni | LIM: Comm TS Mpembe | MP: Comm TR Ntobela | NW: Comm MNZ Mbombo | NC: Comm JD Basson

Re (i) DA-ANCYL/SAHRC Poo Attacks: TYGAE uses Bucket Bokashi-Humanure Toilet System; (ii) SA citizens can ‘Walk our Talk of Supporting Our Police to lessen scarcity induced crime’; by lowering our Ecological footprint and Procreation Factor.

Please find attached correspondence to the DA, Capetown Mayor’s Office, SA Human Rights Commission and SA Media. The correspondence was an invitation to Capetown municipality and Capetown citizens, interested in root cause problem solving their – poo attacks – toilet dispute. [Fact: 10 million – The number of viruses contained in one gram of faeces.]

The correspondence includes detailed information about my personal use of a Bokashi Bucket Humanure Toilet system, and its benefits (a) uses no water, so saves water, (b) recycles human and home organic waste, so massively reduces wastes send to landfills; (c) humanure recycled by composting creates excellent compost which improves soil quality and helps with carbon sequestration (lessens climate change).

In fact in the United States, dozens of Generals and Admirals have challenged citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting the Troops’; by lowering their Ecological footprint (consumption and procreation practices: ie. Consuming less energy, water etc, and breeding less children); to lessen scarcity induced conflict.

In South Africa that can be re-phrased as ‘Walk our Talk of Supporting Our Police to lessen scarcity induced crime’; by lowering our Ecological footprint (consumption and procreation practices: ie. Consuming less energy, water etc, and breeding less children); to lessen scarcity induced conflict.

Consequently the South African citizens who are truly ‘Walking their Talk’ to support the South African Police to reduce crime are those who (a) consume below carrying capacity (a consumption footprint of less than 10 global hectares); and (b) breed below carrying capacity (one or less than one child).

DA-ANCYL Poo Wars: TYGAE Party Leadership uses Bokashi Bucket Humanure Toilet system

TYGAE Party Leadership uses, and recommends all SA citizens to use, Bokashi Bucket Humanure Toilet system.

Invitation to Capetown municipality and Capetown citizens, interested in root cause problem solving your toilet dispute.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 10 June 2013

RE: TYGAE Party Leadership uses, and recommends all SA citizens to use, Bokashi Bucket Humanure Toilet system.

Invitation to Capetown municipality and Capetown citizens, interested in root cause problem solving your toilet dispute. (City Press: Rights Commission to meet De Lille about ANCYL poo wars with City of Capetown.)

I personally use a Bokashi Bucket Humanure Toilet system, for my bodily waste process materials. Bokashi is a fermenting process used in Japan to ferment all organic waste. I collect and ferment my personal ‘manure’ waste, along with all other organic waste generated from our home, including the dog’s manure, for two weeks in the bokashi mixture. I then mix it into my compost pile.

Bokashi is very simple and easy to make, the ingredients are sawdust cultured for 4 weeks in effective microorganisms (Recipe included) and then dried. Contact me for more info, if interested.

Attached PDF letter contains more info and photos of bokashi systems, including my own simple bucket system, if interested.

FBI Complaint: Fraud & Patriarchal Discrimination of Templeton Foundation, Tutu, et al

FBI Complaint: Fraud & Patriarchal Discrimination of Templeton Foundation, Tutu, et al

Charges of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination against (a) Templeton Foundation President & Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr & VP’s, (b) 2013 Nominator: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Winner: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Prize Judges, Templeton Trustees and Templeton Board of Advisors.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 27 April 2013

Complaint to FBI: Pennsylvania & UK National Fraud Intelligence Bureau: Subject: FBI- Pennsylvania & UK Nat Fraud Intel Bureau: Fraud & Discrimination Complaint; CC: Prince Phillip c/o UKIP N. Farage (PDF)

FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND DISCRIMINATON COMPLAINT:

Charges of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination against (a) Templeton Foundation President & Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr & VP’s, (b) 2013 Nominator: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Winner: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Prize Judges, Templeton Trustees and Templeton Board of Advisors.

Fraud: ‘Templeton Prize’ is a fraudulent misrepresentation. Templeton Prize Chairman, Judges, Trustees & Advisors refuse to amend ‘Templeton Prize’ to ‘Templeton Prize for Taker – Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric – Spirituality’; to accurately reflect the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric forms of spirituality Templeton endorses & rewards.

