CNN delete IReport: "African EcoFeminist: Trayvon Martin Case has White Guilt Foxy Liberal America by the short and curlies"

CNN delete IReport: "African EcoFeminist: Trayvon Martin Case has White Guilt Foxy Liberal America by the short and curlies"

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 28 March 2012

The following article was posted to CNN IReport: African EcoFeminist: Trayvon Martin Case has White Guilt Foxy Liberal America by the short and curlies and processed at: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-767965. However as soon as CNN's IReport Team read the report, and its four images [01][02][03][04], they deactivated it, and now it simply says: "Story Not Available: This content is currently unavailable." No further reasons have been provided for CNN deactivating and censoring the IReport.

African EcoFeminist: Trayvon Martin Case has White Guilt Foxy Liberal America by the short and curlies

"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. The white conservatives aren't friends of the Negro either, but they at least don't try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the "smiling" fox." -- Malcolm X, New York City, December 4, 1963

“If a genie were to appear on the beach promising to end racism forever, the Democrats would be in a foot race with Sharpton and Jackson to see who could cut his throat first....” - Wang Newton

Inst. Adv. of Journalism Ex.Dir: Michael Schmidt: 'Media ignore 'Hate Crimes' to Boers; avoid linking 'Kill Boer' to actual Killing of Farmers/Boers'

Institute for Advancement of Journalism: Executive Director's personal belifes are that the 'Media ignore and self-censor racially motivated 'Hate Crimes' to Boers

29 February 2012 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee

Michael Schmidt is the Executive Director for the Institute for the Advancement of Journalism. In an article written in his personal capacity for Anarkismo.net: Death and the Mielieboer: The Eugène Terre’Blanche Murder & Poor-White Canon-fodder in South Africa, Michael states among other things that:

• [so-called'] 'anti-racists' around the world celebrated the murder of Terreblanche;
  
• the Boers are "the only white settlers on the African continent, who self-identified en masse as Afrikaners, as Africans, not Europeans, who severed their ties to their distant motherlands" (For the British-backed English-speaking elites, the mining bosses and big land-owners, this closeness was worrisome; something had to be done to divide and rule them.);
  
• "the viciousness which accompanies many killings belies purely criminal motive";
  
• the "extreme violence committed on the Boers is almost totally ignored by the mainstream media which props up the statist-democratic farce";
  
• "Only with Terre’Blanche’s death is the mainstream belatedly making a tentative link between ANC hate speech calling for the killing of the Boers and, well, the actual killing of Boers."

He provides an excellent example:

"In one grim example, when two elderly white women in a small Free State town were gang-raped a year ago, allegedly by a black gang, tortured to death and the severed breast of one woman used to paint anti-white slogans on the wall, not a single media outlet named this a hate crime. Only one newspaper even covered the atrocity, the Afrikaans-language Volksblad – and then only to decry the “hate-speech” of the women’s traumatised relatives calling for a return of the death penalty for murder".

PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) ICC TRC Fraud Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal

PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) ICC TRC Fraud Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 29 November 2011

From: JusSanguinis
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:33 PM
To: Job Cohen; Job Cohen - PvdA; Geert Wilders - Tweedekamer; Geert Wilders - PVV; NL SGP - Kees van der Staaij; Kees van der Staaij (SGP); Mark Rutte (VVD); Mark Rutte (VVD) Tweedekamer
Cc: Netherlands Consul Capetown; Netherlands Embassy Pretoria; Jurgens, Wouter; SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers; Sadhia Rafi - Vluchtelingenwerk; Prof. Gerard-René de Groot; Elona Bokshi: ECRE Exec & Proj Off; Martin Watson - ECRE Advocacy; Adv. M Wladimiroff.
Subject: PM Mark Rutte, c/o NL Amb de Vos; RE: (1) Charges filed with Amsterdam Politie, (2) Request for Written Reasons from Min. Rosenthal

Prime Minister Mark Rutte

CC: HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa

Prime Minister Rutte,

On 23 November 2011 I filed a complaint to Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland of charges of fraud against Algemene Dagblad Editor: Casper Naber; C/O & VIA: Ambassador de Vos, Netherlands Embassy, Pretoria.

CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: Relevant Dutch Anti-Corruption law, in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption


Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

On 24 November and 25 November I requested Ambassador de Vos to confirm receipt, and to honourably inform me that he had forwarded my complaint to the Amsterdam Politie, to provide me with the relevant contact details, so that I could get a reference number.

Could you please confirm that you have honourably and professionally forwarded the complaint to the Amsterdam-Amstelland Politie, as requested; so that I can be issued a Complaint Reference Number for the matter; to report it to the ICC Prosecutor’s office, et al.

I also have not yet received the reply from Minister Rosenthal in response to: Request for (A) Written Reasons; or (B) Parliamentary Hearing: Request Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (I) Provide Full Written Reasons clarifying the alleged errors of fact or of law made in the Jus Sanguinis Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Netherlands (& EU Progenitor) Governments; or (II) Recommend Dutch or EU Parliament to hold a hearing on the Jus Sanguinis Petition issues to EU Stamvader nations to hear the available International and South African Expert Witness testimony, to determine (a) the factual and legal accuracy and if so seriousness of the issues raised in the Jus Sanguinis petition; and (b) consider all relevant options for resolving the issues; such as amending relevant (i) Foreign Policy laws by politically endorsing a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; and/or (ii) Nationality laws by enacting Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation for their African White Refugee 'settler' descendants, to return to their progenitors motherland/s. (PDF)

Does Minister Rosenthal ever intend providing any written reasons or a response; or how do Netherlands politicians conduct their political problem solving relationships? Do you just ignore any complaint that contradicts your political correct ideologies? If not, when may I expect a response from Minister Rosenthal?

