Ethno-Nationalism's Relationship to Individuals Happiness & Nations Democratic Potentiality

Racial identity tied to happiness, study finds

Published: March 04, 2011
Michigan University

EAST LANSING, Mich. — Black people who identify more strongly with their racial identity are generally happier, according to a study led by psychology researchers at Michigan State University.

The study, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, appears in the current issue of Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, a research journal published by the American Psychological Association.

“This is the first empirical study we know of that shows a relationship between racial identity and happiness,” said Stevie C.Y. Yap, doctoral candidate in psychology at MSU and lead researcher on the project.

Previous research has found a relationship between racial identity and favorable outcomes such as self-esteem, Yap said, but none has made the link with happiness.

For the study, the researchers surveyed black adults in Michigan. The results suggest the more the participants identified with being black – or the more being black was an important part of who they are – the more happy they were with life as a whole, Yap said.

The study also explored the reasons behind the connection. Yap said it may be fueled by a sense of belongingness – that is, blacks with a strong sense of racial identity may feel more connected to their racial group, which in turn makes them happy.

This sense of belongingness is especially important for happiness in women, Yap said.

Prepping for MadMax Collapse: Ten Reasons to Become Self-Sufficient and Ten Ways to Get There...

[MADMAX COLLAPSE]: [Humans: An Endangered Species] :: [Peak Oil, Carrying Capacity & Overshoot] :: [NSSM 200] :: [Tragedy of the Breeding War Commons] :: [Licensed to Breed] :: [Flat Earth Economists: Blood on your Hands] :: [Exponential Eco. & Pop. Growth World Economy Ponzi Scheme] :: PREPPING :: [1] [10 Reasons to Be Self-Sufficient & 10 Ways to Get There] [2] [Protecting Yourself Against Crime and Violence]



Ten Reasons to Become Self-Sufficient and Ten Ways to Get There

Michael Edwards and Jeffrey Green
Activist Post, 20 August 2010

We are now three to five generations removed from the rural backbone that strengthened America. The world at large has undergone a similar transformation as the promise of easier work has created a migration to big cities. These mega-cities could be seen as an experiment gone awry, as general well-being has declined, with suicide rates increasing across the world. Crowded conditions and economic strife have led to rampant crime, pollution, corporate malfeasance, and a dog-eat-dog type of competition that can be described as a temporary insanity.

The economic crisis we are living through has been the final straw for many people, as promises of a better, easier, and more creative life seem to have been sold to us by carnival-style tricksters who are laughing all the way to (their) bank.

Here are the top reasons for becoming self-sufficient; these are based on fundamental, systemic concerns for why undertaking this life change will not be a fly-by-night fad, but rather a long-lasting means for personal independence.

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus [IV] The Reasonable Initiation Legal Fraud – Who cares about the Evidence?

Ubuntufied Legal Lynching in Rainbow Hypocrisy SA

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus

02 March 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

“All law is interpretation. A lawyer uses words, which are inherently imprecise, and when a law is applied to the fact of a new situation what lawyers do is interpret the code words to deem them appropriately or inappropriately applied to the case at hand. To view the law means to understand interpretation. Law has more to do with critical literacy studies than it probably has to do with anything else.” -- Professor David Skover, Professor of Law at Seattle University.

‘Lawyers are either social engineers, or they are parasites. Social Engineer Lawyers aim to eliminate the difference between what the laws say and mean, and how they are applied; whereas legal parasites aim to entrench their parasitism from the difference between what the laws say and mean, and the application of such differences to their parasitic benefit.’ -- Howard Law School, Professor Charlie Houston, the primary legal mentor of U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Thurgood Marshall; as quoted in Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education, by Richard Kluger

This series shall consist of:

1. Introduction: Politicians, Editors & Lawyers: Kangaroo Court Actors
   

2. Media Timeline of Events - Ignoring Anti-Lynching Voices
   

3. Ubuntu Kangaroo Court Justice – Evidence is Irrelevant
   

4. The Reasonable Initiation Satire Legal Fraud – Who cares about Evidence?
   

5. The Dolus Eventualis Legal Fraud – The Multiculti Boiling Frog
   

6. The Reconciliation Religious Fraud – Censoring TRC Fraud

A lynching is the practice of killing people by extrajudicial mob action, where a mob is generally considered to be more than five persons. The mob generally act under the pretext of service to justice, their race or tradition. They use lynching and other terror tactics to intimidate a particular racial, religious or cultural group into political, social or economic submission. A legal lynching has other names such as Stalin's Political Show trials, or Kangaroo Court Justice, etc.

The term show trial is a pejorative description of a type of highly public trial. The term was first recorded in the 1930s. There is a strong connotation that the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant and that the actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning. Show trials exhibit scant regard for the principles of jurisprudence and even for the letter of the law. Defendants have little real opportunity to justify themselves.

[www.guerrylla-law.co.nr] David vs Tutu Goliath's TRC Fraud & Ecolaw Corruption

[Concourt #23-10: Citizen v. McBride] :: [Concourt #06-11: Radical Honesty SA v SANEF & 87 Others]
[Bloemfontein Mag. Crt: State v. Reitz 4] :: [UK Westminster Mag. Crt: RSA v. Shrien Dewani]
[Scientific Journalism Ratings]

Concourt #23-10: The Citizen v. Robert McBride

Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae in Support of Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995

Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus:

• 26 Mar 2010: Radical Honesty Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court)
  
• 18 July 2010: Radical Honesty Amicus Heads of Argument
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness
  
• Expert Witness Dr. Brad Blanton: The legal, psychological, & socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’
  
• Expert Witness Dr. T. Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment connection
  
• Radical Honesty Amicus Curiae Heads of Argument: [Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of TRC Act] :: [Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon] :: [Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract Principles] :: [Population Policy Common Sense Principles] :: [TRC Fraud: ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History] :: [Radical Honesty: Culture and Religion, or Refugee Status?]

