SA Afrikaner Farmer Family in USA wish to apply for White Refugee Status; as subjects of racial discrimination in SA

'We want out of SA'

Nashira Davids | 22 February, 2012 00:31 | Times Live

A South African family is desperate to remain in the US, its members claiming they cannot return home because, as Afrikaners, they will be subject to racial discrimination.

The family's legal representative has been contacting US academics in a bid to get a scholarly opinion that would bolster the asylum application.

The family, described by the law firm as "white Afrikaner farmers", is among dozens of South Africans who, over the past decade, have applied for asylum abroad for a range of reasons, including fear of persecution and violent crime. Some of the applications have been successful.

When contacted for comment, the family's lawyer, Rehim Babaoglu, said the family was too afraid to be identified.

"They were shocked to hear that a reporter was seeking information and they have no comment. They definitely don't want to participate because of privacy and safety concerns," said Babaoglu.

#WRQ2SA: White Refugee Q's to SA Politicians: Pres. Zuma, Helen Zille & Dr. Pieter Mulder

The following four questions are being submitted to the youth leagues of the ANC (via Pres. Zuma); DA (via Helen Zille) and Vryheids Front Plus (via Dr. Mulder) for their response.

Last week I joined a short discussion with Alex Lansdowne (DA Youth Leader for South Peninsula, Cape Town; Liberal; Realist. Proudly South African!!) and Sentletse (His tweets may contain views on any subject which may upset sensitive followers. Parental Guidance is strongly advised). Sentletse is an African Muslim who lives in Johannesburg and was giving a twitter edu-feed on African history. I picked up a retweet (RT) of Sentletse, retweeted by Alex; and responded to it, asking a few questions.

Alex responded to my questions (note questions, not statements of fact) by instructing Sentletse to ignore my questions and ignore me. Sentletse avoided answering my questions asking him to provide his definitions for what he considered to be 'racism' and 'harmonious existence', and how he could say that racism never existed before Europeans arrived, if he could not even provide a clear definition of what racism is. I answered Sentletse's questions, and then he followed Alex's suggesetion that I be ignored by proceeding to mute me.

Fair enough to say that neither of them showed any commitment towards answering questions and discussion.

Then yesterday, Alex posted a tweet about how upset he was with the ANCYL who “show a gross intolerance towards questions and discussion”. I responded that perhaps they learnt that from the DA Youth League. He then proceeded to inform me that if I submit clear questions to him, he would answer them.

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus [III] Ubuntu Kangaroo Court Justice – Evidence is Irrelevant

Ubuntufied Legal Lynching in Rainbow Hypocrisy SA

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus

28 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

“...freedom of expression is an essential process for advancing knowledge and discovering truth. An individual who seeks knowledge and truth must hear all sides of the question, consider all alternatives, test his judgment by exposing it to opposition, and make full use of different minds. Discussion must be kept open no matter how certainly true an accepted opinion may seem to be; many of the most widely acknowledged truths have turned out to be erroneous. Conversely, the same principles applies no matter how false or pernicious the new opinion appears to be; for the unaccepted opinion may be true or partially true and, even if wholly false, its presentation and open discussion compel a re-thinking and re-testing of the accepted opinion. The reasons which make open discussion essential for an intelligent individual judgment likewise make it imperative for rational social judgment.”
T Emerson, The System of Freedom of Expression at 6-7 (1970)

“In determining whether or not the [crimen injuria] act complained of is wrongful the Court applies the criterion of reasonableness “the algemene redelikheidsmaatstaf”. This is an objective test. It requires the conduct complained of to be tested against the prevailing norms of society. (i.e. the current values and thinking of the community) in order to determine whether such conduct can be classified as wrongful. To address the words to another which might wound his self-esteem but which are not, objectively determined, insulting (and therefore wrongful) cannot give rise to an action for injuria.” -- Maithufi v Minister of Safety & Security of the Rep. of South Africa (20382/05) [2007] ZAGPHC 163

This series shall consist of:

