Widowed UK fathers battle to keep his South African children in UK

'I want to keep my family together': Widowed father faces battle to keep his South African children in the UK because he doesn't earn enough money as a barman

Justin Tutt has been told his children will be deported next month | Seth, eight, and Leigh, five, will be sent back to South Africa | Home Office took the decision because Mr Tutt, 29, doesn't earn enough | They began living with their father in Burnley, Lancs after their mother died | Social worker informed him that 'statistics show that one in five white children are raped or killed' in SA. 'They are targets because they are different. Its very dangerous for white children in South Africa.'

Janine Yaqoob | Daily Mail.UK | 18 February 2013

A father faces having his two children taken into care 8,500 miles away because the Home Office says he does not earn enough money to keep them in the UK.

Barman Justin Tutt, 29, brought son Seth, eight, and daughter Leigh, five, to live in England with him after the sudden death of their mother in their native South Africa.

But despite Mr Tutt holding a British passport and having another son born in the UK, under new immigration rules cracking down on asylum seekers claiming benefits, Seth and Leigh cannot stay here as they must be living in a family earning at least £22,500 a year.

Because Mr Tutt brings home only £120 a week and his fiancee is on maternity leave, the youngsters will be deported in March and are likely to be taken into care.

'I feel like a stranger where I live.. Mass Immigration making reluctant racists of us all’

British Woman Feels Like a Stranger in Her Own Neighborhood: 'I feel like a stranger where I live’

In the Nineties, when I arrived, this part of Acton was a traditional working-class area. Now there is no trace of any kind of community – that word so cherished by the Left. Instead it has been transformed into a giant transit camp and is home to no one. The scale of immigration over recent years has created communities throughout London that never need to – or want to – interact with outsiders.

Jane Kelly | 7:30AM GMT 29 Jan 2013 | The Telegraph & Limits to Growth

Limits to Growth: In recent weeks, cumulative demographic changes have been reported in Britain, along with white flight away from cities to escape the social conditions created by diverse immigration.

Human beings don’t want diversity and prefer to be around others who speak their language and share the same culture. Most don’t like it when elitist liberal governments decide that the traditional beliefs like patriotism can be fixed by importing a new, more grateful people. Polls from Pew and Ipsos indicate a cross-cultural dislike of having too many foreigners residing in their countries.

In the present example, Jane Kelly, an editor for the Salisbury Review, voices her unhappiness at feeling like a stranger in her own London neighborhood. The only surprise is that she would be brave enough to speak against the new secular religion of diversity being the highest good; in fact, white Britons are now a minority in London.

Certainly many Americans have told similar stories about how their pleasant California neighborhoods turned into crime-filled Mexican barrios. Citizens are fleeing the once-Golden State for places where a culturally recognizable America remains.

The mega amnesty now being proposed would open the floodgates to a hugely Mexicanized America.

At least the London writer doesn’t live in an area that has been declared a sharia zone by local Muslims — yet.

Rise of 'white flight': British families are 'self-segregating' as more Caucasians abandon urban areas for the countryside

Rise of 'white flight': British families are 'self-segregating' as more Caucasians abandon urban areas for the countryside


Trend has gone largely unnoticed because city centres appear diverse | Well-off whites from diverse areas are moving to outer suburbs in droves | Researchers say better schools, fresher air and background may be factors


Emma Reynolds | 12:55 GMT, 27 January 2013 | UK Daily Mail

Britain is 'self-segregating' as white families flee urban areas for the countryside and outer suburbs.

The trend is causing an 'ethnic cliff', in which the proportion of households from minority backgrounds is vastly different in areas just a few miles apart.

Some outer London boroughs - including Enfield, Waltham Forest and Redbridge - have seen their white British population drop by as much as a quarter over the past decade.

The same applies to urban areas around the capital such as Luton, Reading and Bedfordshire.

Meanwhile, the white British population in many suburban and rural districts just next door has soared, according to research produced by Birkbeck College, University of London, in conjunction with think tank Demos.

Rochdale Grooming Case Shows Britain is sleepwalking off the edge of the Multiculti Political Correct cliff

The Rochdale sex ring shows the horrific consequences of Britain's 'Islamophobia' witch-hunt

Melanie Phillips | Daily Mail | 19:17 GMT, 9 May 2012

So now we can see the outcome of the witch-hunt against ‘Islamophobia’.

With the conviction of nine men for organised sexual crimes from rape to sex trafficking, the full horrific details of more than two decades of sexual violence against young, predominantly white girls living in children’s homes in the north of England have been revealed.

The gang lured an officially estimated 47 girls (the figure may well be higher) aged 12 to 16 with gifts, alcohol and drugs before passing them around to have sex ‘with several men a day, several times a week’ in flats, houses, cars, taxis and kebab shops.

After phone calls inviting them to come and have sex with a girl, men would turn up to do so by the taxi-load. One 13 year-old was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night.

Terrible as all this is in itself, there is far worse. For this monstrous abuse could all have been stopped years ago. The authorities had evidence this was going on as long ago as 1991.

The Eurabia Code: Planned Islamicization of Europe

[Part 01 & 02] [Part 3]
[Eurabia Code] [African White Refugees]

The Eurabia Code: 1: Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis

Fjordman | Brussels Journal | Sun, 2006-10-01 07:53

I decided to write this essay after a comment from a journalist, not a Leftist by my country’s standards, who dismissed Eurabia as merely a conspiracy theory, one on a par with The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I do not disagree with the fact that conspiracy theories exist, nor that they can be dangerous. After all, the Protocols and the Dolchstosslegende, or “stab in the back myth – the idea that Germany didn’t lose WW1 but was betrayed by Socialists, intellectuals and Jews – helped pave the way for Adolf Hitler and the Nazis before WW2.