[www.kaffir-lily-riddle.co.nr]: Understanding Masculine Insecurity Poverty Pimping: Population Production of Poverty & Violence Breeding Wars

The Malthusian Tragedy of the Kaffir Lily Riddle Commons

“With complete freedom in reproduction, conscientious people will be eliminated.”
-- Garrett Hardin, The Feast of Malthus: Living within Limits & The Tragedy of the Commons

“We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc., you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population an act of war.”
–-- Jason G. Brent, Attorney and author of Humans: An Endangered Species

French Riddle of the Lily Pond: Understanding Exponential Growth In this riddle, the lily pond has a potentially virulent lily that apparently will double in size each day. If the lily grows unchecked it will cover the entire pond in 30 days, choking off all other forms of life in the water by the time it covers the entire pond. If a skeptic waited until 50% of the pond was covered before taking any remedial action to save the pond, when would he act? The answer: on the 29th day of the month! But by then, it would be too late. [See also: World Pop. Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle:] Compound Interest on Judas Iscariots' 30 Pieces of Silver “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world.” -- A member of the Rothschild family

‘Huntley accomplished ‘African White Refugee’ objectives’ - Russel Kaplan

Russell Kaplan
Former Attorney for Brandon Huntley

I have been contacted by reporters already who have asked me for my reaction to the Huntley ruling on November 24, 2010. Having gone through the entire refugee claim myself and through the entire judicial review proceeding (the “appeal”) with co-counsel Mr. Galati, here is my reaction.


Mr. Huntley had two objectives when he brought his refugee claim:

1. That he finds protection in Canada and
   
   
2. That he informs the world what a sickly place South Africa is for many white South Africans.

As far as his first objective is concerned, Mr. Huntley is still in Canada. He has an opportunity for a new hearing and also some other remedies that can ensure his safety in Canada.

As far as his second objective is concerned, in my view, he has succeeded. This case has contributed towards placing the plight of many white South Africans in South Africa on the world stage. Further, the court clearly and expressly stated that while the evidentiary foundation might have been lacking in Mr. Huntley’s case, in another case, a white South African could qualify for refugee protection. You need to go no further than paragraph 234 of the decision to realize this. For convenience, paragraph 234 is reproduced below:

Wake Up Whitey Lessons from Scapegoating of Serbia: From Stolen Kosovo, Lies of Racak, to Corruption of International Justice...

Serbian Population in Kosovo, before NATO bombing After NATO bombing; Serb population in Kosovo, at beginning of NATO occupation

"The Turks are conquering Germany exactly as the Kosovars conquered Kosovo: through a higher birth rate. I would like it, if it were Eastern European Jews with a 15% higher IQ than the native Germans."
-- Thilo Sarrazin, SPD politician, DeutscheBank board member, in Lettre International Interview


‘Friction theory’ was one of the two primary driving forces for the establishment of Apartheid, as cited by the Minister of Interior, introducing the Group Areas Act to Parliament on 14 June 1950:

“Now this, as I say, is designed to eliminate friction between the races in the Union because we believe, and believe strongly, that points of contact – all unnecessary points of contact – between the races must be avoided. If you reduce the number of points of contact to the minimum, you reduce the possibility of friction….. The result of putting people of different races together is to cause racial trouble”.

The central justification for this perspective was that segregation was in the interest of all different racial groups, because population pressure contacts between different races, with different cultures, inevitably produced conflict. According to English social geographer, John Western in Outcast Capetown (University of California Press, 1997), the friction theory does have a measure of sense to it, as detailed in the work of Robert Sommer:

“[Animal studies] show that both territoriality and dominance behaviour are ways of maintaining social order, and when one system cannot function, the other takes over… Group territories keep individual groups apart and thereby preserve the integrity of the troop, whereas dominance is the basis for intragroup relationships… Group territoriality is expressed in national and local boundaries, a segregation into defined areas that reduces conflict.” (Personal Space, (1969), N.J. Prentice Hall, pp. 12, 14, and 15)

-- Footnote in Letter to Sigmar Gabriel, Chairman of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD); African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty, excerpted from Radical Honesty SA Amicus to Concourt (PDF)

SA Farm Attacks [www.sa-farm-attacks.co.nr]

‘Zimbabwe style farm invasions may be delayed ... but will definitely happen in SA's future’
-- Lt. Gen. Mojo Matau, Former Chief of Mil. Intel., SANDF

... Then I asked my friend [Lt. Gen. Mojo Matau], this man in the kitchen cabinet of ANC power in the new South Africa, what he thought of Robert Mugabe. At his reply my heart sank. He described Zimbabwe’s President as a hero for what he’s done to white farmers, and a leader who illuminated the path ahead for South Africa. I remonstrated, as I always do, and ended by telling Mojo that I saw myself as an African first, a white second, and that it was my ardent wish to stay on the continent. ‘Your only home,’ countered Mojo, gently taking my hand again, ‘is England.’

.... Mugabe, to say it without beating around the liberal bush, is a hero to many of my black African friends. Most of the people I’m talking about are from the upper middle class, inheritors of the African kingdom after colonialism. According to one Zambian, who is among my very oldest of comrades, ‘Mugabe is Shaka Zulu.’

Mugabe is ‘speaking for black people worldwide,’ writes the South African journalist Harry Mashabela. Regarded as a solid liberal in his long career, and writing in the Helen Suzman Foundation’s September newsletter, Mashabela pointed to the adoration Mugabe won at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg last year:

Dr. Thilo Sarrazin - EU Prophet: African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty

If I want to hear the muezzin, I also can book a vacation to the Orient

by Thilo Sarrazin
Bild (Translation by Big Peace)

Uncontrolled immigration may at any time threaten the state structures and undermine the stability of a society. The Chinese empire therefore had its Great Wall, the Romans had their Limes. At no time were the securing of the territory and the regulation of immigration something trivial. The complications arising from these issues threatened states and societies to their core and penetrated them deeply. And each time they were accompanied by orgies of bloodletting and violence.