1. Introduction: Politicians, Editors & Lawyers: Kangaroo Court Actors
   

2. Media Timeline of Events - Ignoring Anti-Lynching Voices
   

3. Ubuntu Kangaroo Court Justice – Evidence is Irrelevant
   

4. The Reasonable Initiation Legal Fraud – Who cares about the Evidence?
   

5. The Cultural Satire Legal Fraud – The Multiculti Boiling Frog
   

6. The Reconciliation Religious Fraud – Censoring TRC Fraud

A lynching is the practice of killing people by extrajudicial mob action, where a mob is generally considered to be more than five persons. The mob generally act under the pretext of service to justice, their race or tradition. They use lynching and other terror tactics to intimidate a particular racial, religious or cultural group into political, social or economic submission. A legal lynching has other names such as Stalin's Political Show trials, or Kangaroo Court Justice, etc.

The term show trial is a pejorative description of a type of highly public trial. The term was first recorded in the 1930s. There is a strong connotation that the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant and that the actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning. Show trials exhibit scant regard for the principles of jurisprudence and even for the letter of the law. Defendants have little real opportunity to justify themselves.

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus: [II] Ignoring Anti-Lynching Voices

Ubuntufied Legal Lynching in Rainbow Hypocrisy SA

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus

27 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

“There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history..., as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

“The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.

“We are intellectual prostitutes.”

-- John Swinton (1829-1901), editor at New York Times, New York Sun and John Swinton's Paper, remarks at a banquet in his honour in response to a toast to the independent press. (Labor's Untold Story, Richard O. Boyer & Herbert M. Morais. Published: United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)

This series (shall) consist of:

1. Introduction: Politicians, Editors & Lawyers: Kangaroo Court Actors
   

2. Media Timeline of Events - Ignoring Anti-Lynching Voices
   

3. Ubuntu Kangaroo Court Justice – Evidence is Irrelevant
   

4. The Reasonable Initiation Legal Fraud – Who cares about the Evidence?
   

5. The Cultural Satire Legal Fraud – The Multiculti Boiling Frog
   

6. The Reconciliation Religious Fraud – Censoring TRC Fraud

A lynching is the practice of killing people by extrajudicial mob action, where a mob is generally considered to be more than five persons. The mob generally act under the pretext of service to justice, their race or tradition. They use lynching and other terror tactics to intimidate a particular racial, religious or cultural group into political, social or economic submission. A legal lynching has other names such as Stalin's Political Show trials, or Kangaroo Court Justice, etc.

The term show trial is a pejorative description of a type of highly public trial. The term was first recorded in the 1930s. There is a strong connotation that the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant and that the actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning. Show trials exhibit scant regard for the principles of jurisprudence and even for the letter of the law. Defendants have little real opportunity to justify themselves.

Ubuntufied Legal Lynching: The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus

Ubuntufied Legal Lynching in Rainbow Hypocrisy SA

The Reitz 4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus

27 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

“The commission also said that there could be no healing without truth, that half-truths and denial were no basis for building the new South Africa, that reconciliation based on falsehood would not last, and that selective recollection of past violence would easily provide the mobilisation for further conflict in the future. If these are its criteria for the role of truth in promoting reconciliation, it has failed to meet them.”
-- John Kane Berman, the Head of the SA Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), The Truth about the Truth Commission, by Anthea Jeffery

This series shall consist of:

1. Introduction: Politicians, Editors & Lawyers: Kangaroo Court Actors
   
2. Media Timeline of Events - Ignoring Anti-Lynching Voices
   
3. Ubuntu Kangaroo Court Justice – Evidence is Irrelevant
   
4. The Reasonable Initiation Legal Fraud – Who cares about the Evidence?
   
5. The Cultural Satire Legal Fraud – The Multiculti Boiling Frog
   
6. The Reconciliation Religious Fraud – Censoring TRC Fraud
   
7. UFS Black Liberation Theology's 'Reconciliation' successfuly destroyed Reitz-4's ‘Whiteness’, by cultivating their ‘White Guilt’?