Ambassador de Vos and Netherlands Embassy staff do not consider me worthy of honourable professional response.

Could you please clarify whether the Dutch Government ever intends to provide any honourable response to these matters; or whether you are just going to ignore these requests, as if they do not exist, and you never received them?

Are charges of FRAUD and CORRUPTION irrelevant in the Netherlands when such charges are made against Newspaper editors and journalists?

Are journalists and editors ABOVE THE LAW in the Netherlands?

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr


Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Pres. B. Obama; c/o & via: USA Emb, Pta: ICC-TRC FRAUD NYT Complaint, Incompetent US Embassy Staff, Gen. McChrystal & Project BW.PHI.618 AL'QANOON

Pres. B. Obama; c/o & via: USA Emb, Pta: ICC-TRC FRAUD NYT Complaint, Incompetent US Embassy Staff, Gen. McChrystal & Project BW.PHI.618 AL'QANOON

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 29 November 2011

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:57 PM
To: United States Embassy
Cc: Celia Dugger - NYT-Africa; Arthur Brisbane - Public Editor; SPJ: Joe Skeel; McChrystal Group; Blackwater/XE; CENTCOM Insp. Gen.; Col. Bo Gritz; Dep Judge Adv Gen, US Navy; Karen Kiwatkowski; Kremlin Press Office; NATO Public Information Office; US Army Unified Quest: Lawrence Fowler; US Army Environmental Command
Subject: Pres. B. Obama; c/o & via: USA Embassy, Pretoria: ICC-TRC FRAUD NYT Complaint, Incompetent US Embassy Staff, Project BW.PHI.618 AL'QANOON

President Barrack Obama

c/o & via:
United States of America Embassy
Ambassador: HE Mr DH Gips
PO Box 9536, PRETORIA, 0001
877 Pretorius Street, Arcadia, PRETORIA
Tel: (012) 431 4000 / After Hrs 082 285 2341
Fax: (012) 342 2299 / 2199

President Obama,

On 23 November 2011 I filed a complaint to Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, NYPD; against the New York Times: Public Editor: Arthur Brisbane and Africa Bureau Chief: Celia Dugger.

CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: New York Penal Law Code Article 460: Enterprise Corruption and relevant law in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption


Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

On 24 November and 25 November I requested Ambassador Gips to confirm receipt, and to honourably inform me that he had forwarded my complaint to the NYPD, to provide me with the relevant NYPD contact, so that I could get a reference number.

Unfortunately your Ambassador and his Pretoria Embassy staff appear to be either (A) petrified of the New York Times, (B) corrupt cowardly motherfuckers; or (C) don’t provide Embassy services to honourable, honest professional Radical Honoursty world citizens (demonstrating they only serve lying corrupt cowards); (D) a combination of all of the above.

If these fuckers at the US Embassy in Pretoria cannot even forward a goddamn fucking complaint to the New York Police Department (which I imagine the most incompetent nigger post office master in Detroit could do); how the fuck am I supposed to communicate with such incompetent unprofessional dishonourable individuals in regards to: PROJECT BW.PHI.618 ALQANOON.

If you remove your most competent staff – for example General Stanley McChrystal – how the fuck do you expect to get any of your goals accomplished, with incompetent liberal arse kissing fuckwits? Or were you never serious about accomplishing any of the tasks you appointed McChrystal to do? Was it all just political PR BULLSHIT THE PUBLIC about Afghanistan, and McChrystal was TOO SERIOUS, TOO COMPETENT AND TOO PROFESSIONAL ABOUT GETTING THE JOB DONE? So you had to get rid of him?

If you are sincere about PROJECT BW.PHI.618 AL QANOON, I suggest you appoint General McChrstyal as US Ambassador in Pretoria, he can sort out the incompetent fuckwits you employed and stationed in Pretoria, who are incapable of honourable professional Information Operations response, and once so done we can proceed with PROJECT BW.PHI.618 AL QANOON.

Assuming of course you are serious about PROJECT BW.PHI.618 AL QANOON. If not, well in that case keep these incompetent fuckwits at the US Embassy in Pretoria and we can wait and see what the next President has to say about restoring HONOUR, COURAGE and ‘BUCK STOPS HERE: POLITICAL NECESSITY TO END THESE BREEDING WAR ACTS OF WAR’ VALUES to American foreign policy.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Steve Sailor's conservative hypocrisy: A critic of liberals who persecute conservatives, while he covertly endorses NYT persecution of white Africans

According to Wikipedia: “Steven Ernest Sailer is an American journalist and movie critic for The American Conservative, a blogger, a VDARE.com columnist, and a former correspondent for UPI. He writes about race relations, gender issues, politics, immigration, IQ, genetics, movies, and sports.”