However, what puzzles me is that it is a widely-held belief of many (not just in the Islamic world but in Europe and even in the United States) that the terror attacks that brought down the Twin Towers in New York City on September 11th 2001 were really a controlled demolition staged by the American government and then blamed on Muslims. I have seen this thesis talked about many times in Western media. While it is frequently (though not always) dismissed and mocked, it is least mentioned.

In contrast, Eurabia – which asserts that the Islamicization of Europe didn’t happen merely by accident but with the active participation of European political leaders – is hardly ever referred to at all, despite the fact that it is easier to document. Does the notion of Eurabia hit too close to home? Perhaps it doesn’t fit with the anti-American disposition of many journalists? Curiously enough, even those left-leaning journalists who are otherwise critical of the European Union because of its free market elements never write about Eurabia.

Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis; by Bat Ye'Or [*Amazon*]

Because of this, I am going to test whether the Eurabia thesis is correct, or at least plausible. I have called this project The Eurabia Code, alluding to author Dan Brown’s massive bestseller The Da Vinci Code. Brown’s fictional account “documents” a conspiracy by the Church to cover up the truth about Jesus. I’m not sure my work will become equally popular, but I’m pretty sure it’s closer to reality.

The next time Mr. Brown wants to write about massive conspiracies in Europe, he would be well-advised to set his eyes at Brussels rather than Rome. It would be a whole lot more interesting. What follows is a brief outline of the thesis put forward by writer Bat Ye’or in her book “Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis.” My information is based on her book (which should be read in full). In addition I have drawn from some of her articles and interviews. I republish the information with her blessing, but this summary is completely my own.

In an interview with Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Bat Ye’or explained how French President Charles de Gaulle, disappointed by the loss of the French colonies in Africa and the Middle East as well as with France’s waning influence in the international arena, decided in the 1960’s to create a strategic alliance with the Arab and Muslim world to compete with the dominance of the United States and the Soviet Union.

Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood & the White Hunting Season

Rivers Of Blood by Enoch Powell

April 20th 1968
Enoch Powell Speech
Conservative Association Meeting In Birmingham

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.

A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.

After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."

British Awake to Verwoerd's Anti-Multi-Culti Wisdom | Tout va Très Bien Madame la Multiculturalisma

Searchlight poll finds huge support for far right 'if they gave up violence'

Level of far-right support could outstrip that in France or Holland, says poll for Searchlight

Mark Townsend guardian.co.uk,
Saturday 26 February 2011 21.08 GMT

‘Large numbers’ would support a far-right party, if it was not linked to violence. Photograph: KeystoneUSA-Zuma/Rex Features

Huge numbers of Britons would support an anti-immigration English nationalist party if it was not associated with violence and fascist imagery, according to the largest survey into identity and extremism conducted in the UK.

A Populus poll found that 48% of the population would consider supporting a new anti-immigration party committed to challenging Islamist extremism, and would support policies to make it statutory for all public buildings to fly the flag of St George or the union flag.

Anti-racism campaigners said the findings suggested Britain's mainstream parties were losing touch with public opinion on issues of identity and race.

The poll suggests that the level of backing for a far-right party could equal or even outstrip that in countries such as France, the Netherlands and Austria. France's National Front party hopes to secure 20% in the first round of the presidential vote next year. The Dutch anti-Islam party led by Geert Wilders attracted 15.5% of the vote in last year's parliamentary elections.

Anti-fascist groups said the poll's findings challenged the belief that Britons were more tolerant than other Europeans. "This is not because British people are more moderate, but simply because their views have not found a political articulation," said a report by the Searchlight Educational Trust, the anti-fascist charity that commissioned the poll.

According to the survey, 39% of Asian Britons, 34% of white Britons and 21% of black Britons wanted all immigration into the UK to be stopped permanently, or at least until the economy improved. And 43% of Asian Britons, 63% of white Britons and 17% of black Britons agreed with the statement that "immigration into Britain has been a bad thing for the country". Just over half of respondents – 52% – agreed with the proposition that "Muslims create problems in the UK".

Jon Cruddas, the Labour MP who fought a successful campaign against the British National party in his Dagenham and Rainham constituency in east London, said that the findings pointed to a "very real threat of a new potent political constituency built around an assertive English nationalism". The report identified a resurgence of English identity, with 39% preferring to call themselves English rather than British. Just 5% labelled themselves European.

‘Hendrik Verwoerd was Right; Multiculturalism an Impossible Failure’ - Europe Awakens; Will they Act?

Ending the multicultural experiment

February 07, 2011
1:00 am Eastern
Vox Day, World Net Daily

In September, a member of board of the Bundesbank, the German equivalent of the Federal Reserve, published a book titled "Germany is Abolishing Itself." The reaction to Thilo Sarrazin's thesis, which is that Muslim immigration not only threatens the existence of Germany, but of every country in which it is permitted, was mixed. While the pushers of multiculturalism and diversity exploded in outrage and Sarrazin was encouraged to resign from the Bundesbank board, the book became an immediate best-seller.

Unlike past sinners against diversity dogma, Sarrazin has neither apologized nor backed down. Various opinion polls have demonstrated that the majority of Germans agree with him despite the fact that the political elite in both major parties are still frightened to death at the thought of being forced to address the very large elephant in the Bundesrepublik's living room.

This same split between the multicultural pieties of the political and academic classes and the sound historical instincts of the populace is visible throughout Europe. In the Scandinavian countries, the police try to hide the statistics relating to the rape epidemic that is concurrent with the influx of non-Scandinavian immigrants; the incidence of rape in Sweden has doubled in the last 10 years and is now approaches the world-leading South African rate. In Italy, there have even been armed attacks on camps of immigrant squatters by Italians fed up with imported crime.

