Manning court wants Evidence of Amnesty Int-HRW-Nobel Comm's Ecology-of-Peace credibility

Manning Judge: Nobel Comm / Human Rights Watch / Amnesty Int'l have no Ecology of Peace Credibility?

Individuals associated with the (i) International Peace Bureau; (ii) Norwegian Nobel Committee; (iii) Amnesty International; (iv) Human Rights Watch have made public alleged ‘Peace’ declarations regarding US v Manning court proceedings. They are hereby invited to provide the convening authority, court, prosecution and defence whether their ‘Peace’ declarations were credible MILINT Ecology of Peace declarations. If so, to provide the court with a detailed MILINT Ecology of Peace Analysis of their Members Myfootprint.org Consumption footprint and Procreation footprints, by 17:00 HRS (PST) on 23 July 2013.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 20 July 2013

Submission to International Peace Bureau Co-Presidents and Board; Amnesty International: Executive Committee, Secretary General and International Secretariat; Human Rights Watch: Senior Management and Board of Directors; Major General Jeffery S. Buchanan, Convening Authority Commander, US Army Ft. George Mead Garrison, Maryland; Plaintiff: United States Government: Captain Chad M. Fisher; Defendant: Pfc Bradley Manning, c/o: David Coombs Esq; US Army First Judicial Court Military Judge: Judge Denise Lind.

Individuals associated with the (i) International Peace Bureau; (ii) Norwegian Nobel Committee; (iii) Amnesty International; (iv) Human Rights Watch have made public alleged ‘Peace’ declarations regarding US v Manning court proceedings. They are hereby invited to provide the convening authority, court, prosecution and defence whether their ‘Peace’ declarations were credible MILINT Ecology of Peace declarations. If so, to provide the court with a detailed MILINT Ecology of Peace Analysis of their Members Myfootprint.org Consumption footprint and Procreation footprints, by 17:00 HRS (PST) on 23 July 2013.

In the absence of such credible MILINT Ecology of Peace Walk Your Footprint Talk to the Support the Troops evidence, the court, prosecution and defence, may honourably conclude that their ‘Peace’ declarations in this matter were War is Peace Whore Verbal Diarrhoea Parasitism; and that their organisations are secret members of the Ecologically Illiterate Scarcity Combatant Taker Flat Earth society.

Ecology of Peace Theses urges ANC-HPCSA to dismiss charges against Wouter Basson

Ecology of Peace Theses urges ANC-HPCSA to dismiss charges against Wouter Basson

The proceedings against Mr. Wouter Basson should be suspended until (a) the South African Constitutional Court has ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence of TRC fraud submitted to it, in Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs Afriforum, et al

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 17 July 2013 | TYGAE

Electronic Filing to The Registrar, Health Professions Council of South Africa; HPCSA Prosecutor: Salie Joubert SC; Dr. Basson Council: Jaap Cilliers SC, Brooklyn Advocate Chambers; Dr. Wouter Basson - Cardiologist. CC: Transparency: Concourt Case: Alien v. Afriforum et al Parties

[1] The proceedings against Mr. Wouter Basson should be suspended until (a) the South African Constitutional Court has ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence of TRC fraud submitted to it, in Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs Afriforum, et al; and/or (b) foreign international courts have ruled upon the Æquilibriæx / Ecology of Peace Jurisprudence evidence that civilized patriarchy’s legal matrix jurisprudence is based upon fraudulent social contracts between civilized patriarchy nations and their citizens.

