‘Indigenous Rights’ King Anders Breivik of Norway vs ‘Multiculti’ Queen Elisabeth II response to Idle No More Red People’s Indigenous Rights Movement

‘Indigenous Rights’ King Anders Breivik of Norway vs. ‘Multiculti’ Queen Elisabeth II response to Idle No More Red People’s Indigenous Rights Movement



Andrea Muhrrteyn | Ecofeminist v Breivik | 18 January 2013

Correspondence (PDF) to Anders Behring Breivik c/o & via: Geir Lippestad

CC: Queen Elisabeth II c/o Martin Callanan MEP
CC: Prime Minister Stephen Harper
CC: Idle No More: Sheelah McLean, Sylvia McAdam, Jess Gordon, Nina Wilson
CC: Former Senator Sam Nunn, CEO: Nuclear Threat Initiative
CC: Canada Treaty Policy Directorate
CC: Army General Martin E Dempsey, c/o US Army Environmental Command
CC: Richard B Fadden, Dir: CSIS, c/o: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

RE: Request Clarification: What would ‘Indigenous Rights’ King Anders Breivik of Norway’s suggestion be to ‘Multiculti’ Queen Elisabeth II, in response to Indigenous Rights Protest Demands of Attawapiskat Chief Theresa Spence and the Idle No More Red People’s Indigenous Rights Movement?

Question #1: Should Queen Elisabeth honour the Treaty’s made with the First Nations, by Queen Victoria and demand that Prime Minister Stephen Harper meet with First Nation Leaders, to establish a Nation to Nation relationship between First Nations and the Government of Canada, rather than a relationship as defined in the Indian Act to address issues and (2) social and environmental sustainability?

Question #2: If we are to establish a credible International European Code of Honour, we should demand the assassination of any European leader who (a) legislates Flat Earth ‘War is Peace Whore’ Tragedy of the Constitutional Commons Suicide Pacts, i.e. a ‘Peace Treaty’ which ignores confronting the Scarcity Combatant role of overpopulation and overconsumption to scarcity as an underlying cause of conflict; and/or (b) refuses to address and resolve Flat Earth ‘War is Peace Whore’ Treaties enacted by their dishonourable European predecessors who ignored confronting the Scarcity Combatant role of overpopulation and overconsumption to scarcity as an underlying cause of conflict?

SA Demography and Euro Honour Code Questions to FW de Klerk, Swiss, US & Israel Chambers of Commerce

SA Demography and Euro Honour Code Questions to FW de Klerk, Swiss, US & Israel Chambers of Commerce

What do SwissCham SA Officials think Prime Minister Verwoerd and the National Party’s response would have been to the following hypothetical letter from ANCYL Nelson Mandela on 16 December 1961: ANCYL Just War Offer: Request Apartheid Government’s Political and Financial Support for ANCYL Cultural Campaign that Equal Rights be granted to Africans who adopt K-selected reproductive strategy.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | SQSwans | 25 January 2013

Correspondence PDF: ‘South Africa, Demography’ Questions sent to SwissChamber of Commerce, FW de Klerk, Israel Chamber of Commerce and American Chamber of Commerce.

Q1: What do SwissCham SA Officials think Prime Minister Verwoerd and the National Party’s response would have been to the following hypothetical letter from ANCYL Nelson Mandela on 16 December 1961

Questions for FW de Klerk:

Q2. Prove his optimism by clarifying the reasons for FW de Klerk Foundation’s endorsement of SA Constitutional Courts corruption in Alien v Afriforum’s application for Review of SCA’s ‘Kill Boere’ agreement & SA’s Truth and Reconciliation Fraud?

Q3. Once a European Indigenous Rights Code of Honour Tribunal is established, should it order the assassination of FW de Klerk, for his refusal to advocate that South Africa’s Flat Earth ‘War is Peace’ Whore legislation and treaties enacted by him and his dishonourable European predecessors, be resolved; in terms of their failure to address the overpopulation and overconsumption roles contributing to Scarcity, as an underlying cause of conflict?