Germany: Multi-Culti has “utterly failed”; overrun by foreigners, 13% want Fuehrer Problem Solver

Multiculturalism in Germany has 'utterly failed', claims Chancellor Angela Merkel

Alan Hall In Berlin, Daily Mail
18th October 2010

'Too little required of immigrants' says tough-talking Christian Democrat leader

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said her country’s attempts to build a post-war multicultural society have ‘utterly failed’.

In a landmark speech, she broke one of Germany’s last taboos and courted anti-immigration support by claiming those from a different background failed to live happily side-by-side with native Germans.

Her comments, to the youth wing of her own Christian Democrat Union party, came amid growing resentment about immigration in Germany.

There are about seven million foreign residents living in the country. Some 4.3million of these are Muslim and there are more than 3,000 mosques across Germany.

Mrs Merkel said the so-called ‘multikulti’ concept – ‘that we are now living side by side and are happy about it’ – does not work. ‘This approach has failed, utterly,’ she said just days after a poll showed a third of all Germans viewed immigrants as nothing more than welfare cheats.

Dr. Thilo Sarrazin - EU Prophet: African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty

If I want to hear the muezzin, I also can book a vacation to the Orient

by Thilo Sarrazin
Bild (Translation by Big Peace)

Uncontrolled immigration may at any time threaten the state structures and undermine the stability of a society. The Chinese empire therefore had its Great Wall, the Romans had their Limes. At no time were the securing of the territory and the regulation of immigration something trivial. The complications arising from these issues threatened states and societies to their core and penetrated them deeply. And each time they were accompanied by orgies of bloodletting and violence.

In the German media this is frequently concealed. Immigration issues are often treated with a raised admonitory finger, and an attitude that probably can be the best characterized with the slogan: “Peep, peep, peep! We all just love each other.” This approach is as unhistorical as it is silly. Even more regrettable is that the German political elite lets its position on immigration be determined largely by the voices from the media. It thus runs the risk of alienating itself both from the people and the core of the problem.

The growing influx, noted by right-wing populist movements in many European countries — also the referendum on the acceptance of minarets, as held in Switzerland — are consequences of the predominantly unhistorical, naïve and opportunistic migration policy of European governments.

In all countries concerned — whether Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark or Norway — one makes similar observations about the group of Muslim migrants, namely:

• Below-average labor market integration;
  
• Above-average dependence on welfare benefits;
  
• Below-average participation in education;
  
• Above-average fertility;
  
• Spatial segregation with a tendency towards the emergence of parallel societies;
  
• Above-average religiosity with growing penchant for traditional and fundamentalist movements in Islam;
  
• An above-average criminality, from “ordinary” violent street crimes to participating in terrorist activities.

Thilo Sarrazin: How Germany is commiting suicide by Islam

In Germany, an army of integration committees, Islam researchers, sociologists, political scientists, organizational representatives and a group of naive politicians work intensively, hand in hand, on trivialization, self-deception and denial of the problem.

It is particularly popular to blame the critics of Islam for a lack of tolerance. Thereby an important distinction is lost: One can, indeed must be liberal towards beliefs and lifestyles that differ from our own. But this liberality then may not be applied to those who do not want to tolerate different beliefs and lifestyles.

The 18-year-old murderer Ayham Sürücü — who in February 2005 in Berlin, commissioned by his deeply religious Turkish-Kurdish family-in-law, shot dead his sister Hatun Sürücü, five years his senior, because she had a different lifestyle — was deeply religious, and a representative of a broadly shared view among Muslims. Can someone who judges this kind of religion to be unworthy — even if it does not lead to murder — be described as illiberal?

That the strong growth of the Muslim minority in Europe is causing concern certainly need not be construed as xenophobia. Below-average employment among Muslim immigrants in Germany can be established. Only 33.9 percent of them earn a living through professional and other gainful employment. In the population without an immigration background, that is 43 percent.

It is often noted that many Muslim immigrants are especially likely to be self-employed. There are approximately 80,000 self-employed persons in Germany with a Turkish immigration background, of which 40,000 are in food retailing.

At any rate, the percentage of self employed persons among Muslim immigrants is significantly lower than that of the German population and other immigrant groups — in 2007 only 6.8 percent, compared with immigrants from EU countries (12.4 percent), Southeast Asia (13.9 percent) and persons without an immigration background (10.4 percent).

Compared to the working population, there are among Muslims four times as many people living on unemployment benefits and welfare assistance than among the German population. The situation is completely different among the migrants from the EU Member States. Their employment rate is 44.2 percent, which is even slightly higher than that of native Germans.

Of the people living in Germany with a Muslim immigration background, 30 percent have no school diploma whatsoever, and only 14 percent a Higher School Certificate.

It is noteworthy that the immigrants from the EU and South- and East Asia do not have similar problems. Of the children of the Vietnamese contract workers of the former East Germany 80 percent even have a Higher School Certificate, a higher percentage than the Germans.

Discrimination as a cause for this lack of success of the Muslim immigrants can be excluded, as groups of migrants from the Far East or India, whose appearance is even more exotic than that of the Turks and Arabs, in some cases even surpass the Germans.

The relative failure can also hardly be attributed to congenital capacities and talents, as it concerns Muslim immigrants of various origins. It also is a mystery why the progress in the second and third generations, if there is any, is much less with the Muslim immigrants than with others.

Some Germans — including the elite — have not yet even noticed the problem. In their life, domestic, and working environments Muslim immigrants at the most are encountered as cleaners or as an exotic backdrop for a rare visit to Berlin-Kreuzberg [culturally enriched neighborhood in Berlin]. Certain portions of the intelligentsia and the liberal press seem even to quietly gloat about Muslim immigration undermining German society.

What did the U.S. government do for the integration of German, Jewish, Irish and Italian immigrants? They integrated themselves, because they had no other choice if they wanted to survive. There was no public support for importing brides. The failure of integration in Germany is due to the attitude of the Muslim immigrants.