South Africa’s Civilized Patriarchy TRC Fraud:

[2] On 27 November 2012 a Pro Se application was filed for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal ‘Kill Boere Hate Speech’ Mediation Agreement between: ANC, Mr. Malema, Afriforum and TAU-SA. The Ecology of Peace application argues that: (A) The Agreement ignores SA’s TRC Fraud Failure to Clearly Define ‘Reconciliation’ and address Ecological Overshoot induced Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict Issues; and (B) Any ‘Peace’ Agreement that Ignores Ecological Overshoot and Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict is not a Credible Peace Agreement. South African Bar Associations and Law Societies have, for the past ten years, been unable to find a South African lawyer who is willing to represent me in accordance to my Ecology of Peace – “Thou shalt not legislate laws that allow citizens to procreate or consume above carrying capacity limits” – gender and inter-species equality jurisprudence principles. The media have so far refused to publish an appeal to South African attorneys to find an attorney to represent a South African citizen whose gender balanced cultural jurisprudence is based on Ecology of Peace principles. The Constitutional Court registrar refused to process the application, even though the Commission for Gender Equality and the South African Human Rights Commission have respectively ruled the Concourt registrars actions were an act of error and maladministration and referred the matter to the Public Protector and Media Ombudsman.

Gender Comm. Complaint: Patriarchal Discrimination by ICASA in TopTV/COSATU Pornography Ruling

Gender Commission Complaint: Patriarchal Discrimination by ICASA in TopTV/COSATU Pornography Ruling

Gender and Gender Ideology Discrimination by ICASA who refuse to consider/hear the submission from the Radical Honoursty culture, a gender balanced AntiCiv Ecocentric (Anti-Patriarchal civilization) primitivist culture, as part of its hearings on Top TV’s application to publicize three Pornography channels.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 24 April 2013

Complaint to Gender Commission: Subject: CGE Complaint: Discrimination by ICASA in TopTV/COSATU Pornography Ruling (PDF):

Please find attached PDF Complaint: (A) CGE Complaint Form, (B) Complaint: Gender and Gender Ideology Discrimination by ICASA who refuse to consider/hear the submission from the Radical Honoursty culture, a gender balanced AntiCiv Ecocentric (Anti-Patriarchal civilization) primitivist culture, as part of its hearings on Top TV’s application to publicize three Pornography channels.

ICASA’s Ruling is Patriarchal Discrimination: The ruling is patriarchal discrimination, in terms of:

A. The Committee’s decision to rule exclusively in favour of TopTV, On Digital Media, Kopano Ke Matla Investment Company and Cosatu, who are all (a) unsustainable corporations, run by persons who are members of (a) Patriarchal Anthropocentric cultures. The ruling was consequently exclusively in favour of benefiting (a) violent (b) Anthropocentric men and (c) unsustainable corporations.

B. The Committee’s decision to refuse to consider the submission from a non-Anthropocentric, non-Patriarchal sustainable culture: Radical Honesty culture.

C. The Committee’s Patriarchal secretive decision-making process: failing to provide clear transparent closing date for public comment, and then deciding to refuse a non-patriarchal culture’s submission for failing to know when the alleged secret closing date was.

Patriarchy Definition:

[1] A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.

[2] Consequently a legal, political or social system is Patriarchal to the extent of its (a) failure to provide automatic equal legal personhood and rights to nature and animal and plant species; (b) disregard for the objective and scientific carrying capacity truth of the laws of nature/ecology; and (c) disregard for the laws of human nature; when they contradict the AnthroCorpocentric – breeding and consumption war – objectives of the holders of subjective AnthroCorpocentric Truth.

[3] A society has violent Patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives, to the extent that its socio-political status symbols involve breeding war, consumption war and violent warrior mythology: (a) breeding war procreation above carrying capacity: i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood virility status, which are based on the man breeding a family above carrying capacity levels; (b) consumption war consuming above carrying capacity; i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood intelligence/virility status, which are based upon the man consuming above carrying capacity levels, to demonstrate his ‘large consumption penis’; (c) warrior mythology, where violent men are rewarded with ‘freedom fighter’ or ‘soldier’ socio-political status symbol medals and awards; particularly if the warrior mythology censors and ignores information to educate the culture’s members, that scarcity induced resource war violence can be avoided by the culture’s members choosing to breed and consume below carrying capacity levels. A culture which teaches a purely defensive warrior mythology; i.e. based purely on defense of its landbase and resources, i.e. which educate the members of the culture to avoid overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity inducing lifestyle’s within its culture, would not be considered a patriarchal culture.