I am neither a conventional liberal or conservative. I am a truthseeker: many of my working hypotheses on social, political, ecological and many other issues include ideas from the vast spectrum of ideologies, whether liberal, conservative, nationalist, green, libertarian, etc. I evaluate a principle based upon the evidence that supports it, and that is it. I do not practice political correct ideological arse-kissing, simply so that I can be allowed into some ideological group, and now feel happy, cause I can call myself a 'blah blah-ist'. I have plenty of time for a sincere liberal, conservative, black, green, pink. I fucking hate hypocrits, who demand from others, that which they do not practice themselves.

My knowledge of Steve Sailor is that he is an avid critic of liberal hypocrisy. I have no problem with hypocrisy being critized and exposed, whether it is black, white, liberal or conservative.

One of the principles I love about what conservatism allegedly stands for (at least it does for some people, but clearly not for Mr. Sailor) is that an individual or idea is evaluated upon its merit. Not its colour, not its political correctness, not the size of its PR account, ITS MERIT. That means that if you are a sincere conservative who practices this principle of evaluation of any individual, based on their merit (the quality of their character or the factual evidence for the principle), then you do not care one iota for whether Tom Thumb or Galileo has zero followers to adhere to their principle or idea; because you evaluate the principle and idea on its merit.

Nat. Fraud Inv. Bureau (NFIB) & Levenson Media Enquiry Ack. Receipt of ICC-TRC Fraud Charges Against Telegraph: Tony Gallagher & Ainslinn Laing

Nat. Fraud Inv. Bureau (NFIB) & Levenson Media Enquiry Ack. Receipt of ICC-TRC Fraud Charges Against Telegraph: Tony Gallagher & Ainslinn Laing

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 25 November 2011

From: Kiff Holly: City of London Police
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Lara Johnstone
Subject: (NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED)

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Dear Lara

I acknowledge receipt of your email to the National Fraud Desk.

The NFD is part of the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB) hosted by the City of London Police. NFD receives reports of fraud and referrals from Law Enforcement partners for investigation by the City of London Police Economic Crime Directorate (CoLP ECD). The City of London Police has been designated Lead Force for fraud investigation and as such not only investigates fraud occurring within it’s geographical Force area (parts of postal districts EC1 and EC2 and the whole of postal districts EC3 and EC4) but also frauds occurring in other parts of the country (Lead Force cases).

Your report of fraud/referral has been assessed by a police officer and has been accepted for consideration of investigation by ECD as a City fraud investigation/Lead Force Investigation. NFD will review your report/referral and prepare a report for our Senior management Team who will make the final acceptance decision. NFD will provide monthly updates and inform you of the acceptance decision once known.

If your case is not accepted for investigation we will endeavour to reply with tailored advice regarding your situation and will ensure the relevant details are recorded as intelligence by the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau.

Please note our reference is FDL/11886/11. Please ensure this reference number is quoted on all future correspondence.


Yours sincerely,


Holly Kiff Frauddesk
National Fraud Intelligence Bureau
 City of London Police, 21 New Street, London, EC2M 4TP  020 7601 6761 

________________________
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 2:30 PM
To: Holly Kiff: City of London Police
Cc: Ainslinn Laing - UK - Telegraph; SPJ: Heather Dunn; Levenson Enquiry
Subject: NFIB Reference: FDL/11886/11: Fraud: Telegraph: AINSLINN LAING & TONY GALLAGHER

Ms. Holly,

Acknowledged as received. Many thanks for clarifying the process. I shall await further updates as per the decision of the Senior Management Team.

Many thanks,

Lara Johnstone

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Fraud & Corruption Charges filed against Algemene Dagblad: Casper Naber; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud at ICC

Charges of Fraud & Corruption filed against Algemene Dagblad: Casper Naber; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud Charges at Intn’l Criminal Court

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 23 November 2011

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:58 AM
To: Nederland Consul, Capetown; Nederland Embassy, Pretoria; Political Affairs: Jurgens, Wouter
Cc: SPJ: Scott Leadingham; Casper Naber; Algemene Dagblad: Buitenland; Algemene Dagblad: Lezers
Subject: Att: Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland; c/o NL Amb de Vos, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Algemene Dagblad
Importance: High

Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland
Postbus 2287
1000 CG AMSTERDAM

Complaint submitted c/o & via:

HE Ambassador Rob de Vos
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Ambassadeur
Netherlands Embassy
South Africa

Dear Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland,

REQ: INVESTIGATION OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION CHARGES AGAINST ALGEMENE DAGBLAD EDITOR

Please could you be so kind as to forward the attached complaint to the relevant investigating officer.


CHARGES AGAINST:

CASPER NABER: ALGEMENE DAGBLAD EDITOR

CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: Relevant Dutch Anti-Corruption law, in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption

Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Fraud & Corruption Charges filed against Telegraph: Tony Gallagher & Aislinn Laing; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud at ICC

Charges of Fraud & Corruption filed against Daily Telegraph: Tony Gallagher & Aislinn Laing; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud Charges at Intn’l Criminal Court

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugees | 23 November 2011

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:44 AM
To: National Fraud Intelligence Bureau
Cc: Ainslinn Laing - UK - Telegraph; SPJ: Heather Dunn (hdunn@spj.org)
Subject: NFIB Fraud Complaint: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against Daily/Sunday Telegraph
Importance: High

National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB)
City of London Police,
Economic Crime Directorate
21 New Street,
London EC2M 4TP
Tel: 020 7601 6999
Fax: 020 7601 6750

Dear NFIB,

REQ: INVESTIGATION OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION CHARGES AGAINST TELEGRAPH EDITOR AND JOURNALIST

Please could you be so kind as to forward the attached complaint to the relevant investigating officer.