In the German media this is frequently concealed. Immigration issues are often treated with a raised admonitory finger, and an attitude that probably can be the best characterized with the slogan: “Peep, peep, peep! We all just love each other.” This approach is as unhistorical as it is silly. Even more regrettable is that the German political elite lets its position on immigration be determined largely by the voices from the media. It thus runs the risk of alienating itself both from the people and the core of the problem.

The growing influx, noted by right-wing populist movements in many European countries — also the referendum on the acceptance of minarets, as held in Switzerland — are consequences of the predominantly unhistorical, naïve and opportunistic migration policy of European governments.

In all countries concerned — whether Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark or Norway — one makes similar observations about the group of Muslim migrants, namely:

• Below-average labor market integration;
  
• Above-average dependence on welfare benefits;
  
• Below-average participation in education;
  
• Above-average fertility;
  
• Spatial segregation with a tendency towards the emergence of parallel societies;
  
• Above-average religiosity with growing penchant for traditional and fundamentalist movements in Islam;
  
• An above-average criminality, from “ordinary” violent street crimes to participating in terrorist activities.

Thilo Sarrazin: How Germany is commiting suicide by Islam

In Germany, an army of integration committees, Islam researchers, sociologists, political scientists, organizational representatives and a group of naive politicians work intensively, hand in hand, on trivialization, self-deception and denial of the problem.

It is particularly popular to blame the critics of Islam for a lack of tolerance. Thereby an important distinction is lost: One can, indeed must be liberal towards beliefs and lifestyles that differ from our own. But this liberality then may not be applied to those who do not want to tolerate different beliefs and lifestyles.

The 18-year-old murderer Ayham Sürücü — who in February 2005 in Berlin, commissioned by his deeply religious Turkish-Kurdish family-in-law, shot dead his sister Hatun Sürücü, five years his senior, because she had a different lifestyle — was deeply religious, and a representative of a broadly shared view among Muslims. Can someone who judges this kind of religion to be unworthy — even if it does not lead to murder — be described as illiberal?

That the strong growth of the Muslim minority in Europe is causing concern certainly need not be construed as xenophobia. Below-average employment among Muslim immigrants in Germany can be established. Only 33.9 percent of them earn a living through professional and other gainful employment. In the population without an immigration background, that is 43 percent.

It is often noted that many Muslim immigrants are especially likely to be self-employed. There are approximately 80,000 self-employed persons in Germany with a Turkish immigration background, of which 40,000 are in food retailing.

At any rate, the percentage of self employed persons among Muslim immigrants is significantly lower than that of the German population and other immigrant groups — in 2007 only 6.8 percent, compared with immigrants from EU countries (12.4 percent), Southeast Asia (13.9 percent) and persons without an immigration background (10.4 percent).

Compared to the working population, there are among Muslims four times as many people living on unemployment benefits and welfare assistance than among the German population. The situation is completely different among the migrants from the EU Member States. Their employment rate is 44.2 percent, which is even slightly higher than that of native Germans.

Of the people living in Germany with a Muslim immigration background, 30 percent have no school diploma whatsoever, and only 14 percent a Higher School Certificate.

It is noteworthy that the immigrants from the EU and South- and East Asia do not have similar problems. Of the children of the Vietnamese contract workers of the former East Germany 80 percent even have a Higher School Certificate, a higher percentage than the Germans.

Discrimination as a cause for this lack of success of the Muslim immigrants can be excluded, as groups of migrants from the Far East or India, whose appearance is even more exotic than that of the Turks and Arabs, in some cases even surpass the Germans.

The relative failure can also hardly be attributed to congenital capacities and talents, as it concerns Muslim immigrants of various origins. It also is a mystery why the progress in the second and third generations, if there is any, is much less with the Muslim immigrants than with others.

Some Germans — including the elite — have not yet even noticed the problem. In their life, domestic, and working environments Muslim immigrants at the most are encountered as cleaners or as an exotic backdrop for a rare visit to Berlin-Kreuzberg [culturally enriched neighborhood in Berlin]. Certain portions of the intelligentsia and the liberal press seem even to quietly gloat about Muslim immigration undermining German society.

What did the U.S. government do for the integration of German, Jewish, Irish and Italian immigrants? They integrated themselves, because they had no other choice if they wanted to survive. There was no public support for importing brides. The failure of integration in Germany is due to the attitude of the Muslim immigrants.

I would like my great grandchildren 100 years from now still to be able to live in Germany — if they want to. I do not desire that the land of my grandchildren and great-grandchildren be largely Muslim, that Turkish and Arabic be spoken in broad swathes, that women should wear headscarves, and the daily rhythm be determined by the prayer call of the muezzin. If I want to experience that, I can book a vacation to the Orient.

I do not want us to become strangers in our own country.

» » » » [Big Peace (English Translation), from Bild]

Review of Thilo Sarrazin's Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion, by Dr. Frank Ellis, Former Professor of Russian and Slavonic Studies at Leeds Univ. UK


by Dr. Frank Ellis |Why We Are White Refugees

Publication in Germany earlier this year of Thilo Sarrazin’s Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen (Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion: How we are Putting Our Country at Risk) has made it possible for Germans to talk openly for the first time about themes which have been publicly censored in Germany over the last five decades. Having read this work very closely, I have no doubt that Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion may well be the book that finally smashes taboos about race, immigration and integration which have exerted such an insidious influence on German intellectual life since the end of World War Two. In fact, the influence of Sarrazin’s book will extend way beyond Germany. This book is not just about the future and fate of Germany: it is about the very survival of Europe.