CLC 2013: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined.” - Justice Mogoeng

CLA Secretariat & CLC 2013: Req for Info: Re: SA's Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny

Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 16 April 2013

Correspondence to Commonwealth Lawyers Assoc.: President: Boma Ozobia and Vice President: Mark Stephens. CC: Keynote Speakers & Invited Speakers: Subject: CLA: Req for Info: Re: African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?

Please find attached PDF: Commonwealth Law Conference endorses African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: “‘Transformation’ (and ‘reconciliation’) does not even require to be defined (by the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Masters).” - Justice Mogoeng

Issues covered: (a) Apartheid’s Legal Tyranny of ‘vague and ambiguous’ definitions; (b) Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny: Who is to be Master?; (c) African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny

Do the Commonwealth Lawyers Association endorse the African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurists demand to be the Masters of SA’s Alice in Wonderland Legal Tyranny?

Does CLA believe SA citizens are entitled to clear and succinct definitions for the legal terms of ‘reconciliation’ and ‘transformation’; from our African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurist masters? Or, don’t the CLA hold African Patriarch masters to the same standards as Boer Patriarch Masters? When can we expect you to release a statement, clarifying your position?

Transformation of Judiciary Debate: Red Herring Coverup of Fraud of Patriarchal AnthroCorpoCentric Jurisprudence

Transformation of Judiciary Debate: Red Herring Coverup of Fraud of Patriarchal AnthroCorpoCentric Jurisprudence

Correspondence to Judicial Service Commission & Izak Smuts SC: Re: Transformation of Judiciary Debate

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 12 April 2013

The Judicial Service Commission’s ‘transformation’ debate and Izak Smuts resignation is a red herring, obscuring the JSC’s ‘transformation’ agenda to (i) censor the Fraud and Failures of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence; while (ii) simply transforming South Africa’s Jurisprudence from a European Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric flavour to an African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric flavour. (Ref: White Men Can't Judge; JSC in talks on transformation; JSC's Izak Smuts resigns after transformation row; Why I'm resigning from the JSC - Izak Smuts.)

This ‘transformation’ dispute has absolutely nothing to do with significantly ‘transforming’ South Africa’s system of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence benefiting the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric elite; to a Credible system of Jurisprudence, based upon the results of that system, benefiting the consumers of the system: South African citizens, and the parties providing the ecological resources which are the foundation of all constitutional rights.

Any debate about transformation, must first (a) accurately identify what the current status of the system is, (b) then identify its strong points and its weak points, that improve/reduce its credibility; and (c) finally identify how to transform its weak points to strengthen them to improve its credibility, with the consumers of the system.

When identifying the ‘credible’ strong points, those seeking to transform the system, should ask what is ‘credible’ in the experience of the consumer of that particular system, not in the eyes, of the controllers or, or the profiteers from, the system.

All of South Africa’s judges endorse Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence: How many of them can count their monthly pay-check; while holding their breath? Not one! Yet each one of them ignore the ecological foundation (the quality of air, water, soil and biodiversity of nature) when legislating/adjudicating their AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence; as if money gives them the opportunity to breathe!!!

Sincere Consumer Orientated Perspective to Juristic Transformation:

[1] SA’s current system of Jurisprudence is Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric. Patriarchy: A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.

[2] A Credible Judicial System for Citizens and Nature is one such as the Mosuo’s, who have no rape, no murder, no suicide, no prisons, no unemployed, no homeless. If illiterate peasant women are capable of regulating the relations between nature, humans and animals, so simply that they result in a society with no rape, no murder, no suicide, no unemployed, no homeless; why are Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric lawyers with Ph.D’s and seven years of university education incapable of the same results? Because South Africa’s legislators and jurists all endorse the Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric jurisprudence recipe of breeding and consumption wars, for resource scarcity and conflict creation, and their profits!?

[3] Fraud of AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence: Primary Beneficiaries: Anthropocentric males and corporations; Primary Losers: Non-Anthropocentric humans and nature.

[4] Transforming a system of Jurisprudence from Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric to Æquilibriaex: equal & balanced Eco/Anthropocentric law.