CHARGES AGAINST:

AINSLINN LAING: DAILY/SUNDAY TELEGRAPH COLUMNIST

TONY GALLAGHER: DAILY/SUNDAY TELEGRAPH EDITOR


CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: Relevant UK Anti-Corruption law, in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption.


Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.

Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Fraud & Corruption Charges filed against New York Times: Arthur Brisbane & Celia Dugger; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud at ICC

Fraud & Corruption Charges filed against New York Times: Arthur Brisbane & Celia Dugger; for Conspiracy of Censorship of SA’s TRC Fraud at ICC

Andrea Muhrrteyn | White Refugee | 23 November 2011

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:20 AM
To: United States Embassy
Cc: Celia Dugger - NYT-Africa; Arthur Brisbane - Public Editor, New York Times; SPJ: Joe Skeel, SPJ
Subject: Comm. RW Kelly, NYPD; c/o & via: USA Embassy, Pretoria: Req. Investigation of Fraud & Corruption Charges Against New York Times
Importance: High

Raymond W. Kelly,
Commissioner,
New York City Police Department
New York City
Organized Crime Control Bureau: 1-888-374-DRUG
NYPD Switchboard: 1-646-610-5000

Complaint submitted c/o & via:
United States of America Embassy
Ambassador: HE Mr DH Gips
PO Box 9536, PRETORIA, 0001
877 Pretorius Street, Arcadia,
PRETORIA
Tel: (012) 431 4000 / After Hrs 082 285 2341
Fax: (012) 342 2299 / 2199

Commissioner Kelly,

REQ: INVESTIGATION OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION CHARGES AGAINST NEW YORK TIMES EDITOR & JOURNALIST

Please could you be so kind as to forward the attached complaint to the relevant NYPD office.


CHARGES AGAINST:

CELIA DUGGER: NEW YORK TIMES COLUMNIST
ARTHUR BRISBANE: NEW YORK TIMES EDITOR


CHARGES:

Fraud: the unlawful and intentional misrepresentation or perversion of the truth, which can lead to actual or potential disadvantage or prejudice to another individual or group.

Corruption: New York Penal Law Code Article 460: Enterprise Corruption and relevant law in accordance to Article 5, 12, 13, 18, 19 & 20 of United Nations Convention Against Corruption


Complaint:

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”)[1] inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African and International citizens.
Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone
African White Refugees
www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions).
As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Censorship of TRC Fraud Complaint Filed Against SANEF Editors

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:29 AM
To: ICC OTP Information Desk
Cc: NATO: SHAPE, US Navy JAG
Subject: ICC Prosecutor's Office: Art 15 Rome Statute Complaint (RSA SAP Case 823-08-2010)
Attach: 11-11-19 SAPS Insp-Engel Complaint (Signed AckRec) :: 11-05-09 Genocide Complaint ITO Art-15 Rome Statute to ICC (FS+NoC+Complaint)

TO: INT’L CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
Per Email

CC: NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE: CHIEFS OF DEFENCE
Per Email (via SHAPE)

CC: US NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S OFFICE (JAG)
Per Email


Additional Evidence to: Notice of Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute, filed on 09 May 2011

Please find attached additional information submitted to SAP complaint (Case 823-08-2010), in regards to the aforementioned complaint filed with the ICC Prosecutors Office, against relevant Accessories to Censorship of South Africa’s TRC FRAUD.

Complaint reads as follows:

Professor William K Black led the investigations of the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980-90′s, and put 1000 executive crooks in jail. Professor Black explains that fraud typically underlies virtually all major financial failures: financial collapses are caused by fraud (criminal activity) rather than mismanagement or accident. (15:56)

On 09 May 2011, I, Lara Johnstone, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, filed charges (ICC complaint attached) against aforementioned individuals with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting the Office of Prosecutor (OTP): Luis Moreno – Ocampo, of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Hague to investigate the alleged Defendants and Accessories on charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

The Complainants Requested the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:

Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.

Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the African ANC regime.

All aforementioned newspaper publications whom charges have been filed against continue to refuse their duty to report this information in the public interest, by censoring this information from South African citizens.

Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone)
I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions).
As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.

Media 2 Pashtun, Pakistan Breivik Fair Trial Supporter: ‘If you are anti-Multi-Culti, you are a fascist-racist-Nazi & yr opinion does not count’?

Does the International media's coverage of Breivik; PROVE Breivik's Allegations Against the Media in his Manifesto?

“My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.. after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters.” -- Ann Coulter (Right Wing News)

In Breivik's 2083: The European Declaration of Independence (PDF) compilation, it is written:

“More than 90% of the EU and national parliamentarians and more than 95% of journalists are supporters of European multiculturalism and therefore supporters of the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe; yet, they DO NOT have the permission of the European peoples to implement these doctrines.”