I would like my great grandchildren 100 years from now still to be able to live in Germany — if they want to. I do not desire that the land of my grandchildren and great-grandchildren be largely Muslim, that Turkish and Arabic be spoken in broad swathes, that women should wear headscarves, and the daily rhythm be determined by the prayer call of the muezzin. If I want to experience that, I can book a vacation to the Orient.

I do not want us to become strangers in our own country.

» » » » [Big Peace (English Translation), from Bild]

Review of Thilo Sarrazin's Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion, by Dr. Frank Ellis, Former Professor of Russian and Slavonic Studies at Leeds Univ. UK


by Dr. Frank Ellis |Why We Are White Refugees

Publication in Germany earlier this year of Thilo Sarrazin’s Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen (Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion: How we are Putting Our Country at Risk) has made it possible for Germans to talk openly for the first time about themes which have been publicly censored in Germany over the last five decades. Having read this work very closely, I have no doubt that Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion may well be the book that finally smashes taboos about race, immigration and integration which have exerted such an insidious influence on German intellectual life since the end of World War Two. In fact, the influence of Sarrazin’s book will extend way beyond Germany. This book is not just about the future and fate of Germany: it is about the very survival of Europe.

Concerns over the magnitude and speed of population growth, as well as the racial and cultural changes brought about by mass immigration are nothing new. What is new is the manner in which the political establishments of virtually all Western states have abandoned, with complete disregard for the legitimate fears and well being of their own indigenous populations, any form of immigration controls. In the USA and Western Europe, a very large proportion of the political class have tried to justify this mass influx of foreigners with the claim that we need the labour, skilled or otherwise; that the mass movement of people is a necessary part of a globalised economy; that in some vague, sentimental way the prosperous nations of the north have an obligation to throw open their doors to the surplus populations of the Third World. Until quite recently, this mass movement of the unemployed and unemployable from the slums of the Middle East, Africa and the Indian sub-continent, with a fair proportion of actual and would-be terrorists among them, used to be justified by the obviously preposterous claim that the white indigenous populations of northern Europe would somehow benefit from the influx of millions of foreigners into their countries. Indeed, we were told – though not so much these days – that immigrants were bearers of the remarkable gift of diversity; that their presence enriched us.

In common with other Western states, Germany has suffered from the combination of a duplicitous and negligent political class, one which has relentlessly harried its citizens to accept what they instinctively feel and know to be wrong, and from waves of immigrants who, the evidence quite clearly shows, have no intention of integrating. Third World immigrants are attracted to Germany not by abstract concepts of free speech, the rule of law, liberal democracy and personal freedom but by the higher standard of living they can enjoy at the expense of the German taxpayer. In part because of the Nazi period, the pressure on Germans to conform to the United Nations-sponsored ideology of multiculturalism has been immense, much worse than anything we have experienced in the United Kingdom. History matters: the Nazi past will remain an integral part of Germany’s history but no other nation has submitted itself to such soul-searching and public flagellation in order to face up to its past and to make amends. However, one of the downsides of Germany’s laudable, post-1945 Vergangenheitsbewältigung (coming to terms with the past) has been to treat any assertion of national German pride as a manifestation of Neo-Nazi tendencies, as something hideously offensive and shameful when it is, in fact, the normal, emotional and rational pride in, and commitment to, one’s country of origin, to one’s Vaterland, to use that beautifully evocative German word. Germany’s reaction to its past stands in striking contrast to Turkey. The Turkish government will not tolerate any discussion of the genocide of 1.5,000,000 – 2,000,000 Armenians perpetrated by Turks in 1915, and those who highlight the genocide in Turkey can expect to be censored and subjected to other harsh sanctions. Moreover, the Turkish government demands that Turkey be treated as a modern European state, which Turkey emphatically is not, and does not hesitate to pass comment on German immigration policy, as it affects Turks. By exploiting the presence of Turks in Germany for its own ends, as a club with which to belabour Germany, and to exact concessions, the Turkish government behaves in exactly the same way as the Hitler regime did towards Czechoslovakia before World War Two (see below).

It is this specifically German historical, social and political background that makes the appearance of Thilo Sarrazin’s book in Germany so remarkable, and all the more remarkable for its having been written by one of Germany’s top technocrats, a person at the very heart of the German administrative establishment, a person, who whatever his misgivings about the state of Germany, I, for one, would have expected to remain silent. Clearly, Herr Sarrazin has had enough. He instinctively grasps the truth of Solzhenitysn’s eleventh commandment: thou shall not live by the Lie. There is something about Sarrazin that bears the stamp of Martin Luther, Pastor Martin Niemöller and the White Rose students who defied the Nazis in Munich. Moral courage is always inspirational and life-enhancing. Indeed, the fact that Sarrazin’s book has become a best seller in Germany and attracted enormous support for its author may well have prompted Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, publicly to admit (October 2010) that multiculturalism had utterly failed in Germany. Indeed, it has: and not just in Germany.

Sarrazin is well aware that the title of his book will inevitably cause some readers to ask, in all seriousness, whether his central thesis – that Germany is heading towards self-inflicted oblivion – is an accurate reflection of what is happening. The ensuing avalanche of evidence and professional analyses presented by the author left me in no doubt that the suicide scenario is fundamentally accurate. Sarrazin underlines the rather obvious but easily forgotten point that Germany is Germany ‘by virtue of its inhabitants and their living intellectual as well as their cultural traditions. Without the people it would merely be a geographical term’ (Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion, p.7). The same is true of England, Denmark, France and Russia. As befits a highly trained and experienced member of the German technocracy, Sarrazin presents a thoroughly well researched set of arguments. Each chapter addresses some aspect of the immigrant problem – poverty, fertility, declining mean IQ and educational standards, spiralling welfare payments, left-wing and intellectual cowardice and the relentless Islamification of Germany - providing the reader with a series of brilliantly written mini-monographs. He examines the various socio-economic, intellectual and demographic trends which are inextricably linked with one another and which lead inexorably to his synthesis and the work’s devastating conclusions. Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion is a masterly display of erudition and logical exposition; yet additional reasons why the intellectually lazy and sentimental will hate the author.