Concerns over the magnitude and speed of population growth, as well as the racial and cultural changes brought about by mass immigration are nothing new. What is new is the manner in which the political establishments of virtually all Western states have abandoned, with complete disregard for the legitimate fears and well being of their own indigenous populations, any form of immigration controls. In the USA and Western Europe, a very large proportion of the political class have tried to justify this mass influx of foreigners with the claim that we need the labour, skilled or otherwise; that the mass movement of people is a necessary part of a globalised economy; that in some vague, sentimental way the prosperous nations of the north have an obligation to throw open their doors to the surplus populations of the Third World. Until quite recently, this mass movement of the unemployed and unemployable from the slums of the Middle East, Africa and the Indian sub-continent, with a fair proportion of actual and would-be terrorists among them, used to be justified by the obviously preposterous claim that the white indigenous populations of northern Europe would somehow benefit from the influx of millions of foreigners into their countries. Indeed, we were told – though not so much these days – that immigrants were bearers of the remarkable gift of diversity; that their presence enriched us.

In common with other Western states, Germany has suffered from the combination of a duplicitous and negligent political class, one which has relentlessly harried its citizens to accept what they instinctively feel and know to be wrong, and from waves of immigrants who, the evidence quite clearly shows, have no intention of integrating. Third World immigrants are attracted to Germany not by abstract concepts of free speech, the rule of law, liberal democracy and personal freedom but by the higher standard of living they can enjoy at the expense of the German taxpayer. In part because of the Nazi period, the pressure on Germans to conform to the United Nations-sponsored ideology of multiculturalism has been immense, much worse than anything we have experienced in the United Kingdom. History matters: the Nazi past will remain an integral part of Germany’s history but no other nation has submitted itself to such soul-searching and public flagellation in order to face up to its past and to make amends. However, one of the downsides of Germany’s laudable, post-1945 Vergangenheitsbewältigung (coming to terms with the past) has been to treat any assertion of national German pride as a manifestation of Neo-Nazi tendencies, as something hideously offensive and shameful when it is, in fact, the normal, emotional and rational pride in, and commitment to, one’s country of origin, to one’s Vaterland, to use that beautifully evocative German word. Germany’s reaction to its past stands in striking contrast to Turkey. The Turkish government will not tolerate any discussion of the genocide of 1.5,000,000 – 2,000,000 Armenians perpetrated by Turks in 1915, and those who highlight the genocide in Turkey can expect to be censored and subjected to other harsh sanctions. Moreover, the Turkish government demands that Turkey be treated as a modern European state, which Turkey emphatically is not, and does not hesitate to pass comment on German immigration policy, as it affects Turks. By exploiting the presence of Turks in Germany for its own ends, as a club with which to belabour Germany, and to exact concessions, the Turkish government behaves in exactly the same way as the Hitler regime did towards Czechoslovakia before World War Two (see below).

It is this specifically German historical, social and political background that makes the appearance of Thilo Sarrazin’s book in Germany so remarkable, and all the more remarkable for its having been written by one of Germany’s top technocrats, a person at the very heart of the German administrative establishment, a person, who whatever his misgivings about the state of Germany, I, for one, would have expected to remain silent. Clearly, Herr Sarrazin has had enough. He instinctively grasps the truth of Solzhenitysn’s eleventh commandment: thou shall not live by the Lie. There is something about Sarrazin that bears the stamp of Martin Luther, Pastor Martin Niemöller and the White Rose students who defied the Nazis in Munich. Moral courage is always inspirational and life-enhancing. Indeed, the fact that Sarrazin’s book has become a best seller in Germany and attracted enormous support for its author may well have prompted Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, publicly to admit (October 2010) that multiculturalism had utterly failed in Germany. Indeed, it has: and not just in Germany.

Sarrazin is well aware that the title of his book will inevitably cause some readers to ask, in all seriousness, whether his central thesis – that Germany is heading towards self-inflicted oblivion – is an accurate reflection of what is happening. The ensuing avalanche of evidence and professional analyses presented by the author left me in no doubt that the suicide scenario is fundamentally accurate. Sarrazin underlines the rather obvious but easily forgotten point that Germany is Germany ‘by virtue of its inhabitants and their living intellectual as well as their cultural traditions. Without the people it would merely be a geographical term’ (Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion, p.7). The same is true of England, Denmark, France and Russia. As befits a highly trained and experienced member of the German technocracy, Sarrazin presents a thoroughly well researched set of arguments. Each chapter addresses some aspect of the immigrant problem – poverty, fertility, declining mean IQ and educational standards, spiralling welfare payments, left-wing and intellectual cowardice and the relentless Islamification of Germany - providing the reader with a series of brilliantly written mini-monographs. He examines the various socio-economic, intellectual and demographic trends which are inextricably linked with one another and which lead inexorably to his synthesis and the work’s devastating conclusions. Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion is a masterly display of erudition and logical exposition; yet additional reasons why the intellectually lazy and sentimental will hate the author.

Including a detailed introduction, Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion comes with a total of ten chapters. What follows is a chapter-by-chapter summary and review-commentary. My aim is to provide as much information and as many translations of key passages as possible for the English-speaking reader and at the same time to offer a ready reference work for students, academics and others alarmed by, to borrow the title of Oswald Spengler’s book, the Untergang des Abendlandes (The Decline of the West, 1918) and what, if anything, can be done to reverse these trends. For those, such as this reviewer, who consider sources and references important, I have numbered every paragraph in this summary for ease of reference. Page numbers in brackets refer to the original German publication (Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, München, 2010, ISBN 978-3-421-04430-3). All translations from the German are mine: all analysis, commentary and any errors therein are also mine.

Before turning to the substance of Thilo Sarrazin’s book I want to deal briefly with the translation of the German title. The main German title of the book has in some quarters been translated into English as Germany is Abolishing itself or Germany is Doing away with itself. The German verb abschaffen can indeed be translated as to abolish or to get rid of something but these translations do not, in my opinion, do justice to the scope, depth and above all the implications of the book’s themes which will become clear below. I suggest, therefore, that a better translation of the main title, one that better reflects the impending German (and Western) catastrophe, would be Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion (or even Germany Commits Suicide or Germany’s Death Wish).