Discrimination: Templeton Prize practices Gender and Ideological Discrimination against Ecocentric non-Patriarchal, Primitivist religions. All of the recipients for the Templeton Prize, for the past 40 years have been to individuals who are members of, or who endorse, Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric religions/spirituality. (Shall be withdrawn if Templeton Prize amend their name to accurately reflect the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric forms of spirituality Templeton endorses & rewards.)

Fraud, Corruption & Discrimination: The nomination of the 2013 Templeton Prize was corrupt and fraudulent. Archbishop Desmond Tutu was nominated for the prize by his own biographer, who censored information from the Judges about Tutu’s involvement in, and endorsement of, South Africa’s TRC Fraud, and discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist cultures. Tutu’s biographer refused to withdraw the nomination. Templeton Prize Judges also refused to withdraw the award, endorsing Tutu’s TRC Fraud and discrimination against Ecocentric, non-Patriarchal, Primitivist Leaver cultures.

Please find attached PDF’s:

· Templeton Foundation: Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination Complaint: Charges of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination against (a) Templeton Foundation President & Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr & VP’s, (b) 2013 Nominator: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Winner: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Prize Judges, Templeton Trustees and Templeton Board of Advisors. (PDF)
· Affidavit of Lara Johnstone in support of Complaint to FBI: Pennsylvania: Special Agent in Charge: Edward Hanko and National Fraud Intelligence Bureau, City of London Police. (PDF)
· Templeton Prize 2013: Fraud, Corruption & Discrimination: Annexure A, B, & C (PDF)
· Templeton Foundation: Fraud & Discrimination: Annexure D. (PDF)

Gender Comm. Complaint: Patriarchal Discrimination by ICASA in TopTV/COSATU Pornography Ruling

Gender Commission Complaint: Patriarchal Discrimination by ICASA in TopTV/COSATU Pornography Ruling

Gender and Gender Ideology Discrimination by ICASA who refuse to consider/hear the submission from the Radical Honoursty culture, a gender balanced AntiCiv Ecocentric (Anti-Patriarchal civilization) primitivist culture, as part of its hearings on Top TV’s application to publicize three Pornography channels.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 24 April 2013

Complaint to Gender Commission: Subject: CGE Complaint: Discrimination by ICASA in TopTV/COSATU Pornography Ruling (PDF):

Please find attached PDF Complaint: (A) CGE Complaint Form, (B) Complaint: Gender and Gender Ideology Discrimination by ICASA who refuse to consider/hear the submission from the Radical Honoursty culture, a gender balanced AntiCiv Ecocentric (Anti-Patriarchal civilization) primitivist culture, as part of its hearings on Top TV’s application to publicize three Pornography channels.

ICASA’s Ruling is Patriarchal Discrimination: The ruling is patriarchal discrimination, in terms of:

A. The Committee’s decision to rule exclusively in favour of TopTV, On Digital Media, Kopano Ke Matla Investment Company and Cosatu, who are all (a) unsustainable corporations, run by persons who are members of (a) Patriarchal Anthropocentric cultures. The ruling was consequently exclusively in favour of benefiting (a) violent (b) Anthropocentric men and (c) unsustainable corporations.

B. The Committee’s decision to refuse to consider the submission from a non-Anthropocentric, non-Patriarchal sustainable culture: Radical Honesty culture.

C. The Committee’s Patriarchal secretive decision-making process: failing to provide clear transparent closing date for public comment, and then deciding to refuse a non-patriarchal culture’s submission for failing to know when the alleged secret closing date was.

Patriarchy Definition:

[1] A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.

[2] Consequently a legal, political or social system is Patriarchal to the extent of its (a) failure to provide automatic equal legal personhood and rights to nature and animal and plant species; (b) disregard for the objective and scientific carrying capacity truth of the laws of nature/ecology; and (c) disregard for the laws of human nature; when they contradict the AnthroCorpocentric – breeding and consumption war – objectives of the holders of subjective AnthroCorpocentric Truth.

[3] A society has violent Patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives, to the extent that its socio-political status symbols involve breeding war, consumption war and violent warrior mythology: (a) breeding war procreation above carrying capacity: i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood virility status, which are based on the man breeding a family above carrying capacity levels; (b) consumption war consuming above carrying capacity; i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood intelligence/virility status, which are based upon the man consuming above carrying capacity levels, to demonstrate his ‘large consumption penis’; (c) warrior mythology, where violent men are rewarded with ‘freedom fighter’ or ‘soldier’ socio-political status symbol medals and awards; particularly if the warrior mythology censors and ignores information to educate the culture’s members, that scarcity induced resource war violence can be avoided by the culture’s members choosing to breed and consume below carrying capacity levels. A culture which teaches a purely defensive warrior mythology; i.e. based purely on defense of its landbase and resources, i.e. which educate the members of the culture to avoid overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity inducing lifestyle’s within its culture, would not be considered a patriarchal culture.

