Censorship of TRC Fraud Complaint Filed Against SANEF Editors

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:29 AM
To: ICC OTP Information Desk
Cc: NATO: SHAPE, US Navy JAG
Subject: ICC Prosecutor's Office: Art 15 Rome Statute Complaint (RSA SAP Case 823-08-2010)
Attach: 11-11-19 SAPS Insp-Engel Complaint (Signed AckRec) :: 11-05-09 Genocide Complaint ITO Art-15 Rome Statute to ICC (FS+NoC+Complaint)

TO: INT’L CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
Per Email

CC: NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE: CHIEFS OF DEFENCE
Per Email (via SHAPE)

CC: US NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S OFFICE (JAG)
Per Email


Additional Evidence to: Notice of Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute, filed on 09 May 2011

Please find attached additional information submitted to SAP complaint (Case 823-08-2010), in regards to the aforementioned complaint filed with the ICC Prosecutors Office, against relevant Accessories to Censorship of South Africa’s TRC FRAUD.

Complaint reads as follows:

Professor William K Black led the investigations of the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980-90′s, and put 1000 executive crooks in jail. Professor Black explains that fraud typically underlies virtually all major financial failures: financial collapses are caused by fraud (criminal activity) rather than mismanagement or accident. (15:56)

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African citizens.

Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions).
As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Steve Hofmeyr uses ‘Kaffir’ in Pro-AWB song; in “Kaffir Lily Riddle” Radical Honesty Amicus in Afriforum v. Malema Context?

[Afriforum v. Malema][Kaffir Lily Riddle]

Mr. Hofmeyr: Request Clarification Context & Definitions of “kaffer”

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:23 PM
To: Steve Hofmeyr
Subject: Mr. Hofmeyr: Request Clarification Context & Definitions of “kaffer”


Mr. Hofmeyr,

I read the article on Channel 24: Steve Hofmeyr uses 'k' word, and the article on your website: This is gonna hurt a little - Façade 42: It is time for Julius Malema and the ANC to admit....

“Hofmeyr confirmed that "that k-word" does appear in the lyrics of his new song Ons sal dit oorleef, but "in a certain context".”

“It is time for Julius Malema to admit to the sometimes mutual incompatibility between hatespeech and traditional songs, the way Afrikaners had to sacrifice traditional terms like “kaffer”. He can not have his cake and eat it. If some can chant “kill the Boer”, others will gladly reciprocate by revoking the vocable.”

I am not aware of your ‘certain context’; however your reference to “the way Afrikaners had to sacrifice traditional terms like “kaffer”” would appear that your definition of ‘kaffir’ would be a racial definition; i.e describing black people?

Is your usage of ‘kaffir’ in accordance with the pejorative meaning for a black person?


Confirmation Your Usage is Not in Accordance to Radical Honesty Definitions:

Radical Honesty definitions of ‘kaffir’ are not racial, but anyone befitting any of the Radical Honesty ‘kaffir’ definitions can be called a ‘kaffir’ irrespective of race, religion, culture. As stated in court documents (CCT 23-10, CCT 06-11, 07-2010 EQ JHB, ICC 09 May 2011 Radical Honesty Genocide complaint), to among others Afriforum, whom you are closely associated with; I imagine you are aware of them; the Radical Honesty culture’s definitions for ‘Kaffir’ are:


‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition:

Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc.


‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for ‘Kaffir’:

The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a pre-Islamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth.


‘Kaffir Legislation’ = Inalienable Right to Breed’ Poverty, Misery and War legislation; pretending it advocates for ‘peace’ and ‘human rights’.

Kaffir Law/Legislation provides citizens with the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed’ and Vote but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc, etc.

Kaffir Legislation covers up that an ‘Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control policy + No Social Welfare policies or practices provides for an equilibrium carrying capacity; whereas Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control within a welfare state, results in Runaway Growth, and ultimately greater misery, poverty and war.

Please would you confirm that your usage was not in accordance to Radical Honesty culture definitions and meanings; so as to avoid any misunderstandings.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

TRC Fraud Genocide Charges filed to ICC against: Mandela, Tutu, de Klerk, Nobel Committee, 88 SA media, New York Times, Telegraph & Algemene Dagblad

The Complainants hereby request the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.