I can only hope that this magnificent book will very soon be translated into English as well as into all the major European languages. That said, having observed and personally experienced the intellectual and moral cowardice and double standards of the left, above all in universities, I have no doubt that those hostile to Sarrazin’s message will do everything they can to distort the findings and to try to prevent this book from ever being translated into any other language in the hope that Sarrazin’s findings do not become too widely known. I pray I am wrong. Meanwhile, until such time as Sarrazin’s book is translated into English, this review-commentary with its selected translations will serve as a provisional, and I hope, a useful reference work.

» » » » [Read Review]

African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty

08 September 2010 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Why We Are White Refugees

06 September 2010

Sigmar Gabriel, Chairman of the SPD
Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD)
SPD Parliamentary Group in the German Bundestag
Platz der Republik 1, 10557 Berlin, Germany
E-mail: presse@spdfraktion.de

CC:

1. Chairman and Board of Directors, Deutsche Bundesbank
   
2. Dr. Thilo Sarrazin, Deutsche Bundesbank
   
3. Mr. Geert Wilders (PVV)
   Party for Freedom (Partij de Vrijheid)

Sirs,

RE: African White Refugees Support and Appreciation for Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s Courageous Intellectual Honesty

Why We Are White Refugees (i.e. Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe for African White Refugees & Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Holland, for Boer-Afrikaners) has taken note of the media and certain political elite’s hysterical condemnation of board member of Germany’s Bundesbank, and the Social Democratic Party, Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s theories as expressed upon the release of his new book: Germany is Destroying Itself: How we Are Gambling with Our Country. For example, in German Politics Hit by Blowback over Sarrazin, Terence Roth of the Wall Street Journal writes:

A day after the German central bank asked President Christian Wulff to dismiss [Thilo Sarrazin] for racially charged remarks, it was becoming evident that a sizable slice of the electorate share Sarrazin’s concerns over immigration and ethnic integration and were protesting preparations to expel the 65-year-old from the central bank. Informal TV polls suggest that nine in 10 call-ins say Sarrazin might have a point or two.

The government itself fears that the Sarrazin case is splitting society on a thorny issue that German mainstream politics has tried to avoid confronting head on. Now there’s no choice.

The starkest evidence was the letter that the Social Democratic Party sent to members defending a decision to expel the 65-year-old Sarrazin from their party. It was in response to a groundswell of support for the author of a book that warned that high fertility rates among Muslims in Germany will erode the country’s economic potential and collective intelligence.

Why We Are White Refugees would like to express our support and appreciation for Dr. Sarrazin’s courageous intellectual honesty, and request SPD leadership to find the courage to make an impartial enquiry into Dr. Sarrazin’s theories, as opposed to simply firing him to avoid confronting the issues he has raised. We wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Sarrazin that the issues he places before the German people, Europe and the world, are indeed very uncomfortable issues – particularly for those preferring to practice political correct sycophancy, instead of intellectual and visionary ‘practice what we preach’ leadership – and that to solve problems, we do first have to recognize them.

As detailed in Military Study Warns of Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis, by Stefan Schultz, Der Spiegel , 01 September 2010, we believe the ‘friction theory’[*] issues of immigration and integration between conflicting cultures are important issues of leadership and are only going to become more important as Peak Oil takes center stage in the collapse of the globalised industrial economy:

A study by a German military think tank has analyzed how "peak oil" might change the global economy. The internal draft document -- leaked on the Internet -- shows for the first time how carefully the German government has considered a potential energy crisis.

The term "peak oil" is used by energy experts to refer to a point in time when global oil reserves pass their zenith and production gradually begins to decline. This would result in a permanent supply crisis -- and fear of it can trigger turbulence in commodity markets and on stock exchanges.

The issue is so politically explosive that it's remarkable when an institution like the Bundeswehr, the German military, uses the term "peak oil" at all. But a military study currently circulating on the German blogosphere goes even further.

The study is a product of the Future Analysis department of the Bundeswehr Transformation Center, a think tank tasked with fixing a direction for the German military. The team of authors, led by Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Will, uses sometimes-dramatic language to depict the consequences of an irreversible depletion of raw materials. It warns of shifts in the global balance of power, of the formation of new relationships based on interdependency, of a decline in importance of the western industrial nations, of the "total collapse of the markets" and of serious political and economic crises.

On 18 July 2006, PeakOil_RSA filed a 136 page Peak Oil Briefing Paper (PDF) to the South African Government, Media and Civic Society organisations, c/o and via the then Minister of Intelligence: Mr. Ronnie Kasrils, which asked: “Is Gross Mismanagement of the nation’s energy policy an impeachable offense?” The political secession and economic relocalisation suggestions for mitigating a Post Peak Oil world, included: (i) Limit Population, (ii) Develop Alternative Energies; (iii) Reinvent the Way Money Works, i.e. implement local currencies; (iv) Save Energy; (v) Foster local communities, (vi) Get Out of Debt and (vii) Educate and Raise Awareness. The Briefing Paper was ignored by SA political, media and corporate elite.

The issue of cultural conflict in multi-cultural societies, as Dr. Sarrazin identifies, shall be of exponential importance in a future world of energy restraint and socio-economic collapse. It is vitally important that these issues be discussed transparently prior to such events occurring so that citizens, organisations and governments can make the appropriate plans for a relocalized and energy-strained future. Time is of the essence.