Templeton Prize: Earth Day Spiritual Test: Patriarchal vs Primitivist

Spiritual Test for Templeton Foundation: Confront ‘Templeton Prize for Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Spirituality’ endorsement of (a) fraud, corruption and discrimination of 2013 Templeton Prize; (b) discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist spirituality.



Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 22 April 2013

Spiritual Test for Templeton Foundation: Confront ‘Templeton Prize for Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Spirituality’ endorsement of (a) fraud, corruption and discrimination of 2013 Templeton Prize; (b) discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist spirituality.

Spiritual Test for Templeton Foundation: If the Templeton Prize considers honesty a spiritual concept, should it not rename the Templeton Prize to the ‘Templeton Prize for Taker – Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric – Spirituality’, considering that (a) All of the recipients for the Templeton Prize, for the past 40 years have been to individuals who are members of, or whose scientific / spirituality endorses, Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Religions; (b) Templeton Prize’s endorsement of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Tutu’s TRC Fraud and discrimination against Ecocentric, non-Patriarchal, Primitivist Leaver cultures; clearly shows Templeton’s endorsement of Gender and Ideological Discrimination against Ecocentric non-Patriarchal, Primitivist spirituality?

Notification and Confirmation of Templeton Foundation Trustees and Board of Advisors Endorsement of Fraud, Corruption and Discrimination by (a) Templeton Foundation President and Chairman: Dr. John M Templeton Jnr, (b) Nominator of Archbishop Desmond Tutu for Templeton Prize: Archbishop Tutu’s biographer: Steven Gish; (c) 2013 Templeton Prize Recipient: Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and (d) Templeton Foundation Prize Judges: H.R.H. Princess Areej Ghazi, Stephen Barr, Prof. Russell Cowburn FRS, Gurcharan Das, Matthieu Ricard, Vladimir Shmaliy, Esther Sternberg, Faraneh Vargha-Khadem, Miroslav Volf.

The nomination of the 2013 Templeton Prize was corrupt and fraudulent: Archbishop Desmond Tutu was nominated for the prize by his own biographer, who censored information from the Judges about Tutu’s involvement in, and endorsement of, South Africa’s TRC Fraud, and discrimination against non-patriarchal Ecocentric Primitivist cultures. Tutu’s biographer refused to withdraw the nomination. Templeton Prize Judges also refused to withdraw the award, endorsing Tutu’s TRC Fraud and discrimination against Ecocentric, non-Patriarchal, Primitivist Leaver cultures.

CLC 2013: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined.” - Justice Mogoeng

CLA Secretariat & CLC 2013: Req for Info: Re: SA's Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny

Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 16 April 2013

Correspondence to Commonwealth Lawyers Assoc.: President: Boma Ozobia and Vice President: Mark Stephens. CC: Keynote Speakers & Invited Speakers: Subject: CLA: Req for Info: Re: African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?

Please find attached PDF: Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng

Issues covered: (a) Apartheid’s Legal Tyranny of ‘vague and ambiguous’ definitions; (b) Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: Who is to be Master?; (c) African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny

Do the Commonwealth Lawyers Association endorse the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?

Does CLA believe SA citizens are entitled to clear and succinct definitions for the legal terms of ‘reconciliation’ and ‘transformation’; from our African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist masters? Or, don’t the CLA hold African Patriarch masters to the same standards as Boer Patriarch Masters? When can we expect you to release a statement, clarifying your position?

Transformation of Judiciary Debate: Red Herring Coverup of Fraud of Patriarchal AnthroCorpoCentric Jurisprudence

Transformation of Judiciary Debate: Red Herring Coverup of Fraud of Patriarchal AnthroCorpoCentric Jurisprudence

Correspondence to Judicial Service Commission & Izak Smuts SC: Re: Transformation of Judiciary Debate

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 12 April 2013

The Judicial Service Commission’s ‘transformation’ debate and Izak Smuts resignation is a red herring, obscuring the JSC’s ‘transformation’ agenda to (i) censor the Fraud and Failures of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence; while (ii) simply transforming South Africa’s Jurisprudence from a European Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric flavour to an African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric flavour. (Ref: White Men Can't Judge; JSC in talks on transformation; JSC's Izak Smuts resigns after transformation row; Why I'm resigning from the JSC - Izak Smuts.)