Charges Filed Against:

Archbishop Desmond Tutu Reverend Alex Boraine Former President Nelson Mandela Nelson Mandela Foundation Former President F.W. de Klerk F.W. de Klerk Foundation Norwegian Nobel Committee Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo Dep. Ch. Justice Dikgang Moseneke	Justice Edwin Cameron Justice Johan Froneman Justice Chris Jafta Justice Sisi Khampepe Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng Justice Bess Nkabinde Justice Johann van der Westhuizen Justice Zak Yacoob
SA National Editors Forum (SANEF) Mondli Makhanya (SANEF Chair) SA Press Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe SA Press Appeals Panel: Judge Ralph Zulman SA Dep. Press Ombudsman: Johan Retief SA Press Association (SAPA) Mark van der Velden (SAPA Editor) Business Day Peter Bruce (Bus. Day Editor) Business Report Jabulani Sikhakane (Bus. Report Editor) Cape Argus Chris Witfield (Cape Argus Editor) Cape Times Alide Dasnois (Cape Times Editor) City Press Ferial Haffajee (City Press Editor) The Citizen Martin Williams (Citizen Editor) Daily Dispatch Andrew Trench (Daily Dispatch Editor) Daily Maverick Brkic Branko (Daily Maverick Editor) Daily News Alan Dunn (Daily News Editor) East Coast Radio (ECR) Diane MacPherson (ECR Editor) Eyetwitness News Katy Katapodis (Eyewitness News Editor) Independent Online (IOL) Adrian Ephram (IOL Editor) Mail and Guardian Nic Dawes (M&G Editor) The Mercury Angela Quintal (Mercury Editor) News 24 Jannie Momberg (News 24 Editor) Pretoria News Zingisa Mkhuma (Pretoria News Editor) SA Star Moegsien Williams (SA Star Editor) Sunday Independent Makhudu Sefara (Sun. Ind. Editor)	Sunday Tribune Philani Mgwaba(Sun Tribune Editor) Sunday Times/Times Live Ray Hartley (Sun Times Editor) 3rd Degree Debora Patta (3rd Degree Exec. Prod.) Beeld Tim du Plessis (Beeld Editor) Daily Sun Themba Khumalo (Daily Sun Editor) Die Burger Henry Jeffery (Burger Editor) Bun Booysen (Burger Editor) E-News Patrick Conroy (Head of News) Financial Mail Barney Mthombothi (Fin. Mail Editor) Finweek Colleen Naude (Finweek Editor) The George Herald Mandi Botha (George Herald Editor) Independent on Saturday Trevor Bruce (Ind. on Sat. Editor) 702 Radio Pheladi Gwangwa (702 Radio Prod.) Rapport Lisa Albrecht (Rapport Editor) The Saturday Star Brendan Seery (Sat. Star Editor) Sowetan Bongani Keswa (Sowetan Editor) The Herald Jeremy McCabe (Herald Editor) Volksblad Ainsley Moos (Volksblad Editor) Rod Amner (Rhodes Journo Lecturer) Robert Brand (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Guy Berger (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Harry Dugmore (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Harold Gess (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Jane Duncan (Rhodes Journo Prof.) Anton Harber (Wits Journo Prof.) Franz Kruger (Wits Journo Prof.) William Bird, Media Monitoring Africa Projourn Steering Committee
New York Times Celia Dugger (NYT) Arthur Brisbane (NYT) The Daily Telegraph	Ainslinn Laing (DT) Tony Gallagher (DT) Algemene Dagblad Casper Naber (AD)

Should the Concourt Order The Citizen to Apologize to McBride?

[Guerrylla Law] [Concourt: #23-10] [Concourt #06-11]

Should the Concourt Order The Citizen to Apologize to McBride, for calling him a murderer?

Radical Honesty argues: Only if SA's TRC intentions are “an ever-rising tide of corporate and political bullshite” to coverup their TRC Fraud


16 March 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Radical Honesty submissions to the Constitutional Court, in the matter of The Citizen v. Robert McBride (CCT 23-10). In directions dated, 7 March, the Justices asked all parties to make submissions on whether they should order The Citizen to apologize to McBride. More specifically:

“Should the Court find that any statement The Citizen published about Mr. McBride was actionably defamatory, would it be appropriate, in view of the findings of the High Court and the nature of the submissions before the Supreme Court of Appeal and this Court, for the Court to order The Citizen to publish an apology?”

Radical Honesty Submission on Forced Apologies

Radical Honesty's submission (PDF) is as follows:

[2] As detailed in the First Amicus Heads of Argument: These submissions (a) address alternative legal arguments to those of both the Applicant and Respondent, i.e. from a Radical Honesty culture/religion perspective; (b) ‘argues points deemed too far reaching for emphasis by parties intent on winning their particular case’ ; (c) ‘apprises the court of broad-based legal, social, economic, ecological and cultural enquiry implications for its consideration to avoid unintended consequences for groups not before the court,’ (d) informs the court of information to base its decision on a larger, more comprehensive, and more accurate reality based natural law legal framework, so that the court’s final judgment shall include a fully-informed refined legal analysis, which provides equal protection to all SA’s tribes; and (e) provides a perspective from a culture practicing sincere sensate forgiveness.