It is our view that the most effective and least conflict ridden approach to this Post-Peak Oil future is by implementing the parallel goals of Political Secession and Economic Relocalisation. In Economic Relocalisation: A strategic response to Peak Oil and Climate Change, Jason Bradford of the Oil Drum argues, not from a political or social agenda, “but as a scientist who makes deductions based on the laws of physics and ecology”, that many of the trends of the last century or more, made possible by cheap and abundant energy sources, are going to be reversed.” He clarifies the trends that shall be reversed as “population growth, centralisation of political and economic power, and vastly increased quantity of global trade and mass tourism.” In order to avoid the DieOff resource war consequences feared by the German Military’s Peak Oil report, he advocates Relocalisation.

Relocalization is (i) based on a systems approach that doesn’t solve one set of problems only to make another problem worse; (ii) based on an ethic of protecting the Earth System--or Natural Capital; (iii) starts from the premise that the world is a finite place and that humanity is in a state of overshoot. Perpetual growth of the economy and the population is neither possible nor desirable. It is wise to start planning now for a world with less available energy, not more; (iv) advocates rebuilding more balanced local economies that emphasize securing basic needs. Local food, energy and water systems are perhaps the most critical to build. In the absence of reliable trade partners, whether from peak oil, natural disaster or political instability, a local economy that at least produces its essential goods will have a true comparative advantage.

Finally, in the Radical Honesty White Refugee Amicus Curiae(PDF) supporting a Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, before the SA Constitutional Court, our ‘White Refugee’ argument – supported by the current African White Refugee political reality – is that Gause’s Law of Competitive Exclusion must be considered legally relevant where a lower reproducing productive race finds itself effectively censored, by politically correct fascism from prohibiting its eventual elimination from the environment.

We conclude by reiterating our support and appreciation for Dr. Sarrazin’s courageous intellectual honesty, and request SPD leadership to find the courage to make an impartial enquiry into his theories.

Sincerely,

Lara Johnstone
Why We Are White Refugees
why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com
Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees
www.facebook.com/African.White.Refugees

[*] ‘Friction theory’ was one of the two primary driving forces for the establishment of Apartheid, as cited by the Minister of Interior, introducing the Group Areas Act to Parliament on 14 June 1950: “Now this, as I say, is designed to eliminate friction between the races in the Union because we believe, and believe strongly, that points of contact – all unnecessary points of contact – between the races must be avoided. If you reduce the number of points of contact to the minimum, you reduce the possibility of friction….. The result of putting people of different races together is to cause racial trouble”. The central justification for this perspective was that segregation was in the interest of all different racial groups, because population pressure contacts between different races, with different cultures, inevitably produced conflict. According to English social geographer, John Western in Outcast Capetown (University of California Press, 1997), the friction theory does have a measure of sense to it, as detailed in the work of Robert Sommer: “[Animal studies] show that both territoriality and dominance behaviour are ways of maintaining social order, and when one system cannot function, the other takes over… Group territories keep individual groups apart and thereby preserve the integrity of the troop, whereas dominance is the basis for intragroup relationships… Group territoriality is expressed in national and local boundaries, a segregation into defined areas that reduces conflict.” (Personal Space, (1969), N.J. Prentice Hall, pp. 12, 14, and 15)


[Gause's Law of Competitive Exclusion]: Stalking the Wild Taboo, by Garrett Hardin: Part 4: Competition: (20) Competition, a Tabooed Idea in Sociology; (21) The Cybernetics of Competition; (22) Population, Biology and the Law; (23) Population Skeletons in the Environmental Closet; (24) The Survival of Nations and Civilisations (www.garretthardinsociety.org)


» » » » [African White Refugee Letter: Thilo Sarrazin - EU Prophet (PDF)]

Avoid Boring People: Shockley on Eugenics and Race: The Application of Science to the Solution of Human Problems

William Shockley in His Own Words

The collected papers of a warrior against dogma.

Reviewed by Thomas Jackson, American Renaissance
20 August 2010

William Bradford Shockley was, at the time of his death in 1989, perhaps the most reviled man in America. His public image, created by a relentlessly hostile press, was that of a mad scientist, firmly in the service of evil. His crime was not merely to have publicized unacceptable views on race, intelligence, and genetics, but to have lent them the prestige of a Nobel laureate in physics.

Shockley on Eugenics and Race, edited by Dr. Roger Pearson, is a collection of Dr. Shockley’s papers written from 1965 to 1975. This was the very decade during which leftist-egalitarian thinking was tightening its grip on the country. It is hazardous enough today to preach heresy on the subject of race and intelligence, but to have done so when Dr. Shockley was most active was to court assassination.

It was only due to Dr. Shockley’s prominence as a scientist that he was able to get a hearing at all. After receiving his Nobel prize in 1956 for leading the team that invented the transistor, Dr. Shockley founded one of the first high-technology companies in Silicon Valley and was appointed a professor at Stanford University. When, in 1965, he began to preach eugenic heresies, his views hit the country like a bomb.

The Future of Man

Dr. Shockley’s main concerns can be quickly summarized. The best available evidence suggested to him that mankind faced a serious dysgenic threat. The least intelligent were reproducing much more quickly than the most intelligent, and this backward evolution threatened the very basis of civilization. Even more provocative was his view that blacks were devolving more rapidly than whites, since low-IQ blacks were outbreeding high-IQ blacks more rapidly than low-IQ whites were outbreeding high-IQ whites. Furthermore, since blacks were devolving from a lower average IQ to begin with, they faced the prospect of serious, permanent degeneration.

It is important to note that Dr. Shockley never claimed that he had proven that any of this was happening. All he asked was that the nation seriously investigate questions of heredity, intelligence and demographic trends. If Dr. Shockley were proven right then the nation could decide what should be done. If he were shown to be wrong, he would offer a graceful retraction.

Racism, Guilt, Self-Hatred and Self-Deceit: A Philosophers Hard-Headed Look at the Dark Continent..

Light on the Dark Continent

Fascinating observations of an American who has lived in Africa for nearly 30 years.