Including a detailed introduction, Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion comes with a total of ten chapters. What follows is a chapter-by-chapter summary and review-commentary. My aim is to provide as much information and as many translations of key passages as possible for the English-speaking reader and at the same time to offer a ready reference work for students, academics and others alarmed by, to borrow the title of Oswald Spengler’s book, the Untergang des Abendlandes (The Decline of the West, 1918) and what, if anything, can be done to reverse these trends. For those, such as this reviewer, who consider sources and references important, I have numbered every paragraph in this summary for ease of reference. Page numbers in brackets refer to the original German publication (Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, München, 2010, ISBN 978-3-421-04430-3). All translations from the German are mine: all analysis, commentary and any errors therein are also mine.

Before turning to the substance of Thilo Sarrazin’s book I want to deal briefly with the translation of the German title. The main German title of the book has in some quarters been translated into English as Germany is Abolishing itself or Germany is Doing away with itself. The German verb abschaffen can indeed be translated as to abolish or to get rid of something but these translations do not, in my opinion, do justice to the scope, depth and above all the implications of the book’s themes which will become clear below. I suggest, therefore, that a better translation of the main title, one that better reflects the impending German (and Western) catastrophe, would be Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion (or even Germany Commits Suicide or Germany’s Death Wish).

I can only hope that this magnificent book will very soon be translated into English as well as into all the major European languages. That said, having observed and personally experienced the intellectual and moral cowardice and double standards of the left, above all in universities, I have no doubt that those hostile to Sarrazin’s message will do everything they can to distort the findings and to try to prevent this book from ever being translated into any other language in the hope that Sarrazin’s findings do not become too widely known. I pray I am wrong. Meanwhile, until such time as Sarrazin’s book is translated into English, this review-commentary with its selected translations will serve as a provisional, and I hope, a useful reference work.

» » » » [Read Review]

African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty

08 September 2010 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Why We Are White Refugees

06 September 2010

Sigmar Gabriel, Chairman of the SPD
Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD)
SPD Parliamentary Group in the German Bundestag
Platz der Republik 1, 10557 Berlin, Germany
E-mail: presse@spdfraktion.de

CC:

1. Chairman and Board of Directors, Deutsche Bundesbank
   
2. Dr. Thilo Sarrazin, Deutsche Bundesbank
   
3. Mr. Geert Wilders (PVV)
   Party for Freedom (Partij de Vrijheid)

Sirs,

RE: African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty

Why We Are White Refugees (i.e. Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe for African White Refugees & Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Holland, for Boer-Afrikaners) has taken note of the media and certain political elite’s hysterical condemnation of board member of Germany’s Bundesbank, and the Social Democratic Party, Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s theories as expressed upon the release of his new book: Germany is Destroying Itself: How we Are Gambling with Our Country. For example, in German Politics Hit by Blowback over Sarrazin, Terence Roth of the Wall Street Journal writes:

A day after the German central bank asked President Christian Wulff to dismiss [Thilo Sarrazin] for racially charged remarks, it was becoming evident that a sizable slice of the electorate share Sarrazin’s concerns over immigration and ethnic integration and were protesting preparations to expel the 65-year-old from the central bank. Informal TV polls suggest that nine in 10 call-ins say Sarrazin might have a point or two.

The government itself fears that the Sarrazin case is splitting society on a thorny issue that German mainstream politics has tried to avoid confronting head on. Now there’s no choice.

The starkest evidence was the letter that the Social Democratic Party sent to members defending a decision to expel the 65-year-old Sarrazin from their party. It was in response to a groundswell of support for the author of a book that warned that high fertility rates among Muslims in Germany will erode the country’s economic potential and collective intelligence.

Why We Are White Refugees would like to express our support and appreciation for Dr. Sarrazin’s courageous intellectual honesty, and request SPD leadership to find the courage to make an impartial enquiry into Dr. Sarrazin’s theories, as opposed to simply firing him to avoid confronting the issues he has raised. We wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Sarrazin that the issues he places before the German people, Europe and the world, are indeed very uncomfortable issues – particularly for those preferring to practice political correct sycophancy, instead of intellectual and visionary ‘practice what we preach’ leadership – and that to solve problems, we do first have to recognize them.

As detailed in Military Study Warns of Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis, by Stefan Schultz, Der Spiegel , 01 September 2010, we believe the ‘friction theory’[*] issues of immigration and integration between conflicting cultures are important issues of leadership and are only going to become more important as Peak Oil takes center stage in the collapse of the globalised industrial economy:

A study by a German military think tank has analyzed how "peak oil" might change the global economy. The internal draft document -- leaked on the Internet -- shows for the first time how carefully the German government has considered a potential energy crisis.

The term "peak oil" is used by energy experts to refer to a point in time when global oil reserves pass their zenith and production gradually begins to decline. This would result in a permanent supply crisis -- and fear of it can trigger turbulence in commodity markets and on stock exchanges.

The issue is so politically explosive that it's remarkable when an institution like the Bundeswehr, the German military, uses the term "peak oil" at all. But a military study currently circulating on the German blogosphere goes even further.

The study is a product of the Future Analysis department of the Bundeswehr Transformation Center, a think tank tasked with fixing a direction for the German military. The team of authors, led by Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Will, uses sometimes-dramatic language to depict the consequences of an irreversible depletion of raw materials. It warns of shifts in the global balance of power, of the formation of new relationships based on interdependency, of a decline in importance of the western industrial nations, of the "total collapse of the markets" and of serious political and economic crises.