First Amicus Cultural Forgiveness, Reconciliation and Apology Differences to Parties:

Pema Chodron: “The job of a spiritual friend is to insult you”

[3] First Amicus is not a member of either the Applicant (Citizen) or Respondent (McBride) culture of intellectual fake insincere ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’; nor its hyper-sensitivity to ‘insults’. Radical Honesty are far closer to Pema Chodron’s views of ‘insults’ – “The job of a spiritual friend is to insult you” -- as detailed in Pema Chodron: Troublemakers.

[4] In Radical Honesty we very brutally clearly define what we mean by forgiveness, and no Radical Honesty member would ever pretend to another that they have forgiven them, until they have gone through the process of reaching sensate forgiveness. Sincere forgiveness is also a process of acute personal responsibility; so that we can honestly forgive ourselves for our contribution to the misunderstanding.

[5] Nobody in the Radical Honesty community would ever force anyone to make an apology; or even recommend that such an apology be made; for we believe that the only apologies that contribute to meaningful sincere spontaneous and loving relationships are those that are totally 100% sincere, from the gut and the heart. We do not do public relations – i.e. bullshit the public -- with fake insincere apologies.

Radical Honesty Guru Scott Ginsberg describes Edward Bernaysian PR protocols as “the ever-rising tide of corporate and political bullshite”.

SA's TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Concourt Corruption; to be a Guinness World Record?

21 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

A South African citizen has filed a submission to Guinness World Records, nominating a Constitutional Court ruling dismissal of her case, against 88 media respondents, as a World Guinness Record “of Judicial Incompetence – i.e. refusal to apply their minds to the evidence before them, to make such an impartial enquiry into such evidence; in accordance with the Rule of Law.”

The Application was submitted to Guinness World Records on 21 February, 2011; Webclaim ID # 343110. The suggested Guinness Record Title: Constitutional Court Application Dismissal

Lara Johnstone, the author of the submission, states that it was not her intention to set the record for a Constitutional Court Application dismissal. She doubts that it is any legal practitioner's intention, to spend days and weeks, if not months researching the law and evidentiary facts, to draft and application to the Supreme Court in their country, in this case the SA Constitutional Court; to have it summarily dismissed without anything remotely resembling an impartial enquiry into its merits; or alternatively because the legal issues addressed in the application were of such an explosive nature, the Justices are petrified of confronting them.

Consequently, she is "applying to Guiness World Records, to record a Guiness Record, which occurred without [her] intentional effort to do so; and to record it, for the sake of posterity."

In the late afternoon of 28 January 2011, I filed a written application to the SA Constitutional Court, for direct access; for a writ of (1) Habeus Mentem; and (2) Certiorari/Review. The respondents were 88 media publications and their editors. The court reference number issued by the Registrar was: CCT 06-11. The Justices were returning from their Christmas vacations on 01 February, and the Registrar suggested I have all my documentation ready for them, before their return.

Generally, an application for direct access, or for approval to proceed as an Amicus or such issues, -- understandably -- takes the Justices a few weeks, sometimes over a month to enquire into. They need to read the application, its affidavit, and consider all the legal arguments, and their stare decisis precedent, etc. Applying one’s mind to reading legal applications and documents is a time consuming process.

In this application, due to the number of respondents, the Founding Affidavit was longer than the usual 50 pages. Additionally the legal issues addressed are rather controversial, and would be considered a serious challenge to legal minded individuals who love making the application of the law relevant to the people in a code of conduct that can be easily understood. As stated in one of the evidentiary documents; the Radical Honesty SA Amicus in Support of a Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995; which if seriously considered by the Concourt Justices would encourage a legal ecological revolution of consciousness, as radical as that of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses against Indulgences:

“A healthy ecological environment, with due regard for carrying capacity laws of sustainability is a sine qua non for all other constitutional rights; similarly a psychological integrity environment of philosophical courageous truth searching honesty and sincere forgiveness is a sine qua non for healthy, transparent relationships that result in the co-creation of a code of conduct that enables non-violent honest sincere resolutions to disagreements.

