‘Huntley accomplished ‘African White Refugee’ objectives’ - Russel Kaplan

Russell Kaplan
Former Attorney for Brandon Huntley

I have been contacted by reporters already who have asked me for my reaction to the Huntley ruling on November 24, 2010. Having gone through the entire refugee claim myself and through the entire judicial review proceeding (the “appeal”) with co-counsel Mr. Galati, here is my reaction.


Mr. Huntley had two objectives when he brought his refugee claim:

1. That he finds protection in Canada and
   
   
2. That he informs the world what a sickly place South Africa is for many white South Africans.

As far as his first objective is concerned, Mr. Huntley is still in Canada. He has an opportunity for a new hearing and also some other remedies that can ensure his safety in Canada.

As far as his second objective is concerned, in my view, he has succeeded. This case has contributed towards placing the plight of many white South Africans in South Africa on the world stage. Further, the court clearly and expressly stated that while the evidentiary foundation might have been lacking in Mr. Huntley’s case, in another case, a white South African could qualify for refugee protection. You need to go no further than paragraph 234 of the decision to realize this. For convenience, paragraph 234 is reproduced below:

IMM-4423-09: Judge James Russell 24 November 2010 Ruling: Min. of Immig. v. Brandon Huntley

See also: Your Right2Know: 140 SA Elite Confirm: Kill African Whitey Refugees. It’s the Right Thing to Do...

Judge Russell considers Amnesty International to be an 'independent' body! This is the same Amnesty International, who had so little 'independent critical thinking faculties' that when the ANC were torturing, murdering, and executing their own ANC members in Camp Quatro, etc; Amnesty International REFUSED TO MAKE ANY INVESTIGATION.

Only when Amnesty International were threatened to be exposed as ENDORSING THE MURDER, EXECUTION AND TORTURE OF THE ANC AT CAMP QUATRO, by the socialist democratic publication Searchlight South Africa -- THE ONLY LIBERAL NEWS PUBLICATION THAT OBJECTED TO THE ANC'S TORTURE, MURDER AND EXECUTION OF THEIR OWN ANC MEMBERS -- did they finally issue their report -- a verbatim copy of Searchlight South Africa's findings -- about ANC atrocities.

Unlike Dr. Brad Blanton; Amnesty International have REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO MAKE ANY ENQUIRY INTO FARM MURDERS, OR ANY BLACK ON WHITE CRIME IN SA.

Judge Russell clearly is CLUELESS about racial reality in South Africa. He may be a Judge, but when it comes to RACE REALITY in S.Africa, he is the village idiot. Not his fault, his experience of racial realities is that of Canada and England; NOT SOUTH AFRICA.

Judge Russell rules in favour of the Gov's Review application; and refers Huntley's Application for Refugee status, to be re-heard in a new hearing.

READ/SIGN: WHY WE ARE WHITE REFUGEES PETITION!

IMM-4423-09: Applicants Reply Memorandum: Min of Citizenship & Immigration and Brandon C. Huntley

Of course there was political pressure. If this had been a non-white applying, the ANC wouldn't have paid any notice but since this was a white man making the statement that the new ANC-utopia was all but a haven of brotherly love, the ANC regime immediately objected and only AFTER the objections from the South African government did the Canadian government announce that it would appeal. The time line of events is quite clear.

The Canadian government has rubbished Brandon Huntley's claims that it was pressurised into challenging his "white crime refugee" status by South African authorities.

Lawyers for Canadian Immigration Minister Jason Kenney maintain that the judgment that gave Huntley asylum, on the basis of the alleged persecution he suffered as a white South African, was so ludicrous that they could not let it stand.

IMM-4423-09: 'Canada' vs. Huntley: Respondents Memorandum of Fact and Law

“Immediately following the positive decision, reaction from the South African government was swift and hostile, and that government threatened that diplomatic relations would be threatened, if the decision were not reversed. The decision was further termed “racist” and “in support of Apartheid.”