Reviewed by Jared Taylor
American Renaissance

Racism, Guilt, Self-Hatred and Self-Deceit: A Philosophers Hard-Headed Look at the Dark Continent, by Gedahlia Braun [AmRen]

“Almost no one, black or white, left or right, ever says anything but rubbish about race.” So writes Gedahlia Braun in a remarkable book that is anything but rubbish. Racism, Guilt and Self-Deceit is one of those rare books so full of insight and good sense that they are a pleasure to write about. Since the subject is race, this book has not found a commercial publisher, but it can be ordered directly from the author.

Dr. Braun has lived in Africa with only brief interruptions since 1976 and in South Africa since 1988. This book, in the form of a chronological journal, describes how contact with the dark continent quickly dispelled his liberal views and led to startling but plausible conclusions that most Americans—even readers of AR—are likely to find surprising.

‘Time to open Pandora’s Apartheid Box...’ - Mike Smith Political Commentary

In my view Mike Smith is the most astute political commentator in South Africa. If I owned Naspers, I'd make him Editor in Chief of all publications... The first time I read one of his pieces, I thought 'Wow, who is this guy?' He has a way of simplifying the complex, of calling a spade, a spade; and many other genius skills.... Some of my Mike Smith favourites include..:

• How will World War IV be fought?
  
• What future is there for whites and other minorities in SA?
  
• Liberals are the worst racists
  
• The Liberal Women of SA I IV
  
• On trapping birds and kicking dogs
  
• South Africa: A modern day Zimbardo experiment
  
• All it takes are a few good men.. and an idea
  
• Why we gave our country away to Marxist Terrorists
  
• Communist Tactics on so-called 'Right-wing Extremists'

Do yourself a favour: Read Mike Smith!

Time to open Pandora’s Apartheid Box – Part 1

By Mike Smith, MS Political Commentary
22nd of April 2010

When we were children. We could never understand what the church minister meant when he said that all sins are sins and all sins are equally bad. It did not make sense to us, because telling a lie is not as bad as murdering someone...or is it?

Personally I believe that lying is far more dangerous than murder. Lying can kill entire civilisations.

Dr. Truth: ‘TRC was a fraudulent dog and pony show PR publicity stunt’

Honesty in Politics: Dr. Truth Brad Blanton's Affidavit (below) was filed in the High Court, Western Cape, in ‘White Refugee’ Case # 19963-09. Dr. Blanton is the author of Practicing Radical Honesty; wherein he clarifies what he means by Radical Honesty About Anger and Sincere Forgiveness. Among others, Dr. Blanton's affidavit makes the following allegations:

• SA is Not a Democracy: If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent; it is not a democratic country.
  
  
• SA practices legal & political persecution: Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant.
  
  
• SA denies citizens the opportunity to experience sincere forgiveness: Getting Over being offended, is sincere forgiveness: The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors. Put differently, any society that values the principle of ‘crimen injuria’; is one that values protecting the right of people with fragile ego's to not be offended as more important; than protecting the right of Galileo's and Voltaire's to offend.
  
  
• SA does not value Honesty, Truth-Tellers or Forgiveness: The South African government are deliberately and intentionally punishing the defendant for practicing her culture and religion of Radical Honesty: non-violently telling another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.
  
  
• SA denies Defendant a valid Internationally Recognized Defence: The South African government are deliberately and intentionally denying the defendant her right to a defence; and ignoring the justification and accuracy of her non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence.
  
  
• SA's TRC was a fake, dog and pony political PR show: That there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, including South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians.

West Choked by PC Insanity: “Right to Offend More Important than Protecting the Offended”

Right to Offend More Important than Protecting the Offended

Very few people showed a willingness to break ranks. Among them was comedian Rowan Atkinson ("Mr. Bean"), who in the context of a debate over British proposed incitement of religious hatred legislation, declared that "right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." And Somalia-born Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a secular Muslim woman then living in the Netherlands, responded with a manifesto that began with the words: "I am here to defend the right to offend."

But she was one of the few exceptions. Even the then-French president, Jacques Chirac, temporarily forgot that he represented the country of Sartre, Voltaire and Victor Hugo, and decreed that "anything that could offend the faith of others, especially religious beliefs, must be avoided."

Muti-Murder of Maanda Sendeza, Makonde Village Soccer Star

[Witchcraft and the State in South Africa] [Trafficking Body Parts in Mozambique & South Africa] [African Occult Muti Belief Systems and African Criminality]

There are many facets to the African Ideal of Dominance Manhood, ranging from polygamy, an aspect of entitlement to sex; to rape as an entitlement to sex; to large family's where children are -- like in Haiti -- potentially saleable to future husbands, or as child slaves; etc. Another aspect of Occult African Manhood:

“The analogies between African Occult Ritual Slaughter and Sacrifice of Animals and Humans for Profit are direct: both involve (i) Bloodletting parasitism, i.e. the being is not humanely killed, but must slowly and painfully bleed to death; (ii) Terrorizing Torture, the being must suffer, and protest its suffering with fear and terror: the greater the terror and screams of the animal/human’s torture, the greater the muti’s potency, to allegedly ensure future financial profit, sexual prowess, or similar, for the Muti purchaser.”

“Furthermore in terms of African Occult Muti Harvest Human Sacrifice, the humans sexual organs are of great significance; and must be physically removed, while the human is still alive. This ensures sexual potency for the African Ideal of Dominance Manhood: the procreation of large families, with contemptuous disregard for loving and committed procreation family planning practices, or ecological carrying capacity principles (i.e. overpopulation colliding with scarce resources doctrines of sustainability). Children are procreated in terms of their financial, ego or sexual slavery worth; i.e. they are procreated not as individuals to love and cherish; but as possessions to exploit and abuse for profit.”
» » [Open Letter to FIFA 2010 World Cup Teams: God vs. FIFA: Do you have the Honourable Courage to be a ‘Flying Scotsman’?]