[www.guerrylla-law.co.nr] David vs Tutu Goliath's TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Corruption

[Concourt #23-10: Citizen v. McBride] :: [Concourt #06-11: Radical Honesty SA v SANEF & 87 Others]
[Bloemfontein Mag. Crt: State v. Reitz 4] :: [UK Westminster Mag. Crt: RSA v. Shrien Dewani]
[Scientific Journalism Ratings]

Concourt #23-10: The Citizen v. Robert McBride

Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae in Support of Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995

Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus:

• 26 Mar 2010: Radical Honesty Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court)
  
• 18 July 2010: Radical Honesty Amicus Heads of Argument
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: The legal, psychological, & socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’
  
• Expert Witness Dr. T. Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment connection
  
• Radical Honesty Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument: [Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of TRC Act] :: [Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon] :: [Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract Principles] :: [Population Policy Common Sense Principles] :: [TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History] :: [Radical Honesty: Culture and Religion, or Refugee Status?]

‘Exposing (i) TRC Fraud, (ii) Media's Ecolaw Corruption & (ii) African White Refugee Persecution; not in interests of justice' - SA Concourt

Judges don't want to hear about race censorship claim

Would-be litigant runs various websites featuring posts on the genocide of whites

15 February 2011
Sowetan / SAPA / Jenni O'Grady

The Constitutional Court has dismissed an application for an order finding that over 80 editors and journalism professors are censoring Western Cape woman Lara Johnstone, according to papers received on Tuesday.

“The Constitutional Court has considered the application for direct access and concluded that the application should be dismissed as it is not in the interests of justice to hear the matter,” read an order dated February 1.

Johnstone, who intended representing herself because she believes no-one in the country has the ability to grasp her arguments, had filed lengthy papers spanning various issues.

These included that argument in her previous applications to be a friend of courts hearing matters she was interested in, were not reported on. One was the “Reitz Four” case and another the “Robert McBride” case.

Johnstone runs various websites featuring posts on the genocide of whites and farmers, white refugees from Africa and media “prostitutes”.

She believes the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was a fraud because the underlying causes of the world’s problems — overpopulation and ecological sustainability — have not been addressed and that because of this, true forgiveness cannot take place.

The complaint against the SA Press Association, which was among those she had tried to have a ruling on, was that the news agency did not report on all aspects of her arrest on a crimen injuria charge.

She had allegedly sent SMSs to Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille, in the course of a lengthy attempt at seeking comment from politicians on her theories, and De Lille decided to lay the charge.

According to the court report filed by Sapa, based on the court proceedings, Johnstone refused to leave the holding cell and refused to participate in a forensic psychological assessment.

Are the media allergic to constructive critical examination of their conduct?

Tweets: ‘Woman wants editors in Concourt over Censorship’

News24: @News24 South Africa: News24 is Southern Africa and Africa's premier online news resource reaching over 2.3 million local users each month. http://www.news24.com.

In What some media don’t want you to think about, Christi van der Westhuizen writes:

I recently resigned as monthly columnist at Media24’s daily newspapers after one of my columns was censured. The offence that led to the censorship? As a proponent of the position that the media’s allergic reaction to self-criticism is to its own detriment, I had dared to do exactly that: employ critical examination of the media.

The following tweets are responses to:

• News 24: Woman wants editors in ConCourt over censorship (‘Conspiracy of Silence as David v. Goliath in Concourt: CCT #06-11 Blacklisted by SA Media’ Email to SA Legal Fraternity drives SAPA to Action), and
  
• The South African: SA citizen challenges Dewani extradition (‘SA citizens - SA legal system is corrupt - Amicus challenge to Dewani extradition’ - The South African)
.

‘Conspiracy of Silence as David v. Goliath in Concourt: CCT #06-11 Blacklisted by SA Media’ Email to SA Legal Fraternity drives SAPA to Action

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

On 01 February 2011, the following email -- CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE AS DAVID vs. GOLIATH IN CONCOURT: CCT # 06-11 BLACKLISTED BY SA MEDIA; BLACKLIST ENDORSED BY TUTU -- was emailed to a few hundred of SA's Advocates, all the different Law Societies and Bar Councils; all the non-profit Legal Aid Agencies, from Afriforum to F.W's Center for Constitutional Rights.

On 02 February, the SAPA news article further below -- WOMAN WANTS EDITORS IN CONCOURT OVER CENSORSHIP -- was released, and published on News 24 and Mail and Guardian.

Can Goliath ANC's Political Correctness Cuckoo's Nest be Liberated?

In How Will World War IV be Fought, Mike Smith writes:

The question to ask is whether we are intellectually, culturally, sociologically and psychologically prepared for such a war. The battlefield has shifted from jungles and desserts to the media and cyberspace, the prize to fight for is the minds of people. Arming yourself with rifles is one thing, but are we arming ourselves psychologically? The winners of World War IV will be the ones who possesses the most social and cultural intelligence.

So how do we win such a war?