This ‘transformation’ dispute has absolutely nothing to do with significantly ‘transforming’ South Africa’s system of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence benefiting the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric elite; to a Credible system of Jurisprudence, based upon the results of that system, benefiting the consumers of the system: South African citizens, and the parties providing the ecological resources which are the foundation of all constitutional rights.

Any debate about transformation, must first (a) accurately identify what the current status of the system is, (b) then identify its strong points and its weak points, that improve/reduce its credibility; and (c) finally identify how to transform its weak points to strengthen them to improve its credibility, with the consumers of the system.

When identifying the ‘credible’ strong points, those seeking to transform the system, should ask what is ‘credible’ in the experience of the consumer of that particular system, not in the eyes, of the controllers or, or the profiteers from, the system.

All of South Africa’s judges endorse Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence: How many of them can count their monthly pay-check; while holding their breath? Not one! Yet each one of them ignore the ecological foundation (the quality of air, water, soil and biodiversity of nature) when legislating/adjudicating their AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence; as if money gives them the opportunity to breathe!!!

Sincere Consumer Orientated Perspective to Juristic Transformation:

[1] SA’s current system of Jurisprudence is Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric. Patriarchy: A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.

[2] A Credible Judicial System for Citizens and Nature is one such as the Mosuo’s, who have no rape, no murder, no suicide, no prisons, no unemployed, no homeless. If illiterate peasant women are capable of regulating the relations between nature, humans and animals, so simply that they result in a society with no rape, no murder, no suicide, no unemployed, no homeless; why are Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric lawyers with Ph.D’s and seven years of university education incapable of the same results? Because South Africa’s legislators and jurists all endorse the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric jurisprudence recipe of breeding and consumption wars, for resource scarcity and conflict creation, and their profits!?

[3] Fraud of AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence: Primary Beneficiaries: Anthropocentric males and corporations; Primary Losers: Non-Anthropocentric humans and nature.

[4] Transforming a system of Jurisprudence from Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric to Æquilibriaex: equal & balanced Eco/Anthropocentric law.

[5] Other Examples of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence Transformations to Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence: (i) Example of the Application of Aequilibriaex Principles, from a submission to the Military Judge of the US Army First Judicial Court, Ft. Meade in the matter of United States v. Bradley Manning; (ii) New Zealand, Ecuador, Bolivia and US Counties grant Nature Rights; (iii) Pennsylvania judge rules that corporations are not people.

If you want a transformed Judiciary, not for the benefit of the South African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric elite, but for the benefit of South African citizens and nature; for a sustainable future, for a sustainable constitution; then you should only appoint people to the JSC who are Leavers: who consciously breed and consume below carrying capacity; irrespective whether they have a law degree, or even went to school! After all, a person who consciously breeds and consumes below carrying capacity, has more commitment to respecting the rights of nature, and other humans, in terms of her everyday procreation and consumption practices; than any Lawyer or Advocate, who breeds or consumes way above carrying capacity, who appears to believe that the earth is flat and resources are infinite.

SA CommonSism Primitivist Party's MILINT Sustainable Security Options submitted to Kim Jong-un, RU, US & China

CommonSism Primitivist MILINT Sustainable Security Options submitted to SL Kim Jong-un, Russia, China & USA for resolution of N Korea and Industrial Civilization's Suicide Marches.

In my personal CommonSism Primitivist opinion, if you have the courage to challenge Industrial Civilization, and its primary driver: the United States, to embark on an international course of Sustainable Security; you shall have made one of the most fundamental contributions to the lives of this planet, and all of its species, by stepping infront of the Industrial Civilization suicide train. You shall be Industrial Civilization Titanic’s iceberg.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 08 April 2013

On Saturday (06) and Sunday (07) April 2013, the unregistered TYGAE Aex Political Party, based upon CommonSism and Aequilibriaex Jurisprudence principles, in South Africa submitted their CommonSism Primitivist MILINT Sustainable Security Options to Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un, Russia's President Putin, China's President Xi Jinping, America's President Obama, South Korea's President Park Geun-hye and General Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.; for resolution of N Korea and Industrial Civilization's Suicide Marches.

The Russian, American and North Korean Embassies in Pretoria acknowledged receipt of the MILINT Sustainable Security policies, including the offices of Director of National Intelligence: Mr. James Clapper, and United States Environmental Command Offices in Fort Sam, Houston, Texas.

The TYGAE Primitivist CommonSism submissions suggest that both North Korea and Industrial Civilization inspired by the West, primarily America are on Suicide Marches. Resolving these suicide marches requires international adoption of Sustainable Security Policies.