Two days ago, I submitted some suggestions to Mr. Breivik's Attorney, Mr. Geir Lippestad. Today I received an invitation (I do not know if the invitation is related to my correspondence to Mr. Lippestad; it could be totally a coincidence from someone who noticed the postings on my facebook wall) to the Facebook Group: In Support of Geir Lippestad, Attorney for Anders Behring Breivik (Til støtte for Geir Lippestad) whose goals are as follows:

Anders Breivik: 'Labour Party Government failed the country' (00:32)

First and foremost, I would say that this is a group that certainly does not support the actions, visions or something of the perpetrator stands for.

We are however strongly opposed to rumors that Geir Lippestad has received hate speech. This is no time for hate, it's time to stand together. Geir Lippestad has just taken on the job as a lawyer, and we demand that he not be identified with the perpetrator or what Breivik stands for.

This group is created to show support for the defense attorney Geir Lippestad, which has undertaken the difficult job it is to have to defend the man who carried out these actions. We give our support to him is because he does an important job to ensure that the law is followed and that there is a fair trial.

Anders Breivik: Knights Templar: Opening statement: Defence: Innocent; Political Necessity: I am Sitting Bull of Nat. EU Indigenous Rights Movement

Anders Breivik: Knights Templar: Opening statement: Defence: Innocent; Political Necessity: I am Sitting Bull of National European Indigenous Rights Movement

Excerpt: 2083 - EU Declaration of Independence

3.70 Court/trial statements for Justiciar Knight and other patriotic resistance fighters after an operation

2083: A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick (aka Andres Breivik), London [From Unwanted Advocate: (PDF)]

A trial is an excellent opportunity and a well suited arena the Justiciar Knight can use to publicly renounce the authority of the EUSSR/USASSR hegemony and the specific cultural Marxist / multiculturalist regime. After all, this hegemony is nothing more than a global criminal network consisting of fundamentally undemocratic, anti-national dictatorships.

The individual countries in this cultural Marxist/multiculturalist criminal network are not democracies and have not been real democracies since perhaps the 1950s. Instead they are dictated by a small elite of political and cultural leaders who deliberately use the state institutions and media companies to indoctrinate and control their own people. The accused should use this opportunity to present all available documentation, illustrations and proof included in this compendium (2083 – A European Declaration of Independence) to claim his innocence. However, he should also at a later stage in the trial demand freedom on behalf of his people and demand that the regime in question immediately and without hesitation capitulates to the pan-European tribunal – PCCTS, represented by the accused, the Justiciar Knight and the national patriotic forces he indirectly controls.

Knights Templar 2083 by Anders Behring Breivik (12:23)

The Justiciar Knight must demand the right to form a cultural conservative tribunal consisting of the 20 most dedicated and trustworthy cultural conservative/patriotic leaders in the country. Furthermore, he must demand that that the national parliament immediately transfers all political powers to this newly established tribunal / cabinet. The Justiciar Knight must also demand at least 20 hours of unrestricted access to the national broadcasting company in order to consolidate and rally an initial and loyal patriotic military force (2000 should be a benchmark depending on the size of the country). The Justiciar Knight and the newly established tribunal will then appoint one trustworthy individual in his newly appointed cabinet to be the new national military commander with control of the national regular military forces. Martial law must be declared in this transitional period. (See relevant phase 3 strategies for more detailed descriptions).

TIAA-CREF: Tutu’s ‘Israel Apartheid’ Outrage; while censoring Tutu's TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ was Falsification of SA History

I read Archbishops Desmond Tutu’s letter in the Charlotte Observer: TIAA-CREF should hear us, divest from Israeli apartheid, about his alleged moral outrage against ‘Israel Apartheid’ demanding disinvestment from Israeli companies.

This letter is to provide you further information regarding information that is currently censored from the world’s right to know; which significantly affect the credibility of Archbishop Tutu and the South African ‘TRC’ religious, academic, media, political etc. elite.

Radical Honesty SA recently filed a ‘Censorship of TRC Fraud’ complaint with the International Criminal Court against South Africa’s political, legal and media elite; one of whom includes Archbishop Desmond Tutu (PDF):

[..] Attached are excerpts from Petition to the EU and two legal Amicus Applications to South African courts (CCT 23-10: PDF; & 07-2010 EQ-SG: PDF) which examine the Truth and Reconciliation Commission from the perspective of International Just War Theory.

Both of these applications, have been totally censored by the SA media; with the endorsement of Archbishop Tutu, who is not outraged about the SA media censoring evidence of allegations of his TRC Fraud.

Conclusions reached are that if we discard political correct ideology and impartially and unemotionally examine the motivations for implementing Apartheid it meets all the requirements for a Just War of Self Defense: It was a just cause to ensure Afrikaner Demographic Survival, it was a last resort, it was declared by proper authority, it possessed right intention, it had a reasonable chance of success, and the end was proportional to the means used.

The ANC’s Anti-Apartheid Movement on the other hand meets none of the requirements to be considered a Just War: The ANC had no Just Cause: The ANC Could Have Non-violently Ended their Breeding War; which would have terminated the requirement for Apartheid. The ANC had no Right Intention: Apartheid raised Black Living Standards to Highest in Africa. The ANC had No Proper Authority: The majority of Black South Africans did not want Black Rule. The ANC did not use Proportional Force: The ANC implemented a People’s War of Terror to terrorize the African population to join the ‘Liberation Struggle’. The ANC’s declaration of War was not a Last Resort: The ANC’s declaration of war was founded on the Frantz Fanon and Black Liberation Theology principles that the native’s colonized mind can only be liberated by violence on the rotting corpse of the settler.