-- Stefanie Gude, Assistant of Mr. Rocco Galati, Huntley's Review Lawyer

“[H]ad it not been for the explosive, hostile, and “racist” - allegation - ridden pressure of the South African government, and the public diplomatic threats made, and allegations of “racism”, that the Minister would not seek judicial review of such a decision, which rests on anemic factual complaints on evidence and factual issue(s) of effective state protection, tied to the extreme, conceded facts of Mr Huntley's ordeal, in what he suffered by way of physical attack(s).”

-- Amina Sherazee, Barrister and Solicitor, practicing exclusively in Immigration and Refugee Law.

IMM-4423-09: 'Canada' vs. Huntley: Affidavit of Amina Sherazee, in Support of Respondents (Huntley) Memorandum of Fact and Law

“[H]ad it not been for the explosive, hostile, and “racist” - allegation - ridden pressure of the South African government, and the public diplomatic threats made, and allegations of “racism”, that the Minister would not seek judicial review of such a decision, which rests on anemic factual complaints on evidence and factual issue(s) of effective state protection, tied to the extreme, conceded facts of Mr Huntley's ordeal, in what he suffered by way of physical attack(s).”

-- Amina Sherazee, Barrister and Solicitor, practicing exclusively in Immigration and Refugee Law.

IMM-4423-09: 'Canada' vs. Huntley: Affidavit of Stefanie Gude, in Support of Respondents (Huntley) Memorandum of Fact and Law

“Immediately following the positive decision, reaction from the South African government was swift and hostile, and that government threatened that diplomatic relations would be threatened, if the decision were not reversed. The decision was further termed “racist” and “in support of Apartheid.”

-- Stefanie Gude, Assistant of Mr. Rocco Galati, Huntley's Review Lawyer

Official response to Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism on the Brandon Huntley case

By Mike Smith

“Reports emanating from the Institute for Race Relations (IRR) indicated that about a fifth of white South Africans had immigrated over the past 10 years with the main reasons given by immigrants were crime and affirmative action, so said Democratic Alliance leader Tony Leon in Cape Town. He accuses the ANC government of being indifferent to the lot of minorities, especially whites, and has expressed hostility to their interest” » » » » Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB): 27 August 2009 ruling: Brandon Huntley

The Canadian Government in the form of minister of Citizenship, Immigration, and Multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, is seeking a review against their own Immigration and Refugee Board’s decision to grant Brandon Huntley refugee status and compiled a “Memorandum of Argument” (PDF) slamming their own IRB.


Having read their memo, I have to conclude that I have in my entire life never seen such vague liberal and politically correct propaganda that smacks of confirmation bias, one-sidedness and partiality. It is enough to make one wants to vomit.


It is clear that this squad of blinkered egalitarian cultural relativists in the Canadian government has made up their mind long before they drew up their MOA and had absolutely no interest in the facts presented to them about South Africa, but chose to side with the Marxist, socialist academics and terrorist sympathisers who drew up an open letter full of lies and untruths that can be seen here Liberal Academic lies in an open letter to Canada

Memorandum of Argument: Min. of Citizenship & Immigration and Brandon Huntley

Transcript of the Memorandum of Argument: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Mr. Jason Kenney) vs. Brandon Huntley.

Why We Are White Refugees response: Official response to Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism on the Brandon Huntley case, by Mike Smith

SA Media Bias & Canada Seeks Huntley Case Review

Given reporters' penchant for proclaiming to "tell both sides," to render all the news that's fit to print, to answer who? what? where? when? and why?, this leads naturally to the question: Why do reporters avoid the population issue so steadfastly? » » » » How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, University of Southwestern Louisiana

The liberal South African media are cheerleading Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Hon. Jason Kenney's Memorandum of Argument (PDF), in the Canadian Goverments Application for Review, of Immigration and Refugee Board, Mr. William Davis' decision (PDF).

Taking a look at their pages, they all provide links to the 142 Academics Open Letter to Canada (PDF), distancing themselves from Huntley as a 'racist' and alleging that there is no racially motivated crime in South Africa, nor that white South Africans feel particularly targetted. This was subsequently debunked: 142 Academics Get It Wrong on Crime (PDF); but none of these mainstream news media, make any effort whatsoever to attempt to even pretend they are trying to be impartial, and providing for all views to be heard.