I have a few ideas, but the most important is the training of our “soldiers” for this kind of war. Our educational institutions are where the soldiers are trained and armed and where we have to shape and form their minds, arm them with the best and sharpest tools.

Perception shaping is another. Let us face is that Whites in South Africa has more enemies than friends in the world. We need to change that perception, of what the world thinks of us. This should be a national effort from each and every White person in SA, driven by our Academics who understand these things. Not only should they change the perception the world has of us, but also that of our enemy.

In How David Beats Goliath: When underdogs break the rules, Malcolm Gladwell writes, among others:

Open Letter to Tutu: Why do you endorse blacklisting of TRC Fraud critics & evidence?

28 January 2011

Honourable Desmond Tutu,

Why does Archbishop Tutu endorse the blacklisting and censorship of Radical Honesty SA?

As you know Archbishop Tutu, you know who I am, and you know that I am censored and blacklisted by the SA media, because I belong to a culture founded on telling the truth, and practicing sincere – not fake - forgiveness. You know that I was so committed to sincere forgiveness between black and white South Africans, that I was willing to donate my entire inheritance to contribute to that reality, as per my 1999 submission to the TRC.

As you know: You tell the world: South Africa supports truth and reconciliation; and then you censor and blacklist the only South African whose culture is founded on truth-telling and sincere forgiveness! And then you wonder why ‘Proudly South African’ whites and blacks who practice fake reconciliation and sycophancy and hate brutal honesty, suffer from inferiority complexes!

As you know, you endorse me being blacklisted and censored; because you don’t want to hold an honest conversation with someone who belongs to a culture who practices telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, every hour of every day. You do not want to hold a conversation with someone from a culture who has no murderers and no rapists. You do not want to ask them: HOW DO YOU DO IT? WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM YOU? PLEASE SHARE WITH US YOUR SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE? NO, YOU CENSOR AND BLACKLIST THEM! BECAUSE YOU DON’T WANT TO TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR TRC FRAUD!

As you know, Dr. Brad Blanton, founder of Center for Radical Honesty and bestselling author of the Radical Honesty series of books, former candidate for United States Congress from Virginia in 2004 and 2006, has filed expert witness affidavits in the South African High Court (WC Case #19963-09) and Constitutional Court (Case #23-10), wherein he clarifies his reasons for how and why Tutu and Mandela’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was fake, not sincere, a fraud committed on black and white South Africans.

What answers did you give to the legal documents filed in the SA Constitutional Court (CCT #23-10) for how and why your Truth and Reconciliation Commission committed TRC fraud, Sir?

CCT # 06-11: Concourt to review SANEF censorship of TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Media Corruption

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Constitutional Court, Johannesburg (21-Jan-2011): On 19 January 2011 the Concourt Registrar Mr. Delano Louw issued the Concourt Reference Number CCT 06-11, in the matter of Radical Honesty SA and others vs. SANEF and others. The Concourt had been submitted with Proof of Service documentation proving that Radical Honesty SA had provided all the respondents with their Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit documentation.

The Applicants in the matter are Lara Johnstone and Radical Honesty SA, who filed an Application with the Constitutional Court for direct access, as a Pauperis Propria Persona / Litigant in Person; for a [I] writ of Habeus Mentem and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review.

The Application was filed against 88 respondents: (a) three administrators of the SA Press Council; (v) SANEF and its chairman: Mr. Makhanya, (c) 36 SANEF and related media publications and their respective editors, managerial officials; (d) eight Media Professors from Univ. of Rhodes and Wits Journalism faculty departments; (e) Media Monitoring Africa: Mr. William Bird; and finally (f) Projourn Steering Committee.

Radical Honesty SA v. SANEF Press Council, et al: Radical Honesty takes 88 SA Media Elite to Concourt for Censorship of Media Corruption

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

On 03 January 2011, Lara Johnstone and Radical Honesty SA filed an Application with the Constitutional Court for direct access, as a Pauperis Propria Persona / Litigant in Person; for a [I] writ of Habeus Mentem and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review.

The Application was filed against 88 respondents: (a) three administrators of the SA Press Council; (v) SANEF and its chairman: Mr. Makhanya, (c) 36 SANEF and related media publications and their respective editors, managerial officials; (d) eight Media Professors from Univ. of Rhodes and Wits Journalism faculty departments; (e) Media Monitoring Africa: Mr. William Bird; and finally (f) Projourn Steering Committee.

Ms. Martie Stander, registrar of the Constitutional Court tentatively accepted the documentation, requesting that the Proof of Service documentation be filed with the Court, prior to any Reference Number could be issued.

