[RHS777INT:008]: Peaches VW-WY Q&A: DARwin's JAGUSCMDYE Buck Stops Here JCS Joint Force 2020 Future Options

[RHS777INT][002][003][004][005]
[006a][006b][007][008][009][010]
DRAFTING PROCESS: SUBMISSIONS DETAILS
1ST DRAFT RULES COMPLETION: MIDNIGHT SUNDAY: 09(+2)/10/11 GMT+2
RULE CLARIFICATIONS SUBMISSION REQUESTS: 11/10/11-16/10/11
PENDING RULE CLARIFICATIONS: ALL OTHER SUBMISSIONS: 16/10/11]

DARwin's JAGUSCMDYE Buck Stops Here JCS Joint Force 2020 Future Options Drafts...

JAG MIL GILS REG 45473: INCLUDE'S PLAUSIBLE DENIABLE COMMENTARY'S

Q&A & Requests for Excerpts of Peaches VW-WY Discussions

Twitter Q's & Submissions: #JAGUSCMDYE or #JAGMIL45473

In truth, Rommel was guilty of nothing more than keeping his own counsel. Like Kluge, like Guderain, he had sensed that a plot was in the wind - and though no man was witness to his conversation on July 9 with Hofacker, adjutant to the military governor of Paris, he seems always to have rejected assassination. Instead, with or without Hitler's consent he favoured peace feelers to his "friendly enemy", Montgomery. Yet, aware of a plot, he had kept silent. For Hitler, this was complicity enough.

On October 13, Rommel learned by telephone that General Wilhelm Bufgdorf, Hitler's newly appointed chief adjutant, and General major Ernst Maisel, head of the army personnel branch's legal section, would be calling at his Herrlingen villa between nooon and 1 p.m. the next day.

Rommel was under no illusions. On the morning of October 14, during a long tramp into the woods with his son, Manfred, Rommel told him, "Today will decide what is planned for me, whether a People's Court or a new command in the East." "Would you accept such a command?", Manfred asked. Rommel took his son's arm. "My dear boy, our enemy in the East is so terrible that every other consideration has to give way before it... Of course I would go."

The generals arrived punctually at noon: Burgdorf, burly and florid, Maisel, shorter, with a beaked nose. Both men, though the souls of coutesey, declined Lucie Rommel's invitation to lunch. It was, they explained, official business. All three retired to Rommel's ground-floor study.

They had no Eastern Command to offer Rommel, only a choice: a People's Court or a poison capsule, to be followed by a state funeral with full honours. (The wreath had already arrived at Ulm railway station, nearby). Though testimonys obtained under Gestapo duress had falsely implicated him, the Desert Fox was too precious to German legend to perish through a garotte of piano wire.

There were brief restrained farewells with Lucie and Manfred. Then, shrugging into his topcoat, firmly clasping his field marshal's baton, Rommel passed from the villa, to climb into the back of Burgdorf's small Opel. The driver, SS Haptscharfuhrer Heinrich Doose, let in the clutch and the car cruised 200 yards down the road before pulling up on Burgdorf's orders. Following instructions, Doose and Masel sauntered slowly down the road.

Five, perhaps ten minutes later, Burgdorf called them back. In the rear seat, Rommel was unconscious, but not yet dead - "slumped down and sobbing", Doose was to recall, "not a death-rattle or groaning but sobbing."

Solitiously, the SS man helped the Field Marshal to sit bolt upright, as a soldier should. Then, carefully, he replaced Rommel's fallen cap.

[RHS777INT:006a]: DRAFT: DARwin's JAGUSCMDYE Buck Stops Here JCS Joint Force 2020 Future Options: Vision of the Future...

[RHS777INT][002][003][004][005]
[006][007][008][009][010]
DRAFTING PROCESS: SUBMISSIONS DETAILS
1ST DRAFT RULES COMPLETION: MIDNIGHT SUNDAY: 09(+2)/10/11 GMT+2
RULE CLARIFICATIONS SUBMISSION REQUESTS: 11/10/11-16/10/11
PENDING RULE CLARIFICATIONS: ALL OTHER SUBMISSIONS: 16/10/11]

DARwin's JAGUSCMDYE Buck Stops Here JCS Joint Force 2020 Future Options Iron Felix Rules for Radical Honesty WANTED Negotiation

#2 DRAFTING PROCESS OF JAG MIL GILS REG 45473: INCLUDES PLAUSIBLE DENIABLE COMMENTARY'S AND NOTIFICATIONS SHOULD ANY CORRECTIONS/DELETIONS BE REQUIRED

A vision of what the next century could look like. ...


Excerpt: Geopolitics, and Policymaking in the 21st Century, Sir Halford Mackinder (US Army War College: Parameters, Summer 2000, pp. 58-71):

Without a vision of what the next century ought to look like, no policies can be formulated to bring it about. ...

