CRL Rights Comm says 'Rules of Court' are Supreme Law of Land, above Constitution
19 February 2013 | SQSwans | Andrea Muhrrteyn
Correspondence to Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch: Request Amnesty & HRW Take Notice & Provide Independent Observation and monitoring of CRL Rights Commission Complaint & Appeal: Ref: 9/1/1/1/49: Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty culture v. SA Concourt Registrar:
Appeal of Mrs. K. Makgoba’s Ruling endorsing the Constitutional Court Registrar’s position that: South African AnthroCorpocentric Dominant Cultures ‘Rules of Court’ are the Supreme Law of the Land; If or when the AnthroCorpocentric Dominant Cultures ‘Rules of Court’ violate a Minority cultures right to practice their Ecocentric cultural practices, as enshrined in the Constitution Bill of Rights clauses granting citizens from minority cultures, access to courts (S 34), and rights to practice their culture (S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18).
Issues: | Overview: Facts Not in Dispute? | Chronology of Events | CRL Rights Comm Ruling | Fake v Authentic | Multiculturalism | Invocation of Cultural Law | Relief Requested