On 14 January 2011, Ms. Stander and the Director of the Concourt were provided with the Proof of Service documentation proving that Radical Honesty SA had provided all the respondents with their Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit documentation.

Know Your TRC-Reconciliation-Fraud History: Liberation Theology, Kairos, White Guilt, and Black Victimology Power

[Great Tribal Forgetting: Salvation from Law of Limited Competition] :: [Black Liberation Mythology & Black Power] :: [Liberating Black Victim Theology] :: [Black Liberation Theology: Kairos & Reconciliation] :: [The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology] :: [See also at Jus Sanguinis: Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Briefing Paper: [B] Politically Incorrect Truths About Apartheid Conflict: (6) Black Consciousness & Fanon’s Handbook for Black Liberation: ‘Violence as a cleansing Liberating Force’; [C] Rainbow Illusions: Truth and Reconciliation Fraud: (1) TRC Social Contract provides NO Definitions for Multi-Cultural Multi-Interpretation of Key Concepts of Forgiveness, Reconciliation, Closure and Ubuntu; (3) Black Liberation Theology: Salvation/Liberation by Marxist/Fanon Class Struggle, not Reconciliation/Forgiveness of Sins, and (5) Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done; by the Ubuntu Black Liberation Theology Truth Commission?]

“With complete freedom in reproduction, conscientious people will be eliminated.”
-- Garrett Hardin, The Feast of Malthus: Living within Limits

“What becomes of the surplus of human life? It is either, 1st. destroyed by infanticide, as among the Chinese and Lacedemonians; or 2d. it is stifled or starved, as among other nations whose population is commensurate to its food; or 3d. it is consumed by wars and endemic diseases; or 4th. it overflows, by emigration, to places where a surplus of food is attainable.”
-- James Madison, 1791, U.S. President

In the fourth century A.D., one of the Fathers of the Christian church, Tertullian, a Montanist preached the social contract counsels of strict ascetism and chastity, warning his flock to transform the human condition of their sexuality from the ‘state of nature’, to one constrained by ethical conscience. He clearly warned how in a world addicted to warlike breeding, excess populations were culled either by mother nature’s plagues or ‘Conquer and Multiply’ Power and Domination addict resource wars, as proverbial cannon fodder.

In a book review of the The Ostrich Factor: Our Population Myopia, Garrett Hardin writes that Tertullian shocked many traditionalists over the centuries, in a passage where he asked, why is the human population so vast [perhaps 150 million at that time] that we are a burden to the earth, which can scarcely provide for our needs? In a short passage of De Anima, Tertullian explained the very real value of events that are customarily viewed with dismay.

What most frequently meets our view (and occasions complaint), is our teeming population: our numbers are burdensome to the world, which can hardly supply us from its natural elements; our wants grow more and more keen, and our complaints more bitter in all mouths, whilst Nature fails in affording us her usual sustenance. In very deed, pestilence, and famine, and wars, and earthquakes have to be regarded as a remedy for nations, as the means of pruning the luxuriance of the human race....”

According to Hardin, Tertullian was thinking in terms of ecological limits and carrying capacity. The paramount assumption of practical population theory (toward the expression of which both Tertullian and Malthus were struggling) can be added to an Ecological Decalogue:

“Thou shalt not transgress the carrying capacity.”

Radical Honesty White Refugee Complaint to SA Press Council

CC: Dr. S. Cwele, Minister of State Security
CC: Mr. Cecil Burgess, Chairperson of the Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence
CC: All Concourt #23-10 Parties in The Citizen v Robert McBride.


Complainant: Lara Johnstone, First Amicus in Concourt # 23-10


Respondents: Editors:

Business Day; Business Report; Cape Times; Cape Argus; Citizen; Daily News; Daily Dispatch; East Cape Radio; Mail and Guardian; Pretoria News; The Mercury; South African Press Association (SAPA); The Star; Sunday Independent; Sunday Tribune; Times Live/Sunday Times.

Issues covered in this Complaint:

[A] Complaint Publications and Dates of Publication

[B] Courts Reliance on Media to Inform Public’s Right to Know

[C] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1; 1.2 and 1.3

[D] SANEF’s Editors Censorship & Bias: Negligent or Intentional?

[E] Difference between Media ‘Murderer McBride’ Defamation & Citizen’s Sincere ‘Murderer McBride’ Truth-Telling: Gatekeeper Access to National Discourse & ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ corporate profits.

[F] Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS (CAS 823-08-2010) against 22 SANEF editors: Bribery Conspiracy to Censor & Obstruct Administration of Ecolaw Concourt Justice:

[G] Media Editors Censorship & Bias of Issues before Concourt Hearing of 29 Sep 2010

[H] Editors Malicious Contempt for Culture of Sincere Forgiveness

[I] Is SANEF Media Corruption Greater than ANC Corruption?