[5] Other Examples of Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence Transformations to Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence: (i) Example of the Application of Aequilibriaex Principles, from a submission to the Military Judge of the US Army First Judicial Court, Ft. Meade in the matter of United States v. Bradley Manning; (ii) New Zealand, Ecuador, Bolivia and US Counties grant Nature Rights; (iii) Pennsylvania judge rules that corporations are not people.

If you want a transformed Judiciary, not for the benefit of the South African Patriarchal AnthroCorpocentric elite, but for the benefit of South African citizens and nature; for a sustainable future, for a sustainable constitution; then you should only appoint people to the JSC who are Leavers: who consciously breed and consume below carrying capacity; irrespective whether they have a law degree, or even went to school! After all, a person who consciously breeds and consumes below carrying capacity, has more commitment to respecting the rights of nature, and other humans, in terms of her everyday procreation and consumption practices; than any Lawyer or Advocate, who breeds or consumes way above carrying capacity, who appears to believe that the earth is flat and resources are infinite.

SA CommonSism Primitivist Party's MILINT Sustainable Security Options submitted to Kim Jong-un, RU, US & China

CommonSism Primitivist MILINT Sustainable Security Options submitted to SL Kim Jong-un, Russia, China & USA for resolution of N Korea and Industrial Civilization's Suicide Marches.

In my personal CommonSism Primitivist opinion, if you have the courage to challenge Industrial Civilization, and its primary driver: the United States, to embark on an international course of Sustainable Security; you shall have made one of the most fundamental contributions to the lives of this planet, and all of its species, by stepping infront of the Industrial Civilization suicide train. You shall be Industrial Civilization Titanic’s iceberg.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 08 April 2013

On Saturday (06) and Sunday (07) April 2013, the unregistered TYGAE Aex Political Party, based upon CommonSism and Aequilibriaex Jurisprudence principles, in South Africa submitted their CommonSism Primitivist MILINT Sustainable Security Options to Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un, Russia's President Putin, China's President Xi Jinping, America's President Obama, South Korea's President Park Geun-hye and General Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.; for resolution of N Korea and Industrial Civilization's Suicide Marches.

The Russian, American and North Korean Embassies in Pretoria acknowledged receipt of the MILINT Sustainable Security policies, including the offices of Director of National Intelligence: Mr. James Clapper, and United States Environmental Command Offices in Fort Sam, Houston, Texas.

The TYGAE Primitivist CommonSism submissions suggest that both North Korea and Industrial Civilization inspired by the West, primarily America are on Suicide Marches. Resolving these suicide marches requires international adoption of Sustainable Security Policies.

Sustainable Security policies being: [1] Industrial Civilization is on a Tragedy of the Commons planetary suicide march. [2] Only the international adoption of Sustainable Security policies can stop Industrial Civilization’s Suicide March. [3] National Sustainable Security policies: [3.1] Every Nation must draw up a Sustainable Security Plan, by 09 September 2014. Each nation’s Sustainable Security plans must clarify: [3.1A] Detailed analysis of what their nation’s ecological carrying capacity is. [3.1B] How they intend to require every citizen, corporation and organisation to reduce/maintain their consumption and procreation practices to remaining below carrying capacity. [3.1C] Their planned De-Industrialization and/or Primitivization Policies. [3.2] International Sustainable Security Peace Treaties: [3.2A] All ‘Peace treaties’ which do not require both parties to maintain their nation citizens’ procreation and consumption practices below carrying capacity, as a fundamental requirement for the credibility of the peace treaty should be considered ‘War is Peace’ Whore treaties, and null and void, and renegotiated. [3.2B] Any credible ‘Sustainable Security’ Peace Treaty, must require all parties to the Peace Treaty to maintain their nation’s citizens and corporations procreation, consumption and production practices below carrying capacity. Any nation which allows their citizens or corporations to engage in a breeding, consumption or production war, shall be considered to have declared war with all other Sustainable Security nations.

Transparency Copies were also submitted to the Leaders of the following countries, via their Embassies, and various left and right wing political parties in their respective countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, South Africa, United Kingdom