Policy is driven by analogy, both historical and theoretical. One common, and dangerous, analogy that drives US Eurasian policy is “the game.” Brzezinski speaks of chess; Central Asian policy is the “new great game”; Kissinger and Nixon used game analogies throughout their reign and in their writings afterward. Impenetrably complex problems are simplified to games, which was problematic enough during the Cold War but is acutely poisonous today. Take Brzezinski's chess analogy. Chess has two players, and one opponent; it is zero-sum, and to the finish; there is a winner and a loser, with no middle ground. The opponent of the United States to Brzezinski is, and has always been, Russia. If we approach Eurasia as if it were a chessboard, then we will be met by opponents, and cooperation and mutual benefit would be removed from our calculations. ...

If the leaders of the most powerful nation on earth were to conceptualize foreign policy as a chess game, it would virtually ensure that other nations would as well. A Eurasian alliance to counteract growing US influence would be virtually inevitable. ...

Policymakers in the United States vastly underestimate the hegemon's potential to shape the nature of the international system. Intellectuals wedded to old ideas about the unchanging nature of power have so far failed to lead the world in the new directions that it expected. The unparalleled unipolar position that the United States found itself in when the Cold War abruptly ended is being wasted by politicians with no vision for shaping the future. The debate that occasionally resurfaces over the "isolationist" nature of the United States misses a key dimension: if nothing else, America has certainly been intellectually isolationist in the post-Cold War era, hiding behind walls and refusing to lead the world in new directions that its unprecedented power has made possible. The rules that govern international relations evolve. ...

No so-called permanent interests, or eternal geographical realities, exist. The only way that the next century can be better than the one we are leaving is with a reevaluation of the assumptions and attitudes that underlie our actions. A prolonged investigation into the utility of all geopolitical theory would be a good place to start. ...


Excerpt: A study of the Anglo-American Establishment: The Pilgrims Society Membership list:

Every historian at one point will realize that all he or she is reading about is the shifting of borders and the destruction of cultures as a result of abusive rulers looking for more territory and more riches. The only difference between all these wars is that they have become increasingly destructive as the centuries went by. At this point they will be so destructive that a war among the major nations of the earth will have to be avoided at all costs. The globalist group understands this, which in this case is good for everyone. What people in the conspiracy community may actually want to do is to stop fighting the concept of globalization, as apparently America's ultra-right wants them to do, and instead focus on educating themselves and other people about the corruption in national governments and the globalist group. We need to get to a point in which enough people are so informed about conspiracy affairs that it will be impossible for governments to manipulate them into giving up their rights or supporting economic or military policies which will ruin the country, or maybe even Western democratic civilization as a whole. For a number of reasons, some more obvious than others, this is a daunting task, but one things is for sure: a more systematic and intellectual approach to conspiracy affairs, combined with a "different-globalist"* stance, will draw in many more educated and influential persons than the unfocused U.S.-inspired isolationist attitude that is still dominant today.


Excerpt: The Crippled Giant, J. William Fulbright (p26)

The matter was raised when Chairman Khruschev visited the United States in 1959, and he replied with some anger that he had been talking about economic competition. "I am deeply concerned over these conscious distortions of my thoughts," he said. "I've never mentioned any rockets."

We will never know, of course, but it is possible that an opportunity for a stable peace was lost during the years of Khruschev's power. As we look back now on the many things he said regarding peaceful coexistence, the words have a different ring. At the time we did not believe them; at best they were Communist propaganda, at worst outright lies. On the occasion of his visit to the Foreign Relations Committee on September 16, 1959, for example, Chairman Khruschev suggested that we lay aside the polemics of the past. Mr Khruschev said:

"We must face the future more and have wisdom enough to secure [a Homer Lea Martial Honour Warrior] peace for our countries and for the whole world. We have always had great respect for the American people. We have also been somewhat envious of your achievements in the economic field, and for that reason, we are doing our best to try to catch up with you in that field, to compete with you, and when we do catch up, to mover further ahead.. I should say that future generations would be grateful to us if we managed to switch our efforts from stockpiling and perfecting weapons and concentrated those efforts fully on [population control and space exploration)].


Excerpt: “Military Gospel – according to Homer Lea”: Valour of Ignorance, by Homer Lea

BlackfootSwan ~ SageRedRussian :: “Military Gospel – according to Homer Lea”: Valour of Ignorance, by Homer Lea :: CheyenneMission ~ RedArticBell

When will that Golden Age be ushered in upon this unhappy earth, and arbitration between individuals substituted for law and dynamic force in which it originates and ends? When will laws made by man for the government of man, together with his courts, his penal institutions, be put aside and voluntary arbitration between man and man take their place?

Only when arbitration is able to unravel the tangled skein of crime and hypocrisy among individuals can it be extended to communities and nations. As nations are only man in the aggregate, they are the aggregate of his crimes and deception and depravity, and so long as these constitute the basis of individual impulse, so long will they control the acts of nations.

The Feynman Series - Beauty (05:11)	The Feynman Series - Honour (03:57)
The Feynman Series - Curiosity (04:24)	Sagan Series: NASA: Frontier Is Everywhere (01/07)

[RHS777INT:005]: DRAFT: DARwin's JAGUSCMDYE Buck Stops Here JCS Joint Force 2020 Future Options Iron Felix Rules 4 Radical Honesty WANTED Negotiation

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.