Introduction:

A lynching is the practice of killing people by extrajudicial mob action, where a mob is generally considered to be more than five persons. The mob generally act under the pretext of service to justice, their race or tradition. They use lynching and other terror tactics to intimidate a particular racial, religious or cultural group into political, social or economic submission. A legal lynching has other names such as Stalin's Political Show trials, or Kangaroo Court Justice, etc.

The term show trial is a pejorative description of a type of highly public trial. The term was first recorded in the 1930s. There is a strong connotation that the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant and that the actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning. Show trials exhibit scant regard for the principles of jurisprudence and even for the letter of the law. Defendants have little real opportunity to justify themselves.

White Refugee Pensioners in Zimbabwe Today; South Africa 2020; Europe 2050

White Refugee Pensioners in Zimbabwe Today; South Africa 2020; Europe 2050

10 February 2011
Andrea Muhrrteyn, White Refugees

A White Refugee Pensioner in Zimbabwe; supported by the Zimbabwe Pensioners Support Fund

Zimbabwe Today:
Once considered the Breadbasket of Southern Africa, today Zimbabweans face the following:

• 90% unemployment
  
• Major shortages in most consumer goods and raw materials
  
• Fuel shortages and when petrol is available, it is hugely unaffordable
  
• A cost of living that far exceeds earnings income
  
• Widespread Famine and Disease
  
• An excessively corrupt goverment
  
• Lawless Society and extensive media censorship
  
• An economy that has collapsed - all transactions are now in Rand or US$
  
• Pensioners that are destitute and without means of support

How did This Happen?:
» » [Mugabe and the White African]
» » [Why Were We So Wrong About Mugabe?]
» » [The Sixth Weapon: Ethno-Cultural Warfare]
» » [Frank Ellis on Zimbabwe & SA Farm Murders]
» » [UK Immig. Judge: Zim Farm Invasions = Genocide]
» » [White SA's & Zim's: World's Euro Coalmine Canaries]
» » [Roy Bennet 2 UK: Thanks for Our Zimbabwean ‘Democracy’!]
» » ['Life was better under White Rhodesia Gov.' - Black Zimbabweans]
» » [From Rhodesia's Kings Feast Breadbasket to Zimbabwe's Basketcase]
» » [Christiane Amanpour interviews Robert Mugabe; Re 'Reconciliation']
» » [Africa's Indiginisation -- Bread Basket to Basket Case -- Pied Piper....]

Prof. Denis Alland, Univ. Paris II; UNHCR Rep. (1989-97), ECRE & ELENA Refugee Law Expert Declares Legal War on African White Refugees

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Denis Alland, Professor of Public Law at the Universite Pantheon-Assas Paris II; UNHCR Representative (1989-97), Assessor in Refugee Appeals Commission, European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) and European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Refugee Law Expert, has decided to sue Jus Sanguinis to demand they delete the webpage: "Boer Volkstaat or Jus Sanguinis 'EU' Citizenship for African White Refugees Petition & Briefing Paper submitted to Prof. Denis Alland".

Prof. Alland's legal declaration of war, was formally acknowledged, with a letter to his Legal Counsel: French UNHCR Rep., EU Council on Refugees & Exiles (ECRE) and EU Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Refugee Law Expert, Prof. Denis Alland Demands to Delete Jus Sanguinis Webpage: African White Refugees Petition to Prof. Alland

French UNHCR Rep. & EU Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Law Prof.'s legal allergy to Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat 4 African White Refugees Petition

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return to France; for Boer-Huguenots Facebook Group

Denis Alland has been a professor of law at the University Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) since 1996. He was also the French UNHCR Representative (1989-97), an Assessor in the Refugee Appeals Commission, and is one of the EU Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Law Professor experts on Refugee Law.

Prof. Alland also appears to be legally allergic to the concept of African White Refugees.