[J] Newsworthy Inspirational Significance of Concourt’s (a) Approval of Radical Honesty SA’s ‘little guy citizen’s’ Amicus Application; (b) Possible Commitment to Sincere Truth and Reconciliation by enquiry into Radical Honesty SA’s TRC fraud Amicus arugments?

Excerpts: Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala - A Soldier's Story, by Mwezi Twala

Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala - A Soldier's Story, by Ed Bernard and Mwezi Twala [*Amazon*]

Further below are excerpts from Mwezi Twala's book: Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala - A Soldier's Story. Herewith two preface perspectives:

In Women in the ANC and SWAPO: sexual abuse of young women in the ANC camps, by Olefile Samuel Mngqibisa, October 1993, Searchlight South Africa, No 11, Pages 11-16 (PDF); Olefile Samuel Mngqibisa, a former soldier in the ANC's Umkhonto we Sizwe, describes the education of an Mbokodo officer in a poem which he presented to the Commission of Inquiry into human rights abuses in ANC detention camps, chaired by Mr Sam Motsuenyane.

Give a young boy — 16 years old — from the ghetto of Soweto, an
opportunity to drive a car for the first time in his life.
This boy is from a poor working class family.
Give him money to buy any type of liquor and good, expensive clothes.
This boy left South Africa during the Soweto schools uprising in 1976.
He doesn't know what is an employer.
He never tasted employer-exploitation.
Give him the right to sleep with all these women.
Give him the opportunity to study in Party Schools and well-off
military academies in Eastern Europe.
Teach him Marxism-Leninism and tell him to defend the revolution
against counter-revolutionaries.
Send him to the Stasi to train him to extract information by force from
enemy agents. He turns to be a torturer and executioner by firing
squad.
All these are the luxuries and the dream-come-true he never thought
of for his lifetime...
This Security becomes the law unto itself.

In Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala - A Soldier's Story, Mwezi Twala writes:

Complaint to SAPS against City Press, for Criminal Defamation & Fraud; RE: ‘Rightwing group tries to scupper Reitz trial’

Audi Alteram Partem: Complaint to SAPS against City Press, for Criminal Defamation & Fraud; RE: “Rightwing group tries to scupper Reitz trial” article

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

I filed a complaint with the South African Police (SAPS): Criminal Charges: Malicious Defamation and Fraud (CAS: 180-08-2010)

Accused:

1. City Press Newspaper: Charge: Defamation
   
2. City Press Editor: Ms. Ferial Haffajee: Charge: Defamation
   
3. City Press Journalist: Ms. Khadija Bradlow: Charge: Defamation and Fraud
   
4. City Press Alleged Anonymous Source Known only as: ‘Senior Legal Figure Present in Court’: Charge: Defamation

Plaintiff:

• Lara Johnstone, personal capacity; and on behalf of Radical Honesty – SA.

Defamation Publication Details:

• Rightwing group tries to scupper Reitz trial , published: 2010-07-30 12:45, by Khadija Bradlow, City Press

Complaint Affidavit states as follows:

I am a 43 year old adult female unemployed paralegal, who sells wormeries and organic compost to make a very simple living. (Additional Info in Annex F: Heads of Argument: para 2, 3 & 4).

Save where appears from the context, the facts contained in this affidavit are within my own personal knowledge and are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, both true and correct.

I am the only member – to my knowledge – of the Radical Honesty culture and religion currently living in South Africa (Annex: A: CCT 23-10: Concourt Chief Justice Order: 03 May 2010: Amicus Directions: Lara Johnstone: Member Radical Honesty Culture and Religion (p.2) (PDF).

White Refugee Amicus to Concourt: ‘TRC is guilty of fraud and falsifying history’

Excerpts from White Refugee's
First Amicus Filed in Concourt

TRC FRAUD: ‘CRIME OF APARTHEID’ FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY

• Negligent or Intentional Avoidance of Key Concept Definitions?
  
• Amnesty Meaning Changed without Due Process?
  
• Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done?
  
• Did ‘Evil Apartheid’ raise Black living standards to Highest in Africa?
  
• Apartheid: Crime Against Humanity; or Just War for Demographic Survival?
  
• Nature & Causes of Apartheid: A Just War for Demographic Survival?
  
• Farm Murders: A Rainbow TRC Peace, or Racial Hatred War Reality?