Press Ombudsman Thloloe Refuses English Media Bias on Reits Appeal Articles Complaint as Spam

From: Joe Thloloe, Press Ombudsman
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 10:15 AM
To: Lara Johnstone
Cc: Khanyi Mndaweni; Johan Retief, Dep. Press Ombudsman
Subject: Re: Press Ombudsman: Complaint: SAPA: [1.1, 1.2] Reits Four Sentences Reduced

Dear Ms Johnson,

You will not be getting a response from this office - you take up the space and time of people who use this system for legitimate complaints.

You are not one of them.

I've previously asked you to stop sending your spam to this office and you continue to do so. Please desist.

Regards,

Joe Thloloe.


________________________________________

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:53 AM
To: Press Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe
Cc: Khanyi Mndaweni; Johan Retief, Dep. Ombudsman
Subject: Press Ombudsman: Complaint: SAPA: [1.1, 1.2] Reits Four Sentences Reduced

Press Ombudsman,

I have had no response to complaint filed on 24 June from the Press Ombudsman's office.

Lara Johnstone

________________________________________

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:08 PM
To: Press Ombudsman: Joe Thloloe
Cc: Khanyi Mndaweni; Johan Retief, Dep. Ombudsman
Subject: Press Ombudsman: Complaint: SAPA: [1.1, 1.2] Reits Four
Sentences Reduced

Re: Complaint: SAPA, News 24, Sowetan, Mail & Guardian, Timeslive, IOL: Reits Four Sentences Reduced.

24 June 2011

Press Ombudsman,

COMPLAINT: Violation of SANEF Press Code of Conduct: 1.1, 1.2.

1.1 The press shall be obliged to report news truthfully, accurately and fairly.
1.2 News shall be presented in context and in a balanced manner, without an intentional or negligent departure from the facts whether by:
1.2.1 distortion, exaggeration or misrepresentation;
1.2.2 material omissions; or
1.2.3 summarisation.

Articles: SAPA: Reits Four Sentences Reduced, republished in News 24, Sowetan, Mail and Guardian, TimesLive, IOL.

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

Mr. Collins Chabane: Evidence of SANEF Media Mafia Bias and Censorship Behaviour

Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 5:45 PM
Subject: Prof. A. Harber, Min. C. Chabane & Mr. J. Manyi: Req. Response from SANEF to Media Mafia Bias Evidence

TO: Prof. Anton Harber, Media Critic (sic)
TO: Minister Collins Chabane
TO: Mr. Jimmy Manyi, c/o Black Management Forum
TO: Mr. Mondli Makhanya, SANEF

Req. SA Media Critics (sic) provide Mr. Collins Chabane an official response in Meeting with Mr. Manyi, to Radical Honesty SA Evidence of SANEF Media Mafia Bias and Censorship Behaviour.

CC: SANEF, Mr. Manyi, Min. Collins Chabane

Dear Prof. Harber,

I was most surprised to read your statement to Mr. Manyi, the CEO of GCSI to “Stop being a media critic, because that is no way to build working relationships with journalists.”


Working Relationships with Psychological Infant Journalists and Editors:

It is my understanding that any individual who considers themselves psychologically mature; is aware of the importance of constructive criticism to a professional working relationship. Any relationship founded on the parties being capable of sharing and hearing each other’s constructive criticism, and seriously enquiring into its evidentiary arguments; is a working relationship that can only grow stronger and stronger, as each party is provided the opportunity to receive information about its blindspots, and to fix those blindspots.

Active Listening and Constructive Criticism: Blogger’s Professional Response

I write a blog: Why We Are White Refugees.

In early 2010 I was contacted by another blogger, who shared with me some photos of farm murders, he said had been provided to him by a policeman friend of his. He asked that we publish the photos. I published the photos and also sent them to numerous politicians etc; including to Mr. Malema at the ANC. A few days later, I got an anonymous tip that one of the photos was fake. I investigated and found out that the tip was correct, and in fact four of the thirteen alleged farm murder photos were not South African crime scene photos, but foreign. I published a retraction and wrote an individual letter of apology to every single person and politician to whom I had sent the original photos.

Nobody had to go to an Ombudsman to file a complaint against me. All it required was for them to inform me of the error, and evidence where I could prove I had erred. Once it was clear to me I had made an error; I considered it my honour and duty and responsibility to publish a retraction and apology. I did not require someone to force me to do the right thing. I do not publish erroneous facts. If I am informed any alleged fact I have published is false, I consider it my duty as an honourable human being to correct such error.

I wrote letters of apology and retraction, and published these letters of apology and retraction to:

1. SA Students Congress, Mandela Rhodes Foundation, ANC Youth League; RE: Reitz 4 & Black Culture...;
   
2. Irish Embassy, Jefferson Family & Independent Newspapers; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup;
   
3. Austrian Embassy, Burgstaller & Symcox Families; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup;
   
4. PC Canada vs. IRB & Huntley: How many SA Black on White Crimes are Racially Motivated?;
   
5. Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues.

Excerpts from PDF letter.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

Encl. Excerpts from Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone, Member of Radical Honesty culture; in Application for Direct Access for a Writ of Habeus Mentem (CCT 06-11).