Both aforementioned documents, and the latters evidentiary documents to substantiate its debunking claims against the Academics, were submitted to Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Mr. Jason Kenney, as Respondent Ten, in High Court, Western Cape: #19963-09, Application for Review, with particular reference to [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa's Unrepresented White Refugees (PDF) (PDF:Proof of Service).

White Refugee Documents Legally submitted to High Court, Western Cape & Federal Court, Canada

by Lara Johnstone

In a Notice of Intention: Application for Leave and for Judicial Review, filed with the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape, Capetown, on 22 September 2009, I cited the Minister of Citizenship, Canada, and the Nobel Institute, Norwegian Nobel Committee as Respondents Nine and Ten, requesting them to take notice of the State of Effective Emergency, regarding South Africa's Unrepresented White Refugees.

Other respondents in the matter, include, among others, Respondent Two: The Director of National Prosecutions; Three: Hon. Patricia de Lille; Four: Former President Thabo Mbeki; Five: Former NPA Nat. Director, Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka; Six: Former SAPS Commissoner Jackie Selebi; Seven: Former Min. of Corrections BM Skosana; and Eight: Former President Nelson Mandela.

Specifically, the Notice requests Respondents Nine and Ten, to take particular notice of the White Refugee Issues cited, under the Notice of Intention's points, [10], [11], [12] and [13], among others:

[10] For the Record: State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees: The Tyranny, Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the State, has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended, as a result of corruption, incompetence and indifference. South Africa is heading towards a socio-economic, political and military failed state of Zimbabwefication. For example, South African Law Commission Issue Paper Six, alleged the Criminal Justice System to have a severe Legitimacy and Inefficiency Crisis, in that:

1. Communities are intimidated by the legal system, and ignorant of how it works.
   
2. Legal representation is inadequate and discriminatory.
   
3. Legal aid has not been able to serve its intended purpose.
   
4. The justice system's inaccessibility means it is perceived as illegitimate, ineffective, unfriendly, resulting in alternative dispute resolution whether legal or illegal.
   
5. Unnecessary complexities brought into access to justice and the mystifying language used.

[10a] Since 18 June 2002, the Applicant has accused Official Legislative, Judicial and Executive Officers of the State that their actions of commission and omission have, and continue to, demonstrate an intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests; by implementing policies which negligently, intentionally and deliberately foster and support criminal activity, ethnic and social conflict, tyranny and anarchy.

[10b] The repeated response from these State authorities, to these allegations was simply more actions of commission and omission unwillingness and indifference to its constitutional social contract duties and responsibilities; including repeatedly, by Respondents Two to Eight.

Federal Court: Review Application: Min. of Citizenship & Immigration and Brandon Carl Huntley

Federal Court of Canada:

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Brandon Carl Huntley

Application for Leave and for Judicial Review

Court File No. IMA 4423-09

FEDERAL COURT

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

and

BRANDON CARL HUNTLEY

Respondent

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE AND FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

TO THE RESPONDENT:

AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO COMMENCE AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER S 72(1) OF THE IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT has been commenced by the applicant.

UNLESS A JUDGE OTHERWISE DIRECTS, THIS APPLICATON FOR LEAVE will be disposed of without personal appearance by the parties, in accordance with paragraph 72(2)(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION FOR LEAVE, you or a solicitor authorized to practice in Canada and acting for you must immediately prepare a Notice of Appearance in Form IR-2 prescribed by the Federal Court Immigration and Refugee Proteciton Rules, serve it on the tribunal and the applicants solicitor or, where the applicant does not have a solicitor, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof after service, at the Registry, within 10 days of service of this application for leave.

Press Release, from Russel Kaplan, Counsel for Mr. Huntley

Press Release:

From: Russel Kaplan,

Counsel for Mr. Huntley

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – September 7, 2009

1. There are "Brandon Huntley" stories from all over the world coming in every single day. They are all consistent in one thing: Mr. Huntley's story is real. The support is unbelievable. Personal stories of fear, by white South Africans, based on the colour of their skin, and of atrocities suffered by them and their family members and friends, because they are white, keep streaming in. Many have left South Africa already. Others still remain in South Africa.