On December 08, 2010 2:19 AM, the Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) Boer Volkstaat for African White Refugees Petition, was submitted by email to the Pretoria Offices of Ambassador Jacques Lapouge. Ambassador Lapouge was requested to officially forward the Petition and Briefing Paper to French Political leaders, Refugee and Nationality Law legal experts, and Peak Oil/Ecological Social Contract experts; one of whom was Denis Alland, ELENA Refugee Law Expert, Professor in Public Law at the Universite Pantheon-Assas Paris.

‘SA citizens - SA legal system is corrupt - Amicus challenge to Dewani extradition’ - The South African

SA citizen challenges Dewani extradition

A South African woman, who lodged an appeal against Dewani’s extradition with the Westminster Magistrate's Court, claims that SA’s legal system is corrupt

01 February 2011 7:15
Rob Boffard, The South African
editor@thesouthafrican.com

Lara Johnstone, 43, filed an Amicus Curiae application with the Westminster Magistrate’s Court from South Africa, presenting an argument that Dewani would not receive a fair trial if extradited to South Africa and should be allowed to stand trial in the UK. The case was presented at the start of Dewani’s extradition trial on 20 January, which was postponed to 8 February, due to Dewani’s health.

On Tuesday 1 February, Dewani's publicist Max Clifford said his client was still ill and would not be present at the 8 February hearing.

Johnstone, who works as a vermicompost worm farmer in George, South Africa, trained as a paralegal through Damelin, but has been unable to find work in the field since graduating.

Speaking to The South African, Johnstone said that she did not believe judicial standards in South Africa were the same as the UK. “I filed [the application] because I don’t think he’ll get a free and fair trial,” Johnstone said. “If we can’t give people free and fair trials, we should just set up bullets to the head.”

Nalini Gangen, director of the Cape Law Society, says, however, that Ms Johnstone’s views are “without substance or legal basis”.

“There is no reason to doubt that Mr Dewani would receive a fair hearing. South Africa has one of the best constitutions in the world and the Constitution provides for the instruments of democracy to be protected. The Constitution provides for the separation of powers and in particular the independence of the judiciary.

“South African legal processes are clearly defined and any accused would have the freedom of choice of legal representation.

“We have confidence in our judiciary,” she added.

Amicus Curiae, which translates as Friend Of The Court, refers to someone, unconnected to a case, who volunteers information to a court for a matter before it. It is filed in the form of an affidavit, and can be put to a court by any citizen or organisation at any time, even if they have no previous involvement in a case. Johnstone filed her application as a private citizen.

Radical Honesty SA Q to SA Holocaust Foundation: What has been Tutu's response to TRC Fraud Allegations filed in Concourt #23-10?

Updated: 16 January 2011: 14:41 hrs
Additional Recipients Added to Letter

Radical Honesty SA scientific journalism submission to SA Holocaust Foundation: Censorship of Tutu’s Just War TRC Fraud: African National Congress (ANC) & Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth & Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud (Excerpts):

[..] The evidence for the TRC FRAUD arguments are dealt with in great detail in the Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Briefing Paper. One of them: Did Black South Africans Want Black Rule?; is a parallel of the current reality in Israel: Do Palestinians want Arab Rule?

When the Anti-Apartheid ANC elite finally confronted this reality [that Black Africans did NOT want Black Rule], they decided that the Black African majority would need to be coerced and terrorized to support the ANC’s alleged ‘liberation struggle’, and consequently Nelson Mandela implemented the M-PLAN. Did the ANC’s decision bother the Archbishop’s conscience during the ‘liberation struggle’ against Apartheid; or perhaps enough to disclose these truths during the TRC hearings. No. It was not enough that he committed fraud on his own people, and happily accepted his 30 pieces of Noble Peace Prize silver, for betraying them with Orwellian Ministry of Truth deception and lies. Now he wishes to overthrow the state of Israel; with a big middle finger to the majority of Palestinians in Israel, who do not want to live under Arab rule.