Jimmy Manyi & Scott Lovaas on Media Mafia's Corporate Cultural Fascism

Jimmy Manyi and Scott Lovaas (Manufacturing Consent in democratic South Africa: Application of the propaganda model) on Media Mafia's Corporate Cultural Fascism

22 June 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn

Gov. Communications CEO Jimmy Manyi was interviewed by Radio 702's John Robbie, to discuss the Goverment relationship with the Media.

The response from the Media has been their usual pathetic, proverbial 13 year old adolescent theatric outrageous incapacity to hear constructive criticism and do some introspection: SANEF slams Manyi for ‘Rock Bottom’ Relationship.

It is indisputable that Goverment corruption needs to be criticised and exposed. However corporate and media corporate corruption also needs to be exposed with the same level of enthusiasm. Journalists willing to expose media corruption are few: Sandile Memela has been the only one to address the systemic corruption: The Media Mafia. David Bullard and Michelle Solomon have addressed corruption at Avusa, but not systemically: Sunday Times Report: Avusa's Dirty Linen.

In my objective opinion listening to the interview between Manyi and Robbie, Manyi wins hands down. I ain't a big fan of Mr. Manyi; but I do appreciate his willingness to express what has been covert policy (to the knowledge of media and all, who are quite happy if the policy is covert; but only complain when it is publicly stated for the ignorant masses to awaken to its reality). Even a broken clock tells the truth twice a day. It is only those who are slaves to their subconscious hatreds who cannot hear the truth spoken from someone they may consider an enemy. Honour requires you to admit when your enemy states a truth.

John Robbie's listening skills are non-existant. He does not seem at all interested in an active listening conversation with Manyi. He deliberately avoids all Manyi's totally valid allegations about media corruption, media censorship, the media's lack of diversity of wide ranges of opinions on issues (the media consistently censor conservative opinion, white and black). Manyi sounds like he arrived for a serious interview; Robbie sounds like his intentions are to make an arse out of Manyi.

John Robbie further disputes that he and Manyi don't belong to the same culture. He sarcastically insists that there are no cultural differences between them. Unbelievable!

Radio 702: John Robbie Interview of GCIS CEO Jimmy Manyi (Radio 702)[27:43]

Manufacturing Consent in democratic South Africa: Application of the propaganda model, by Scott Lovaas, details in great detail corporate effects on the news you read:

In short, corporations are bound by class and adhere to the values and principles that reinforce the current system. Unwanted elements that threaten the system are weeded out by a variety of methods: limiting the discourse, suppression, framing of issues, choice of language, distortion, use of sources and self-censorship. Parenti writes:

the most important effect of the news media: they set the issue agenda for the rest of us, choosing what to emphasize and what to ignore or suppress, in effect, organizing much of our political world for us. The media may not always be able to tell us what to think, but they are strikingly successful in telling us what to think about.[59]

Stated even more starkly, Parenti continues:

News manufacturers are more than merely conduits for official and moneyed interests. They help create, embellish, and give life to the news, with an array of stereotypes, often misleading, but well-executed images, tones, evasions, nuances, suppressions and fabrications that lend confirmation to the ruling class viewpoint in a process that is not immediately recognized as being the propaganda it is.[60]

It is self-evident that profit-driven media have their own agenda and will do whatever it takes within the confines of the laws and regulations to maximize market share and ultimately enhance the bottom line.

Corporate media ownership by its very nature and self-interest reduces the range of debate on certain issues. For example, corporate media would not advocate or encourage commercial-free media, as it would simply be a threat to their existence despite the fact that it may meet the needs of the population. The “manufacturing of a social and political world” has significant consequences for the electorate because they receive limited, partial, or inaccurate information, thus making informed decisions more difficult. In a functioning democracy, informed decisions are vital. Citizens must understand the motives, interests, and aspirations of those collecting and disseminating the information they are receiving, as will now be discussed.

The media mafia, by Sandile Memela

The media mafia

15 June 2011
Sandile Memela, M&G ThoughtLeader

I don’t know when it hit me but it was during my first year as a young reporter in 1985 when I had just joined City Press newspaper fresh from studying communications at Fort Hare University.

That was when I noticed that newspaper journalists, sub-editors, columnists and editors in every publication have, unavoidably, a particular political agenda.

Maybe it was how the paper identified and selected the high-flying personalities whose businesses had to be covered. Or maybe it was the angle adopted in covering a particular social responsibility donation to the community by a major corporation. Or it might have been the headline scripted for a particular story. I am not sure. But the more I got insight and understanding into how the news business network operates, I noticed that the news guys always had a specific political agenda.

Oh, let me state it categorically: there is no objectivity in journalism. I mean, the news business is a commercial enterprise with a particular political agenda to make profits. It is not to expose what is loosely called the truth or provide information and knowledge that will empower the mind of consumers.

In between attending meetings with corporate management and sitting in long sessions with cut-throat bean counters or accountants, the news guys and dolls have to put up a brave face of being committed to pursuit of the truth.

Most of the time, senior journalists and editors are monumentally self-delusional people who believe their own lies. Of course, they project the impression of being serious agents of change who influence developments and trends in society, especially at a political and economic level. But this is self-deception.

Most journalists are nothing but mere reporters who do as they are told and write stories that repeat everything said by so-called movers and shakers — without question.

This would sound like a contradictory statement except that people who know how the media operates will tell you that it is only a handful of guys and dolls in a news organisation that call the shots.