Sustainable Security policies being: [1] Industrial Civilization is on a Tragedy of the Commons planetary suicide march. [2] Only the international adoption of Sustainable Security policies can stop Industrial Civilization’s Suicide March. [3] National Sustainable Security policies: [3.1] Every Nation must draw up a Sustainable Security Plan, by 09 September 2014. Each nation’s Sustainable Security plans must clarify: [3.1A] Detailed analysis of what their nation’s ecological carrying capacity is. [3.1B] How they intend to require every citizen, corporation and organisation to reduce/maintain their consumption and procreation practices to remaining below carrying capacity. [3.1C] Their planned De-Industrialization and/or Primitivization Policies. [3.2] International Sustainable Security Peace Treaties: [3.2A] All ‘Peace treaties’ which do not require both parties to maintain their nation citizens’ procreation and consumption practices below carrying capacity, as a fundamental requirement for the credibility of the peace treaty should be considered ‘War is Peace’ Whore treaties, and null and void, and renegotiated. [3.2B] Any credible ‘Sustainable Security’ Peace Treaty, must require all parties to the Peace Treaty to maintain their nation’s citizens and corporations procreation, consumption and production practices below carrying capacity. Any nation which allows their citizens or corporations to engage in a breeding, consumption or production war, shall be considered to have declared war with all other Sustainable Security nations.

Transparency Copies were also submitted to the Leaders of the following countries, via their Embassies, and various left and right wing political parties in their respective countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, South Africa, United Kingdom

AUM Prof Steven Gish: Request withdrawal of Tutu nomination for Templeton Prize

AUM Prof Steven Gish: Request withdrawal of Tutu nomination for Templeton Prize

Radical Honoursty Culture and TYGAE Request for Withdrawal of your Nomination of Desmond Tutu as Recipient of Templeton Prize, due to your (a) biographer conflict of interest, and (b) failure to provide the evidence of Archbishop Tutu’s involvement in the cover-up and censorship of South Africa’s TRC Fraud.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | SQSwans | 11 April 2013

[1.20] Colonialism is a product and symptom of Patriarchy’s addiction to breeding and consumption wars. Colonialism, whether it is the colonialism of Europeans conquering African tribes, or the colonialism of African tribes who conquered other African tribes, or the colonialism of both Europeans and Africans who conquered the gender balanced Bushmen tribes.

[1.21] All Colonialism, whether it resulted from the conquering wars of Columbus, or Shaka Zulu, or Mohammed, were a product and symptom of Patriarchy.

[1.22] A patriarchal society, or a society which does not address the causes of masculine insecurity, cannot and will not ever be sustainable. Any ideology, whether political or religious, founded upon masculine insecurity (patriarchy) will result in (a) breeding and consumption war concepts of power and domination (to provide insecure males with social/psychological penis extension status symbols, their fragile ego's lack).

[1.23] Consumption wars require exponential expropriation of land, natural resources and knowledge. Breeding wars require a war against sustainable consciousness (ecological and political balance) and a human factory farming war economy racket culling. Colonialism is a symptom of Patriarch’s addiction to breeding and consumption wars; i.e. consuming above carrying capacity, and then using the surplus population as cannon fodder to conquer another culture’s resources.

[1.24] The argument that Apartheid and European colonialism was morally reprehensible, and had massive destructive psychological and physical consequences for the Bushmen and African tribes conquered; is a very valid argument; if those making such an argument, hold all other African, Chinese, etc cultures to the same standard, by condemning those culture’s patriarchal conquering and colonization of other tribes resources.

[1.25] An honourable impartial argument against European Colonialism, including apartheid, must also admit that all Patriarchal colonialism is morally reprehensible, irrespective of who the patriarchal colonialists were who were doing the breeding war, consumption war conquering!

[1.26] When an individual argues that only European and Boer colonialism is morally reprehensible, while ignoring the patriarchal reprehensible colonialism of African Tribes conquering and colonizing other tribes, including African tribes, then the implication of that argument is that African Patriarchy and Colonialism and African Patriarch’s are morally inferior and incapable of criticism of their Patriarchal Colonizing behaviour.

[1.27] Put differently, when European or Africans argue that only European and Boer Colonialists should be considered morally reprehensible, they effectively agree with European and Boer Colonialists that Europeans/Boers are superior to Africans, and that Africans are inferior and incapable of being held to the same Patriarchal colonialists standards as white men.

[1.28] If you object to Colonialism and Apartheid (the symptom of Patriarchal culture’s) and want a world where one group of people are not constantly being colonized by another group of people, anywhere and everywhere on the planet; then you must be consistent and object to all patriarchy (the root cause of colonialism).