IV: TRC FRAUD: ‘CRIME OF APARTHEID’ FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY

“The commission also said that there could be no healing without truth, that half-truths and denial were no basis for building the new South Africa, that reconciliation based on falsehood would not last, and that selective recollection of past violence would easily provide the mobilisation for further conflict in the future. If these are its criteria for the role of truth in promoting reconciliation, it has failed to meet them.”
-- John Kane-Berman, The Truth About the Truth Commission

Apartheid Revisited & the M.A.D. Road to GlobalCorpse Serfdom: Greece Puts Islands Up for Sale, California Soon to Follow

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Further Below are two articles: (i) Greece Starts Putting Island Land Up for Sale to Save Economy: Desperate attempt to repay debts also driven by inability to find funds to develop infrastructure on islands, and (ii) California on 'verge of system failure’: Golden State, like many others, is nearly bankrupt and desperately needs a bailout.

They demonstrate the cause and effect endgame March of Corporate Cannibalism: (i) the result of Greece overspending on its Welfare Politicians, Corporations and Citizens, now means the Greek Goverment has decided -- as per the orders of the German Gov. -- to sell its Assets to pay its debts, i.e. islands to Rich People Corporations; and (ii) California's impending bankruptcy due to overspending on its Welfare Corporations, Citizens and Immigrants, soon to sell its National Parks and Air Force Bases to Corporations?

They provide an 'In Your Face' example of the End Game, of the Corporate & Economic Growth Conquer & Multiply Memeplex, which works hand-in-hand with the Population Growth Conquer & Multiply Memeplex, the end growth documented in Mencken -- Licensed to Breed DieOff -- Monkeylaw Prophets.

Mencken – Licenced to Breed DieOff – Monkeylaw Prophets

[Peak Population] :: [Pop: Resource Wars] :: [Pop: Exponential Growth]

Licensed to breed

Published: 8/12/2009 19:57:18
by Michael Coetzee, The Citizen’s Chief Sub Editor

James Bond has one that allows him to kill, drivers of cars are supposed to always have one on them, and gun owners are constantly complaining about how difficult it is to get or renew one.

While it may indeed often be an inconvenience to obtain them, licences play a very useful role in regulating the ownership and use of dangerous and potentially lethal tools such as vehicles and firearms.

Few would deny that it’s a good idea people should obtain licences before being allowed to pilot a few tons of metal down the highway at 120km/h, or that it should be ascertained whether someone has a criminal record or is mentally unstable before they are allowed to own and carry a lethal weapon.

It seems there is pretty much a consensus that when it comes to things that have the possibility to injure, kill or in any other way negatively impact the lives of people or society in general, regulation is desirable.

Considering this, there is one sort of licence that is conspicuous by its absence: a licence to breed.

Or procreate, to use the more acceptable term, for people seem to get quite upset when the rather mundane event of a human giving birth to a child is referred to in any way other than with the respect and awe usually reserved for describing some religious experience.

MK's Mbokodo & Complaint by SADF Generals to Public Protector of TRC Handling of SADF - January 1998

Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala: A soldier's story, Ed Benard and Mwezi Twala (1994) The Battle for Rhodesia, by Douglas Reed (1966) Zulu Kings and their Armies, J Sutherland & D Canwell (2004) Commando Courageous - A Boer's Diary, by R. W. Schikkerling (1964) Great Battles of History - The Zulu War - Isandhlwana and Rorke's Driftt, Rupert Furneaux, (1963)

Give a young boy — 16 years old — from the ghetto of Soweto, an
opportunity to drive a car for the first time in his life.
This boy is from a poor working class family.
Give him money to buy any type of liquor and good, expensive clothes.
This boy left South Africa during the Soweto schools uprising in 1976.
He doesn't know what is an employer.
He never tasted employer-exploitation.
Give him the right to sleep with all these women.
Give him the opportunity to study in Party Schools and well-off
military academies in Eastern Europe.
Teach him Marxism-Leninism and tell him to defend the revolution
against counter-revolutionaries.
Send him to the Stasi to train him to extract information by force from
enemy agents. He turns to be a torturer and executioner by firing
squad.
All these are the luxuries and the dream-come-true he never thought
of for his lifetime...
This Security becomes the law unto itself.
-- Olefile Samuel Mngqibisa, a former soldier in the ANC army Umkhonto we Sizwe, describes the education of an Mbokodo officer, which he presented to the Commission of Inquiry into human rights abuses in ANC detention camps, chaired by Mr Sam Motsuenyane. (Women in the ANC and SWAPO: sexual abuse of young women in the ANC camps, by Olefile Samuel Mngqibisa, October 1993, Searchlight South Africa, No 11, Pages 11-16 (PDF))