In fact, they operate like a mafia.

Report: Sunday Times Sensationalism: Something foul in the air?…AVUSA’s dirty linen

Out to Lunch: Something foul in the air?…. it must be AVUSA’s dirty linen.

Sunday, June 19, 2011
David Bullard, Newstime

If you smelt something foul in the air as you were driving through Rosebank last Wednesday afternoon don’t worry. No, it wasn’t the malodourous sulphur stench we expect to be wafted onto the Highveld from Sasolburg at this time of year. It was much worse than that….it was the stench of AVUSA’s dirty linen being aired.

Now before you all get misty eyed and start thinking that AVUSA had second thoughts about denying Michelle Solomon’s request to access to the entire 88 page report compiled by the Bouffant Haired Prof Anton Harber and his three colleagues let me put you right by revealing the extraordinary facts.

Back in 2008 things were going so badly for the lads at the Sunday Times that they decided to call the bouffant haired one in to tell them what they were doing wrong. The report would then be published for all and sundry to see and, hopefully, trigger some constructive debate and corrective action. But when the report was finished the AVUSA management(sic) decided to keep it a secret and instead published a 900 word summary. This is rather like receiving the Ten Commandants from God and rejecting those that it’s inconvenient to keep.

Journo Ivo Vegter Endorses Persecution of SA citizen and Censorship of Media Corruption & Scientific Journalism Campaign?

Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:43 PM
To: Phillip de Wet - DMaverick; Branko Brkic - DMaverick; Ivo Veger - DMaverick;
Cc: Press Ombudsman; Murray Hunger - R2K Nat. Coord; Right2Know; Right2Know - FXI:Gauteng; Right2Know - KZN; LeadSA: Adriaan Groenewald
Subject: Mr. Brkic, CC: I. Vegter; RE: Vegter's Endorsement of Persecution and Media Corruption

TO: Branko Brkic
TO: Ivo Vegter
TO: Daily Maverick
CC: John Pilger, Wikileaks, SA Leads, Right2Know, Press Ombudsman

Radical Honesty SA to Daily Maverick: Editor: Branko Brkic

Daily Maverick Journalist: Ivo Vegter Endorses Persecution of SA citizen and Censorship of Media Corruption & Scientific Journalism Campaign

Dear Mr. Brkic,

Mr. Ivo Vegter writes: “Oh dear. Now I'm part of a "media mob", endorsing persecution and covering up corruption. http://bit.ly/kjbkAg @dailymaverick”; in response to my comments on Daily Maverick News Article: Open Letter to the Directors of Afriforum, by Xhanti Payi.

I am unaware whether Mr. Vegter wishes to be perceived as an ignorant moron imbecile; or an honourable scientific critical thinking problem solving investigative journalist. Perhaps he can clarify which he wishes to be perceived as.

SA Media and Mr. Vegter’s Endorsement of SA citizens Persecution:

Please could Mr. Vegter inform me where he or any other SA journalist or SA media publication disputed Dr. Brad Blanton's -- founder of Radical Honesty, former candidate for US congress in Virginia in 2004 and 2006 -- allegations filed in the High Court (WC: 19963-09) regarding South Africa’s legal and political persecution of myself (PDF).

Please could Mr. Vegter clarify which statements he or any other journalist in SA have disputed as being untrue; and if none; where he or any other journalist in SA have voiced their objections to the legal and political persecution of a member of the Radical Honesty culture. Or does Mr. Vegter believe that endorsing the ‘rule of law’ means you only endorse the rule of law for people in your own mob; not for those you dislike or whom you disagree with; they can be persecuted and denied the right to free and fair trials and their constitutional rights?

The 17 March 2010 Report: 140 SA Editors, Politicians, Academics et al confirm they are Deliberately Indifferent to the Rule-of-Law; have No Objections to SA Governments persecution of ‘Radical Honesty White Refugee’ (“RHWR”) (PDF) was provided to the Daily Maverick, on Wed 3/17/2010 4:31 PM (PDF).

Continued in PDF:

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

Secede to Survive: Vlaams Belang Declares Flemish Independence!

“The wild stallion of revolution: either mount it successfully or get kicked to death making the effort.” - Sebastian Ronin, Chairman, Renaissance Vanguard International: RE: BBC article: Greek state starting to lose grip on functions of state:

“And I will repeat the point about hostility to the media: it's not a problem for me and my colleagues to be hounded off demos as “representatives of big capital”, “Zionists”, “scum and police informers” etc. But to get this reaction from almost every demographic - from balaclava kids to pensioners - should be a warning sign to the policymaking elite. The “mainstream” - whether it's the media, politicians or business people - is beginning to seem illegitimate to large numbers of people.

As one old bloke put it to me, when I said: “Don't you want us to report what's happening to you?” - “No.”

He was quite calm and rational as he waved his hand in my face: “It's too late for that.”

Vlaams Belang Declares Flemish Independence!

15 June 2011
Morley Patriot Blog

Our Flemish friends in the Vlaams Belang marked the first anniversary of the last general election in the non-country formally known as Belgium with an interesting and provocative activity in Brussels yesterday.

Since then elections of last year Belgium has not had a government, leading the Flemish patriots to declare Flemish Independence and unveil some new street signs accordingly.

The police were co-operative at first, but went on to arrest a number of people, including Filip Dewinter.