Nongoloza's Children: Western Cape prison gangs during and after apartheid: Introduction

Nongoloza's Children is Johnny Steinberg's monograph on the Number Gangs: the 26's, 27's and 28's; their origins, history, structure, practices and evolution and relationships to Street Gangs.

Most 'Poverty is the source of criminality' (Poverty Pimps) addicts, think that township kids join gangs, because they are forced to. For some this may be the case, but for many it is not; it is what they aspire to. Poverty Pimp Addicts also think that many go to prison, because their poverty allows them no choices, but to commit crimes; when in fact, for many individuals who have already made a conscious choice to become a 'big time gangster', where a big time wannabe neurosurgeon registers at UCT to acquire his Ph.D. in neurosurgery; a wannabe big time gangster registers, for the University of Crime, by committing his 'registration criminal act', to gain entry to a prison, where he will acquire his degree, or Ph.D. in violence; his 'street cred'. As far as South African University's of Crime go, Pollsmoor is in the creme de la creme of Universities of Violent Crime.

Nongoloza's Children is long, so I have seperated it into 6 posts:

Over the past two decades, news of the strange world behind the bars of South Africa's prisons has been spilling out in dribs and drabs. Among the things we have learned is that the so-called "Number gangs"—the 26s, 27s and 28s—are about 100 years old, that they originated in the jails, mine compounds and informal settlements of turn-of-the-century Johannesburg, and that today they constitute a formidable force in every prison across the country.

We know, too, that the world of the Number gangs is one of staggering brutality. Its self-styled judiciaries sentence inmates to death, to gang rape, to beatings with prison mugs, padlocks and bars of soap; among the prerequisites of joining the "soldier lines" of the gangs is the taking of a warder's or a non-gangster's blood; leaving a prison gang, sharing a gang's secrets with a warder, or talking casually about the gang's workings to the non-initiated are all punishable crimes.

Finally, we know that sexual relations between prison gangsters and their lovers are highly stylised, caricaturing the most pungently misogynist relationship imaginable between a man and a woman. The passive partner in an archetypal prison relationship is stripped of the jail equivalent of his juridical personhood: he is not allowed to conduct commerce or to leave the cell without his partner's permission; he cooks for his partner, makes his bed, washes his back and cuts his toenails.

USA Population Map 1790 - 1890: Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics

USA Population Maps 1790 - 1890:

Racial Population Growth & Decline Statistics, represented at 10 year intervals, including related political events and laws promulgated.

Put differently, it provides a greater more detailed political and demographic perspective to the events between 1790 and 1890.

Provides further justifications for why Ecologically-minded liberals should also heed Dr. Salter’s work, for only when Third-World populations are made to bear the consequences of their own reproductive irresponsibility will they, and the world as a whole, establish population policies that protect the environment.

Closing off the “safety valve” of Third-World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere left as to the racial right.

Or as stated in The Feast of Malthus: “Don't try to solve your population problem by exporting your excess people to us.”

USA Population: 1790 To 2090: Racial Percentage

Titans to Lemmings: Suicide of White Race, by Reconquista

Titans to Lemmings: Suicide of White Race

By Reconquista

1. Selected For Extinction
   
2. Halting The Tide
   
3. Walking The Wheel
   
4. Slaying David, Crippling Britannia
   
5. Galloping Headstrong To Bondage
   
6. Behind The Smiling Rainbow Mask

1. Selected For Extinction

Background

Recently, British National Party Chairman Nick Griffin made a statement describing the plight of the indigenous British people. It was short and to the point:

"What is happening in Britain is a bloodless genocide."

For once in his political life, this astute politician is mistaken. What is happening in Britain today is indeed a genocide but it is far from bloodless and this blood-thirsty genocide is superbly described in the BNP's "Racism Cuts Both Ways" pamphlet which provides strong evidence that whites are by far the most likely to be victims of racial hatred. As aliens from all around the world continue to flood into Great Britain, racial violence against the indigenous British people continues to escalate.

And let's not forget please, the 6 million + aborted babies who have been denied life in Britain since 1967.

ANC: VIP's of Violence (Documentary)

“Maybe the decision of the ANC youth cadres to take up witchhunting, was also based on the calculation, that party politics and revolutionary slogans would not be sufficient for mobilizing the population. Witchhunts on the other hand seemed to be a common cause for which one could expect broad-based support.” (1993:527) Isak Niehaus shows how witchcraft was politicised .. and how the ANC and other political groups used witchcraft beliefs to further their own agendas. [ANC's Occult “Struggle” Politics] [African Occult Muti Sacrifice Beliefs] [AIDS, Witchcraft & Power in Post-Apartheid SA]

“People’s war has two main facets, the political struggle and the military struggle, and together they constitute the hammer and the anvil between which all adversaries are crushed. In this kind of conflict, no distinction is drawn between combatants and civilians. Instead all individuals living within the arena of conflict are regarded as weapons of war (hence the term, ‘people’s war’). The people’s war has also contributed to South Africa’s plague of violent crime, if only because it turned policemen into targets of attack, loosened moral constraints, drew youngsters into heinous acts of violence, and flooded the country with illegal weapons, many of which have never been recovered.”-- Anthea Jeffery

“For once the techniques of ungovernability have been widely taught, that knowledge cannot be withdrawn. The genie cannot simply be put back inside the bottle.” -- Anthea Jeffery

» » » » The ANC's 'People's War' struggle for Power & Hegemony, at any price...

Wake Up Whitey! (aka Population Policy Common Sense) Deleted from Facebook...

Irrespective of Wake Up Whitey! Nonviolent Martin Luther King Population Policy Common Sense Education Mission; it was subsequently deleted from Facebook, as stated below.

Facebook does not provide any reason or evidence for what statement on Wake Up Whitey provided the evidence for them to delete Wake Up Whitey!.

What did Facebook find so offensive on Wake Up Whitey?