Radical Honesty SA v. SANEF Press Council, et al: Radical Honesty takes 88 SA Media Elite to Concourt for Censorship of Media Corruption

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

On 03 January 2011, Lara Johnstone and Radical Honesty SA filed an Application with the Constitutional Court for direct access, as a Pauperis Propria Persona / Litigant in Person; for a [I] writ of Habeus Mentem and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review.

The Application was filed against 88 respondents: (a) three administrators of the SA Press Council; (v) SANEF and its chairman: Mr. Makhanya, (c) 36 SANEF and related media publications and their respective editors, managerial officials; (d) eight Media Professors from Univ. of Rhodes and Wits Journalism faculty departments; (e) Media Monitoring Africa: Mr. William Bird; and finally (f) Projourn Steering Committee.

Ms. Martie Stander, registrar of the Constitutional Court tentatively accepted the documentation, requesting that the Proof of Service documentation be filed with the Court, prior to any Reference Number could be issued.

On 14 January 2011, Ms. Stander and the Director of the Concourt were provided with the Proof of Service documentation proving that Radical Honesty SA had provided all the respondents with their Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit documentation.

[Updated] Radical Honesty SA Questions to V&A Waterfront: 'Public Relations Censorship & Deception' of Crime in SA, by SA Media

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees
Updated @ 16:13 hrs with V&A Response

Radical Honesty SA Questions to V&A Waterfront: 'Public Relations Censorship & Deception' of Crime in SA, by SA Media [Large]

Radical Honesty SA Questions to V&A Waterfront Spokesperson Ms. Emma King (who works for Corporate Image), about 'Public Relations Censorship & Deception' of Crime in SA, by the South African Media

Radical Honesty SA contacted the V&A Waterfront to speak to their Spokesperson Ms. Emma King, after reading the news article: WATERFRONT CONFISCATES HATE FLYERS: Pamphlets targeting V & A tourists tell of 'white genocide' on former Sunday Times journalist, Adriana Stuijt's blog: Censorbugbear: Boer-Genocide Protests: Paris, Cape Town, Randburg.

The V&A receptionist informed Radical Honesty SA, of Ms. King's cell phone number. When asked for a landline number, the receptionist said she did not have the landline number, but Ms. King works for the company known as Corporate Image, and can be contacted there.

Corporate Image is a public affairs company with a particular focus on corporate communications, media liaison, crisis communication and issues management. Reputation management and corporate brand strategy are the two areas where the company enjoys special expertise.

The company has been extensively involved over the years with the corporate, financial and industrial sectors. Corporate Image has completed successful bids including five gambling licence applications and has also conducted successful JSE listings, crisis communications, investment issues, major corporate image re-vamps, and employee programmes ranging from transformation to share schemes.

Radical Honesty SA telephoned Ms. King at her Corporate Image offices, and asked her whether she would be willing to answer some questions about the article in the Cape Argus. She said she had ten minutes available and would do so.

Swiss President Requests Printed Hardcopy of Boer Volkstaat Theses Petition

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

The Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition and Briefing Paper was submitted to the Stamvader nations of Netherlands, France, Germany, United Kingdom, and Switzerland; and finally to the NATO Military Committee Chiefs of Defence, between 05 to 16 December 2010.

One hundred and sixty EU politicians, academics, legal experts and military officials were petitioned; the majority of whom acknowledged receipt of the petitions for their attention.

The Boer Volkstaat for African White Refugees Petition appeals for:

[A] International and EU Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a Euro/Boere-Volkstaat in South Africa; or in the absence thereof;

[B] The legislative enactment of Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by the relevant Progenitor/Stamvader EU Nations, for EU citizenship for African White Refugee descendants

Their Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Petition Justifications (evidentiary details provided in the African White Refugees Briefing Paper # 10/31/16), are:

1. International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Right-of-Return, International Covenant on Civil, Political, Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, etc;
   
   
2. S. 235 of the SA Constitution and the Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party (Encl. to Briefing Paper);
   
   
3. African National Congress (ANC) / Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) / Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud.
   