On 18 July 2006, PeakOil_RSA filed a 136 page Peak Oil Briefing Paper (PDF) to the South African Government, Media and Civic Society organisations, c/o and via the then Minister of Intelligence: Mr. Ronnie Kasrils, which asked: “Is Gross Mismanagement of the nation’s energy policy an impeachable offense?” The political secession and economic relocalisation suggestions for mitigating a Post Peak Oil world, included: (i) Limit Population, (ii) Develop Alternative Energies; (iii) Reinvent the Way Money Works, i.e. implement local currencies; (iv) Save Energy; (v) Foster local communities, (vi) Get Out of Debt and (vii) Educate and Raise Awareness. The Briefing Paper was ignored by SA political, media and corporate elite.

The issue of cultural conflict in multi-cultural societies, as Dr. Sarrazin identifies, shall be of exponential importance in a future world of energy restraint and socio-economic collapse. It is vitally important that these issues be discussed transparently prior to such events occurring so that citizens, organisations and governments can make the appropriate plans for a relocalized and energy-strained future. Time is of the essence.

It is our view that the most effective and least conflict ridden approach to this Post-Peak Oil future is by implementing the parallel goals of Political Secession and Economic Relocalisation. In Economic Relocalisation: A strategic response to Peak Oil and Climate Change, Jason Bradford of the Oil Drum argues, not from a political or social agenda, “but as a scientist who makes deductions based on the laws of physics and ecology”, that many of the trends of the last century or more, made possible by cheap and abundant energy sources, are going to be reversed.” He clarifies the trends that shall be reversed as “population growth, centralisation of political and economic power, and vastly increased quantity of global trade and mass tourism.” In order to avoid the DieOff resource war consequences feared by the German Military’s Peak Oil report, he advocates Relocalisation.

Relocalization is (i) based on a systems approach that doesn’t solve one set of problems only to make another problem worse; (ii) based on an ethic of protecting the Earth System--or Natural Capital; (iii) starts from the premise that the world is a finite place and that humanity is in a state of overshoot. Perpetual growth of the economy and the population is neither possible nor desirable. It is wise to start planning now for a world with less available energy, not more; (iv) advocates rebuilding more balanced local economies that emphasize securing basic needs. Local food, energy and water systems are perhaps the most critical to build. In the absence of reliable trade partners, whether from peak oil, natural disaster or political instability, a local economy that at least produces its essential goods will have a true comparative advantage.

Finally, in the Radical Honesty White Refugee Amicus Curiae(PDF) supporting a Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, before the SA Constitutional Court, our ‘White Refugee’ argument – supported by the current African White Refugee political reality – is that Gause’s Law of Competitive Exclusion must be considered legally relevant where a lower reproducing productive race finds itself effectively censored, by politically correct fascism from prohibiting its eventual elimination from the environment.

We conclude by reiterating our support and appreciation for Dr. Sarrazin’s courageous intellectual honesty, and request SPD leadership to find the courage to make an impartial enquiry into his theories.

Sincerely,

Lara Johnstone
Why We Are White Refugees
why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com
Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees
www.facebook.com/African.White.Refugees

[*] ‘Friction theory’ was one of the two primary driving forces for the establishment of Apartheid, as cited by the Minister of Interior, introducing the Group Areas Act to Parliament on 14 June 1950: “Now this, as I say, is designed to eliminate friction between the races in the Union because we believe, and believe strongly, that points of contact – all unnecessary points of contact – between the races must be avoided. If you reduce the number of points of contact to the minimum, you reduce the possibility of friction….. The result of putting people of different races together is to cause racial trouble”. The central justification for this perspective was that segregation was in the interest of all different racial groups, because population pressure contacts between different races, with different cultures, inevitably produced conflict. According to English social geographer, John Western in Outcast Capetown (University of California Press, 1997), the friction theory does have a measure of sense to it, as detailed in the work of Robert Sommer: “[Animal studies] show that both territoriality and dominance behaviour are ways of maintaining social order, and when one system cannot function, the other takes over… Group territories keep individual groups apart and thereby preserve the integrity of the troop, whereas dominance is the basis for intragroup relationships… Group territoriality is expressed in national and local boundaries, a segregation into defined areas that reduces conflict.” (Personal Space, (1969), N.J. Prentice Hall, pp. 12, 14, and 15)


[Gause's Law of Competitive Exclusion]: Stalking the Wild Taboo, by Garrett Hardin: Part 4: Competition: (20) Competition, a Tabooed Idea in Sociology; (21) The Cybernetics of Competition; (22) Population, Biology and the Law; (23) Population Skeletons in the Environmental Closet; (24) The Survival of Nations and Civilisations (www.garretthardinsociety.org)


» » » » [African White Refugee Letter: Thilo Sarrazin - EU Prophet (PDF)]

‘Europe Importing Non-Western Rapists & Criminals’ - Coalmine Canary Prophets..

Brave Voices of Reason....

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK. She said she was aware that the “statistics are controversial.”

The Prime Minister of Italy said during a press conference after the Council of Ministers that the fewer Muslim immigrants there are in Europe, the less there is crime.

Monmouth MP David Davies, about a 14 year old immigrant's rape of a British woman: "There are some sensitive issues here, but there do seem to be some people in some communities who don't respect women's rights at all, and who, if I may say, without necessarily saying that this is the case on this occasion, who have imported into this country barbaric and medieval views about women, and that is something that needs to be addressed."

Former Berlin Finance Minister Thilo Sarrazin: Berlin's High Jobless rate due to 40 percent of births in the underclass

Ethno-Cultural Suicide: Are white South Africans and Zimbabweans the World Demographic Coalmine Canary's?

