No More Harems: The Hidden History of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Feminism

No More Harems: The Hidden History of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Feminism: The battle for women's rights is central to the battle for Europe and for western values.

“It’s not a question of Islam or Christianity, East or West, democracy, justice or freedom,” my father always told me. “It is a question of power. It is a question of modern day colonialism of countries for money and natural resources and the corruption of the Muslim government betraying their people,” Asra Quratulain Nomani, Standing Alone in Mecca, page 44.

Phyllis Chesler | Pajamas Media | October 4, 2011

I love Muslim and ex-Muslim feminist women. They are so earthy, womanly, passionate, knowledgeable, beautiful, and eloquent — so emotionally present, so incredibly brave. Smitten? I guess I am, I always have been — ever since I began moving in Muslim circles 50 years ago.

Take Tunisia's minister for women's affairs. Amidst the mayhem and madness, Lilia Labidi just up and walked out of the United Nations meeting. Unlike Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was "waxing enthusiastic about the success of the Arab uprisings," Labidi's "giddy exposure to the UN rapidly dissipated. Her own appeal to the gathering (of powerful women presidents and secretary of states) for help in consolidating gains for women in Tunisia elicited little reaction."

And so, Labidi decided to go home. She said: "I cannot live here in such luxury," and she noted that her $700.00 a day cost of staying in New York "would be better spent on a project for rural women." Labidi was offended, frustrated, that the entire UN seemed to care only about the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" and had absolutely no interest in the needs of women, neither in Tunisia nor anywhere else.

AntiShyster Alfred Adask - The American Woman, You're Only Cattle to the Elite & Declaration of Independence

“AntiShyster” defined:
Black’s Law Dictionary defines “shyster” as “one who carries on any business, especially a legal business, in a dishonest way. An unscrupulous practitioner who
disgraces his profession by doing mean work, and resorts to sharp practice to do it.” Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines “shyster” as “one who is professionally unscrupulous esp. in the practice of law or politics.” For the purposes of this publication, a “shyster” is a dishonest attorney or politician, i.e., one who lies. An “AntiShyster”, therefore, is a person, an institution, or in this case, a news magazine that stands in sharp opposition to lies and to professional liars, especially in the arenas of law and politics.

Legal Advice:
The ONLY legal advice this publication offers is this: Any attempt to cope with our modern judicial system must be tempered with the sure and certain knowledge that “law” is always a crapshoot. That is, nothing (not even brown paper bags filled with hundred dollar bills and handed to the judge) will absolutely guarantee your victory in a judicial trial or administrative hearing. The most you can hope for is to improve the probability that you may win. Therefore, DO NOT DEPEND ON THE ARTICLES OR ADVERTISEMENTS IN THIS PUBLICATION to illustrate anything more than the opinions or experiences of others trying to escape, survive, attack or even make sense of “the best judicial system in the world”. But don’t be discouraged; there’s not another foolproof publication on law in the entire USA – except the Bible.

Big Government’s Goin’ Down

• I suspect the decentralizing forces of the internet are “melting, melting!” the power of central government.
  
• I am persuaded that there are two “kinds” of government and attempt to clarify that conviction by defining one government (the good one) as “Federal” while the other (“evil twin”) as “National”.
  
• I am absolutely convinced that there are several kinds of citizenship. If you don’t understand each variety of citizenship, you can’t know the rights and disabilities that attach to each. Without that understanding, your mere agreement to being a “citizen” can be hazardous to your health.

The cause of this hazardous predicament is, finally, our own. We’ve trusted government to tend to our rights and citizenship for so long, that we’ve lost the vital understanding of our own legal capacity. This lack of knowledge causes Biblical people to perish and secular people to pay exorbitant taxes and be regularly jailed in administrative hearings rather than judicial trials. In a world of public schools and mainstream media control, self-education may be the only road to freedom. This publication reports the educational progress of myself and other like-minded individuals. If the idea of citizenship interests you, you may find this edition of the AntiShyster fascinating.

The American Woman - Alfred Adask, Anti-Shyster [01/04] [02/04] [03/04] [04/04]