   
4. The geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving population pressures colliding with declining resources multi-cultural conflicts, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic resource war consequences of Peak Oil.

On 21 December 2010, Wouter Jurgens, the Head of the Political Section of the Royal Netherlands Embassy in Pretoria responded, acknowledging receipt of the Petition, “pleading for Netherlands Citizenship for White African Refugees”.

On behalf of Ambassador de Vos, Mr. Jurgens wished to convey that the Embassy had carefully studied the petition, and responded with some specific legal recommendations, and advising on the correct procedures for applying for Refugee Status in the Netherlands, or alternatively applying for citizenship of the Netherlands.

The Boer Volkstaat Secession Solution: Have You Registered?

The Secession Solution

January 2, 2011
by Kirkpatrick Sale,
Chronicles Magazine

Aristotle declared that there should be a limit to the size of states. But really, what did he know? He lived at a time when the entire population of the world was somewhere around 50 million—about the size of England today. Athens, where he lived, would have been under 100,000 people. He couldn’t even imagine a world (ours) of 6.8 billion, or a city (Tokyo) of 36 million. How is he going to help us?

He, at least, knew this much:

“Experience shows that a very populous city can rarely, if ever, be well governed; since all cities which have a reputation for good government have a limit of population. We may argue on grounds of reason, and the same result will follow: for law is order, and good law is good order; but a very great multitude cannot be orderly.”

So political units, Aristotle said, have to be limited. And it is with that understanding that we now may start contemplating what in today’s world would constitute the ideal, or optimum, size of a political state.

This is not some sort of idle philosopher’s quest but the foundation of a serious reordering of our political landscape, and a reordering such as the process of secession—indeed, only the process of secession—could provide. The U.S. provides abundant evidence that a state as large as 310 million people is ungovernable. One scholar recently said that we are in the fourth decade of the U.S. Congress’ inability to pass a single measure of social consequence. Bloated and corrupted beyond its ability to address any of the problems it has created as an empire, it is a blatant failure. So what could replace it, and at what size? The answer is the independent states of America.

Let us start by looking at modern nations to give us some clue as to population sizes that actually work.

Among the nations that are recognized models of statecraft, eight are below 500,000: Luxembourg, Malta, Iceland, Barbados, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and San Marino.

Huntley to appeal 'African White Refugee' Canadian asylum ruling; after African White Refugees Briefing Paper submitted to 160 EU Elite..

As detailed in 'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff; c/o SHAPE & NATO Sec. General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the African White Refugees Briefing Paper was submitted to 160 EU and NATO Officials between 05 to 16 December 2010.

Some of the officials who acknowledged receipt of the Briefing Paper include:

• Prime Minister David Cameron/10 Downing Street;
  
• Mr. Jean-Rene Germanier, President of the Swiss National Council;
  
• Rt. Hon. Michael Meacher MP. UK House of Commons;
  
• Lieutenant General André Blattmann, Chief of Swiss Armed Forces;
  
• Mark Laity, Chief of Strategic Communications, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE);
  
• Kingdom of Netherlands, French Republic and Swiss Confederation Embassies in Pretoria;
  
• Amnesty International;
  
• French Institute of International Relations - Ifri (Paris);
  
• France Terre d'Asile;
  
• Asylum Aid;
  
• International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC);
  
• Swiss Refugee Council.

The African White Refugees Briefing Paper naturally refers to, and details issues raised in Brandon Huntley's case, including evidence and arguments that:

1. Judge James Russell‟s African White Refugee Assertions of particular NGO Agencies and Goverment Departments being "credible and trustworthy sources‟ of "objective evidence" in the matter of African White Refugees was in error; because many of these agencies who support the ANC's narrative of Apartheid political history, have huge ideological prejudice towards ethno-cultural conservative/Apartheid Europeans;
   
2. the South African media and Political elite censor and suppress evidence of political and legal persecution of European South Africans such as the African White Refugees Documentation currently before the Constitutional Court (Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae detailing Persecution of Radical Honesty culture); and
   
3. that the UNHCR failed to submit the African White Refugee Petition to Federal Court Canada, Justice's via: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada; but failed to honourably inform the African White Refugee Petitioners of their refusal to do so. Consequently Judge James Russell was never provided with the African White Refugees petition; as a result of the UNHCR's refusal to forward it.

