SAHRC Ruling Referral: Maladministration by Concourt Registrar in Kill Boere Review Application to Concourt

SAHRC Ruling Referral: Maladministration by Concourt Registrar in Kill Boere Review Application to Concourt

SAHRC refers Concourt Registrar's maladministration refusal to process the Radical Honesty culture's review of Equality Court case between Afri-Forum, TAU-SA, Malema and the ANC, to the Office of the Public Protector.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 10 July 2013 | SQSwans

Response from SAHRC to complaints filed on 28 February 2013 with the Commission for Gender Equality, SA Human Rights Commission and Public Protector in Kill the Boer Concourt matter of Alien on Pale Blue v. Afriforum et al.

Complaint: AnthroCorpocentric Patriarchal Dominant culture/s Cultural and Gender discrimination, by: (1) SA Concourt Registrar & Director; (2) SAPA & SA Media Editors; (3) CRL Rights Commission: Chair, against Ecocentric Gender Balanced Radical Honoursty culture member.

SAHRC Referral Ruling: After careful assessment, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC or the Commission) has found that your complaint should be dealt with by other institutions namely the Press Ombudsman and the Office of the Public Protector.

In regard to your complaint against the refusal by the Registrar of the Constitutional Court to issue your review application and your appeal against the refusal to issue the review application the SAHRC has determined that your complaint relates to alleged maladministration by a government official and that accordingly that the Office of the Public Protector is the more appropriate body to deal with such a complaint.

In regards to the aforementioned allegations relating to the press the Commission has determined that the Press Ombudsman is the most appropriate organisation that should deal with your matter.

MI6: Is Queen's Westminster Abbey Mandela Memorial Service decision fully informed?

MI6: Is Queen's Westminster Abbey Mandela Memorial Service decision fully informed?

Confirmation (i) Britain's Memorial Service at Westminster Abbey for Nelson Mandela is a fully informed decision: Prime Minister, MI5 & MI6 and ANC, Mandela & Mandela Foundation honourably and transparently informed Buckingham Palace of Media Suppressed Facts/Info regarding Mandela/ANC/TRC Fraud; (ii) Invitation to MI6 to join NSA, CIA, Mossad and KGB, to establish gender balanced MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace paradigm.

TYGAE | 01 July 2013 | Andrea Muhrrteyn

Correspondence to Her Majesty: The Queen, Buckingham Palace, c/o: Duncan Jeffery, Westminster Abbey. CC: President Putin, Kremlin Press Office, President Barack Obama, c/o: DNI: James Clapper, PM Benjamin Netanyahu, Knesset, Nelson Mandela, c/o: Nelson Mandela Foundation, PM Cameron, c/o Sec. Def: Philip Hammond, UK Dep. Of Defence, MI5 & MI6
Subject: HM Queen, c/o Duncan Jeffery, Westminster Abbey: Confirmation Mandela Memorial Service is fully informed decision

Your Majesty,

Please find attached PDF: Confirmation (i) Britain's Memorial Service at Westminster Abbey for Nelson Mandela is a fully informed decision: Prime Minister, MI5 & MI6 and ANC, Mandela & Mandela Foundation honourably and transparently informed Buckingham Palace of Media Suppressed Facts/Info regarding Mandela/ANC/TRC Fraud; (ii) Invitation to MI6 to join NSA, CIA, Mossad and KGB, to establish gender balanced MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace paradigm.

Please Note: Mandela, ANC and Anti-Apartheid movement, emphatically do not endorse the Ecology of Peace paradigm. Mandela and Tutu – like Assange, Snowden and Manning – believe that the Earth is flat and white/western men don’t have to take control of their psychological penises and consume below carrying capacity; and black/brown men don’t have to take control of their physical penises and breed below carrying capacity. War has nothing to do with jurisprudence that enables transgression of carrying capacity, ecological overshoot, and scarcity induced conflict. White conservative men cause war!

Complaint to Int Bar Assoc to Confirm SA Courts & lawyers Discriminate Against – Tourette Syndrome like -- Radical Honesty Culture

Complaint to Int Bar Assoc to Confirm SA Courts & lawyers Discriminate Against – Tourette Syndrome like -- Radical Honesty Culture

Request IBA provide Independent Observation and Written Confirmation that (I) the SA Concourt refuses to process -- or provide written reasons for their refusal -- a Pro Se application, from a member of the Radical Honesty culture, (II) who is unable to find a lawyer in South Africa, to represent her, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture; (III) South African media believe it is ‘not news’ that a member of the Radical Honesty culture is unable to find a lawyer in South Africa; for Radical Honesty Pro Se communication to UNHRC: Human Rights Committee, ITO violations of International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights (ICCPR).

Andrea Muhrrteyn | SQSwans | 12 December 2012

On 27 November 2012, I filed a Pro Se application for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal ‘Kill Boere Hate Speech’ Mediation Agreement entered into by and between: ANC, Mr. Malema, Afriforum and TAU-SA. The Respondents are: Afriforum, Transvaal Agricultural Union, Julius Malema, African National Congress, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Former Presidents Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk, CRL Rights Commission, Norwegian Nobel Committee: Chair, Central Intelligence Agency: Director, and David Petraeus.

1: Agreement is Unconstitutional due to being culturally vague: My Review argument was that the Agreement is unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous, in that South Africa has many different cultures, with many perspectives on the ‘Kill Boere’ issue, and the Mediation Agreement pretends South Africa is one happy monoculture family. The Mediation Agreement does not specify which cultures it is referring to.

2: Agreement ignores SA’s TRC Fraud Failure to Clearly Define ‘Reconciliation’ and address Ecocentric Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict Issues: Additionally, the Mediation Agreement had totally censored and ignored the evidence submitted to the Equality Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal, exposing South Africa’s fraudulent Truth and Reconciliation Commission process and a country’s legal establishment who refuse to clarify what their legal definition is for ‘Reconciliation’ , and the TRC’s “failure to investigate demographic youth bulge and ‘population production’ breeding war acts of war as contributory factors to Apartheid violence, to be a failure of the requirements of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995.”

3. Any ‘Peace’ Agreement that Ignores Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict is not a Credible Peace Agreement: Declaring that in our Post Peak NNR world, Sustainable Security requires seriously confronting Scarcity as a Cause of Violent Conflict, and to recommend that if the South African Government and its ‘Peace Leaders’ are sincerely committed to implementing peaceful coexistent relations between races, cultures and religions; the SAG should include consideration of the role of overpopulation and overconsumption as root cause factors of resource scarcity pushing society to conflict and war.

SA Concourt seeks Radical Honesty lawyer

SA Concourt seeks Radical Honesty lawyer

Application to the Constitutional Court, for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum, TAU-SA, Julius Malema and the ANC, is seeking a 'Radical Honesty' lawyer.

09 December 2012 | Link2Media | Andrea Muhrrteyn

An Application to the Constitutional Court, for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum, TAU-SA, Julius Malema and the ANC, is seeking a 'Radical Honesty' lawyer.

The Pro Se application was filed with the Constitutional Court Registrar on 27 November, by an EcoFeminist paralegal and South Africa's only member of the Radical Honesty culture. The respondents are: Afriforum, Transvaal Agricultural Union, Julius Malema, African National Congress, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Former Presidents Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk, CRL Rights Commission, Norwegian Nobel Committee: Chair, Central Intelligence Agency: Director, and David Petraeus.

The application requests the Court to issue orders: (1) allowing the applicant to invoke cultural law on behalf of her Radical Honesty culture; (2) to review the ambiguity and lack of clarity of the Afriforum-Malema SCA Negotiated Agreement, (3) alleges that the ‘TRC Fraud’ evidence submitted to the Equality and Supreme Court of Appeal by the Applicant was censored and ignored by the primary parties and that the agreement is not a credible peace agreement; (4) that a credible proactive peace plan requires confronting Peak Non-renewable Resources (NNR) and Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict; (5) Alternatively; to order all South African’s to prepare for SA’s Race and Class War in the impending Peak NNR Crisis of Conflict.