[Eurabia Code] :: [African White Refugees] :: [Ethnic Genetic Interests] :: [Thilo Sarrazin EU Prophet]

According to Lord Carey, Former Archbishop of Canterbury, ‘Britain & Christianity Under Threat from Aggressive Secularism & Radical Islam’.

Isn't this exactly what Gareth Hardin (recommended for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009) warned would happen in his Tragedy of the Commons essay warning about impending Nuclear War unless those addicted to handing out charity to the starving masses, and welfare checks to breed to the breeding masses gave up their self-righteous addictions?:

If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if thus, over breeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line -- then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state, and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons.

In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts over breeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.

USA Population Map 1790 - 1890: Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics

USA Population Maps 1790 - 1890:

Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics, represented at 10 year intervals, including related political events and laws promulgated.

Put differently, it provides a greater more detailed political and demographic perspective to the events between 1790 and 1890.

Provides further justifications for why Ecologically-minded liberals should also heed Dr. Salter’s work, for only when Third-World populations are made to bear the consequences of their own reproductive irresponsibility will they, and the world as a whole, establish population policies that protect the environment.

Closing off the “safety valve” of Third-World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere left as to the racial right.

Or as stated in The Feast of Malthus: “Don't try to solve your population problem by exporting your excess people to us.”

USA Population: 1790 To 2090: Racial Percentage

USA Population Map 1890 - 1990: Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics

USA Population Maps 1890 - 1990:

Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics, represented at 10 year intervals, including related political events and laws promulgated.

Put differently, it provides a greater more detailed political and demographic perspective to the events between 1890 and 1990.

Provides further justifications for why Ecologically-minded liberals should also heed Dr. Salter’s work, for only when Third-World populations are made to bear the consequences of their own reproductive irresponsibility will they, and the world as a whole, establish population policies that protect the environment.

Closing off the “safety valve” of Third-World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere left as to the racial right.

Or as stated in The Feast of Malthus: “Don't try to solve your population problem by exporting your excess people to us.”

USA Population: 1790 To 2090: Racial Percentage

USA Population Map 1990 - 2090: Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics

USA Population Maps 1990 - 2090:

Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics, represented at 10 year intervals, including related political events and laws promulgated.

Put differently, it provides a greater more detailed political and demographic perspective to the events between 1990 and 2010, and the extrapolated projections for 2010 to 2090.

Provides further justifications for why Ecologically-minded liberals should also heed Dr. Salter’s work, for only when Third-World populations are made to bear the consequences of their own reproductive irresponsibility will they, and the world as a whole, establish population policies that protect the environment.

Closing off the “safety valve” of Third-World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere left as to the racial right.

Or as stated in The Feast of Malthus: “Don't try to solve your population problem by exporting your excess people to us.”

USA Population: 1790 To 2090: Racial Percentage

Does Racial Diversity Strengthen or Weaken Communities and Nations?

A future Islamic planet is not a pretty picture. Islam does not believe in gender equality and the Koran say that men are in charge of women. Under sharia law and in custom, Muslim men have far more worth than women..... Does it matter if your African Refugee is black, or white?

In a recent post, Labour wanted multi-cultural Britain, to “rub the Right's nose in diversity”, it was revealed how cynical British 'diversity is strength' policy, politicians, who do not sincerely believe that 'diversity is strength,' used the politically correct 'diversity is strength' belief; as a political football, to 'rub the rights noses in diversity'.

They did so by throwing open Britains borders to mass immigration, to socially engineer a 'truly multicultural' country. Perhaps after the IRA terrorists had given up, and made peace, they decided they needed to nurture some new Islamic terrorists in British soil, who -- unlike those peace-making paddies -- would 'never give up' the fight to destroy Britain and British values. Irrespective the hammer they used was 'diversity is strength' (AYE for forced multiculturalism.):

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

Labour wanted multi-cultural Britain, to “rub the Right's nose in diversity.”

[Ethnic Genetic Interests] :: [Eurabia Code] :: [Thilo Sarrazin EU Prophet]

As I stated in my letter to the Chronicle Herald, Canada, Refugees: Does it Matter if they are Black or White?, subsequently followed by a slew of Immigration : Black or White? posts, on the topics of Religion, Rape, Perceptions to Democracy & Biopolitics; that

It depends on whether you are concerned about their assimilation into your native Canadian culture. If you are not concerned and you don't particulary like your own culture nor want to preserve it, by assimilating like minded people who appreciate your values.. then no it does not matter.

Perhaps you are unaware of the many documented blowback consequences from ethnically different immigrants to the host country, who refuse to assimilate: There are many....

[Daily Mail.co.uk] A generation of outsiders [1/28/07]

How much worse can immigration get when the younger generation is not only less assimilated than their parents, they are actively hostile and want to blow the place up? That's the situation where Britain finds itself today.The doctrine of multi-culturalism has alienated an entire generation of young Muslims and made them increasingly radical, a report has found.

In stark contrast with their parents, growing numbers sympathise with extreme teachings of Islam, with almost four in ten wanting to live under Sharia lawin Britain.

British Elite's Conspiracy of Silence: The Non-White Immigration Crisis!

[Eurabia Code] :: [Ethnic Genetic Interests] :: [African White Refugees] :: [Thilo Sarrazin EU Prophet]

Yesterday, the BBC, made the alleged controversial decision to allow Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party, to appear on the BBC's Question Time Show. I say 'controversial', because well -- allegedly -- Britain is a 'democracy' and as such, in democracies, it is alleged that all political parties are to be given the impartial, but critical, opportunity to share their platform message. It is assumed in a democracy, that the voters are adults, and that voters are capable of deciding whether any Politician is an idiot, and talking the biggest load of crap, or whether he sincerely represents the interests of the people he says he is speaking on behalf. Alternatively in autocracies, the elite, decide that the voters and electorate are emotional and political children, and therefore the elite need to act as shepherds and steer the sheep to vote for whomever the elite consider the most satisfactory candidate to be. Generally an autocratic elite consider the most satisfactory candidate or party to be, the party who is going to reward the elite with the most benefits. If you think back to the recent billion and trillion bank bailouts; to 'save the economy' (yeah right!), you may kinda get 'the idea'!