It is unknown whether the African White Refugees Briefing Paper arguments have anything to do with Huntley's decision to launch an appeal of Judge Russell's 24 November 2010 ruling.

READ/SIGN WHY WE ARE WHITE REFUGEES PETITION!

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff; c/o SHAPE & NATO Sec. General Anders Fogh Rasmussen

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees &
Jus Sanguinis
16 December 2010

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff.

The African White Refugees Petition, from 34 Founding Petitioners to Europe; was submitted to the Belguim Offices of NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, c/o: Mr. Mark Laity, Chief of Strategic Communications, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:47:27 +0100.

SHAPE Public Affairs Office acknowledged receipt thereof on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:06:00 +0100

NATO Secretary General Mr. Rasmussen is requested to officially forward the Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Petition and African White Refugees Briefing Paper to NATO Military Committee: Chiefs of Staff.

1. Brigadier General Maksim Malaj, Chief of the General Staff, Albania
   
2. General Charles-Henri Delcour, Chief of Defence, Belgium
   
3. General Simeon Hristov Simeonov, Chief of Defence, Bulgaria
   
4. General Walt Natynczyk, Chief of Defence, Canada
   
5. General Josip Lucic, Chief of General Staff, Croatia
   
6. General Vlastimil Picek, Chief of Defence, Czech Republic
   
7. General Knud Bartels, Chief of Defence, Denmark
   
8. Lieutenant General Ants Laaneots, Chief of Defence, Estonia
   
9. Admiral Edouard Guillaud, Chief of Defence Staff, France
   
10. General Volker Wieker, Chief of Defence, Germany
    
11. General Ioannis Giagkos, Chief of Defence, Greece
    
12. Lieutenant General Tibor Benko, Chief of Defence, Hungary
    
13. Thordur Bjarni Gudjonsson, Chief of Defence, Iceland
    
14. General Vincenzo Camporini, Chief of Defence, Italy
    
15. Major General Raimonds Graube, Chief of Defence, Latvia
    
16. Major General Arvydas Pocius, Chief of Defence, Lithuania
    
17. General Gaston Reinig, Chief of Defence, Luxembourg
    
18. General Peter van Uhm, Chief of Defence, Netherlands
    
19. General Harald Sunde, Chief of Defence, Norway
    
20. General Mieczyslaw Cieniuch, Chief of Defence, Poland
    
21. General Luis Valença Pinto, Chief of Defence, Portugal
    
22. Admiral Gheorghe Marin, Chief of Defence, Romania
    
23. General Lubomír Bulík, Chief of Defence, Slovakia
    
24. Major General Alojz Šteiner, Chief of Defence, Slovenia
    
25. Air Force General Julio Rodríguez, Chief of Defence, Spain
    
26. General Isik Kosaner, Chief of Defence, Turkey
    
27. Air Chief Marshal Jock Stirrup, Chief of Defence, UK
    
28. Admiral Mike Mullen, Chief of Defence, USA

Martial Monk Military Gospel ‘Law of Five’ Strategy Justifications for Forwarding Request:

Among others the petition letter to NATO Secretary General Rasmussen, requests NATO's Military Committee to clearly define what it means by 'success' of the NATO Mission; a future Eurabia, Paki-Canadia and Medellin-Americana; i.e. Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, European Countries for Everybody?

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition delivered to Swiss Gov.; c/o Swiss Ambassador: H E Mr R Bärfuss

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees &
Jus Sanguinis
14 December 2010

Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Switzerland; for Boer-Afrikaners Facebook Group

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to Swiss Gov.

The African White Refugees Petition, from 34 Founding Petitioners to Europe; two of whom are petitioning the Swiss Government, was submitted to the Pretoria Offices of Ambassador R. Bärfuss on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:05 PM.