Personally, what has driven me to read more about the BNP, and to listen to what Mr. Griffin says, has been the amount of vilification and totaly irrational hate that is spewed in the BNP's direction. To read how these people who allegedly personify multi-culturalism and tolerance, could find not one little bit of iota or tolerance for the views of Mr. Griffin or the BNP; and whose multicultural 'respect' for all cultures views, are quite capable of embracing the view that Islam can be the future of Britain; but not that British Europeans may wish to keep their European British heritage, and culture; as the BNP, would like her to.

It just simply did not make sense. If you support the Aborigines, like multi-culturalists do, in stating that their country was overrun by white Australians, then the same is true for Britain; which is being overrun, by Third World Muslim and African immigration, and where European British Nationals who have lived in Britain for over a thousand years, will soon be minorities in their own country. Now you may also think that Britain was an Imperial Power, with colonies, to exploit and rape! Well take a look at Africa, and ask the average poor black man in Africa, whether he was better off under the British Benevolent Empire, or whether he is better of under Mugabe, or Idi Amin, et al. The British Empire, after all brought all its colonies, new concepts such as the Magna Carta (the Great Charter of Freedoms), and 'Trial by Jury' (PDF: International Development of the Jury: Role of the British Empire).

But to state this in public, as a fact, and to oppose this future Islamofascist reality (Jury Trials in Saudi Arabia??), as the cultural suicide of Britain, is -- according to the British 'tolerant' and 'multicultrual' elite -- 'racist' and fascist?

Religion: Does it Matter if your African Refugee, is Black or White?

Roy Beck is a card carrying liberal, former newspaperman, editor for the journal Social Contract, and the author of The Case Against Immigration: The moral, economic, social, and environmental reasons for reducing U.S. immigration back to traditional levels (PDF). In The Case Against Immigration he argues for cutting immigration, as a cause of falling real wages that breed deteriorating communities and crumbling families--the "crisis of the middle class." Furthermore it states that immigration increases the gap between the rich and the poor, harms every level of the economy, including the high end sectors.

Who lobbies for immigration?: Business lobbies who prefer cheap labour and low wages; diversity and multiculturalist academics and activists who hate western civilization; Kings Need Peasants politicians who import dependant populations, that need free services, and will vote for them; and conservatives who fear the 'r' word.

Do you know that in 20 to 40 years time, your European children will be a minority in most Western Nations? Do you think the new African / Muslim majority will share your Western democratic values; towards you, women, justice etc?

The Case Against Immigration graph (further below) is not genetic specific, but the following Table from Arthur Kemps, March of the Titans is more blunt:

USA Population Projections, millions (rounded off)

__________ Total _______ Non White _______ White ________ W % of Total
1997: _____ 267 M ________ 72 M __________ 195 M _________ 72.8
2010: _____ 298 M ________ 96 M __________ 202 M _________ 68
2030: _____ 347 M ________ 137 M _________ 210 M _________ 60.5
2100: _____ 572 M ________ 353 M _________ 219 M _________ 45.6

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P25-1130, Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1995 to 2050.

Does it matter if your child, may be living under Sharia law, in the Islamicised West?

Another plus for Muslim immigrants to the West is the treasure chest of welfare benefits in places like Britain that can enable a poor man step up to a multi-wife lifestyle.

Confirming their reluctance to assimilate, Muslim protest rallies routinely feature participants with signs attacking free speech and democracy , as well as expressing the intention to dominate the whole world with their totalitarian religion.

BioPolitics: Does it Matter if your SA Refugee, is Black or White?

Other factors being equal, is immigration more harmful to the receiving population's genetic interests, the more genetically distant the immigrants?

According to Ted Salis, in Ethnic Genetic Interests, in a review of, Dr. Frank Salter's, On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethnicity, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration

“Mainstream” discussions about immigration, race, and the implications of a multiracial society usually consider only secondary questions such as economics, crime, culture, etc. They ignore the ultimate interest of a people: genetic continuity. No rational person would support policies that would, on the one hand, “enrich” their family while, on the other hand, simultaneously replace their family with strangers. And yet we seem to completely ignore the large scale effects of public policies on our greater “extended family”–the racial and ethnic groups to which we belong.

Dr. Salter’s paper can be summarized as follows. Ethnies (and races) are large reservoirs of genetic interests for group members. Ethnic genetic interests are real and vitally important. Genetic kinship can be calculated, and the harm to any person’s (or group’s) ethnic genetic interests resulting from alien immigration can be quantified. Immigration of even closely-related groups has a negative impact on genetic interests, and this detrimental influence increases rapidly with greater genetic distance. Putting this detrimental impact in the form of “child-equivalents” is a particularly powerful way of demonstrating these effects. If people of European descent understood that every non-white face they see is diminishing their personal and group interests they might begin to understand they are being ill-served, at a fundamental genetic level, by non-European immigration and the ideology of multiculturalism.

Thus, this essay has three basic purposes. First, to introduce the fundamentally important concept of genetic interests–which are ultimate interests–to Western peoples. Second, to explain, succinctly but precisely, what is at stake: the demographic decline of an entire people, with a consequent devastating personal loss for each and every member of that people. Third, to encourage Western peoples, so informed, to engage in legal, peaceful, non-violent, and rational sociopolitical activism to pursue their genetic interests. Which means: to ensure their own survival.