Ambassador Bärfuss is requested to officially forward the Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Petition and African White Refugees Briefing Paper to Officials and citizens of the Swiss Confederation / Confoederatio Helvetica.

Petition letters delivered to the Swiss Embassy were addressed to Political Officials, Refugee and Jus Sanguinis/Nationality Law legal experts, and Peak Oil/Population Policy/Ecological Social Contract experts:

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition delivered to UK Gov.; c/o UK High Commissioner: Dr Nicola Brewer

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees &
Jus Sanguinis
14 December 2010

Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to England; for African White Refugees Facebook Group

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition to British Gov.

The African White Refugees Petition, from 34 Founding Petitioners to Europe; five of whom are petitioning the British Government, was submitted to the Pretoria Offices of High Commissioner Dr. Nicola Brewer on Sunday, December 12, 2010 9:54 PM.

Commissioner Brewer is requested to officially forward the Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Petition and African White Refugees Briefing Paper to Officials and citizens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Petition letters delivered to the UK High Commission were addressed to Political Officials, Jus Sanguinis practitioners, Refugee and Jus Sanguinis/Nationality Law legal experts, and Peak Oil/Population Policy/Ecological Social Contract experts:

'Boere-Volkstaat for African White Refugees' Petition delivered to French Gov., c/o & via: Ambassador Jacques Lapouge, Pretoria

Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees &
Jus Sanguinis
13 December 2010

Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return to France; for Boer-Huguenots Facebook Group

The Boere Volkstaat for African White Refugees Petition, from 34 Founding Petitioners to Europe; 20 of whom are petitioning the French Government, was submitted to the Pretoria Offices of Ambassador Jacques Lapouge on Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:19 AM.

Ambassador Lapouge is requested to officially forward the Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Petition and African White Refugees Briefing Paper to Officials and citizens of the French Republic / Republique Francaise.

Petition letters delivered to the French Embassy were addressed to Political leaders, Refugee and Nationality Law legal experts, and Peak Oil/Ecological Social Contract experts:

The Political Officials: * President Nicolas Sarkozy; * Jacques Chirac & Jean-Francois Cope, Union pour un Mouvement Populaire / Union for a People's Movement (UMP), * Jean-Marie Le Pen, Front National (FN) / National Front, * Cecile Duflot, The Greens / Les Verts (VEC / LV), * Philippe de Villiers, Movement for France / Mouvement pour la France (MPF), * Martine Aubry, Socialist Party / Parti Socialiste (PS), * Herve Morin, New Centre / Nouveau Centre (NC) / European Social Liberal Party / Parti Social Liberal Europeen (PSLE), * Frederic Nihous, Hunting, Fishing, Nature, Tradition / Chasse, Peche, Nature, Traditions (CPNT).

‘Huntley accomplished ‘African White Refugee’ objectives’ - Russel Kaplan

Russell Kaplan
Former Attorney for Brandon Huntley

I have been contacted by reporters already who have asked me for my reaction to the Huntley ruling on November 24, 2010. Having gone through the entire refugee claim myself and through the entire judicial review proceeding (the “appeal”) with co-counsel Mr. Galati, here is my reaction.


Mr. Huntley had two objectives when he brought his refugee claim:

1. That he finds protection in Canada and
   
   
2. That he informs the world what a sickly place South Africa is for many white South Africans.

As far as his first objective is concerned, Mr. Huntley is still in Canada. He has an opportunity for a new hearing and also some other remedies that can ensure his safety in Canada.

As far as his second objective is concerned, in my view, he has succeeded. This case has contributed towards placing the plight of many white South Africans in South Africa on the world stage. Further, the court clearly and expressly stated that while the evidentiary foundation might have been lacking in Mr. Huntley’s case, in another case, a white South African could qualify for refugee protection. You need to go no further than paragraph 234 of the decision to realize this. For convenience, paragraph 234 is reproduced below: